[ATTN:cross] Semiconductor lithography problem



 Science > Physics > [ATTN:cross] Semiconductor lithography problem

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Bubba"
Date: 09 Sep 2006 05:57:23 PM
Object: [ATTN:cross] Semiconductor lithography problem
ATTN: cross set to alt.lasers, sci.physics, sci.physics.particle, FuT
NOT set, by request.
Greetings to all,
First of all, i hope that my choice of groups might shed some light on
the following question, especially sci.physics.particle in certain
issues.
So, as far as i am aquatinted with the problem of ultra violet
lithography, currently the most ultra violet lasers are ArF on 192nm.
"Taking" it to one quarter of wave length, we can expect recently
announced 45nm lithography, but my first question is: what's next? Can
we go beyond one quarter of wave length? Are there "more violet" lasers
to be produced?
Now, that was regarding the technical part, but as far as i know, in
order to produce such low wavelength lithography, one must obtain
favorable level of simultaneous and spontaneous emission, given by the
following equation:
A/B = 8 pi h c (1/wave length)^3
now that would make approximately this chart:
650 nm 1.82*10^-5
350 nm 1.17*10^-4
192 nm 7.06*10^-4
65 nm 0.018
17 nm 1.01
So, what really happens after semiconductor industry would try to go
beyond ~17nm? Is it even possible, or is it just a theoretical model?
Also (particle group, i belive you should know a bit more on this one),
how do quantum effects exihibits on such low wave lengths, such as
transforming conductors to isolators, tunneling effects, electron leaps
and similar effects? Is there way to bypass those?
I hope that i haven't made to much beginners errors and that you were
able to understand my questions. Also, if these matters have been
discussed elsewhere, can someone provide a link or reference?
Thanks in advance!
--
Documentation is like sex: when it's good, it's very, very good; when
it's bad, it's better than nothing.
.

User: "Sorcerer"

Title: Re: [ATTN:cross] Semiconductor lithography problem 09 Sep 2006 08:25:15 PM
"Bubba" <nickname@hcp.hr> wrote in message
news:Xns983A9B339F16bubbachipsetone@130.133.1.4...
| ATTN: cross set to alt.lasers, sci.physics, sci.physics.particle, FuT
| NOT set, by request.
|
| Greetings to all,
|
| First of all, i
Ok, no capital 'I', lunatic alert.
*plonk*
Androcles.
.
User: "Bubba"

Title: Re: [ATTN:cross] Semiconductor lithography problem 10 Sep 2006 04:12:41 AM
Sorcerer's log on stardate 10 ruj 2006

Ok, no capital 'I', lunatic alert.
*plonk*
Androcles.

You could have just said you were clueless, son...

might also be interested in your post, since I(!) did nothing wrong to you
and you insult me without any apparent cause.

X-Newsreader: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.2869

This one was obvious...
FuT set! :\
--
Documentation is like sex: when it's good, it's very, very good; when it's
bad, it's better than nothing.
.


User: "Christoph Bollig"

Title: Re: [ATTN:cross] Semiconductor lithography problem 03 Oct 2006 01:16:28 PM
Ok, since there wasn't any serious reply to this message, I will have
a go. And since it's already late and I have to go soon, I will try to
keep it brief.
As far as I know (and I'm not an expert on this), a laser source at
157nm was already developed some time ago but never taken to a stage
where it was feasable to use in the lithography industry. The current
believe seems to be that it will never make it. Instead, people are
now concentrating on 13.5nm for lithography. Apperently, this would
already fall into the soft x-ray region, but since x-ray sounds more
dangerous than ultraviolet, they are now caling it "Extreme
ultraviolet" (EUV). You will find lots of links in a google search for
EUV lithography, including a long page on wikipedia:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Extreme_ultraviolet_lithography
For this wavelength, they will not use lasers as light sources. As far
as I know, there are two approaches being investigated by several
groups: Either plasma generation or non-linear conversion.
It's a huge step from the current 193nm systems and some people in the
industry question whether it will ever become feasible at a reasonable
cost. They argue that Moore's law might just not be valid any more for
the future.
I hope this helps,
Christoph
On 9 Sep 2006 22:57:23 GMT, Bubba <nickname@hcp.hr> wrote:

ATTN: cross set to alt.lasers, sci.physics, sci.physics.particle, FuT
NOT set, by request.

Greetings to all,

First of all, i hope that my choice of groups might shed some light on
the following question, especially sci.physics.particle in certain
issues.

So, as far as i am aquatinted with the problem of ultra violet
lithography, currently the most ultra violet lasers are ArF on 192nm.
"Taking" it to one quarter of wave length, we can expect recently
announced 45nm lithography, but my first question is: what's next? Can
we go beyond one quarter of wave length? Are there "more violet" lasers
to be produced?

Now, that was regarding the technical part, but as far as i know, in
order to produce such low wavelength lithography, one must obtain
favorable level of simultaneous and spontaneous emission, given by the
following equation:

A/B = 8 pi h c (1/wave length)^3

now that would make approximately this chart:

650 nm 1.82*10^-5
350 nm 1.17*10^-4
192 nm 7.06*10^-4
65 nm 0.018
17 nm 1.01

So, what really happens after semiconductor industry would try to go
beyond ~17nm? Is it even possible, or is it just a theoretical model?
Also (particle group, i belive you should know a bit more on this one),
how do quantum effects exihibits on such low wave lengths, such as
transforming conductors to isolators, tunneling effects, electron leaps
and similar effects? Is there way to bypass those?

I hope that i haven't made to much beginners errors and that you were
able to understand my questions. Also, if these matters have been
discussed elsewhere, can someone provide a link or reference?

Thanks in advance!

------------------------------------------------------------------------
CSIR - National Laser Centre
Pretoria, South Africa
Phone and email can be looked up on the staff list under
"contact us" on the CSIR web pages:
http://www.csir.co.za/
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER