A Correct Aether Theory


 Science > Physics > A Correct Aether Theory

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1
 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "kenseto"
Date: 19 Aug 2003 08:23:05 AM
Object: A Correct Aether Theory
The following link decribes a correct aether theory. This theory gives rise
to a new theory of gravity. It unites gravity with the other forces. It
explains action at a distance. It includes SR, GR and QM as subsets. In
addtion a proposed experiment capable of detecting the existence of this
aether is included.
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf
Ken Seto
.

User: "kenseto"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 19 Aug 2003 12:41:13 PM
"Elpoep19" <elpoep19@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20030819111833.07151.00000264@mb-m25.aol.com...

I hate to say it, but your experiment to measure absolute velocity will

not

work, the effects described by STR, if properly analyzed, will conceal it.

You are wrong. The experiment was peer-reviewed by three journals and they
all planned to publish it.

Aether followed.

It is not understood why, if you accept the idea of the Aether, you have

not

rejected the existence of "virtual exchange particles" required to produce
forces between material particles.

The concept of field/virtual particle can be represented by the distortions
in the aether (The E-Matrix)

The Aether very nicely performs that
function.

Yes...matter particle reacting to the distortions (geometry) in the E-Matrix
gives rise to all the processes of nature.

It is also not understood why it is felt necessary to rely on a
structure for the Aether,

The unique structure of the E-Matrix is needed. It gives rise to a new
repulsive force of nature that, in turn, gives rise to a new theory of
gravity.

particularly since such a structure would produce
chromatic dispersion of radiation from distant parts of the cosmos. No

such

dispersion seems to have been reported.

No such problem exists with my theory.


If one accepts the Aether, then there would seem to be no need for

material

particles smaller than hadrons (or quarks which are essentially the same

size)

to explain our reality.

Perhaps that's your theory. My theory posits that all matter particles are
made from S-Particles by virtual of different states of absolute motion of
the S-Particles in the E-Matrix.
Ken Seto
.

User: "Eric Prebys"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 19 Aug 2003 03:59:04 PM
Ken Seto's views on physics: $0.00
H.E.Retic's views on physics: $0.00
Watching to mathematically illiterate morons in a "scientific" discussion:
priceless
-Eric
.
User: "kenseto"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 19 Aug 2003 06:24:41 PM
"Eric Prebys" <ericprebys@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bhu2ri$21i$1@info4.fnal.gov...


Ken Seto's views on physics: $0.00
H.E.Retic's views on physics: $0.00
Watching to mathematically illiterate morons in a "scientific" discussion:
priceless

Ah...the RUNT of the SRians Prebys comes out swinging.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what
he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who disagrees with
SR.
Ken Seto
.
User: "Ed Keane III"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 20 Aug 2003 10:39:05 AM
kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk5c8br8nt95ce@corp.supernews.com...

Ah...the RUNT of the SRians Prebys comes out swinging.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond

what

he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who disagrees with
SR.

Me thinks that the SRcrazyauntintheatticist doth protest to much.
What exactly do you mean by "correct theory"? I get the impression
that your theories are more things that you *believe in* rather than
*ideas* that you have.
Would it be accurate to reduce your experiment to this; If you have
a laser pulse detector the diameter of the surface of the detector will
affect the ability to detect the full length of the pulse. You say that a
detector at a distance of 100 meters will show this effect when the
diameter gets smaller than around ten centimeters. Is that correct?
.
User: "kenseto"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 20 Aug 2003 12:35:34 PM
"Ed Keane III" <keane@westelcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f439760$0$4829$38cece19@news.newshosting.com...


kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk5c8br8nt95ce@corp.supernews.com...

Ah...the RUNT of the SRians Prebys comes out swinging.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond

what

he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who disagrees

with

SR.


Me thinks that the SRcrazyauntintheatticist doth protest to much.
What exactly do you mean by "correct theory"? I get the impression
that your theories are more things that you *believe in* rather than
*ideas* that you have.

In that case you don't know the difference between "believe in" and "ideas".
My ideas have been approved for publication by three peer-reviewed journals


Would it be accurate to reduce your experiment to this; If you have
a laser pulse detector the diameter of the surface of the detector will
affect the ability to detect the full length of the pulse.

Yes.

You say that a
detector at a distance of 100 meters will show this effect when the
diameter gets smaller than around ten centimeters. Is that correct?

NO...the purpose of the experiment is to find the diameter that will show
this effect. If the state of absolute motion of the detector is at 300
km/sec vertically then this effect will show up when the detector is smaller
than 10 cm.
Ken Seto
.
User: "Ed Keane III"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 20 Aug 2003 03:43:10 PM
kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk7c5tp3qoe82f@corp.supernews.com...


"Ed Keane III" <keane@westelcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f439760$0$4829$38cece19@news.newshosting.com...


kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk5c8br8nt95ce@corp.supernews.com...


In that case you don't know the difference between "believe in" and

"ideas".

My ideas have been approved for publication by three peer-reviewed

journals


I know that you know the term is peer review journal and that you are
refering
to your own web pages that you call journals. Fess up. You are a word game
playing troll.

