attn: Jimmy Wales founder of Wikipedia; you have a corrupt and defaming editor on the Archimedes Plutonium Wiki page



 Science > Physics > attn: Jimmy Wales founder of Wikipedia; you have a corrupt and defaming editor on the Archimedes Plutonium Wiki page

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "a_plutonium"
Date: 17 Mar 2007 07:01:41 PM
Object: attn: Jimmy Wales founder of Wikipedia; you have a corrupt and defaming editor on the Archimedes Plutonium Wiki page
Attention Mr. Jimmy Wales:
On the Wiki page of Archimedes Plutonium, one of your editors keeps
"defaming Mr. Plutonium" making his
biography a joke instead of following the rules set down by you. The
rules of "objectiveness" with cited references
that are objective references.
One of your cited sources for Archimedes Plutonium is a Tim Skirvin
website. Tim is a outright open hatemonger
and has defamed Mr. Plutonium by trying to tie him to a tradegy of the
Zantop murder case in New Hampshire.
And now, Tim Skirvin or another biased editor of Archimedes Plutonium
has locked that site to editing.
This is defamation of character and the AP Wiki entry has never been a
truly objective entry. It has been a joke
entry and character defamation ever since Wikipedia entered Archimedes
Plutonium.
Here is what an objective entry for Mr. Plutonium looks like with
objective cited references.
It is because Mr. Plutonium had the original idea of the Atom Totality
theory that he deserves a Wiki entry, but
anyone who reads the current Wiki entry of Mr. Plutonium is left with
the impression of some sort of joke
and defamation of character.
-------------------------------------------------------
'''Archimedes Plutonium''' (born [[July 5]] , [[1950]]<ref> According
to this website [http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/] which purports to be
maintained by Plutonium </ref> as Ludwig Poehlmann <ref> [http://
www.dartmouth.edu/~almag/],[http://www.sciam.com/]</ref>) is primarily
noted for his original idea of the Atom Totality Theory which appears
in the October 1992 Dartmouth Alumni Magazine with
a picture of Mr. Plutonium; and the theory is further explained in
Scientific American magazine April 1993.
The first idea of a Universe being one single atom appears to have
been Democritus, the founder of the Atomic theory, as referenced by
the book "A Short History of Atomism", Joshua C. Gregory, 1931, A.&C.
Black Ltd, page 4 "single Democritean atom might even be, so some
said, as big as the world. The gigantic Democritean atom, if it ever
existed, vanished from the atomic tradition."
Then Carl Sagan hinted and brushed by an idea that the universe can be
an elementary particle.
As written in his book "Cosmos", 1980, Random House: pages 265-267
"so that an elementary particle, such as an electron, in our universe
would, if penetrated, reveal itself to be an entire closed universe."
Then in November 1990, Archimedes Plutonium announced a full theory of
the Atom Totality theory, by saying what chemical element the Universe
is specifically-- a big Plutonium Atom and that galaxies are dots of
the electron-dot-cloud of this single big plutonium atom. AP says it
must be plutonium to satisfy special numbers of physics and
mathematics such as the fine-structure-constant.
Interestingly, Archimedes Plutonium has the first Internet Book where
he wrote the entire book and
used the Internet to publish it. This first Internet published book is
his Atom Totality theory:
Book: "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY REPLACES THE BIG-BANG THEORY OF PHYSICS",
Archimedes Plutonium
Internet book published 1993-2007 (assimilated in Jan-Feb 2007 in
sci.physics,sci.math)
Curiously, the Dalai Lama published a book "Universe in a Single Atom"
in 2006 by Time Warner. The Dalai Lama never referenced Archimedes
Plutonium but then when does a spiritual leader ever reference and
cite the way science cites?
-----------------------------------------------------------
.

User: "Seth Breidbart"

Title: Re: attn: Jimmy Wales founder of Wikipedia; you have a corrupt and defaming editor on the Archimedes Plutonium Wiki page 20 Mar 2007 04:51:46 PM
In article <1174176101.657220.253760@o5g2000hsb.googlegroups.com>,
a_plutonium <a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote:

On the Wiki page of Archimedes Plutonium, one of your editors keeps
"defaming Mr. Plutonium" making his biography a joke

Since he _is_ a joke, that seems perfectly reasonable to me.

One of your cited sources for Archimedes Plutonium is a Tim Skirvin
website. Tim is a outright open hatemonger

Speaking of references, why do you want anybody to believe your
unsupported claims? Cross-posting doesn't gain you credibility, it
costs it (if you'd had any to begin with).

This is defamation of character

It seems more like accurate description of a character.
Seth
.
User: "Shmuel Seymour J. Metz"

Title: Re: attn: Jimmy Wales founder of Wikipedia; you have a corrupt and defaming editor on the Archimedes Plutonium Wiki pag 21 Mar 2007 07:54:08 AM
FUP set to news.admin.net-abuse.misc
In <etpl1i$e9s$1@reader2.panix.com>, on 03/20/2007
at 09:51 PM,
(Seth Breidbart) said:

Speaking of references, why do you want anybody to believe your
unsupported claims?

Google[1] is your friend. AP *never* supports his claims, since his
claims are never supportable.

Cross-posting doesn't gain you credibility,

Why didn't you set a follow-up to drop the irrelevant groups? Surely
*you* know how to do that.

(if you'd had any to begin with).

Does negative credibility count?
[1] Although I'd have expected you to already know who the OP is and
just how little credibility he has.
--
Shmuel (Seymour J.) Metz, truly insane Spews puppet
<http://patriot.net/~shmuel>
I reserve the right to publicly post or ridicule any abusive
E-mail. Reply to domain Patriot dot net user shmuel+news to contact
me. Do not reply to

.


User: "Jim Black"

Title: Re: attn: Jimmy Wales founder of Wikipedia; you have a corrupt and defaming editor on the Archimedes Plutonium Wiki page 17 Mar 2007 10:54:53 PM
On Mar 17, 7:01 pm, "a_plutonium" <a_pluton...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Attention Mr. Jimmy Wales:

On the Wiki page of Archimedes Plutonium, one of your editors keeps
"defaming Mr. Plutonium" making his
biography a joke instead of following the rules set down by you. The
rules of "objectiveness" with cited references
that are objective references.

One of your cited sources for Archimedes Plutonium is a Tim Skirvin
website. Tim is a outright open hatemonger
and has defamed Mr. Plutonium by trying to tie him to a tradegy of the
Zantop murder case in New Hampshire.
And now, Tim Skirvin or another biased editor of Archimedes Plutonium
has locked that site to editing.

This is defamation of character and the AP Wiki entry has never been a
truly objective entry. It has been a joke
entry and character defamation ever since Wikipedia entered Archimedes
Plutonium.

Here is what an objective entry for Mr. Plutonium looks like with
objective cited references.

It is because Mr. Plutonium had the original idea of the Atom Totality
theory that he deserves a Wiki entry, but
anyone who reads the current Wiki entry of Mr. Plutonium is left with
the impression of some sort of joke
and defamation of character.

-------------------------------------------------------

'''Archimedes Plutonium''' (born [[July 5]] , [[1950]]<ref> According
to this website [http://www.iw.net/~a_plutonium/] which purports to be
maintained by Plutonium </ref> as Ludwig Poehlmann <ref> [http://www.dartmouth.edu/~almag/],[http://www.sciam.com/]</ref>) is primarily
noted for his original idea of the Atom Totality Theory which appears
in the October 1992 Dartmouth Alumni Magazine with
a picture of Mr. Plutonium; and the theory is further explained in
Scientific American magazine April 1993.

The first idea of a Universe being one single atom appears to have
been Democritus, the founder of the Atomic theory, as referenced by
the book "A Short History of Atomism", Joshua C. Gregory, 1931, A.&C.
Black Ltd, page 4 "single Democritean atom might even be, so some
said, as big as the world. The gigantic Democritean atom, if it ever
existed, vanished from the atomic tradition."

Then Carl Sagan hinted and brushed by an idea that the universe can be
an elementary particle.
As written in his book "Cosmos", 1980, Random House: pages 265-267
"so that an elementary particle, such as an electron, in our universe
would, if penetrated, reveal itself to be an entire closed universe."

Then in November 1990, Archimedes Plutonium announced a full theory of
the Atom Totality theory, by saying what chemical element the Universe
is specifically-- a big Plutonium Atom and that galaxies are dots of
the electron-dot-cloud of this single big plutonium atom. AP says it
must be plutonium to satisfy special numbers of physics and
mathematics such as the fine-structure-constant.

Interestingly, Archimedes Plutonium has the first Internet Book where
he wrote the entire book and
used the Internet to publish it. This first Internet published book is
his Atom Totality theory:
Book: "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY REPLACES THE BIG-BANG THEORY OF PHYSICS",
Archimedes Plutonium
Internet book published 1993-2007 (assimilated in Jan-Feb 2007 in
sci.physics,sci.math)

Curiously, the Dalai Lama published a book "Universe in a Single Atom"
in 2006 by Time Warner. The Dalai Lama never referenced Archimedes
Plutonium but then when does a spiritual leader ever reference and
cite the way science cites?

-----------------------------------------------------------

More bad news...
I'm afraid the people at Uncyclopedia have deleted the article about
your theory that you praised so highly in this post:
http://groups.google.com/group/sci.physics/browse_frm/thread/f966315484a537a6/ff44e029b9100f1a?&hl=en#ff44e029b9100f1a
Here's the deletion log:
http://uncyclopedia.org/index.php?title=Special%3ALog&type=&user=&page=Atom+Totality
How awful! How are you ever going to get to turn down the Nobel Prize
if your theories are suppressed at every turn?
My personal advice is for you to post this article over on
Conservapedia. The URL is:
http://www.conservapedia.com/
Now, granted, Conservapedia is run by politically-conservative
Biblical literalists, whereas you only believe in Science. But don't
abstain from contributing just because you don't share some of their
views. I'm sure they want a "fair and balanced" encyclopedia, just
like Fox News. Just be sure to follow the "Conservapedia
Commandments" and cite dates as "A.D.," rather than dating from the
discovery of plutonium.
Of course, what Conservapedia really needs is a [Hammond] SPOG
article. But we'll get to that later.
--
Jim E. Black
.
User: "Teh Most Revernd Bishop of Willesden"

Title: Re: attn: Jimmy Wales founder of Wikipedia; you have a corrupt anddefaming editor on the Archimedes Plutonium Wiki page 18 Mar 2007 04:53:12 AM
Jim Black wrote:

On Mar 17, 7:01 pm, "a_plutonium" <a_pluton...@hotmail.com> wrote:

Attention Mr. Jimmy Wales:

[stuff]
No *****?
I thought ArchiePu was dead, Jim.
--
That's_ the message; "Donut sit behind leaning cats that have just
farted you blind"!
Dr HotSalt in A.R.K.
.


User: "a_plutonium"

Title: Mr. Wales, all I am asking is that some level headed editor review the Wiki page on Archimedes Plutonium 17 Mar 2007 07:26:28 PM
When a person comes to a medium such as the Internet with a new idea
that is a big new idea, then it is
almost guaranteed that young and old dumb punks are going to harass
such a person. Who are going to
stalk, hatemonger, harrass, mock and play jokes and pranks on such a
person.
And that harrassement followed even into the Wikipedia page of
Archimedes Plutonium. And some of the
very same editors who work for Wikipedia were some of the very same
harrassing and hatemongers of
Mr. Plutonium.
His Wiki page was a joke and defamation of character for all these
years, and now someone has "locked that
page"
Mr. Plutonium deserves a Wiki page because of his new and original
idea of the Atom Totality Theory, but
noone would ever understand that from reading the Wiki page on Mr.
Plutonium. Currently that page is still
a "joke and defamation of character" page.
Below is what a objective Wiki page of Mr. Plutonium would look like.
For it cites and references the Atom
Totality theory through history. It cites Democritus, Carl Sagan and
even the Dalai Lama. It cites "Scientific
American" magazine and the Dartmouth Alumni Magazine that has a
feature article on Mr. Plutonium and
his Atom Totality Theory.
So I am asking for Mr. Wales to intervene and allow for the Wiki page
of Mr. Plutonium to be a "fair and
objective page" and to stop and cut out this hatemongering
harrassement.
--- posted the below onto Mr. Wales own Wiki page ---
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Wales#Published_works_by_Wales
[edit] Published works by Wales
* Robert Brooks, Jon Corson, and J. Donal Wales. "The Pricing of
Index Options When the Underlying Assets All Follow a Lognormal
Diffusion", in Advances in Futures and Options Research, volume 7,
1994. See also Log-normal distribution.
Attention Mr. Wales, since your editors never give me any attention:
Newsgroups: news.admin.net-abuse.misc, sci.physics, soc.history From:
"a_plutonium" <a_pluton...@hotmail.com> Date: 17 Mar 2007 17:01:41
-0700 Local: Sat, Mar 17 2007 6:01 pm Subject: attn: Jimmy Wales
founder of Wikipedia; you have a corrupt and defaming editor on the
Archimedes Plutonium Wiki page
Attention Mr. Jimmy Wales:
On the Wiki page of Archimedes Plutonium, one of your editors keeps
"defaming Mr. Plutonium" making his biography a joke instead of
following the rules set down by you. The rules of "objectiveness" with
cited references that are objective references.
One of your cited sources for Archimedes Plutonium is a Tim Skirvin
website. Tim is a outright open hatemonger and has defamed Mr.
Plutonium by trying to tie him to a tradegy of the Zantop murder case
in New Hampshire. And now, Tim Skirvin or another biased editor of
Archimedes Plutonium has locked that site to editing.
This is defamation of character and the AP Wiki entry has never been a
truly objective entry. It has been a joke entry and character
defamation ever since Wikipedia entered Archimedes Plutonium.
Here is what an objective entry for Mr. Plutonium looks like with
objective cited references.
It is because Mr. Plutonium had the original idea of the Atom Totality
theory that he deserves a Wiki entry, but anyone who reads the current
Wiki entry of Mr. Plutonium is left with the impression of some sort
of joke and defamation of character.
Archimedes Plutonium (born July 5, 1950[37] as Ludwig Poehlmann [38])
is primarily noted for his original idea of the Atom Totality Theory
which appears in the October 1992 Dartmouth Alumni Magazine with a
picture of Mr. Plutonium; and the theory is further explained in
Scientific American magazine April 1993.
The first idea of a Universe being one single atom appears to have
been Democritus, the founder of the Atomic theory, as referenced by
the book "A Short History of Atomism", Joshua C. Gregory, 1931, A.&C.
Black Ltd, page 4 "single Democritean atom might even be, so some
said, as big as the world. The gigantic Democritean atom, if it ever
existed, vanished from the atomic tradition."
Then Carl Sagan hinted and brushed by an idea that the universe can be
an elementary particle. As written in his book "Cosmos", 1980, Random
House: pages 265-267 "so that an elementary particle, such as an
electron, in our universe would, if penetrated, reveal itself to be an
entire closed universe."
Then in November 1990, Archimedes Plutonium announced a full theory of
the Atom Totality theory, by saying what chemical element the Universe
is specifically-- a big Plutonium Atom and that galaxies are dots of
the electron-dot-cloud of this single big plutonium atom. AP says it
must be plutonium to satisfy special numbers of physics and
mathematics such as the fine-structure-constant.
Interestingly, Archimedes Plutonium has the first Internet Book where
he wrote the entire book and used the Internet to publish it. This
first Internet published book is his Atom Totality theory: Book: "ATOM
TOTALITY THEORY REPLACES THE BIG-BANG THEORY OF PHYSICS", Archimedes
Plutonium Internet book published 1993-2007 (assimilated in Jan-Feb
2007 in sci.physics,sci.math)
Curiously, the Dalai Lama published a book "Universe in a Single Atom"
in 2006 by Time Warner. The Dalai Lama never referenced Archimedes
Plutonium but then when does a spiritual leader ever reference and
cite the way science cites?
END
[edit] Sources and notes
---------------------------------------------
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
User: "a_plutonium"

Title: ElinorD, Jimmy Wales; rules for your editors and when you have rogue editors 17 Mar 2007 10:10:24 PM
I finally contacted ElinorD. Anyone know her full name as a Wikipedia
editor?
The problem I have is that the Wikipedia page on Archimedes Plutonium
has a libel and defamation of
character reference. The reference is the Zantop murders by Tim
Skirvin.
The references to Archimedes Plutonium should be Dartmouth Alumni
Magazine feature article on him
and to Scientific American magazine citation and to the book written
on Atom Totality.
So why is Wikipedia using a reference of a murder case by a rogue
hatemonger like Tim Skirvin.
Because Tim Skirvin works for Wikipedia does not mean he will abide by
your rules that Jimmy Wales set
down.
So I am asking for editors high up in Wikipedia to review the
Archimedes Plutonium entry.
Why should I be harrassed by your editors libel and defamation of
character.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.



  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER