On Thu, 13 Jan 2005, Brad Guth wrote:

If per given black hole there were to be such a core or nucleus of
anti-matter that's rather nicely surrounded by way of those trillions
upon trillions of photons per atom (perhaps 1e100 photons/atom), then it
stands to my subjective reasoning that a blackhole in of itself is not
necessarily the all-consuming density worth of normal matter, nor that
of any subsequent space time continuum sink-hole of mass that's been
continually touted.

Where is this anti-matter coming from? What's the process that is
producing it? Also, how has it managed to stay there? We've seen
accretion disks going into black holes. If it was anti-matter in there,
it wouldn't be there for very long.

In fact, if this notion of an anti-matter core is what it is, whereas we
should be able to safely utilize such as a viable point-source and/or
that of a super-nullification zone that could be offering us an extreme
performance gateway to wherever, or perhaps otherwise as for that of a
handy pitstop of snatching a little anti-matter as energy along the way.

I've had this topic badly ongoing within other forums, such as the BBC
space forum that sucks, and numerous other supposed all-knowing physics
forums that suck, whereas there has usually been more of their
sanctimonious style of mainstream NASA/Apollo butt sucking flak than
viable contributions upon this or any other topic of worth, though
generally I've identified upon many two-faced individuals contributing
quite nicely wherever there's absolutely no chance of involving
intellectual morals or remorse.

In spite of such flak, I have a few too many questions:

1) Wouldn't there honestly have to be a containment shell, sphere or
perhaps that of an atmosphere of something reacting as rather
anti-photonic (non-illuminating) surrounding anti-matter?

Anti-photonic? Anything that has electric charge can couple to photons.

2) Would not the interaction between the slight energy and otherwise
extremely slight mass associated with the individual photon become
altered in some inverse way as to be safely coexisting around
anti-matter?

Individual photons don't have mass. Systems of photons may have mass
however, e.g. a pion decays to two photons and these two photons as a system
have the same mass as the pion.

3) If a photon was no longer AM/FM modulated, thus nearly resting as
stripped of all associated energy and mass, wouldn't a sufficient
collective of such photons become dark-matter or perhaps dark-energy?

Is the CMBR a candidate for dark matter or dark energy? No. Dark matter
has a particular distribution. SNIP

5) Is there actually any relevant limitation as to the population of
such photons/m3?