| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Sam Wormley" |
| Date: |
03 Aug 2005 09:57:48 PM |
| Object: |
Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings |
Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings (Aug 3)
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/18/8/8
An increasing number of natural phenomena do not fit into the relatively
simple description of diffusion developed by Einstein a century ago
.
|
|
| User: "mountain man" |
|
| Title: Re: Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings |
04 Aug 2005 03:54:23 AM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message
news:MufIe.214765$x96.95201@attbi_s72...
Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings (Aug 3)
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/18/8/8
An increasing number of natural phenomena do not fit into the
relatively
simple description of diffusion developed by Einstein a century ago
An increasing number of natural phenomena are being
analysed by way of fractals, Brownian motion - for which
AE got his Nobel - being one of these.
--
Pete Brown
Falls Creek
OZ
www.mountainman.com.au
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andy Resnick" |
|
| Title: Re: Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings |
04 Aug 2005 07:41:34 AM |
|
|
Sam Wormley wrote:
Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings (Aug 3)
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/18/8/8
An increasing number of natural phenomena do not fit into the relatively
simple description of diffusion developed by Einstein a century ago
Um... maybe it's just me, but I don't see anything here that discusses
*anomolous* diffusion- it's all about random walkers and straight-up
diffusive processes.
--
Andrew Resnick, Ph.D.
Department of Physiology and Biophysics
Case Western Reserve University
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edward Green" |
|
| Title: Re: Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings |
09 Aug 2005 11:54:37 PM |
|
|
Andy Resnick wrote:
Sam Wormley wrote:
Anomalous diffusion spreads its wings (Aug 3)
http://physicsweb.org/article/world/18/8/8
An increasing number of natural phenomena do not fit into the relatively
simple description of diffusion developed by Einstein a century ago
Um... maybe it's just me, but I don't see anything here that discusses
*anomolous* diffusion- it's all about random walkers and straight-up
diffusive processes.
I agree that's one lousy abstract, based on the title.
I did find:
http://chaos.ph.utexas.edu/research/annulus/rwalk.html
I was ready to scoff, but the basic idea is only retrospectively
obvious: to consider processes which look like random walks, but
violate some classical assumption about the statistics of the steps.
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|