Article: Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival



 Science > Physics > Article: Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Robert Karl Stonjek"
Date: 25 Apr 2006 07:07:33 PM
Object: Article: Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C66918.AFA75AF0
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
By Doug Payne
Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival
Experts welcome the new entry into academic publishing, but question =
some of its potential benefits
[Published 25th April 2006 06:05 PM GMT]
Microsoft has entered the academic search field, launching this month a =
beta version of a tool called Windows Live Academic Search, which will =
index peer-reviewed subscription content from different publishers. =
Experts generally welcomed the new product, which rivals Google Scholar, =
but suggested it could pose problems for librarians and commercial =
vendors.=20
"The new tool "is a bona fide competitor to Google scholar," Dean =
Giustini, a Biomedical Branch Librarian at the University of British =
Columbia who blogs about Google Scholar, told The Scientist in an Email. =
Free to use, the Microsoft product is targeted to scientists and =
academic researchers wanting to find scholarly literature across broad =
areas of research. It's currently available only in English, and only in =
certain countries, including the US, UK, and Germany. Thirumalai =
Anandanpillai, of MSN's Search Product Planning group, said that =
additional markets will be added this year, and content will be added =
throughout the beta period.=20
The searches will cover content from a range of publishers, including =
the Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Blackwell =
Publishing, Elsevier, Nature Publishing Group, the British Library, and =
John Wiley & Sons Inc. "Our goal is to add content from more publishers =
on an ongoing basis," said Anandanpillai. At least initially, Microsoft, =
which partnered with the industry association CrossRef, is not using =
citation count as a factor in determining relevance. "We utilize =
Microsoft's Search algorithms to do the relevance ranking [although] we =
have not ruled out using citation-based ranking in the future," =
Anandanpillai told The Scientist.=20
Open access publisher BioMed Central welcomed the new tool, as it did =
Google Scholar, which also indexes open access material. "The more the =
merrier," said Mathew Cockerill at BMC, a sister company of The =
Scientist. "One of the very positive things about the Internet is the =
extent to which it stimulates competition."=20
Anandanpillai added that the Windows program offers better sorting =
options than Google Scholar, allowing users to sort the search results =
by author, date of publication, conference in which the paper was =
presented, and the journal in which it was published. Academic Search =
also offers a feature that allows users to automatically derive =
citations to a paper that appears on the search results page.
=20
Full Text at TheScientist
http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23346/
=20
Google Scholar
http://scholar.google.com/
=20
Windows Live Academic Search=20
http://academic.live.com/
=20
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS=20
Visit your group "evolutionary-psychology" on the web.
=20
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:

=20
Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of Service.=20
-------------------------------------------------------------------------=
-------
------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C66918.AFA75AF0
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.3790.0" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>By Doug Payne</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival<BR>Experts welcome the new =
entry=20
into academic publishing, but question some of its potential =
benefits</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>[Published 25th April 2006 06:05 PM GMT]</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Microsoft has entered the academic search field, launching this =
month a=20
beta version of a tool called Windows Live Academic Search, which will =
index=20
peer-reviewed subscription content from different publishers. Experts =
generally=20
welcomed the new product, which rivals Google Scholar, but suggested it =
could=20
pose problems for librarians and commercial vendors. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>"The new tool "is a bona fide competitor to Google scholar," Dean =
Giustini,=20
a Biomedical Branch Librarian at the University of British Columbia who =
blogs=20
about Google Scholar, told The Scientist in an Email. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Free to use, the Microsoft product is targeted to scientists and =
academic=20
researchers wanting to find scholarly literature across broad areas of =
research.=20
It's currently available only in English, and only in certain countries, =
including the US, UK, and Germany. Thirumalai Anandanpillai, of MSN's =
Search=20
Product Planning group, said that additional markets will be added this =
year,=20
and content will be added throughout the beta period. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>The searches will cover content from a range of publishers, =
including the=20
Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers (IEEE), Blackwell =
Publishing,=20
Elsevier, Nature Publishing Group, the British Library, and John Wiley =
&amp;=20
Sons Inc. "Our goal is to add content from more publishers on an ongoing =
basis,"=20
said Anandanpillai. At least initially, Microsoft, which partnered with =
the=20
industry association CrossRef, is not using citation count as a factor =
in=20
determining relevance. "We utilize Microsoft's Search algorithms to do =
the=20
relevance ranking [although] we have not ruled out using citation-based =
ranking=20
in the future," Anandanpillai told The Scientist. </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Open access publisher BioMed Central welcomed the new tool, as it =
did=20
Google Scholar, which also indexes open access material. "The more the =
merrier,"=20
said Mathew Cockerill at BMC, a sister company of The Scientist. "One of =
the=20
very positive things about the Internet is the extent to which it =
stimulates=20
competition." </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>Anandanpillai added that the Windows program offers better sorting =
options=20
than Google Scholar, allowing users to sort the search results by =
author, date=20
of publication, conference in which the paper was presented, and the =
journal in=20
which it was published. Academic Search also offers a feature that =
allows users=20
to automatically derive citations to a paper that appears on the search =
results=20
page.<BR>&nbsp;<BR>Full Text at TheScientist<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.the-scientist.com/news/display/23346/">http://www.the-=
scientist.com/news/display/23346/</A><BR>&nbsp;<BR>Google=20
Scholar<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://scholar.google.com/">http://scholar.google.com/</A><BR>&nb=
sp;<BR>Windows=20
Live Academic Search <BR><A=20
href=3D"http://academic.live.com/">http://academic.live.com/</A><BR>&nbsp=
;<BR>Posted=20
by<BR>Robert Karl Stonjek</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------<BR>YAHOO!=20
GROUPS LINKS </DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;Visit your group "evolutionary-psychology" on the =
web.<BR>&nbsp;=20
<BR>&nbsp;To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:<BR>&nbsp;<A=20
href=3D"mailto:
">evolu=
tionary-psychology-unsubscribe@yahoogroups.com</A><BR>&nbsp;=20
<BR>&nbsp;Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to the Yahoo! Terms of =
Service.=20
</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><BR>----------------------------------------------------------------=
----------------</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_0037_01C66918.AFA75AF0--
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Article: Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival 25 Apr 2006 07:33:19 PM
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:
[snip]
Am I the only one amused by the degree of which microsoft is showing
itself to be a follower rather than a leader?
Innovation my *****.
.
User: "Robert Karl Stonjek"

Title: Re: Article: Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival 26 Apr 2006 06:02:02 PM
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1146011599.821747.17450@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:

[snip]

Am I the only one amused by the degree of which microsoft is showing
itself to be a follower rather than a leader?

Innovation my *****.

Let's not moan too much - remember, it's three.
Sorry, I meant 'free' (was I thinking of Yahoo!s belated effort in advance?)
Robert
.

User: "Bill Hobba"

Title: Re: Article: Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival 25 Apr 2006 09:48:56 PM
"Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1146011599.821747.17450@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...


Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:

[snip]

Am I the only one amused by the degree of which microsoft is showing
itself to be a follower rather than a leader?

Errrrrrrr - No.


Innovation my *****.

When you are the biggest a viable strategy is to wait until your competition
proves something then flog it - hell look what Microsoft did to Netscape.
Problem is they can still come a cropper - remember Ford - any color you
like as long as it is black - misread the market, leave it too late, and you
are down the gurgler. It may slowly be happening with Open Source
software - but then again there is no money in that for Microsoft to take it
up. In time it in fact may kill them.
Thanks
Bill
.

User: "Gregory L. Hansen"

Title: Re: Article: Microsoft launches Google Scholar rival 25 Apr 2006 10:09:17 PM
In article <1146011599.821747.17450@i40g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
Eric Gisse <jowr.pi@gmail.com> wrote:


Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:

[snip]

Am I the only one amused by the degree of which microsoft is showing
itself to be a follower rather than a leader?

Innovation my *****.

Let me haul up a quote from my list.
"No other major companies were working on [computer-controlled homes], and
that was exactly the problem. Microsoft does best when it has a
successful competitor it can copy and then crush." -- Marlin Eller,
"Barbarians Led by Bill Gates", 1998
--
"Then they placed the ark of the Lord on the cart; along with the box
containing the golden mice and the images of the hemorrhoids."
-- 1 Samuel 6:11
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER