| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
12 Jun 2004 11:04:05 AM |
| Object: |
A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
The sundial uses a shadow from the sun in order to place the hour of
the day apon the hourly markers. At the hour of the day where the sun
is highest the hour is noon and the sunrise and sunset mark the
beginning and ending.
And so each day realizes the shadow it necessarily casts.
Making the clock of the sun.
Another force of nature known as the pendulum’s force is called
a cause to attract or maybe repel.
And here the force of the shadow and the heavens are related. One is
used as the clock and the other is also such a clock as with the
tides.
Making the force either the cast shadow or that which its effect is a
necessity of its existence. Causing the casting to be always in the
mind of the beholder.
And the force is one or the other, as the effect of the shadow on the
material itself and never the eye. For to hold the shadow effect, the
tide would always follow as the clock and not the cause of the water
to be swung.
So, here is the clock to forever remove the mind from the forces
existence. Impossible to fathom except for the nature of this shadow
of the mind’s desire as the clock, and not the cause of the
earth’s rotation.
As diagram.
**********************************************
So, I just wrote the discourse for the disproof of equivalence by the
existence of my odd pendulum clock. And to diagram it in discourse is
to reference the diagram. All that is needed is the function of the
marker spacing. And the philosopher would allow empirical placement
in relation to the capacity to prove.
So just make a self stablizing loop to clock shutter timer and have
the shutter open on the exact time where the weight is zero for the
shutter.
That is it.
http://www.angelfire.com/md3/dougeagleson
Just look at the bottom of the page and select the sunclock.
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
12 Jun 2004 12:29:28 PM |
|
|
wrote:
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
The sundial uses a shadow from the sun in order to place the hour of
the day apon the hourly markers. At the hour of the day where the sun
is highest the hour is noon and the sunrise and sunset mark the
beginning and ending.
No, stooopid. The sun has not yet arisen when you see it at dawn, and
it has set long before you see it dip beneath the horizon at sunset.
Atmospheric optics, you hopeless psychotically spewing jackass.
And so each day realizes the shadow it necessarily casts.
No, stooopid. The sun describes an annual lemniscate in the sky at a
given local time. A decent sundial must allow for this plus being
corrected for latitude of its placement.
Hey idiot Eagleson, describe a sundial for use north of the Arctic
Circle.
Making the clock of the sun.
Obsolete by the 1759 when Harrison's H4 chronometer was demonstrated.
The sun's angular diameter is too large for accurate anything anyway.
Use other stars.
Another force of nature known as the pendulum’s force is called
a cause to attract or maybe repel.
Uneducated idiot.
And here the force of the shadow and the heavens are related. One is
used as the clock and the other is also such a clock as with the
tides.
Fucking imbecile.
http://nist.time.gov/
http://www.shoplite.com/pat-1gp.htm
http://www.sustainableworld.com/y2kgps/gpseng/time-keep_manuf.html
http://www.realhamradio.com/GPS_Frequency_Standard.htm
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/history.html
http://www.nawcc.org/museum/nwcm/galleries/today/today.htm
http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/pulsar/reduction/p2.html
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/pulsar/reduction/p3.html
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/pulsar/reduction/p4.html
[snip crap]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
12 Jun 2004 04:11:28 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<40CB3D78.1993881B@hate.spam.net>...
eagleson2004123@yahoo.com wrote:
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
The sundial uses a shadow from the sun in order to place the hour of
the day apon the hourly markers. At the hour of the day where the sun
is highest the hour is noon and the sunrise and sunset mark the
beginning and ending.
No, stooopid. The sun has not yet arisen when you see it at dawn, and
it has set long before you see it dip beneath the horizon at sunset.
Atmospheric optics, you hopeless psychotically spewing jackass.
And so each day realizes the shadow it necessarily casts.
No, stooopid. The sun describes an annual lemniscate in the sky at a
given local time. A decent sundial must allow for this plus being
corrected for latitude of its placement.
Hey idiot Eagleson, describe a sundial for use north of the Arctic
Circle.
Making the clock of the sun.
Obsolete by the 1759 when Harrison's H4 chronometer was demonstrated.
The sun's angular diameter is too large for accurate anything anyway.
Use other stars.
Another force of nature known as the pendulum’s force is called
a cause to attract or maybe repel.
Uneducated idiot.
And here the force of the shadow and the heavens are related. One is
used as the clock and the other is also such a clock as with the
tides.
Fucking imbecile.
http://nist.time.gov/
http://www.shoplite.com/pat-1gp.htm
http://www.sustainableworld.com/y2kgps/gpseng/time-keep_manuf.html
http://www.realhamradio.com/GPS_Frequency_Standard.htm
http://tycho.usno.navy.mil/history.html
http://www.nawcc.org/museum/nwcm/galleries/today/today.htm
http://www.gpsclock.com/
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/pulsar/reduction/p2.html
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/pulsar/reduction/p3.html
http://astronomy.swin.edu.au/pulsar/reduction/p4.html
[snip crap]
I wrote in the style of greek translations.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
12 Jun 2004 04:29:11 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message news:<40CB3D78.1993881B@hate.spam.net>...
wrote:
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
The sundial uses a shadow from the sun in order to place the hour of
the day apon the hourly markers. At the hour of the day where the sun
is highest the hour is noon and the sunrise and sunset mark the
beginning and ending.
No, stooopid. The sun has not yet arisen when you see it at dawn, and
it has set long before you see it dip beneath the horizon at sunset.
Atmospheric optics, you hopeless psychotically spewing jackass.
[snip crap]
I wrote in the style of greek translations.
You pulled it out of your *****. You don't speak either classical or
modern Greek.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "MorituriMax" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
12 Jun 2004 04:12:13 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
eagleson2004123@yahoo.com wrote:
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
Things like this make me wish for a moderated physics newsgroup where anything
you read has at least received a cursory look-through and thus can be enjoyed by
those of us who would like a forum for passing on knowledge, and not
dissemination of brain chum.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
12 Jun 2004 09:18:53 PM |
|
|
"MorituriMax" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote in message news:<NkKyc.7687$wD5.4808@fe1.texas.rr.com>...
Uncle Al wrote:
eagleson2004123@yahoo.com wrote:
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
Things like this make me wish for a moderated physics newsgroup where anything
you read has at least received a cursory look-through and thus can be enjoyed by
those of us who would like a forum for passing on knowledge, and not
dissemination of brain chum.
It is a curious device.. Making you lacking everything? Where does
the al guy collect you kind.
.
|
|
|
| User: "MorituriMax" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
13 Jun 2004 12:25:59 AM |
|
|
wrote:
It is a curious device.. Making you lacking everything? Where does
the al guy collect you kind.
Try rephrasing this in english and I'll reply.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
12 Jun 2004 04:43:13 PM |
|
|
"MorituriMax" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
eagleson2004123@yahoo.com wrote:
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
Things like this make me wish for a moderated physics newsgroup where anything
you read has at least received a cursory look-through and thus can be enjoyed by
those of us who would like a forum for passing on knowledge, and not
dissemination of brain chum.
Ah, but what about the replies?
Jim
.
|
|
|
| User: "MorituriMax" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
12 Jun 2004 05:32:40 PM |
|
|
Jim wrote:
"MorituriMax" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
eagleson2004123@yahoo.com wrote:
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
Things like this make me wish for a moderated physics newsgroup where
anything
you read has at least received a cursory look-through and thus can be enjoyed
by
those of us who would like a forum for passing on knowledge, and not
dissemination of brain chum.
Ah, but what about the replies?
Censorship! Anything that meets the criteria for the initial rejection should
also be summarily executed with the DEL key.. I don't even mind waiting as
couple days for the whole process to take place.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: A SunDial to Disprove Equivalence |
13 Jun 2004 11:00:25 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics,
<>
wrote
on 12 Jun 2004 09:04:05 -0700
<43d9f575.0406120804.44b69d4f@posting.google.com>:
A SunClock
Douglas Eagleson, 2004
The sundial uses a shadow from the sun in order to place the hour of
the day apon the hourly markers. At the hour of the day where the sun
is highest the hour is noon and the sunrise and sunset mark the
beginning and ending.
Highly debatable, though it depends in part what one counts as
"noon". The standard striping (which is somewhat politicized,
as they're not true stripes!) of time zones allows for up to
about a 30-minute variance from "true noon"; additional factors
include the Earth's non-circular orbit.
And so each day realizes the shadow it necessarily casts.
Making the clock of the sun.
Another force of nature known as the pendulum’s force is called
a cause to attract or maybe repel.
?
And here the force of the shadow and the heavens are related. One is
used as the clock and the other is also such a clock as with the
tides.
The tides are interesting, but if one has a 1 metric tonne pendulum
one computes:
F = mMG/d^2 = (1000)*(7.35*10^22)*(6.6873*10^-11)/(3.84*10^8)^2
= 0.033 N
a = 3.33 * 10^-5 m/s/s
Since this is swamped by g = 9.805 m/s/s I'm not sure if this is
visible, or not.
Making the force either the cast shadow or that which its effect is a
necessity of its existence. Causing the casting to be always in the
mind of the beholder.
That was not. A coherent sentence.
And the force is one or the other, as the effect of the shadow on the
material itself and never the eye. For to hold the shadow effect, the
tide would always follow as the clock and not the cause of the water
to be swung.
So, here is the clock to forever remove the mind from the forces
existence. Impossible to fathom except for the nature of this shadow
of the mind’s desire as the clock, and not the cause of the
earth’s rotation.
As diagram.
**********************************************
So, I just wrote the discourse for the disproof of equivalence by the
existence of my odd pendulum clock. And to diagram it in discourse is
to reference the diagram. All that is needed is the function of the
marker spacing. And the philosopher would allow empirical placement
in relation to the capacity to prove.
So just make a self stablizing loop to clock shutter timer and have
the shutter open on the exact time where the weight is zero for the
shutter.
That is it.
http://www.angelfire.com/md3/dougeagleson
That diagram needs a lot of work. I would suggest SVG if you
have the technology; if not, get the sizes right; apparently
there's a mismatch between the size specified in the webpage
(640 x 426) and the actual size of the image (727 x 452).
On my browser, at least, this leads to a bad case of the jaggies
and dropped line segments. (It is possible other browsers
with smarter anti-aliasing capabilities may be less affected.)
Also, BMP is a bandwidth-waster; try using GIF or PNG instead.
One a slightly more relevant note, I have a few questions.
[1] Your device appears to have a hinge-pivot point between the
post and the pendulum. Does the center pole rotate?
[2] I'm assuming you mean "at the exact time the pendulum stops
on its upswing" for "zero gravity potential". Gravity is
everywhere, if one's standing on Earth; one can't avoid
it, although one might try to counteract it with various
means, some of them Bernoulli-based (e.g., aircraft).
A pendulum never experiences zero weight unless it is seriously
overdriven over a 180 degree arc. (An interesting idea,
for some experiments. Your diagram suggests that the pendulum
is not swinging through 180 degrees; it appears that it is
swinging perhaps 60 degrees.)
[3] I have no idea what you mean by "equivalence principle".
Just look at the bottom of the page and select the sunclock.
I did. It's a duplicate of this post, except for the hyperlinks
and the sunclock diagram.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
