Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:

ALBERT EINSTEIN ON THE SCIENCE OF ASTROLOGY

NO REFERENCES

Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote in message

In article <410D489E.A19D5F0C@hate.spam.net>,
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> posted:

[... references to lies and defamation deleted ...]

How to handle stalkers and "Uncle Al"

[ Subject: How to handle stalkers and Uncle Al
[ From: Archimedes Plutonium <plutoniu@willinet.net>
[ Newsgroups: sci.chem,sci.physics,sci.archaeology
[ Message-ID: <3A6128B1.7ED158B6@willinet.net>
[ Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2001
[
[
[ Ryan Doherty wrote:
[
[ > Uncle Al (24.16.181.181),
[ >
[ > I am consider this message of yours SPAM, so please
[ > keep your childish postings to yourself!
[ > By the way, Grow up.. you are wasting more bandwidth
[ > with your repeated responces that Archimedes and his
[ > questions!
[ >
[ > Ryan
[
[ > Ryan, you are talking to a fence post when you talk to
[ > Uncle Al. He and his motley crew of cohorts have stalked
[ > me for years. In fact they have stalked me nonstop for 7
[ > years now.
[ >
[ > Uncle Al feels he is a police cop of sci.chem and
[ > sci.physics and wants to chase out any poster he does not
[ > like. Many chemistry professors have put Al Schwartz into
[ > their killfile. That is about the only real solution.
[ >
[ > Some say Al Schwartz is a failed chemistry professor of
[ > 80s in age living in Tallahassee Florida or Denton Texas.
[ > He is old, cranky with nothing to do but post to the
[ > Internet. He feels a righteous duty to stalk me. No
[ > matter if I post pure chemistry to sci. chem or pure
[ > physics to sci.physics, Uncle Al feels that none of my
[ > posts belongs to those newsgroups.
[ >
[ > He has set himself up as a self righteous self imposed
[ > police cop of sci.chem.
[ >
[ > Many other people have complained about Uncle Al in sci.
[ > chem.
[ >
[ > SOLUTION: the only solution that I can see is to killfile
[ > Uncle Al and all Al supporters. And to add sci.chem and
[ > sci.physics to all of your posts to the Internet. Let
[ > Uncle Al stalk you everywhere, not just sci. chem or sci
[ > physics. Make it so that everyday Uncle Al wakes up, his
[ > chores and work are to stalk people on the Internet. Make
[ > it such that the essence of life for Uncle Al will now be
[ > to stalk 1 or 3 or 20 or 117 people every day.
[ >
[ > So, I am asking of all those people on the Internet who
[ > have been attacked by Uncle Al, to give Uncle Al what he
[ > craves. Add sci.chem and sci.physics to all of your
[ > Internet posts. And killfile Uncle Al.
[ >
[ > Uncle Al is already a crackpot and is insane, but drive
[ > him wildly insane.
[ >
[ > Force him to waste minutes and hours every day of his
[ > life stalking you.
[ >
[ > And you just sit back and laugh at how the idiot Uncle Al
[ > is making himself a monkey idiot.
[ >
[ > Last year someone emailed me saying that sci.chem was
[ > back to normal and that Uncle Al had been put under
[ > sedation and it was safe to post to sci.chem again.
[ > Sci.chem was flooded by outsiders because Uncle Al had
[ > pissed them off.
[ >
[ > Well, that is not the way to handle the self imposed
[ > sci.chem police dog of Uncle Al. The way to handle Uncle
[ > Al and other stalkers like him is to "killfile them" and
[ > then force them to stalk you all over the Internet. Let
[ > everyone see what a fool he is, not just sci.chem folk.
[ >
[ > I wish that someone is archiving all of the Uncle Al
[ > stalks of Archimedes Plutonium. I have him killfiled and
[ > so I have zero. But I would imagine that Uncle Al has
[ > about 500 posts per year of attacks.
[ >
[ > So, I ask everyone who knows Uncle Al, to add sci. chem
[ > to their Internet posts and to killfile Uncle Al. Let the
[ > fool make himself a larger fool.
[ >
[ > And it takes little energy for me or for you to add
[ > "sci.chem" but think of how much energy and how much rage
[ > it gives Uncle Al. Why, I just burst out into laughter at
[ > all the energy spent by Uncle Al in stalking this and
[ > other posts of mine. Uncle Al is too stupid to realize he
[ > has been defeated and that the world laughs at his cop
[ > enforcement. That method (if they have a newsgroup
[ > hangout) will deal with all stalkers of the Internet, not
[ > just Uncle Al.
End of copy

Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti


[ From: Dr. Jai Maharaj
[ Subject: Re: How to handle stalker Alan 'Uncle Al' Schwartz
[ Date: Wed, 10 Mar 2004

In article <ZcednUDSG4Zb5NPdRVn-jg@comcast.com>,
Bill Vajk <bill9north@hotmailDITCHTHIS.com> posted:

Arindam Banerjee wrote:

Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote in message

news:<Stalker-Uncle-Al-27hf3.20040308@news.mantra.com>...

In article <404D34BE.30087280@hate.spam.net>,
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> posted:

[... reference to lies and defamation...]

How to handle stalkers and "Uncle Al"

- snip -
Thanks, Jai, looks like this fellow was not worth my attention. It is
depressing to think, that those in power in the field of modern
physics are what chaps like these want to be.

Al is a chemist wannabe physicist.

Alan Schwartz has published his contact information:

Alan Schwartz
49 Fabriano
P.O. Box 005
Irvine, CA 92620-2525

http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:Nu16TComWkEJ:www.mazepath.com/uncleal/adver
t.htm+%22Schwartz%22+%22Uncle+Al%22&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

and e-mail addresses:

"Alan Schwartz" <uncleal0@ix.netcom.com>

"Alan Schwartz" <UncleAl0@ix.netcom.com>

hmm.. looks like alan a.ka Alan Schwartz is exposed :-(

Good compilation.

That we can now think of no mechanism for astrology is relevant but
unconvincing. No mechanism was known, for example, for continental
drift when it was proposed by Wegener. Nevertheless, we see that
Wegener was right, and those who objected on the grounds of
unavailable mechanism were wrong.
- Carl Sagan

[mws snecked, aa added]

His name isn't Jai Maharaj and he isn't a Dr., but he still wrote:

ALBERT EINSTEIN

had real credentials, and thus didn't need to lie about them.

Can you say the same thing, Jay?

BTW - alt.jyotish has been provisionally annexed into the greater
alt.astrology family. As such your post is off-topic there. Did you
have any melons or crab won tons to discuss, abuser?