| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
14 Mar 2007 01:07:10 PM |
| Object: |
A Neutrino Event Filter for PMTs |
A quanta received in the neutrino stations can be divided into the
special one from the exact interation of other theorectical
interactions.
A certain characteristic as the transission appear to be the
application. An observation as transission causes, in Quantum Theory
of the alternative style.
So the PMT effect the appearance of transission. An interaction is
defineable between PMT photolayer and the interaction. And so to
cause the state necessary for exact well probability as a maximum
notch is a certain layer of state on the pMT!
Alternative interaction theory.
And so the chemisty as the stability was the level of science in
alternative theory schools. A neutrino event-PMT layer interaction
has a stability! And it is calculable based on the parameter of choice
in all quantum theory. An energy well size called the, variable that
make the well sides real high like man.
So if a 20 eV quanta has to have a maximized stability in the
solution, a detection event is assured. And to cause stability of
delay time of emission of the transission quanta a certain energy.
SO go to photoelectric theory and select the closest analogous, K-
edge. And to have the filter match the event causes all detection to
occur! Quantum theory is true, and Schrodinger's cat is real.
A slight change in energy caused a dramatic drop in sensitiy because
the event appeared to not occur! It never interacted! I am sorry
Quantum Mechanics is this strange.
SO a good matched filter in Neutrino Observatories allows the
inference. ONly neutrinos can be effected!
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: A Neutrino Event Filter for PMTs |
14 Mar 2007 02:25:39 PM |
|
|
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
A quanta
Christ, Eagleson, you didn't make it to the third word - and your
first word is an indefinite article.
received in the neutrino stations can be divided into the
special one from the exact interation of other theorectical
interactions.
[snip crap]
Idiot.
A neutrino event-PMT layer interaction
has a stability!
[snip rest of crap]
You don't suspect that a lightyear thickness of lead to give 50%
neutrino interaction probability would be out of budget, do you?
Idiot.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
.
|
|
|
| User: "Douglas Eagleson" |
|
| Title: Re: A Neutrino Event Filter for PMTs |
14 Mar 2007 02:56:00 PM |
|
|
On Mar 14, 3:25 pm, Uncle Al <Uncle...@hate.spam.net> wrote:
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
A quanta
Christ, Eagleson, you didn't make it to the third word - and your
first word is an indefinite article.
received in the neutrino stations can be divided into the
special one from the exact interation of other theorectical
interactions.
[snip crap]
Idiot.
A neutrino event-PMT layer interaction
has a stability!
[snip rest of crap]
You don't suspect that a lightyear thickness of lead to give 50%
neutrino interaction probability would be out of budget, do you?
Idiot.
--
Uncle Alhttp://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/lajos.htm#a2
I have to remind a certain basic school division exists. And liquid
theory interaction has all quanta at the fifth abstract locale of
energy. Locale means a place. And the divison of the boson appears
the sixth quanta. Except remember this is alternative liquid class
quantum theory where the force of the nuclear appears resolved, a
neutron.
Just take all the data and translate to the right by the size of 10%.
So every fluence is off by 10%.
This is areal school. And I meet poeple routinely who know it
exists. So in a round about fashion ask around. It is NOT statistical
mechanics!
The very first thing the professsor reminded us in college was, why is
liquid class not allowed?
And the answer was the cause to strong force and weak force. And what
caused this inference was absolute number of quanta in the third
usage. Your likly usage.
Here is reality. When NIST confirm E=mc^2 it means something
terribly importent. And the logic of inference was apriori liquid
error. This is real and importent when two hydrogen nuclei are to
fuse. And worry over that interaction and fission caused the basic
error to be acceptable:)
And I used to be a physical security custodian of the old NIST neutron
standard. NIST is the original National Lab and existed at the dawn
of the nucelar age. And I am sorry you need to not worry about the
people interested in the actual value printed on the actual paper
work.
Do you understand my drift. I use liquid theory asummption always
almost.
You can get cheap intelligence here on th einternet. Very advanced
theory is often discoussed, but I am the guy allowing the liquid
class. Figure that out.
I think NIST get annoyed when the Delattes experiment is not in the
right context. It is importent to secure the technoogy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
