Science > Physics > An Invention as the Theory or the Material Stress Fallacy
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Douglas Eagleson" |
| Date: |
15 Jan 2006 07:18:50 PM |
| Object: |
An Invention as the Theory or the Material Stress Fallacy |
A machine is invented. And this time it is just a certain art.
A dog on the marine window clamps down the frame against the window
seal. And the angle of the dog makes a lever to oppose the seal force.
And so the twisting force conversion to the frame seal for is the
torque itself converted.
And so the angled edge of the dog is the certain art to be modified.
An alternative dog design uses a screw as the converter.
And the size of the torque conversion edge then becomes the realm of
the art. A screw thread as opposed to the single thread part
determines a range of angled edges.
A rubber band can cause the seal force. And so the bungie closure
denotes another example of seal force.
A formal art as the angled edge is then the fallacy of the dogged
window of marine usage. And to reference the art without qualification
becomes abstract fallacy in example.
So true fallacy is hard to spot without apriori. A force art as the
apriori is required to question the dogged edge limitation.
So my point is to beware of the meaning of ignorence in science,
because abject unseen and untought-of implication becomes the power of
fallacy.
A science of the quanta is rife with fallacy because it is incomplete.
And to discover an effect theoretically is to also discover by apparent
accident.
SO here is either the accident defined or a test of theory, a more
complete quantum theory.
Do this interest anybody btw? I mean does a true unique easily
demonstrated art offer a hint of curious causation.
A dogged window as analogy to cause the interaction becomes a kind of
altered common causality. A quanta as the force may be effected, by the
adjacent matter, causing a rotation torque.
And to call all dogged things torqued makes the appearence of matter.
A seal to force makes a slight mass deviation.
And so to alter weigh by torque release and placement is a real
Invention. And the slight balance force weigh change is then a kind of
balance.
A force with mass is caused to exist or disappear within the stressed
material.
And so the stress scale becomes the invention.
A five pound force denotes how many kilograms of weight?
And this is the equivlance of Newton. A stress of five pounds a dog
force is not the same as the equivlent five pound force. One is real
scale force.
And so the fallacy of the stress is displayed. A size of seal appears
independent of the scale weight change until the meaning of the stress
torque is inferred.
And the mass of seal compressed then causes the absolute torque scale
deviation. An efficiency of dimensional force application then allows
a lever to move the earth.
A mass caused efficiently is then related to the rate of mass formation
and the constant is discovered. A common misconception in quantum
theory appears a power rate.
Applied power then causes the difference rate of seal weight change.
And high power then either causes a higher scale deflection or it is
independent?
Douglas Eagleson
Gaithersburg, MD USA
note: I can answer the question posed, but the proof of this last
relation is profound in implication. Newton's equivalence is either
real or contrived.
And his equivalence is false.
trivial proof exist so the serious theorist needs to support the
movement for its overturning.
A falsified theory is stated and the relatively easy analysis is
evident. Why must Newton's theroy be maintained?
,
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
