| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
11 Sep 2006 07:08:36 AM |
| Object: |
4-Ton Girders: Blowing in the Wind? |
4-Ton Girders: Blowing in the Wind?
David Chandler / 911SpeakOut.org | September 10 2006
4-ton girders were found as much as 600 feet from the base of the North
Tower of the World Trade Center after its collapse. This raises ... all
=BB obvious questions. How fast must they have been ejected from the
collapsing building to land that far away? What forces were at work to
give such massive structures high horizontal velocities? If anything
besides gravity was at work, pandora's box is opened up.
http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/September2006/100906Girders.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: 4-Ton Girders: Blowing in the Wind? |
11 Sep 2006 07:42:28 AM |
|
|
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1157976516.839161.209760@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
4-Ton Girders: Blowing in the Wind?
David Chandler / 911SpeakOut.org | September 10 2006
4-ton girders were found as much as 600 feet from the base of the North
Tower of the World Trade Center after its collapse. This raises ... all
» obvious questions. How fast must they have been ejected from the
collapsing building to land that far away?
600 feet horizontally, 1000 feet vertically in 16 seconds,
errr... 37.5 fps, or 25 mph horizontally. This raises all kinds
of obvious answers.
What forces were at work to
give such massive structures high horizontal velocities?
A 300 ton fuel laden plane travelling horizontally at 250 mph was at work.
By conservation of momentum the 4 ton girder should have been
travelling at 30,480 mph horizontally and gone into orbit because
the plane stopped.
However, the girder was bolted down and the bolts had to shear first.
If anything
besides gravity was at work, pandora's box is opened up.
*****, YOU INCOMPETENT STUPID FUCKING MORON!
Androcles
.
|
|
|
| User: "malibu" |
|
| Title: Re: 4-Ton Girders: Blowing in the Wind? |
11 Sep 2006 09:43:21 AM |
|
|
Sorcerer wrote:
<schoenfeld.one@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1157976516.839161.209760@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com...
4-Ton Girders: Blowing in the Wind?
David Chandler / 911SpeakOut.org | September 10 2006
4-ton girders were found as much as 600 feet from the base of the North
Tower of the World Trade Center after its collapse. This raises ... all
=BB obvious questions. How fast must they have been ejected from the
collapsing building to land that far away?
600 feet horizontally, 1000 feet vertically in 16 seconds,
errr... 37.5 fps, or 25 mph horizontally. This raises all kinds
of obvious answers.
What forces were at work to
give such massive structures high horizontal velocities?
A 300 ton fuel laden plane travelling horizontally at 250 mph was at work.
By conservation of momentum the 4 ton girder should have been
travelling at 30,480 mph horizontally and gone into orbit because
the plane stopped.
However, the girder was bolted down and the bolts had to shear first.
If anything
besides gravity was at work, pandora's box is opened up.
*****, YOU INCOMPETENT STUPID FUCKING MORON!
Androcles
Orrrr.............could it have
been some kind of explosions?
Maybe someone heard some explosions?
There were 'power-downs' that weekend and
'workers' in and out all that weekend at the
WTC.
Carrying things?
What things?
There was notice of these power-downs
three weeks in advance.
Who gave the notice?
What were they 'officially' doing?
Why were the sprinklers shut down and no
water in the stabilizer holding tank at the
top of the building?
Why do witnesses say the planes had no
windows?
John
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "despondent neuropeptide" |
|
| Title: Re: 4-Ton Girders: Blowing in the Wind? |
11 Sep 2006 01:25:15 PM |
|
|
4-ton girders were found as much as 600 feet from the base of the North
Tower of the World Trade Center after its collapse. This raises ... all
» obvious questions. How fast must they have been ejected from the
collapsing building to land that far away? What forces were at work to
give such massive structures high horizontal velocities? If anything
besides gravity was at work, pandora's box is opened up.
A lot of energy had to go somewhere, so it would not be very strange to
think that girders could end up that far from the WTC in a natural collapse.
In fact I find it much stranger that so much of the structure came directly
down with little falling further away. And what proof do you have that
girders were in fact found 600 feet away? I do not think that controlled
demolition would cause girders to end up that far away. Much more energy was
released from the collapse than from any controlled demolition charges. The
main reason demolition charges are used to bring a structure down in such a
specific manner is not so much to just bring it down, but rather to bring it
down in the smallest footprint possible. So your far flung girders are a
counter argument to the idea that demolition charges were used.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
