A Single Relation Theory- Light Space



 Science > Physics > A Single Relation Theory- Light Space

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Douglas Eagleson"
Date: 26 Jun 2005 03:05:47 PM
Object: A Single Relation Theory- Light Space
Most theories are truely rather
complicated affairs.
In modern particle theory fifty
unique relation are assembled.
So as a daily event the theoretical
change in the state of physics theory is
quite dynamic.
A hard kind of theory is when the quite
rare event occurs. A new one is
pointed out where the set of new
possible theory is profound.
Changing the relationship of the
already discovered is considered easy.
And here a single little physical theory
is proposed.
And I claim it is of the profound
kind.
A single statement serves to point
out its existence in a fashion such that
falsifiable relations may be constructed.
Meaning that the experimental apparatus
may be postulated as possible. A kind
of falsified truth.
So here goes.
******************************************
A line.
A light quanta or wave.
A space.
Any quanta whether a collapsable
wave or the wave in true space,
causes a set.
*******************************************
I stated the creation of a set in two spaces.
And the abstract set of uncollapsed space
relative to the actually existing space set
is the relation given a physical interpretation.
I claim that the process of collapse
is provablly a relation nonexistent and
present only to define the abstract
relative to the measurable.
Making the experiment to prove its
truth of abstract existence rather than
its true physical existence a simple one.
A line of real space is definable. A valid
line.
A two sentence validity proves the abstract
existence of the set of collapse.
A set of the wave.
A wave in abstract form.
A certain space is definable.
Making the abstract set.
Now the rather, Ge-Denken like proof
here is done in set theory.
Einstein's Ge-Denken proof were
always of this form.
And the proper Ge-Denken experiment
to associate with the set proposed
in this theory, is a very simple one.
********************************
A wave.
A point.
And the location of the quanta.
A location is determined.
And the uncollapsed location, relative
to the collapsed location exists or not.
*********************************
A set exists for uncollapsed location
or not. And to prove the location in
pre-collapse space relative to actual space
is not required to prove set existence.
A certain example in uncollapsed space is
either measurable and inferable or not.
Making the existence of abstract to actual
the experiment. Ergo- "The Cat".
And to prove the set existence without relation
to the member's existence forms the
experiment.
So transform "The Cat".
*******************************
A particle.
A location.
A single location is measurable.
*******************************
Making the correct Ge-Denken form-of-experiment
capable of proving the true existence
of a Schrodinger Wave or not.
Everybody uses the truely existent
applied abstraction to beat around the bush.
And the applied formal relation of objective
abstraction is thusly proven by the
truth of quantum mechanics.
end note: I write such that complete
formal statement is intended. The first
sentence is related to the last sentence
by a real relation.
A single relation is defined for all
theory.
A school of objective science in
predicate may use a modified Ge-Denkan
form of abstract theory.
A dilemma is always the correct form
of both solution and difficulty in
experimental proof.
Making the relationship between
physical relations a single easy one.
And all of theory is difficult in two
aspects. Solution and Truth.
A validity of profoundness is
this one. A discovery either
causes the set to exist or
all of science is provably
subjective.
The example theory, in predicate,
is a proof by validity, a GeDanken
form. Science as experimentally
quantified outcomes is truely
both provable by measure and
by validity.
Proving itself valid in predicate.
.

User: "T Wake"

Title: Re: A Single Relation Theory- Light Space 26 Jun 2005 03:20:48 PM
"Douglas Eagleson" <eaglesondouglas@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1119816347.631067.138780@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...

Most theories are truely rather
complicated affairs.

<snip>
You think yours was less complicated than normal ones?
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: A Single Relation Theory- Light Space 26 Jun 2005 04:07:11 PM
Douglas Eagleson wrote:


Most theories are truely rather
complicated affairs.

The whole of General Relativity is ten equations.

In modern particle theory fifty
unique relation are assembled.

List them.

So as a daily event the theoretical
change in the state of physics theory is
quite dynamic.

[snip]

Any quanta whether a collapsable
wave or the wave in true space,
causes a set.

[snip]

A line of real space is definable. A valid
line.

[snip]

A school of objective science in
predicate may use a modified Ge-Denkan
form of abstract theory.

[snip]
Gibbering idiot. You are fluently illiterate in two languages.

--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER