| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
07 Nov 2006 07:06:13 AM |
| Object: |
A Special Tricycle for Special Physicists |
With all the lousey press on the Shawyer Drive, www.emdrive.com, I
thought to introduce this special tricycle for the needy physicist.
http://www.myfox.com
A basic swaying motion left and right allows it to travel up the slight
incline. A highly complex maneuver is to prove all physicists wrong.
At least the unsophisticated wrong. I will post some more later, I just
had to grin at the idea of incline physics being so complicated.
.
|
|
| User: "Douglas Eagleson" |
|
| Title: Re: A Special Tricycle for Special Physicists |
07 Nov 2006 07:24:18 AM |
|
|
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
With all the lousey press on the Shawyer Drive, www.emdrive.com, I
thought to introduce this special tricycle for the needy physicist.
http://www.myfox.com
A basic swaying motion left and right allows it to travel up the slight
incline. A highly complex maneuver is to prove all physicists wrong.
At least the unsophisticated wrong. I will post some more later, I just
had to grin at the idea of incline physics being so complicated.
Sorry that is a lousey link. It is a special nonpedal tricycle to use
inertia as the cause of the propulsion? I think is is really just a
special energy efficiency gain though, but the feeling of special power
efficiency must be real fun.
I really do have the original experimental james bond cylinder, btw.
The submarine tracking one, I need to find place to give it to.
Everybody thinks the CIA sub runs around breaking into phone lines, ha
ha. I am sophisticated every JB movie fan needs a cylinder. An the
original Shawyer drive is a real find. I am trying to buy one of the
early Shawyer drives.
SO the challege to divide the real physicist from the wannabe is the
reality and the ability to react to it correctly. Invest in the
company. It is good for true satellite station keeping, only though.
As a long range space drive it appears sun related.
So here we are, tricycles and space drives. This is the divider of the
physicist right now and to allow the "free energy" or efficient gain of
inertia means who denies both as existing?
And the guy with the cylinder decides who is who. So if you say,
impossible in the face of experimental evidence, you are
unsophisticated.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A Special Tricycle for Special Physicists |
07 Nov 2006 07:23:21 AM |
|
|
http://s6.metaldamage.pl/c.php?uid=116048
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
