Science > Physics > ArXiV Paper "Ward-Takahashi Identities, Magnetic Anomalies, and the Anticommutation Properties of the Fermion-Boson Vertex"
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jay R. Yablon" |
| Date: |
31 Oct 2006 09:07:57 PM |
| Object: |
ArXiV Paper "Ward-Takahashi Identities, Magnetic Anomalies, and the Anticommutation Properties of the Fermion-Boson Vertex" |
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
Thomas Alva Edison
Dear Friends:
I have just posted a new paper to ArXiV titled:
Ward-Takahashi Identities, Magnetic Anomalies, and the Anticommutation
Properties of the Fermion-Boson Vertex
It is at the link http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0610377.
As those of you who have followed my posts from time to time know, many
of the "10,000 ways that won't work" which I have found in the past,
have been shared publicly with everyone on this Board and on SPR. That
is the nature of scientific research, and we shortchange ourselves as
well as deny the realities of this research if we are unwilling to find
things that don't work on the way to finding what DOES work.
I say this, because I believe that the research I have posted at the
link above DOES work. I hope that those of you who have looked in the
past at some of the things I've posted that didn't work, will take the
time to look at this paper. This is my first ArXiV post in a year, and
it follows six months of intensive study of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
and about nine weeks of writing and rewriting and careful, deliberative
review. I finally decided to dive into QFT, once I finally convinced
myself that a purely classical, "no dice" approach to quantum field
theory, which I stubbornly held to for a long time, simply does not have
enough juice to work by itself. As I have found here, however, this by
no means precludes placing QFT onto a fully-geometrical / gravitational
footing, and that is the main result here.
While the paper is just shy of 30 pages, I have given great attention to
organizing it in a way that enables the reader to absorb the materials
as quickly as possible.
The goal of this paper, candidly, is to place quantum field theory --
starting with QED -- onto a firm, general relativistic footing, and to
make general relativity inherently renormalizable by applying what we
know about renormalizability in QED. In particular, we build the
Ward-Takahashi identities directly into general relativity by using the
anticommutators of the electron/photon vertex as a momentum space metric
tensor. If the results in this paper stand up, this will draw together
into a single theory, the seemingly-disparate theories of quantum fields
for which the Dirac-Schwinger magnetic moment explanation is a central
phenomenological foundation, and geometrically-based gravitation.
I'll not summarize any more here, since you can easily read the abstract
and the introduction to get an idea of the premises and results of the
paper. Please make sure if noting else, that you try to understand the
basis for Figure 2 and covariant differentiation in momentum space, as
that is perhaps the most important and fundamental new result. The
sections on the magnetic anomaly, though very central, are "defensive,"
in the sense that they are designed to show consistency with the
magnetic anomaly and so prove that the theory is not experimentally
falsified, at least on that basis.
I welcome your comments and suggestions. If people have questions, or
seek elaboration, I'll be happy to provide that to the extent I am able.
Best to all,
Jay.
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email:
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm
.
|
|
| User: "Ken S. Tucker" |
|
| Title: Re: ArXiV Paper "Ward-Takahashi Identities, Magnetic Anomalies, and the Anticommutation Properties of the Fermion-Boson Vertex" |
01 Nov 2006 02:08:34 AM |
|
|
Jay R. Yablon wrote:
"I have not failed. I've just found 10,000 ways that won't work."
Thomas Alva Edison
Dear Friends:
I have just posted a new paper to ArXiV titled:
Ward-Takahashi Identities, Magnetic Anomalies, and the Anticommutation
Properties of the Fermion-Boson Vertex
It is at the link http://arxiv.org/abs/hep-ph/0610377.
As those of you who have followed my posts from time to time know, many
of the "10,000 ways that won't work" which I have found in the past,
have been shared publicly with everyone on this Board and on SPR. That
is the nature of scientific research, and we shortchange ourselves as
well as deny the realities of this research if we are unwilling to find
things that don't work on the way to finding what DOES work.
I say this, because I believe that the research I have posted at the
link above DOES work. I hope that those of you who have looked in the
past at some of the things I've posted that didn't work, will take the
time to look at this paper. This is my first ArXiV post in a year, and
it follows six months of intensive study of Quantum Field Theory (QFT)
and about nine weeks of writing and rewriting and careful, deliberative
review. I finally decided to dive into QFT, once I finally convinced
myself that a purely classical, "no dice" approach to quantum field
theory, which I stubbornly held to for a long time, simply does not have
enough juice to work by itself. As I have found here, however, this by
no means precludes placing QFT onto a fully-geometrical / gravitational
footing, and that is the main result here.
While the paper is just shy of 30 pages, I have given great attention to
organizing it in a way that enables the reader to absorb the materials
as quickly as possible.
The goal of this paper, candidly, is to place quantum field theory --
starting with QED -- onto a firm, general relativistic footing, and to
make general relativity inherently renormalizable by applying what we
know about renormalizability in QED. In particular, we build the
Ward-Takahashi identities directly into general relativity by using the
anticommutators of the electron/photon vertex as a momentum space metric
tensor. If the results in this paper stand up, this will draw together
into a single theory, the seemingly-disparate theories of quantum fields
for which the Dirac-Schwinger magnetic moment explanation is a central
phenomenological foundation, and geometrically-based gravitation.
I'll not summarize any more here, since you can easily read the abstract
and the introduction to get an idea of the premises and results of the
paper. Please make sure if noting else, that you try to understand the
basis for Figure 2 and covariant differentiation in momentum space, as
that is perhaps the most important and fundamental new result. The
sections on the magnetic anomaly, though very central, are "defensive,"
in the sense that they are designed to show consistency with the
magnetic anomaly and so prove that the theory is not experimentally
falsified, at least on that basis.
I welcome your comments and suggestions. If people have questions, or
seek elaboration, I'll be happy to provide that to the extent I am able.
Best to all,
Jay.
_____________________________
Jay R. Yablon
Email:
Web Site: http://home.nycap.rr.com/jry/FermionMass.htm
It looks to me that Weyl's 4D gauge and Einstein's
nonsymmetrical theory is brundled with Dirac's 5D
matrices and Kaluza's 5D geometry to unify QFT
and GR, that's fair enough.
What one fellow uses as an orthogonal geometric
basis by setting the metric determinant "g=1"
another will permit a variation of "g".
As an example, let "epsilon" be the Levi-Cevita tensor
that provides the generalization of "Curl".
From that we can generate vectors,
gamma^1 = epsilon^12345 Dirac_2345.
That Dirac tensor can be reduced to the more
familiar dirac matrices by association using,
dirac^23 = g^45 Dirac_2345
with g^45 being a 5D metric.
The curvature texture being resolute in the
Dirac_2345 consistent with the existance
of material and gravitation such as in the
Reimann Christoffel R_abcd =/=0 where
both are 4th rank tensors.
That approach relies on 5D orthogonality,
that looks to me to be Kaluza's idea in
incorporating QFT into GR.
Weyl and Einstein prefered to use 4D with
a variable "g" and/or a nonsymmetric g_uv.
In that context, the dirac matrices, and
the GR curvature (aka tidal force) are
descriptions of interactions.
Regards
Ken S. Tucker
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|