| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
09 Feb 2006 08:05:54 AM |
| Object: |
A Test Question- Category Implication |
A short relatviely concise discussion of the theory in a formal
school's method. I finally found a school that each's Aristotle's form
applied in a fashion.
A category as the class to which all things belong appears the solution
to the nomenclature problem. People use the term class as the set and
the title of the set becomes a new term when classifed as a category.
A special set to be given symbol independent of the definition.
A short set discussion was attempted and the reader is to hopefully
address the logical implication of the category. A certain relation of
the set of all relations is the category while the set is truely
distinct.
And in philosophy the ability to discusss the exact nature of this
difference is critical to displaying the ability to relate.
hint- a symbol as the identifier of all elements is either functional
or not as a relation.
.
|
|
| User: "Douglas Eagleson" |
|
| Title: Re: A Test Question- Category Implication |
09 Feb 2006 06:05:10 PM |
|
|
Douglas Eagleson wrote:
A short relatviely concise discussion of the theory in a formal
school's method. I finally found a school that each's Aristotle's form
applied in a fashion.
A category as the class to which all things belong appears the solution
to the nomenclature problem. People use the term class as the set and
the title of the set becomes a new term when classifed as a category.
A special set to be given symbol independent of the definition.
A short set discussion was attempted and the reader is to hopefully
address the logical implication of the category. A certain relation of
the set of all relations is the category while the set is truely
distinct.
And in philosophy the ability to discusss the exact nature of this
difference is critical to displaying the ability to relate.
hint- a symbol as the identifier of all elements is either functional
or not as a relation.
Well, the answer is.
A relation of the symbol as a set existence function is very different
from the element function of sets. A symbol is independent of the set
or set element.
And so the term function must be defined as the relation. And to cause
the symbol to exist as if it were element assignable a special function
was devised.
A symbol may symmetrically exist in relation to the set. A symmetry as
the cause of correspondence is a certain function. Allowing sets of
symbols to be functionalized by symmetric inversion.
And to expound apon the term symmetry.
A symmetry as the function is a relation of a certain relation as the
cause of the correspondence. Meaning the element of the correpondent is
either caused to exist or the correspondence is set independent. And a
single relation of symmetry allows independent correspondent function.
A very importent symmetry is logical inversion. A complete objective
statement must exist with the symmetry of the applied abstraction.
Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg. MD USA
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
