FrediFizzx wrote:

<<Do you make any new predictions that can be tested?>>


Yes, you have new predictions in "questions and answers" in my group:
http://groups.google.es/group/Aspin-bubbles


You haven't caught my attention enough to bother going to your website.

Post some results and predictions right here on the groups. It's your
nickel.


Dear FrediFizzx

Excuse me, my intention was good. The questions and answers are:

(1).- Are there any (new) effects predicted by your theory, accesible
to experimental verification?

Answer: Yes, for example: "neutral matter repels positive charges. And
positive charges atracts neutral matter".

This could be a hint towards explaining the expansion of
the Universe.

"Also neutral matter atracts negative charge and negative charge repels
neutral matter"

This would explain the negative charges lie always in the
surface of conductors.

Also both effects would clear up some atmospheric phenomena.

2) Care, this go against the third principle of Newton!

Answer: This is a very important observation. This model does not go
against the Principle of action-reaction. In fact, the description of
the mechanical interaction between the ton and its surrounding ether is
based on this principle. All the interactions are between tons and
their surrounding ether and NOT between tons. In other words: the
neutral matter forms its surrounding ether. In such ether, a ton
self-propels, according the third principle of Newton. If the ton is
positon (positive charge), it moves away from the neutral matter. If it
is negaton (negative charge), it gets closer to the neutral matter. The
neutral matter also self-propels in its ether, which is formed by tons
external to her, according to the third principle of Newton. In this
case, the neutral matter gets closer to positons and moves away from
negatons. The final result is that, apparently, the fact following
taking place: "neutral matter repels positive charges and positive
charges atracts neutral matter" and "neutral matter atracts negative
charge and negative charge repels neutral matter".

(This problem cannot appear between two neutral matters or between two
charged particles because the apparent results of the Gravity and
Electrical forces fulfill perfectly the third principle of Newton).

(3) Is the viscosity of the ether compatible with energy conservation?

Answer: Ether does not have the viscosity that we know. There is no
friction. The tons move freely in the ether. The tons conserve their
energy. The potential energy of the membrane is transformed into
kinetic energy and vice versa.

(4).- Are there any effects which seem to refute this theory, so that
further refinement of the model is required?

Answer: Apparently no, although I=B4m convinced that the model would
require some additional refinement.

(5) Does the theory shed light on the nature of "mass"?

Answer: "Active mass is a consequence of interaction between tones".

(6) Does the theory predict the mass difference between electron and
muon?

Answer. No, but the theory is compatible with their masses being
different but otherwise identical properties.

(7) What is the position with respect the uncertainty relation?

Answer: "It is OK, it is a consequence of the vibration of the membrane
of tons. We cannot localize the ton".

(8) There is a clear prediction that we make: "In this theory, there
are no molecules made of antimatter". (Matter molecules of course are
OK).

Yo=EBl Lana-Renault