APS - What's New by Bob Park - Friday, October 31, 2003



 Science > Physics > APS - What's New by Bob Park - Friday, October 31, 2003

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Sam Wormley"
Date: 31 Oct 2003 02:38:25 PM
Object: APS - What's New by Bob Park - Friday, October 31, 2003
APS - What's New by Bob Park - Friday, October 31, 2003
1. MICROGRAVITY: LEAKED "WHITE PAPER" FINDS "VOODOO SCIENCE."
In an internal critique of human life sciences research on the International
Space Station, Lawrence Kuznetz, a professor at the Baylor College of
Medicine and a senior research manager for a NASA academic consortium,
describes human health experiments as "pitiful" and "voodoo science not
worth the cost." He finds that "few if any of the experiments have valid
controls...The line between real and wishful science is continually being
blurred." He saw no progress in finding "countermeasures" against health
problems. The paper was posted on the web just days before Congressional
hearings began on the ISS. With Shuttle transport grounded, malfunctioning
air, water and radiation monitors on the ISS can't be replaced. Those in
Congress who pushed for the ISS talk in terms of "protecting our
investment," while others just want to know how we're going to bring it
down.
2. MICRO-IMPORTANCE: PROTEIN-CRYSTAL-GROWTH IN MICROGRAVITY.
In a review conducted at NASA's request, the National Research Council
concluded on Mar 1, 2000 that,"The enormous investment in protein crystal
growth on the shuttle and Mir has not led to a single unique result." On
Wednesday, in a Senate Commerce and Science Committee hearing, an
obscure physicist testified that a crystal, allegedly grown in space, was found
to have been grown in Australia (WN 21 Feb 03). In spite of the NRC finding
and this fraud, a former astronaut continued to fly protein crystal growth
experiments on the shuttle, including the final Columbia mission, and is listed
on research planned for the ISS. "And they still haven't grown one crystal
that hasn't been grown on Earth?" Sen. Bill Nelson (D-FL) asked. "Not one,"
the physicist replied.
http://commerce.senate.gov/hearings/witnesslist.cfm?id=979
3. EMISSIONS: SENATE REJECTS CAP ON GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS.
It was the first test of Congressional sentiment on mandatory caps on
industry emissions. Co-sponsored by John McCain (R-AZ) and Joseph
Lieberman (D-CT), it was trounced 55-43, but proponents were encouraged
that it did that well; they note it took 10 years to get acid rain legislation.
McCain vowed "we will be back."
4. ARSENIC: YOU GET TO DIE WITH A LITTLE HELP FROM YOUR FRIENDS.
Arsenic contamination of groundwater is a major health problem in
developing countries. Not to worry. The Science and Development Network
http://www.scidev.net is ready to help. The stated aim of London-based
SciDevNet is to help the developing world make informed decisions on
science-related issues. Isn't it nice to have SciDevNet? The cure for arsenic
poisoning? Homeopathic arsenic trioxide -- rat poison. Won't that put more
arsenic in your system? Not at all. The recommended dilution far exceeds the
dilution limit -- you won't get a single molecule, and you can drink your
arsenic-laden water without a care.
Bob Park can be reached via email at

THE UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND
Opinions are the author's and are not necessarily shared by the University,
but they should be.
.

User: "Andrew Resnick"

Title: Re: APS - What's New by Bob Park - Friday, October 31, 2003 03 Nov 2003 07:42:56 AM
In <3FA2C83C.523DE737@mchsi.com> Sam Wormley wrote:

APS - What's New by Bob Park - Friday, October 31, 2003

1. MICROGRAVITY: LEAKED "WHITE PAPER" FINDS "VOODOO SCIENCE."
In an internal critique of human life sciences research on the
International Space Station, Lawrence Kuznetz, a professor at the
Baylor College of Medicine and a senior research manager for a NASA
academic consortium, describes human health experiments as "pitiful"
and "voodoo science not worth the cost." He finds that "few if any
of the experiments have valid controls...The line between real and
wishful science is continually being blurred." He saw no progress in
finding "countermeasures" against health problems. The paper was
posted on the web just days before Congressional hearings began on
the ISS. With Shuttle transport grounded, malfunctioning air, water
and radiation monitors on the ISS can't be replaced. Those in
Congress who pushed for the ISS talk in terms of "protecting our
investment," while others just want to know how we're going to bring
it down.

2. MICRO-IMPORTANCE: PROTEIN-CRYSTAL-GROWTH IN MICROGRAVITY.
In a review conducted at NASA's request, the National Research
Council concluded on Mar 1, 2000 that,"The enormous investment in
protein crystal growth on the shuttle and Mir has not led to a
single unique result." On Wednesday, in a Senate Commerce and
Science Committee hearing, an obscure physicist testified that a
crystal, allegedly grown in space, was found to have been grown in
Australia (WN 21 Feb 03). In spite of the NRC finding and this fraud,
a former astronaut continued to fly protein crystal growth
experiments on the shuttle, including the final Columbia mission, and
is listed on research planned for the ISS. "And they still haven't
grown one crystal that hasn't been grown on Earth?" Sen. Bill Nelson (
D-FL) asked. "Not one," the physicist replied. http://commerce.
senate.gov/hearings/witnesslist.cfm?id=979

In the interest of presenting the other point of view...
http://www.spaceref.com/news/viewsr.html?pid=10823
http://www.nasawatch.com/

[Current News][Recent News]
------------------------------------------------------------------------
*
29 October 2003: Bob Park is at it again.
Editor's note: Bob Park from
the APS has never met a human spaceflight program he likes. He
demonstrated this bias once again in a Senate hearing today. In order to
support that claim he has a propensity for citing a "report" from the
ASCB - American Society for Cell Biology - a citation he made once again
today. In reality, this "report" was a press release written by people
with no expertise whatsoever in space research. What follows are two
items I wrote when this report first came out. Of course, NASA is not
faultless in all of this, and in my opinion has yet to mount a proactive
response to issues that Dr. Park raises again - and again - and again.
*
29 October 2003: Analysis of 1998 ASCB Report on NASA Life Science
Research, NASA Watch
Editor's note: This was first published on NASA
Watch in 1998.
* 29 October 2003: Science x Hype = Bad policy + No
Benefit: NASA Life Science Research, NASA Watch
Editor's note: This
was first published on NASA Watch in 1999. "When Congress fails to
obtain credible scientific and technical expertise when making decisions,
the taxpayers and the country's research base suffer. When scientists
themselves produce superficial pronouncements such as the ASCB "report"
and deliver it to Congress, they undermine the credibility of all
scientific expertise - everywhere. When NASA takes clear evidence of the
value of its programs and hypes it out of proportion to serve its own PR
needs, it becomes harder and harder for its supporters to muster the
support to keep that research funded.""
--
Andrew Resnick, Ph. D.
National Center for Microgravity Research
NASA Glenn Research Center
.

User: "Uncle Al"

Title: Re: APS - What's New by Bob Park - Friday, October 31, 2003 31 Oct 2003 06:00:34 PM
Sam Wormley wrote:


APS - What's New by Bob Park - Friday, October 31, 2003

1. MICROGRAVITY: LEAKED "WHITE PAPER" FINDS "VOODOO SCIENCE."
In an internal critique of human life sciences research on the International
Space Station, Lawrence Kuznetz, a professor at the Baylor College of
Medicine and a senior research manager for a NASA academic consortium,
describes human health experiments as "pitiful" and "voodoo science not
worth the cost." He finds that "few if any of the experiments have valid
controls...The line between real and wishful science is continually being
blurred." He saw no progress in finding "countermeasures" against health
problems. The paper was posted on the web just days before Congressional
hearings began on the ISS. With Shuttle transport grounded, malfunctioning
air, water and radiation monitors on the ISS can't be replaced. Those in
Congress who pushed for the ISS talk in terms of "protecting our
investment," while others just want to know how we're going to bring it
down.

With more surface area than three clipper ships under full sail and
scraping the top of the atmosphere because the lamentable Space
Scuttle could go no higher, International Space Station Freedom FUBAR
Space Hole One Alpha is assuredly competent at coming down all by
itself. Heating of the upper atmosphere by solar flares billows it
outward, speeding the process. The big money will be in when and
where, not how.
Uncle Al, proposes shipping and installing huge solid fuel thrusters
to boost mothballed ISS FUBAR into much higher orbit "for future
generations." NASA accountants can then list it as an asset and
appreciate the value over time rather than writing it off as a big
deep red hole in the ledger. OTOH, NASA has been known to have little
challenges with thrusters, like Space Scuttle SSBs (Challenger, boom),
cheap plumbing on a $billion Mars mission (boom), or putting the hot
parts inside the spacecraft (recent $250 million comet probe, boom).

The June 1996 "Scientific American" contains an article about the
International Space Station (what was Space Station Freedom).
It will be a FUBAR of governmental proportions and expense. And it WILL
be coming down. Oh yes, have no doubt about that, at meteoric
velocities.
Uncle Al, rec.org.mensa, 27 May 1996.

[snip]
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER