In previous communications I have shown the aether-equation:

kappa*U*V = G*h*c^2,

from which follows:

K = G*c/kappa*L^2 = U*L/h*c = 2.000343E3,

L = 1 cm, V = L^3, kappa = 1 erg/sec*g^2 providing a radiant
flux Phi_x,y erg/sec, > when kappa*m_x*m_y = Phi, acts as the
flux of mutual energy exchange between any pair of masses through
the medium of radiant energy of the aether from all astro- physical
objects, U erg, of energy density u = U/V erg/cm^3, so that
Phi/c dyn at the energy velocity of light, c, is proportional the

of gravity between any pair of masses m_x and m_y:
G*m_x*m_y/L^2, by a factor K. Phi/c may also be written as
Phi/(ny*lambda) demonstrating the validity for energy exchange
of all frequencies at their corresponding wavelengths.

Considering the neutron m_n as a composite particle consisting
of a proton of mass m_p, and a neutron-meson m_m, where
(m_n minus m_p) equals m_m = 2.305589E-27 g with the electric
unit charge -e = 4,803242E-10 esu, I presume that in matter the
neutron-meson m_m is in enduring shifts of orbit between two
protons of unit charge +e esu, thus alternating the two protons
between the phases of a neutron and a proton respektively,
constantly binding a shifting a proton-neutron pair.

I further presume that the mass-difference between the neutron-
meson and the electron = 9.109535E-28 g, (m_m minus m_e),
is the virtual mass of gravity between the proton and the neutron-
electron: rho*G*m_p*m_e/r*c^2 = 1.2394636E-27 g, where r
is the mean radius of the electron-orbit, and rho is a co-efficient
of gravity depending of the local energy density of the neutron,
confirming the aether equation, from which is seen that if h, Planck's
constant, is a universal constant, then the Newtonian G and velocity
of light c are variables depending on the local energy density u in
space, varying considerably, say from the inner of a galaxy to a
position in intergalactic space far from radiant stars and bodies.

In galaxies of much higher radiant energy density u than in outer
intergalactic space, the proportionally greater value of the
Newtonian G results in peculiar differential velocities of the

stars, as well as to the formation or creation of new stars from

condensations of dust, particles, and gasses, precisely like the

of mock-gravity by light-pressure and the ordinary universal action of
gravity due to the aether must be assumed able to generate black

quasars, and new galaxies, from intergalactic dust and gasses.
In black holes all massive matter should be regenerated into high

radiation and new fundamental particles in pair-productions of
electrons-positrons and protons-antiprotons by which new galaxies
are created from the debris of old stars and galaxies, which have

worn out from the abundant production of radiant energy at the cost of
their masses.

In the aether equation the specific aether energy U = 3.973637E-13 erg
is proportional to the 4th. power of the aether temperature T(Aether)

2.692064 Kelvin, confirming the best results from COBE measurements
of T(CMBR) = 2.735+/-0.06 K. G = 6.672426E-8 cm^3/g*sec^2,
h = 6.626176E-erg*sec, c = 2.99792348E10 cm/sec.
U and T(Aether) therefore should be universal minimum values, meaning
that no natural temperature may ever occur to be lower than the

T(Aether) = 2.692064 K.

From the foregoing, with here mentioned fundamental constants, and the
fine-structure constant alpha = 7.297349E-3, I find the following

between the neutron mass m_n, and the masses of the proton m_p, the
neutron-meson m_m, and the electron m_e of unit charge +/- e
(Note the simple relation to the proton/electron proportion m_p/m_e =
1.836151E3 and the numerical exactness):

(alpha/2*pi)*K^2 + (m_p/m_e)^2 = (m_n*m_p)/(m_e)^2 =
3.376099E6,

from which follows that

(alpha/2*pi)*K^2 = (m_p*m_m)/(m_e)^2 = 4.647230E3.

I further remark that the following relations seem to be valid:

L*U/K*G = h*c/G = (m_Planck1)^2,

L*U/2*pi*K*G = h'*c/G = (m_Planck2)^2,

alpha*L*U/2*pi*K*G = e^2/G = (m_Johnstone-Stoney)^2,

h*K/c*L = G*h/kappa*V = U/c^2 = m_U,
The equivalent mass of the aether energy U.

15th. September 2005, Ole D. Rughede

In previous communications I have shown the aether-equation: