Article: New Type Of Massive Stellar Death [HTML]



 Science > Physics > Article: New Type Of Massive Stellar Death [HTML]

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Robert Karl Stonjek"
Date: 24 Dec 2006 05:07:35 AM
Object: Article: New Type Of Massive Stellar Death [HTML]
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C727A6.742C4060
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
New Type Of Massive Stellar Death
Science Daily - Stars die when they have exhausted the fuel in their =
centres and until now it has been believed, that stars could only die in =
two ways -- one way for the smaller and medium size stars and one way =
for the very massive stars. Our sun is a middle size star. When stars =
that are smaller than our sun or up to 8 times more massive than the sun =
die, they expel the outer layers and leave behind a white dwarf in the =
centre.
Stars with a mass more than 8 times that of our sun die violently in =
energetic supernova explosions expelling several solar masses of =
chemically enriched material into the interstellar medium leaving behind =
either neutron stars or black holes in the centre. In this way the =
interstellar medium becomes more and more enriched in elements such as =
Oxygen and Carbon, that are essential for life.=20
The new discovery
In May and June of this year, two long-duration Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) =
were detected by the NASA satellite Swift. GRBs are power-full bursts of =
gamma-rays coming from far away. There has been a tremendous progress in =
the study of this during the last 10 years, and it has been found that =
the long-duration GRBs (these have duration longer than 2 seconds) are =
caused by the deaths of massive stars.=20
A team of astrophysics from Dark Cosmology Centre (DARK) at the Niels =
Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen monitored the two bursts =
intensively during June, July, August and September 2006. The remarkable =
conclusion from this monitoring was that there were no supernovae =
associated with these two Gamma-ray bursts.=20
Conclusion of this research
There are two possible conclusions: 1) that these GRBs were not caused =
by massive stars, or 2) that they were caused by massive stars that did =
not cause associated supernova explosions. Focusing on the May burst, =
where the team have the strongest evidence, the team has obtained deep =
images in very good observing conditions and spectroscopy as well. This =
allowed the team to localise exactly where in the host galaxy the burst =
occurred.=20
The host galaxy turns out to be a small spiral galaxy, and the burst =
occurred in a compact star-forming region in one of the spiral arms of =
the galaxy. This is strong evidence that the star(s) that made the GRB =
were massive, as massive stars due to their short lifetimes (few million =
years) are only found in star-forming regions.=20
Some massive stars simply collapse
The implications of this discovery are therefore this: Where as we up =
till now thought that massive stars died in supernova explosions =
expelling large materials of enriched material into the interstellar =
medium, it seems that this is not always the case.=20
The theoretical idea is that some massive stars simply collapse under =
the formation of a black hole (either directly as water running out of =
the sink, or in an indirect way where some material gets expelled, but =
then "falls" back and forms a black hole). Such stars would return very =
little chemically enriched material to the interstellar medium. It is =
difficult to estimate what fraction of massive stars that die in this =
way, but it is probably small.=20
Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by =
University of Copenhagen.
Source: University of Copenhagen
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061221075003.htm
--=20
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C727A6.742C4060
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.3790.1218" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV>
<H1 class=3Dstory><FONT size=3D5>New Type Of Massive Stellar =
Death</FONT></H1><!-- BODY BEGIN -->
<P class=3Dfirst><EM><A style=3D"COLOR: #666; TEXT-DECORATION: none"=20
href=3D"http://www.sciencedaily.com/">Science Daily</A> =97</EM> Stars =
die when they=20
have exhausted the fuel in their centres and until now it has been =
believed,=20
that stars could only die in two ways -- one way for the smaller and =
medium size=20
stars and one way for the very massive stars. Our sun is a middle size =
star.=20
When stars that are smaller than our sun or up to 8 times more massive =
than the=20
sun die, they expel the outer layers and leave behind a white dwarf in =
the=20
centre.</P>
<P>Stars with a mass more than 8 times that of our sun die violently in=20
energetic supernova explosions expelling several solar masses of =
chemically=20
enriched material into the interstellar medium leaving behind either =
neutron=20
stars or black holes in the centre. In this way the interstellar medium =
becomes=20
more and more enriched in elements such as Oxygen and Carbon, that are =
essential=20
for life. </P>
<P><STRONG><FONT size=3D4>The new discovery</FONT></STRONG></P>
<P>In May and June of this year, two long-duration Gamma-ray bursts =
(GRBs) were=20
detected by the NASA satellite Swift. GRBs are power-full bursts of =
gamma-rays=20
coming from far away. There has been a tremendous progress in the study =
of this=20
during the last 10 years, and it has been found that the long-duration =
GRBs=20
(these have duration longer than 2 seconds) are caused by the deaths of =
massive=20
stars. </P>
<P>A team of astrophysics from Dark Cosmology Centre (DARK) at the Niels =
Bohr=20
Institute, University of Copenhagen monitored the two bursts intensively =
during=20
June, July, August and September 2006. The remarkable conclusion from =
this=20
monitoring was that there were no supernovae associated with these two =
Gamma-ray=20
bursts. </P>
<P><STRONG><FONT size=3D4>Conclusion of this =
research</FONT></STRONG></P>
<P>There are two possible conclusions: 1) that these GRBs were not =
caused by=20
massive stars, or 2) that they were caused by massive stars that did not =
cause=20
associated supernova explosions. Focusing on the May burst, where the =
team have=20
the strongest evidence, the team has obtained deep images in very good =
observing=20
conditions and spectroscopy as well. This allowed the team to localise =
exactly=20
where in the host galaxy the burst occurred. </P>
<P>The host galaxy turns out to be a small spiral galaxy, and the burst =
occurred=20
in a compact star-forming region in one of the spiral arms of the =
galaxy. This=20
is strong evidence that the star(s) that made the GRB were massive, as =
massive=20
stars due to their short lifetimes (few million years) are only found in =
star-forming regions. </P>
<P><STRONG><FONT size=3D4>Some massive stars simply =
collapse</FONT></STRONG></P>
<P>The implications of this discovery are therefore this: Where as we up =
till=20
now thought that massive stars died in supernova explosions expelling =
large=20
materials of enriched material into the interstellar medium, it seems =
that this=20
is not always the case. </P>
<P>The theoretical idea is that some massive stars simply collapse under =
the=20
formation of a black hole (either directly as water running out of the =
sink, or=20
in an indirect way where some material gets expelled, but then "falls" =
back and=20
forms a black hole). Such stars would return very little chemically =
enriched=20
material to the interstellar medium. It is difficult to estimate what =
fraction=20
of massive stars that die in this way, but it is probably small. </P>
<P><EM>Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by=20
University of Copenhagen.</EM></P><!-- BODY END -->
<DIV id=3Dsecond_ad_unit>Source: University of Copenhagen<BR><A=20
href=3D"http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061221075003.htm">ht=
tp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061221075003.htm</A></DIV>
<DIV>&nbsp;</DIV>
<DIV><BR>-- <BR>Posted by<BR>Robert Karl Stonjek</DIV><!-- Originally =
posted on ScienceDaily 2006-12-24 --></DIV></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_000D_01C727A6.742C4060--
.

User: "Sam Wormley"

Title: Re: Article: New Type Of Massive Stellar Death [HTML] 24 Dec 2006 08:11:27 AM
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:


New Type Of Massive Stellar Death

/Science Daily <http://www.sciencedaily.com/> ?/ Stars die when they
have exhausted the fuel in their centres and until now it has been
believed, that stars could only die in two ways -- one way for the
smaller and medium size stars and one way for the very massive stars.
Our sun is a middle size star. When stars that are smaller than our sun
or up to 8 times more massive than the sun die, they expel the outer
layers and leave behind a white dwarf in the centre.

Stars with a mass more than 8 times that of our sun die violently in
energetic supernova explosions expelling several solar masses of
chemically enriched material into the interstellar medium leaving behind
either neutron stars or black holes in the centre. In this way the
interstellar medium becomes more and more enriched in elements such as
Oxygen and Carbon, that are essential for life.

*The new discovery*

In May and June of this year, two long-duration Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs)
were detected by the NASA satellite Swift. GRBs are power-full bursts of
gamma-rays coming from far away. There has been a tremendous progress in
the study of this during the last 10 years, and it has been found that
the long-duration GRBs (these have duration longer than 2 seconds) are
caused by the deaths of massive stars.

A team of astrophysics from Dark Cosmology Centre (DARK) at the Niels
Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen monitored the two bursts
intensively during June, July, August and September 2006. The remarkable
conclusion from this monitoring was that there were no supernovae
associated with these two Gamma-ray bursts.

*Conclusion of this research*

There are two possible conclusions: 1) that these GRBs were not caused
by massive stars, or 2) that they were caused by massive stars that did
not cause associated supernova explosions. Focusing on the May burst,
where the team have the strongest evidence, the team has obtained deep
images in very good observing conditions and spectroscopy as well. This
allowed the team to localise exactly where in the host galaxy the burst
occurred.

The host galaxy turns out to be a small spiral galaxy, and the burst
occurred in a compact star-forming region in one of the spiral arms of
the galaxy. This is strong evidence that the star(s) that made the GRB
were massive, as massive stars due to their short lifetimes (few million
years) are only found in star-forming regions.

*Some massive stars simply collapse*

The implications of this discovery are therefore this: Where as we up
till now thought that massive stars died in supernova explosions
expelling large materials of enriched material into the interstellar
medium, it seems that this is not always the case.

The theoretical idea is that some massive stars simply collapse under
the formation of a black hole (either directly as water running out of
the sink, or in an indirect way where some material gets expelled, but
then "falls" back and forms a black hole). Such stars would return very
little chemically enriched material to the interstellar medium. It is
difficult to estimate what fraction of massive stars that die in this
way, but it is probably small.

/Note: This story has been adapted from a news release issued by
University of Copenhagen./

Source: University of Copenhagen
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2006/12/061221075003.htm


--
Posted by
Robert Karl Stonjek

Star are born and stars die... just like us. The big massive stars have
but short lives, a few millions of years. Stars like our sun last for a
good 10 billions of years, and the little red stars like Barnard's Star
might last for 100 billion years. How long stars live, is determined by
their mass (which must be at least 80 Jupiter masses to sustain
thermonuclear fusion of hydrogen).
There are four (4) fates for the end of stars depending on their masses
and the masses of their cores:
Red/Brown Dwarfs - less than 0.6 Ms <== Main Sequence 0.076-0.8 Ms
Stars less than about 0.6 solar masses, when nuclear fuel is used up,
gravitational collapse shrinks the star, but no more than the gas
temperature-pressure-volume laws of classical physics allow. We have
not found any white dwarf less massive than 0.6 solar masses. Part of
the answer is that the universe may not be old enough for lower mass
stars to have evolved off the main sequence.
White Dwarfs - 0.6 and 1.44 Ms <== Main Sequence 0.8-8 Ms
Stars with core masses between 0.6 and 1.44 solar masses are
destined to become white dwarfs. White dwarfs are degenerate matter.
Further collapse is halted by electron degeneracy pressure. See pages
456-459 in your textbook. The vast majority of stars are in this mass
range and are destined to become white dwarfs
Neutron Stars - 1.44 and 2.9 Ms <== Main Sequence 8-30 Ms
Core masses between 1.44 and 2.9 solar masses overcome electron
degeneracy pressure and collapse to form neutron stars, a star that is
essentially one gigantic nucleus. Further collapse is halted by neutron
degeneracy pressure.
Black Holes - 3 or more Ms <== Main Sequence > 30 Ms
But for cores with mass of 3 or more solar masses, neutron
degeneracy pressure does not stop the collapse and the star becomes a
black hole with zero physical size, but with all the mass. Gravity
really wins!
In each case, gravity eventually wins, but, to what extent is
determined by the mass and the relative pressures of the quantum
mechanical forces, electron and neutron degeneracy pressure. Your book
has an excellent diagram on page 459 relating the original star mass to
that of the final core mass (core mass being the mass of whats left of
the star at the end of its evolutionary processes).
.

User: "Eric Gisse"

Title: Re: Article: New Type Of Massive Stellar Death [HTML] 24 Dec 2006 08:30:55 AM
Robert Karl Stonjek wrote:

New Type Of Massive Stellar Death
Science Daily - Stars die when they have exhausted the fuel in their centres and until now it has been believed, that stars could only die in two ways -- one way for the smaller and medium size stars and one way for the very massive stars. Our sun is a middle size star. When stars that are smaller than our sun or up to 8 times more massive than the sun die, they expel the outer layers and leave behind a white dwarf in the centre.

Stars with a mass more than 8 times that of our sun die violently in energetic supernova explosions expelling several solar masses of chemically enriched material into the interstellar medium leaving behind either neutron stars or black holes in the centre. In this way the interstellar medium becomes more and more enriched in elements such as Oxygen and Carbon, that are essential for life.

The new discovery

In May and June of this year, two long-duration Gamma-ray bursts (GRBs) were detected by the NASA satellite Swift. GRBs are power-full bursts of gamma-rays coming from far away. There has been a tremendous progress in the study of this during the last 10 years, and it has been found that the long-duration GRBs (these have duration longer than 2 seconds) are caused by the deaths of massive stars.

A team of astrophysics from Dark Cosmology Centre (DARK) at the Niels Bohr Institute, University of Copenhagen monitored the two bursts intensively during June, July, August and September 2006. The remarkable conclusion from this monitoring was that there were no supernovae associated with these two Gamma-ray bursts.

Conclusion of this research

There are two possible conclusions: 1) that these GRBs were not caused by massive stars, or 2) that they were caused by massive stars that did not cause associated supernova explosions. Focusing on the May burst, where the team have the strongest evidence, the team has obtained deep images in very good observing conditions and spectroscopy as well. This allowed the team to localise exactly where in the host galaxy the burst occurred.

The host galaxy turns out to be a small spiral galaxy, and the burst occurred in a compact star-forming region in one of the spiral arms of the galaxy. This is strong evidence that the star(s) that made the GRB were massive, as massive stars due to their short lifetimes (few million years) are only found in star-forming regions.

This means a huuuuuuuuge star is doing it, or a black hole is doing it.
As far as I know, huge stars can only die in two ways:
a) Burn fast and explode :
We see this all the time - our old friend the Type II supernova.
b) Get so fat that it outright collapses:
I haven't heard of these happening recently in the cosmic sense. It was
my understanding that the only star that could pull a trick like that
was a Wolf-Rayet star, a star that masses several hundred solar masses.


Some massive stars simply collapse

Sounds like a Wolf-Rayet star to me. Or one that is very close.
Fun!
[...]
.
User: "Phineas T Puddleduck"

Title: Re: Article: New Type Of Massive Stellar Death [HTML] 24 Dec 2006 08:38:15 AM
On 2006-12-24 14:30:55 +0000, "Eric Gisse" <jowr.pi@gmail.com> said:

This means a huuuuuuuuge star is doing it, or a black hole is doing it.


As far as I know, huge stars can only die in two ways:

a) Burn fast and explode :

We see this all the time - our old friend the Type II supernova.

b) Get so fat that it outright collapses:

I haven't heard of these happening recently in the cosmic sense. It was
my understanding that the only star that could pull a trick like that
was a Wolf-Rayet star, a star that masses several hundred solar masses.

It would have to be truly massive, as the really big stars can lose via
stellar winds a thousandth of a solar mass per year or more - which
over the average lifetime of these stars (being around a few million
years) means they quickly shrink down...
--
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to
persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Carl Sagan
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER