| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
24 Aug 2005 03:14:04 PM |
| Object: |
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10 |
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10
Douglas Eagleson, 2005
I found an old Macintosh computer in the corner
that seems to type text works real nice.
A few of the keys stick. An m key in particular.
And so if the word has a missing m, the key
stuck or it stuck and I did not correct the
error.
A symmetry was discussed. And the applied
symmetry in modern quantum theory is the topic.
A guy recently discovered in space the fact
that water will stay in the soap loop. Except
he found out the soap was unnecessary.
A reader has to absolutely understand a certain
failure. Equivalence has failed. A force theory
of the solid state kind was apparently the
correct force theory.
Understand the division of the sciences in this
fashion. A cruise control administrator appears
to cause the delay in recognition of new
scientific facts.
A failed equivalence is real.
A guy and his soapless water have evidence
of the failure. Evidence abounded.
A change occured in the water because of
symmetry causality.
People often wonder how cells align.
And the causality of symmetry is the answer.
A force will appear out of the background.
A sufficiency of geometric form has
a causality.
A soapless layer of water was held in
place in the ring by the small force.
Such a small force that the microgravity
environment was necessary.
And the appearance was the outcome of nature.
An independence of force exists because the
necessity of the like force no longer
exists, as the equivalence has failed.
No big deal. When the rope forces are added
the stress on the earth itself is caused.
Making the self tension appear in the
solid state.
And so the causality of symmetry is to be
defined without debate. A mathematical
relation is undesirable.
A property of space and its contents
appears the state symmetry.
A space of the particle theory is
unable to correctly express symmetry
causality consistently.
A state is nothing more than the
applied observation to the most
accurate level so far discovered.
Abstract universe space is irrelevent
when trying to actually define.
A supersymmetry in the geometric
fashion is claimed. And the exact
claim is to consider the implication
of the geometric causality.
A theory to explain the universe and its
contents is unnecessary in order to
define symmetry causality.
A simple observational definition
appears desirable.
A four state observation appears
the most sufficient observation.
All theory may be derived from four state
systems.
A state of location and the force
defines the four state observation.
A force is given size, direction and
absolute location.
Here begins the debate over the
background definition I suggest.
A force itself exists and the relation
to the particle is optional.
A particle's force may be defined, but
the location is to be the origin of the
force itself. And not a particle's center.
A differential of force defines the
background debate.
A differential of momenta appear
the common necessity of modern
field theory.
Equivalence has failed.
I choose the alternative field.
A field where the space itself causes.
How else is the water loop layer to
be explained, but by sufficiency?
And so the definer appears to suggest
that the open minded simply consider the
implications of this alternative
background dependent field.
A symmetry of four state sufficiency
is a discovery.
A solid force is caused geometrically.
And given this discovery the field
of momenta is left without the means to
quantify the water's solid force.
Yes, early on the solid state physicist
began a field theory, divergent.
Making the debate of practical nature
only the mathematical capacity
to extend the four state to all fields.
And this has been discovered recently.
A differential appears as the matrix.
Abstracted matrices correctly exist.
And so the force of the solid is able
to be assigned four states.
This definer believes the evidence.
And so the symmetry of geometric
four state is the kind to define.
"An abstract existence of the geometry
causes."
Meaning the topology state effects.
And so the implication was to
solve for the correct topology
four state function. A class of problem
now solved.
And the definer has solved.
As the symmetry appears to be
placeable in the function the
completed relation of all forces
is also solved.
A disparat existence of one force
relative to another, is only, the
function assigned to symmetry
away.
A resolution without relation to
particle momenta is possible.
And given the set of symmety's
proven to effect, the nature
of systems only dreamed of
are inferrable.
An inverted symmetry causality
appeared.
An inverted system physically possible
was also found to exhibit symmetry
effect.
And as support for this definer's field,
an implication as simple as the water
loop discovery will be suggested.
Suggested as theoretical implication.
Of course this definer has already
suggested the time distortion
of the moon's earthly high noon location.
A far simpler more easy to convey
appearence.
A one dimensional force of the electron.
A relation will appear between the charge
and the magnet of the alteration.
A resolution force is the normal
interpretation of the one-dimensional force.
A unit force arbitrary.
A real implication is the capacity to
make the one dimensional magnet.
An electron placed anywhere, but in the
correct location sees no field.
A charge's field is removed from existence
by considered geometry causality.
Overlapping fields may cause the
nonexistence of the field itself.
A charge is always to radiate in relation
to the resolution force.
No dilemma with common physics exists.
But, the physicist may wind a magnet
correctly for the one-dimensional field.
I have written of this.
A standard TV scanning coil is such a field.
A degree of accuracy hardly thinkable is possible
as a result.
And so large claims have been formulated by this
definer.
A small claim is sufficient evidence to
consider the realm of field study.
A water loop, as the only standard
necessary of the true philosopher.
Can I predict the class of discovery
comparable to the water loop and
cause the field to truely exist?
Here is the challenge.
A symmetry of the tree.
As a subject of study define the
location of the material apparently causing the
tree cell alignment.
And the claim of intracellular material
causing alignment force is made.
A study of the relation of the growth
appears a physics.
And the cell will be seen to align as
surely as the water loop appears.
Symmetry causality is real.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10 |
24 Aug 2005 03:57:25 PM |
|
|
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
A Philosophical Physicist, Statement no. 10
Douglas Eagleson, 2005
[snip crap]
An independence of force exists because the
necessity of the like force no longer
exists, as the equivalence has failed.
[snip more crap]
A state is nothing more than the
applied observation to the most
accurate level so far discovered.
[snip rest of crap]
Snip 287 lines of crap.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