Would it be accurate to reduce your experiment to this; If you have
a laser pulse detector the diameter of the surface of the detector will
affect the ability to detect the full length of the pulse.


Yes.

You say that a
detector at a distance of 100 meters will show this effect when the
diameter gets smaller than around ten centimeters. Is that correct?


NO...the purpose of the experiment is to find the diameter that will show
this effect. If the state of absolute motion of the detector is at 300
km/sec vertically then this effect will show up when the detector is

smaller

than 10 cm.

You know that makes no sense at all you word gaming troll.
Is it really so incredibaly dark under your bridge that you can't c.
.
User: "kenseto"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 20 Aug 2003 04:06:23 PM
"Ed Keane III" <keane@westelcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f43debb$0$4822$38cece19@news.newshosting.com...


kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk7c5tp3qoe82f@corp.supernews.com...


"Ed Keane III" <keane@westelcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f439760$0$4829$38cece19@news.newshosting.com...


kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk5c8br8nt95ce@corp.supernews.com...


In that case you don't know the difference between "believe in" and

"ideas".

My ideas have been approved for publication by three peer-reviewed

journals



I know that you know the term is peer review journal and that you are
refering
to your own web pages that you call journals. Fess up. You are a word game
playing troll.

You are an idiot. The paper is approved for publication by: Galilean
Electrodynamics, Episteme and it is already published by the Journal of
Theoretics


Would it be accurate to reduce your experiment to this; If you have
a laser pulse detector the diameter of the surface of the detector

will

affect the ability to detect the full length of the pulse.


Yes.

You say that a
detector at a distance of 100 meters will show this effect when the
diameter gets smaller than around ten centimeters. Is that correct?


NO...the purpose of the experiment is to find the diameter that will

show

this effect. If the state of absolute motion of the detector is at 300
km/sec vertically then this effect will show up when the detector is

smaller

than 10 cm.


You know that makes no sense at all you word gaming troll.
Is it really so incredibaly dark under your bridge that you can't c.

Idiot.
Ken Seto
.
User: "kenseto"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 21 Aug 2003 09:10:51 AM
"Eric Prebys" <ericprebys@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bi0sdt$h3t$1@info4.fnal.gov...


"kenseto" <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk7oh8a2esud5d@corp.supernews.com...


"Ed Keane III" <keane@westelcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f43debb$0$4822$38cece19@news.newshosting.com...


kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk7c5tp3qoe82f@corp.supernews.com...


"Ed Keane III" <keane@westelcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f439760$0$4829$38cece19@news.newshosting.com...


kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk5c8br8nt95ce@corp.supernews.com...


In that case you don't know the difference between "believe in" and

"ideas".

My ideas have been approved for publication by three peer-reviewed

journals



I know that you know the term is peer review journal and that you are
refering
to your own web pages that you call journals. Fess up. You are a word

game

playing troll.


You are an idiot. The paper is approved for publication by: Galilean
Electrodynamics, Episteme and it is already published by the Journal of
Theoretics


We have to come up with a better term than "peer review". No one can
argue that Galilean Electrodynamics and Journal or Theoretics are indeed
run by Mr. Seto's "peers". We need a term that means "reviewed by
people who understand the topic", which would leave these two journals
off the list.

Ah...the RUNT of SRians Prebys comes out swinginbg again. He can't attack me
so he attack the journals.
For those who don't know: Prebys is the math genius who use the SR concept
of mutual time dilation to prove the concept of reciprocity. He is so stupid
that he didn't know that mutual time dilation is already mean reciprocity.
When this was pointed out to him, he then came up with the idiotic statement
that there is no mutual time dilation in SR. <shrugg>
Ken Seto
.

User: "Ed Keane III"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 21 Aug 2003 11:10:26 AM
kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk7oh8a2esud5d@corp.supernews.com...


"Ed Keane III" <keane@westelcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f43debb$0$4822$38cece19@news.newshosting.com...


kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk7c5tp3qoe82f@corp.supernews.com...


"Ed Keane III" <keane@westelcom.com> wrote in message
news:3f439760$0$4829$38cece19@news.newshosting.com...


kenseto <kenseto@erinet.com> wrote in message
news:vk5c8br8nt95ce@corp.supernews.com...


In that case you don't know the difference between "believe in" and

"ideas".

My ideas have been approved for publication by three peer-reviewed

journals



I know that you know the term is peer review journal and that you are
refering
to your own web pages that you call journals. Fess up. You are a word

game

playing troll.


You are an idiot. The paper is approved for publication by: Galilean
Electrodynamics, Episteme and it is already published by the Journal of
Theoretics


Its like gay porn. It shouldn't bother me but it does.
And now that I have viewed and reviewed the
Journal of Theoretics does that mean that I am a peer?
.





User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 19 Aug 2003 06:42:28 PM
kenseto wrote:


"Eric Prebys" <ericprebys@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bhu2ri$21i$1@info4.fnal.gov...


Ken Seto's views on physics: $0.00
H.E.Retic's views on physics: $0.00
Watching to mathematically illiterate morons in a "scientific" discussion:
priceless


Ah...the RUNT of the SRians Prebys comes out swinging.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what
he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who disagrees with
SR.

Ken Seto

Ken Seto fails to point out that SR has never been falsified
by observation or experiment, and remains valid in its domain.
SP has become one of the most fruitful tools in physics and
has been incorporated into a broad range of technologies.
.
User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 20 Aug 2003 02:25:03 PM
kenseto wrote:



That's because SRians refused to do any experiment that could refute the
claims of SR. For example: they refused to do any one-way speed of light
experiment. Also the experiment I have in the following link will refute the
claims of SR.
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf

Best get on with it, Seto, and show the world! Come back with
data.
.


User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 19 Aug 2003 08:19:00 PM
kenseto wrote:


"Eric Prebys" <ericprebys@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bhu2ri$21i$1@info4.fnal.gov...


Ken Seto's views on physics: $0.00
H.E.Retic's views on physics: $0.00
Watching to mathematically illiterate morons in a "scientific" discussion:
priceless


Ah...the RUNT of the SRians Prebys comes out swinging.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond what
he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who disagrees with
SR.

There are no empirical falsifications of either GR or SR in any venue
or scale, particle physics to cosmology, jackass. Provide one or shut
your pie hole.
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume4/2001-4will/index.html>
Experimental constraints on General relativity.
<http://rattler.cameron.edu/EMIS/journals/LRG/Articles/Volume6/2003-1ashby/index.html>
http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/projecta.pdf
Relativity in the GPS system
http://fourmilab.to/etexts/einstein/specrel/specrel.pdf
page 21
<http://www.physics.gatech.edu/people/faculty/finkelstein/relativity.pdf>
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/Paper6.pdf
http://users.powernet.co.uk/bearsoft/LPHrel.html
Longitudinal and transverse mass
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/gpsuser/gpsuser.pdf
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/sigspec/default.htm
http://www.navcen.uscg.gov/pubs/gps/icd200/default.htm
http://www.trimble.com/gps/index.html
http://sirius.chinalake.navy.mil/satpred/
http://www.phys.lsu.edu/mog/mog9/node9.html
http://egtphysics.net/GPS/RelGPS.htm
http://www.schriever.af.mil/gps/Current/current.oa1
http://edu-observatory.org/gps/gps_books.html
<http://www-astronomy.mps.ohio-state.edu/~pogge/Ast162/Unit5/gps.html>
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
User: "kenseto"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 20 Aug 2003 12:24:44 PM
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:3F42CC84.979E4171@hate.spam.net...

kenseto wrote:


"Eric Prebys" <ericprebys@comcast.net> wrote in message
news:bhu2ri$21i$1@info4.fnal.gov...


Ken Seto's views on physics: $0.00
H.E.Retic's views on physics: $0.00
Watching to mathematically illiterate morons in a "scientific"

discussion:

priceless


Ah...the RUNT of the SRians Prebys comes out swinging.
Definition for a runt of the SRians:
A moron who thinks that SR is a religion. An idiot who doesn't
know the limitations of SR. A mental midget who can't comprehend beyond

what

he was taught in school. An imbecile who follows
the real experts around like a puppy and eats up their ***** like
gourmet puppy chow. An ***** who will attack anybody who disagrees

with

SR.


There are no empirical falsifications of either GR or SR in any venue
or scale, particle physics to cosmology, jackass. Provide one or shut
your pie hole.

Any one-way light speed experiment will refute the claims of SR. The
experiment I have in the following link will also refute the claim of SR
that there is no absolute motion.
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/Links/Papers/Seto.pdf
Ken Seto
.



User: "Robert J. Kolker"

Title: Re: A Correct Aether Theory 19 Aug 2003 04:30:23 PM
Eric Prebys wrote:

Ken Seto's views on physics: $0.00
H.E.Retic's views on physics: $0.00
Watching to mathematically illiterate morons in a "scientific" discussion:
priceless

You are a cruel man.
Bob Kolker
.



  Page 1 of 1

1
 


Related Articles
Time as defined by a correct aether theory
Lies 2: "Can't Have Both Self-Defense and Jobs," and "Only One Theory is Correct"
Theory of Forms- Correct Intro
Can Lorentz E Theory replace S. Relativity?? (is George Sagnac correct?)
Re: On whats Representation Theory (groups) for?
The Future of String Theory -- A Conversation with Brian Greene
Corrections to IRT (Improved Relativity Theory)
The Doppler - Hubble Big Bang theory is done for.
Possibility of telepathy information theory (theory of)
Cubit Size Range - The Smart Model Theory - And A Spiritual Point of View...
The Theory of Moving Dimensions/Time Vector : Thanks For The Feedback!!!
String Theory and Letterman
correcting Landau & Lifschitz in "The Classical Theory of Fields" onMaxwell derivation
Tachyons is that breakes Einstein's Theory
What, precisely, is an Aether Theory?
 

NEWER
pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER