| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
28 Aug 2006 09:53:00 AM |
| Object: |
A Simple Relation-Modern Physics |
I was trying to understand the current state of modern physics and the
nth category of material as a function appears the level of
understanding.
So the meaning of modern functional representation as approximation to
the exact correct function becomes this rather lengthy discourse. A
symmetric state to cause is implied in theory. This is now written
over on sci.physics.research.
A set of psi<> as wavefunctional set theory represents the symmetric
state evidently.
A certain problem is the discovery of all symmetric set. So modern
physics is converging on the solution and recognizes the existence of
symmetry casuality.
Why people do not just jump up and down and rant and rave is because
the modern physicist is a rather odd personality. They belong to the
school. And they are littorelly not readable unless translated.
SO here is the interpretation of the common computer simulation
utilized. A volume represents the time as transfer of energy of the
system. So a certain system volume pops up on the computer simulator.
A deviation of rate of energy change deforms the volume causing the
interaction.
So in theory land everybody gets to plot their own trial attempt at
this class of theory on the computer.
What is necessay to understand is the form of theory alters field to
the point where Mr. Feynman would no long read. He was to early in the
science of physics.
ANd the book is just now being written.
A new particle is related to defomation rate. So given the interaction
computer test, does the theory predict all class of particle
interaction. ANd everybody gets to play functional representation.
The news group here is wowfully misinformed as to what quantum field
theory currently is.
And so the best solution is to wait for the n-th category field theory
book to come out.
I can suggest a certain modifcation only. A symmetric set of
wavefunction has a limited representation of the true parameter
necessary. A unit of symmetry cause is required to advance theory in
the odd fellow world. And so given the defomation volume of the
interaction a symmetric unit is proposed.
A point of the computer displayed geometric function appears to have
its original functional relation a mathematical form. And to make all
symmetric cause a function appeared the unit of deformed.......... blah
blah i get lost here.
SO I am looking for the correct computer simulation book , does anybody
know its title!
As a research direction: I am studying the necessary psi operation to
cause symmetric sets of the right kind. For example given the common
Copenhagen function transform to the set.
And mathematically the explicitly probabilistic function requires the
unit probability per unit shape. A shape transform for psi. Making
the density function of any usage.
And so all symmetric cause is representable by a companion virtual
geometry. So the companion solution to all theory is allowed.
Any computer simulation may then be altered mathematcially with another
screen showing the companion form to allow a single function to
represent all interaction.
Symmetric form is demanded to solve and not approximate.
Right now on sci.physis.research the current form is always incorrect
to the point of simple gravity usage only.
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
