| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Anonymous" |
| Date: |
23 May 2005 02:11:33 PM |
| Object: |
*ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
IDEALLY, THE VOTE will go to a divisively-contentious
tie-breaker, with our good Vice President ***** Cheney
casting the deciding vote--very much to the liberals'
chagrin! You see, the more that gloatingly-victorious
Republicans oppose and undermine the liberal Democrat
agenda, then the better off our great nation--and the
whole free world--will be for it. Just WATCH and see...
Every God-fearing, law-abiding, tax-paying, patriotic
American citizen should support the so-called nuclear
option, since it deals yet another *devastating* blow
against the God-hating Anti-American liberal Democrat
party, who'll NEVER regain majority power in American
politics again. Liberals are getting evermore visibly
desperate, so they're grasping at straws in vain--ALL
IN VAIN--realizing that they haven't got a snowball's
chance in Hades of stopping our manifest destiny from
overcoming the evils of the world through our unified
faith in God the Creator. The liberals are *hopeless*.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn) is working
in concert with the Republican majority, to establish
the rule requiring only a simple majority vote by the
Senate to confirm ALL decidedly-conservative nominees
to the courts, thereby destroying the radical liberal
agenda for the foreseeable future i.e. to say FOREVER!
The pristine definition of "filibuster" is FREEBOOTER,
which Webster's defines as "an adventurer who engages
in unauthorized warfare against a country with which
his own country is at peace[end quote]. Thus liberals
are merely Anti-American anti-freespeech _terrorists_,
whose *failed* politically-, socially-, economically-
and religiously-inviable agenda is meeting its demise.
This is ECSTATIC news for every Republican in America!
So if ever there was a time for our elated Republican
majority to be totally unified, *NOW* is the time! We
MUST support our great President GW Bush and by every
ways and means available *TRIGGER* the nuclear option.
Let's drive the liberal vermin into global extinction!
Buy RED! Boycott BLUE! And Support The NUCLEAR Option!
Daniel Joseph Min
Download Free Astro-Books by Daniel Joseph Min:
http://...<URLs censored by desperate anti-freespeech liberals>
Search Yahoo, Alta Vista, MSN et all RNC-supporting search engines,
since free webservers after all are popping up like spring daisies.
And remember to *BOYCOTT* liberal DNC-supporting "google" 24/7/365!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iQA/AwUBQpIFSZljD7YrHM/nEQJA3wCg+/2zJ5k+C+6STNT+q9lNJVUQXQoAoNAv
n24XfghrhWYmVbKzl18+A3hh
=JGbL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
.
|
|
| User: "AM" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
24 May 2005 07:18:34 AM |
|
|
"Anonymous" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:ZB2YE5SJ38495.5913541667@anonymous.poster...
Ya know.........................
I am a conservative and it's people like YOU that make
conservatives have to struggle !!
You are NO better than the far to the left liberals !
Bury your hatred, get a life and please don't come back !
BTW...... {PLONK}
Allan
Only A Gentleman Can Insult Me And A True Gentleman Never Will
.
|
|
|
| User: "Martin Edwards" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
24 May 2005 12:26:57 PM |
|
|
AM wrote:
"Anonymous" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:ZB2YE5SJ38495.5913541667@anonymous.poster...
Ya know.........................
I am a conservative and it's people like YOU that make
conservatives have to struggle !!
You are NO better than the far to the left liberals !
Bury your hatred, get a life and please don't come back !
BTW...... {PLONK}
Allan
Only A Gentleman Can Insult Me And A True Gentleman Never Will
I am sure you can understand why we in Europe are worried.
--
You can't fool me: there ain't no Sanity Clause. -Chico Marx
http://www.geocities.com/Athens/Agora/1955
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "William McHale" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
24 May 2005 01:42:33 PM |
|
|
In sci.astro.amateur AM <SCTUSER@comcast.net> wrote:
"Anonymous" <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote in message
news:ZB2YE5SJ38495.5913541667@anonymous.poster...
Ya know.........................
I am a conservative and it's people like YOU that make
conservatives have to struggle !!
You are NO better than the far to the left liberals !
Bury your hatred, get a life and please don't come back !
BTW...... {PLONK}
In general I agree. While I am generally to the left of center, I don't see
the filibuster as a left or right issue but rather one that is crucial to
our democracy. Anyone who believes that the power of government should be
checked (as most Republicans once claimed to believe) should be wary of
any attempt to make it easier for the majority to push its agenda through
Congress. It looks like a compromise has finally been pushed through
so the filibuster is safe. Just look at it this way, with 55 votes the
Republicans only needed to convince 5 democrats to vote for those judges; if
you can't convince 5 out of 44 democrats and 1 independent one should consider
whether or not the candidate in question might indeed be too partisan (the
same would apply if the situation was reversed).
--
Bill
.
|
|
|
| User: "AM" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
24 May 2005 02:09:12 PM |
|
|
"William McHale" <mchale@beast.toad.net> wrote in message
news:tAKke.9$bF1.1347@news.abs.net...
In general I agree. While I am generally to the left of center, I don't
see
the filibuster as a left or right issue but rather one that is crucial to
our democracy.
Except....that it has never been used against judicial nominees
before now. All of a sudden it is the weapon of choice. And
again it wouldn't bother me except that the liberals use it for
nothing more than an *anything but Bush* strategy.
Same reason they lost the election.
Against instringancy like this, than the *Constitunial Option*
seems the only answer.
I don't know... But.... until I see a viable option/idea
from the far left, than they will get what they deserve
according to the majority party, and the American people
lose all around. Their refusal to work with this administration
hurts everyone............
I hate Limbaugh (I'd like to show him some talent on loan
from God sometime, the arrogant SOB he is) but he is right
about the liberals.
They are funnier to watch when they are NOT in power !
I think this country would be well served if their were
term limits to ALL politicians ! People like Ted Kennedy, and
other almost *lifers* should not be allowed to hold the same
office for so long a time.
(flat tax wouldn't hurt either)
In the end, the American people are to blame...
We vote these people in to represent US, not their own beliefs...
(applies to BOTH sides)
Allan
Only A Gentleman Can Insult Me And A True Gentleman Never Will
.
|
|
|
| User: "William McHale" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
24 May 2005 11:51:37 PM |
|
|
In sci.astro.amateur AM <SCTUSER@comcast.net> wrote:
"William McHale" <mchale@beast.toad.net> wrote in message
news:tAKke.9$bF1.1347@news.abs.net...
In general I agree. While I am generally to the left of center, I don't
see
the filibuster as a left or right issue but rather one that is crucial to
our democracy.
Except....that it has never been used against judicial nominees
before now. All of a sudden it is the weapon of choice. And
again it wouldn't bother me except that the liberals use it for
nothing more than an *anything but Bush* strategy.
Except in fact it has been used before against judical nominees. In fact
a group of Republicans used the filibuster against two of Clintons nominees in
the year 2000. They were not successful but lack of success is not the same
as "never has been used".
Furhter it is decidedly wrong to think the democrats are opposing the
nominations simply because President Bush nominated them; the vast majority
of the President's Judicial nominations have been approved.
Same reason they lost the election.
Against instringancy like this, than the *Constitunial Option*
seems the only answer.
The issue is over the procedural ruls that have run the Senate for more than
150 years; it might be Constitutional to change those rules, but it doesn't
mean it is a good idea. While the Democrats are using the filibuster, the
Republicans used other procedural issues during the Clinton Administration
to block quite a few of Clinton's nominees to the bench. The thing you
should consider is this; what happens if the democrats are in charge of
Congress again in 10 or 20 years (And lest the republicans should get too
cocky, we should remember that there was a time that the Democrats felt
they had a perpetual hold on Congress).
I don't know... But.... until I see a viable option/idea
from the far left, than they will get what they deserve
according to the majority party, and the American people
lose all around. Their refusal to work with this administration
hurts everyone............
You know its always amazing when the viable ideas and options always seem
to come from those one agress with. The administration has done much to set
the tone of the current debate; their idea of compromise seems to be when
the democrats agree with them and not when the two sides meet in the middle.
I hate Limbaugh (I'd like to show him some talent on loan
from God sometime, the arrogant SOB he is) but he is right
about the liberals.
They are funnier to watch when they are NOT in power !
You know the democrats saw thought the same thing about the right wing of
the Republican Party.
I think this country would be well served if their were
term limits to ALL politicians ! People like Ted Kennedy, and
other almost *lifers* should not be allowed to hold the same
office for so long a time.
(flat tax wouldn't hurt either)
You mean like most of the current leadership of the Senate? Far more effective
reform could be achieved by true finance reform and real hard ethics rules in
Congress.
In the end, the American people are to blame...
We vote these people in to represent US, not their own beliefs...
(applies to BOTH sides)
They key is we elect them to represent us, not necessarily our own beliefs.
One of the biggest problems today is we seem to want the Congress to impose
our own beliefs on the rest of the Nation.
--
Bill
.
|
|
|
| User: "DustyMars" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
28 May 2005 03:47:58 PM |
|
|
In article <tvTke.13$bF1.4707@news.abs.net>,
says...
In sci.astro.amateur AM <SCTUSER@comcast.net> wrote:
"William McHale" < > wrote in message
news:tAKke.9$bF1.1347@news.abs.net...
In general I agree. While I am generally to the left of center, I don't
see
the filibuster as a left or right issue but rather one that is crucial to
our democracy.
Except....that it has never been used against judicial nominees
before now. All of a sudden it is the weapon of choice. And
again it wouldn't bother me except that the liberals use it for
nothing more than an *anything but Bush* strategy.
Except in fact it has been used before against judical nominees. In fact
a group of Republicans used the filibuster against two of Clintons nominees in
the year 2000. They were not successful but lack of success is not the same
as "never has been used".
Furhter it is decidedly wrong to think the democrats are opposing the
nominations simply because President Bush nominated them; the vast majority
of the President's Judicial nominations have been approved.
Same reason they lost the election.
Against instringancy like this, than the *Constitunial Option*
seems the only answer.
The issue is over the procedural ruls that have run the Senate for more than
150 years; it might be Constitutional to change those rules, but it doesn't
mean it is a good idea. While the Democrats are using the filibuster, the
Republicans used other procedural issues during the Clinton Administration
to block quite a few of Clinton's nominees to the bench. The thing you
should consider is this; what happens if the democrats are in charge of
Congress again in 10 or 20 years (And lest the republicans should get too
cocky, we should remember that there was a time that the Democrats felt
they had a perpetual hold on Congress).
I don't know... But.... until I see a viable option/idea
from the far left, than they will get what they deserve
according to the majority party, and the American people
lose all around. Their refusal to work with this administration
hurts everyone............
You know its always amazing when the viable ideas and options always seem
to come from those one agress with. The administration has done much to set
the tone of the current debate; their idea of compromise seems to be when
the democrats agree with them and not when the two sides meet in the middle.
Democrats lost, get over it!!!!!! GET OVER IT and wait until the next
defeat in 2006 for the Democraps!!!!!
--
RustyMars
"Nothing is rich but the inexhaustible wealth of nature. She shows us
only surfaces, but she is a million fathoms deep."
.....Ralph Waldo Emerson
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: *ATTN* Demopublican Partisans: The New Cabal is here (was: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P.) |
31 May 2005 01:41:18 PM |
|
|
DustyMars wrote:
Democrats lost, get over it!!!!!! GET OVER IT and wait until the next
defeat in 2006 for the Democraps!!!!!
You mean: the Demopublican lost. There's another Political Divide on
the
block that cuts horizontally across your obsolete, petty left-right
pseudo-debates, and it's going to sweep you all out of town.
Heretofore, the Future has only been related at various places in bits
and pieces.
Now, for the first time, they will be assembled together and the
revelation will emerge:
THE HIDDEN CABAL
The Week of May 24, a new "cabal" (to use the words of the Face the
Nation commentator) emerges: the Gang of 14.
(Take a look at who was on the Gang of 14 and compare to below)
From 2004 September 24; talk.politics.misc:
[...] the developed
world is already in the midsts of a massive pendulum shift
toward the liberal end of the spectrum --- the counterpart
of the shift toward the right that began in Scandinavia in
the 1970's. In the US it will first show up in 2006. But
not along party lines; along another fault line, that will
make itself increasingly felt over time.
From 2004 October 16, alt.wisdom:
An interesting pattern, however, does emerge that is entirely
unrelated to anything seen or discussed when it comes to the
general issue of voting history [of the Senate].
The largest and most prominent factor behind the voting pattern
accounts correctly for 75% of the votes actually cast. (Adding
factor #2 gets you up to 92.1% predictability; factor #3 up
to 93.1%). It is simply: Yea vs. Nay, overall. The votes that
have the highest factor score for this factor are those that
have votes like 99-0, 98-0, 97-0, etc. The senators that
have the highest scores on this factor tend (somewhat) to be
those who voted yes for the most things.
But most interesting is the actual breakdown:
The 14 female senators are marked in the list.
Within the respective parties, they rank:
Democrat (out of 48): #2, 5, 7, 8, 11, 12, 20, 22, 25
Republican (out of 51): #1, 6, 8, 16, 30
THE WIPE OUT OF 2008
Recent talk on the newsshows and the web indicates the possibility of
Laura Bush for 2008, thus creating the scenario of 2 women running in
2008.
From 2003 April 15:
Bush will serve no more than 2 terms as president.
He is the last man who will ever be elected president
of the United States.
But the United States will elect a president in 2008.
From 2003 June 14:
2008 -- a total, complete 100% wipeout; both Democrat and Republican
nominations go to women, plus one VP spot.
And, the new fault line?
THE PINK WAVE
From here
2004 October 24
Because the developed world is on the crest of a huge pendulum
shift back to the left -- similar to that in the 1970's in
the opposite direction begun in Scandinavia and spreading to
the US.
Yes, these things will happen as you said. But the "Why?" is
because of 2006. The Liberal Wave is going to hit hard, also
starting in Scandinavia -- but this time along a new divide
not seen before at this level: sex.
Forget about red vs. blue states
http://www.csd.uwm.edu/~whopkins/RatioPolitics.gif
It's pink vs. blue states. And the Pink Wave is coming.
Women Are Taking Over Sweden
news://alt.california October 14, 2004
http://groups.google.com/groups?q=Women+Taking+Over+Sweden
Russia and the Disappearance of Men, period
news://sci.anthropology October 17, 2004
http://google.groups.com/groups?q=Russia+Disappearance+Of+Men
The Middle East -- A Man's World (But Not Much Longer)
news://talk.politics.mideast September 26, 2004
http://google.groups.com/groups?q=%22Middle+East%22+%22Man%27s+World%22
The Truth About The Gender Wage Gap -- The Glass Floor
news://talk.politics.misc October 22, 2004
http://google.groups.com/groups?q=Reversal+Gender+Gap+Wage
Hysteresis & Schloegel Process In Population Dynamics
news://soc.culture.indian May 20, 2003
http://google.groups.com/groups?q=Hysteresis+Schloegel
(Dealing with the Schloegl model analogue underlying the sudden
reversal in the wage gap and other parts of the balance of power;
misspellings are done intentionally to facilitate search engine
citation references by keyword).
Re: Is Psychology/psychiatry a Science?
news://sci.psychology.theory October 11, 2004
http://google.groups.com/groups?%22No+more+sciences+left+in+Russia%22
(The gradual takeover of the sciences -- including the hard
sciences -- by women).
These are elements that will form part of a much more comprehensive
picture provided in the first volume of the forthcoming Federation
trilogy
http://www.csd.uwm.edu/~whopkins/federation.html
titled "The Fall Of Mankind"
http://www.csd.uwm.edu/~whopkins/fallman.html
all of which has been previewed in the Fourth Wave presentation at
the Transvision 2004 conference in Toronto in August of 2004, an
early draft of the corresponding report/presentation currently
available at
http://www.csd.uwm.edu/~whopkins/tv04.htm
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bob Cain" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
14 Jun 2005 03:21:55 AM |
|
|
Anonymous wrote:
IDEALLY, THE VOTE will go to a divisively-contentious
tie-breaker, with our good Vice President ***** Cheney
casting the deciding vote--very much to the liberals'
chagrin! You see, the more that gloatingly-victorious
Republicans oppose and undermine the liberal Democrat
agenda, then the better off our great nation--and the
whole free world--will be for it. Just WATCH and see...
Every God-fearing, law-abiding, tax-paying, patriotic
American citizen should support the so-called nuclear
option, since it deals yet another *devastating* blow
against the God-hating Anti-American liberal Democrat
party, who'll NEVER regain majority power in American
politics again. Liberals are getting evermore visibly
desperate, so they're grasping at straws in vain--ALL
IN VAIN--realizing that they haven't got a snowball's
chance in Hades of stopping our manifest destiny from
overcoming the evils of the world through our unified
faith in God the Creator. The liberals are *hopeless*.
Senate Majority Leader Bill Frist (R-Tenn) is working
in concert with the Republican majority, to establish
the rule requiring only a simple majority vote by the
Senate to confirm ALL decidedly-conservative nominees
to the courts, thereby destroying the radical liberal
agenda for the foreseeable future i.e. to say FOREVER!
The pristine definition of "filibuster" is FREEBOOTER,
which Webster's defines as "an adventurer who engages
in unauthorized warfare against a country with which
his own country is at peace[end quote]. Thus liberals
are merely Anti-American anti-freespeech _terrorists_,
whose *failed* politically-, socially-, economically-
and religiously-inviable agenda is meeting its demise.
This is ECSTATIC news for every Republican in America!
So if ever there was a time for our elated Republican
majority to be totally unified, *NOW* is the time! We
MUST support our great President GW Bush and by every
ways and means available *TRIGGER* the nuclear option.
Let's drive the liberal vermin into global extinction!
Almost perfect left/right justification without any extra
spaces! I'm very impressed and curious that no one else
seems to have noticed. Or does everyone just expect this
trick from Anonymous?
Bob
--
"Things should be described as simply as possible, but no
simpler."
A. Einstein
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
14 Jun 2005 07:45:15 AM |
|
|
Bob Cain pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
news:42AE93A3.6000004@arcanemethods.com:
Anonymous wrote:
IDEALLY, THE VOTE will go to a divisively-contentious
tie-breaker, with our good Vice President ***** Cheney
[snip Min-Drivel]
Almost perfect left/right justification without any extra
spaces! I'm very impressed and curious that no one else
seems to have noticed.
It's one of Danny's quirks. Sometimes he tortures the grammer a bit, uses
odd spellings or punctuations to make the words fit. But it is remarkable.
He must spend hours in writing his little lectures.
Or does everyone just expect this trick from Anonymous?
Yup. He brags about it in his FAQ about himself.
R.
--
Go not to Usenet for counsel, for they will say both yes and no.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory L. Hansen" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
14 Jun 2005 08:49:17 AM |
|
|
In article <Xns9675595E811A3Ross@216.196.97.142>,
Ross <Ross@SingingFrog.com> wrote:
Bob Cain pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
news:42AE93A3.6000004@arcanemethods.com:
Anonymous wrote:
IDEALLY, THE VOTE will go to a divisively-contentious
tie-breaker, with our good Vice President ***** Cheney
[snip Min-Drivel]
Almost perfect left/right justification without any extra
spaces! I'm very impressed and curious that no one else
seems to have noticed.
It's one of Danny's quirks. Sometimes he tortures the grammer a bit, uses
odd spellings or punctuations to make the words fit. But it is remarkable.
He must spend hours in writing his little lectures.
I think he said once he has a script that substitutes synonyms until the
margin lines up.
--
"When the fool walks through the street, in his lack of understanding he
calls everything foolish." -- Ecclesiastes 10:3, New American Bible
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
14 Jun 2005 07:06:46 AM |
|
|
In article <d8mn8t$q81$3@rainier.uits.indiana.edu>,
(Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:
In article <Xns9675595E811A3Ross@216.196.97.142>,
Ross <Ross@SingingFrog.com> wrote:
Bob Cain pulled a bright blue crayon out of the box and scribbled this in
news:42AE93A3.6000004@arcanemethods.com:
Anonymous wrote:
IDEALLY, THE VOTE will go to a divisively-contentious
tie-breaker, with our good Vice President ***** Cheney
[snip Min-Drivel]
Almost perfect left/right justification without any extra
spaces! I'm very impressed and curious that no one else
seems to have noticed.
It's one of Danny's quirks. Sometimes he tortures the grammer a bit,
uses
odd spellings or punctuations to make the words fit. But it is
remarkable.
He must spend hours in writing his little lectures.
I think he said once he has a script that substitutes synonyms until the
margin lines up.
What a lot of work. RUNOFF does just fine.
/BAH
Subtract a hundred and four for e-mail.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory L. Hansen" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
23 May 2005 02:36:41 PM |
|
|
In article <ZB2YE5SJ38495.5913541667@anonymous.poster>,
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
IDEALLY, THE VOTE will go to a divisively-contentious
tie-breaker, with our good Vice President ***** Cheney
casting the deciding vote--very much to the liberals'
chagrin! You see, the more that gloatingly-victorious
And then, in a term or two when the Democrats have a majority, wanna bet
he'll be whining about godless liberals denying the filibuster to
patriotic Republicans for nefarious reasons?
--
"Awareness means not just a vague, comfortable, fuzzy feeling. It means
explicit knowledge of current conditions." -- NBSR Radiation Safety
Training
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom McDonald" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
23 May 2005 06:46:22 PM |
|
|
Gregory L. Hansen wrote:
In article <ZB2YE5SJ38495.5913541667@anonymous.poster>,
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
IDEALLY, THE VOTE will go to a divisively-contentious
tie-breaker, with our good Vice President ***** Cheney
casting the deciding vote--very much to the liberals'
chagrin! You see, the more that gloatingly-victorious
And then, in a term or two when the Democrats have a majority, wanna bet
he'll be whining about godless liberals denying the filibuster to
patriotic Republicans for nefarious reasons?
Always assuming said patriotic Republicans haven't improved the
time by snipping away the capacity for Democrats to regain the
majority. Get enough crap, ideologically neo-con radicals in
lifetime judgeships and it could be done.
--
Tom McDonald
http://ahwhatdoiknow.blogspot.com/
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "james" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
23 May 2005 05:58:04 PM |
|
|
On Mon, 23 May 2005 19:36:41 +0000 (UTC),
glhansen@steel.ucs.indiana.edu (Gregory L. Hansen) wrote:
In article <ZB2YE5SJ38495.5913541667@anonymous.poster>,
Anonymous <Use-Author-Address-Header@[127.1]> wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
IDEALLY, THE VOTE will go to a divisively-contentious
tie-breaker, with our good Vice President ***** Cheney
casting the deciding vote--very much to the liberals'
chagrin! You see, the more that gloatingly-victorious
And then, in a term or two when the Democrats have a majority, wanna bet
he'll be whining about godless liberals denying the filibuster to
patriotic Republicans for nefarious reasons?
********
Funny that the original poster fails to point out that the Senate
Majority Leader used the fillibuster rules to his advantage during the
Clinton Presidency.
I find it funny that the Evangelical Right clings to so many
politicians. They fail to understand that the God of politicians is
"money". Without it they are not elected or reelected.
james
.
|
|
|
| User: "redway420" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
23 May 2005 09:16:56 PM |
|
|
The Evangelical Right understands very well that the god of the
politicians is money because that's their god too, the Almighty Dollar.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Nosterill" |
|
| Title: Re: *ATTN* Godless Liberals: Filibuster R.I.P. |
24 May 2005 07:28:07 AM |
|
|
Well I never thought I'd see the words "good" and "***** Cheney" in the
same sentence.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|