On Fri, 06 Apr 2007 06:16:52 GMT, in sci.geo.earthquakes, "Sunny"





<wombatho...@yahoo.com.au> wrote:

"Tom McDonald" <kilt...@gmail.com> wrote in messagenews:1175828804.308654.188770@y66g2000hsf.googlegroups.com...
| On Apr 5, 9:33 pm, "Greatest Mining Pioneer of Australia of all Times"
| <australia.mining-pion...@neuf.fr> wrote:
|
| Jean-Paul,
|
| Please stop posting to sci.archaeology. What you are dealing with is
| almost never relevant to archaeology. In addition, your views about
| Australia, geology, etc., are well-known. By addressing so much off-
| topic stuff to sci.archaeology, you lose whatever good will you might
| have had.

Le Turcaud posts same spam to 5 News Groups at a time
(note the deliberate duplicates in each set) e.g

aus.invest , aus.legal , aus.media-watch , aus.aviation,
nz.politics

aus.invest , aus.photo , aus.cars , aus.services.defence
aus.politics

aus.invest , aus.films , aus.invest , aus.electonics , aus.rail
(note aus invest in twice)

aus.invest , aus.politics , aus.history , aus.services.defence
uk.finance

aus.invest , aus.politics , nz.politics , uk.finance , us.politics

aus.religion.islam , aus.media-watch , aus.religion.christian
soc.culture.israel , soc.culture.australian

aus.religion.islam , aus.religion.christian , aus.science , aus.computers
aus.environment.misc

aus.religion.islam , alt.religion.islam , aus.religion.christian
soc.culture.israel , soc.culture.jewish

aus.religion.islam , aus.religion.christian , aus.education , aus.aviation
soc.culture.australian

aus.religion.islam , aus.regilion.christian , aus.computers , aus.aviation
soc.culture.australian

aus.religion.islam , aus.religion , soc.culture.jewish , soc.culture.israel
soc.culture.australian

aus.politics , aus.invest , soc.culture.australian , aus.legal
aus.general

aus.politics , alt.religion.islam , talk.politics.mideast , soc.culture.indonesia
soc.culture.malaysia

aus.politics , uk.finance , soc.culture.german , soc.culture.celtic
soc.culture.scottish

aus.politics, co.politics, ca.politics, ny.politics, tx.politics

aus.media-watch , aus.cars , aus.tv , aus.theatre ,
aus.sport.rugby-league

aus.media-watch, aus.films, aus.tv, aus.aviation, aus.theatre

soc.culture.indian , soc.culture.tamil , sci.geology , sci.archaeology

sci.geo.geology , sci.geo.earthquakes , aus.science ,
sci.engr.mining , sci.astro

sci.geo.geology , sci.geo.earthquakes , sci.physics , sci.astro
sci.archaeology

(His latest "feature" is to hijack any thread, to paste his idiotic ravings)
(Posting through google)

Google has long been known as a place which spammers can post with
full immunity.

--
Ak'toh'di- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

On Apr 6, 10:31 pm,

On 6 avr, 11:03,

Impossible. You have never revealed any details of what you call
"the true geology". Whenever you are asked to you deliver yourself of
a Biblical-scale inriddled rant about the ancestry and habits of your
questioners. The closest you've come is to deride all of standard
geology as false with no explanation. Until you provide a detailed
explication of this "true geology" you will continue to be ignored,
laugned at, or treated as insane.

Mark L. Fergerson

Our extremely massive and nearby moon is still measurably salty, and
Mars is not nearly salty enough.

Mars is simply not hardly indicating as though ever having been a
salty planet, and it's otherwise indicating as being much older than
Earth. What gives?

I happen to agree with "Andrew Nowicki", that not one but many
significant impacting events must have morphed, iced down and
otherwise having so extensively salted the surface of Earth. Of
course, there's no such absolute proof that Earth originated within
this solar system, and there's even less proof pertaining to our salty
moon. Mars seems nearly dead to the core and thereby much older than
Earth, and Venus seems extra hot to the core and thereby much less old
than Earth. What gives?

How much if any sial is on that deck of our physically dark and nasty
moon?

How much of a planetology and/or moon common element does salt account
for?

At times of such an icy proto-moon representing itself as an incoming
NEO, as likely having previously passed so close to impacting, it must
have seemed exactly like the end of the world to many, and actually
becoming the end of the world to many others caught in its gravity and
aerobraking wake. The actual glancing blow of that icy sucker upon
having accomplished its dastardly deed, whereas I'd have to think a
good third of most everything living upon this Earth would have been
killed off or traumatised well enough past the point of no return.

That "true geology" specified date of 11,700 BP also sounds just about
right on the money for the final lithobraking, ocean basin creating,
antipode worthy and seasonal tilt causing arrival of our moon, which
should have seriously kicked all sorts of planetology as well as human
butt upon its icy arrival. At the very least the near miss of such an
icy proto-moon should have been downright interesting, if not a touch
lethal for a great many.

There should also have been those significant teratonne spacebergs of
moon ice falling upon Earth for a few thousands of years past the time
of that initial glancing blow.

BTW; there's still nothing contained in any bible or koran, as
reasonably interpreted to our environment having that moon as of prior
to 10,000 BC (12,007 BP), or even of somewhat earlier or perhaps a bit
more recently. When exactly was the first humanly made record of our
moon?

What do you folks think about complex intelligent ET life, as for such
having survived their extended interstellar trek, as safely coexisting
within a few of those proto-moon ice caves? (I know that even I could
do as much [how about yourself?])

Within such a deep enough icy moon cave (assuming all the way down to
the moon's surface) would have accommodated all the essential elements
for survival, including sufficient isolation from the bad sorts of
cosmic and solar radiation, and otherwise having provided loads of
easily accessible O2 for sustaining our kind of frail DNA/RNA.

I'm thinking our moon could have been covered by as much as a 262 km
thick layer of salty ice, of which obviously lost much of its icy load
upon encountering Earth, and especially that of our 1AU nearby solar
energy would have summarily evaporated and/or having solar wind
extracted all such vapors of salty ice that wasn't otherwise safely
sequestered underground.

That pesky GW traumatising moon of ours is still in the process of
losing the remainders of its naked surface element of sodium. (not
nearly enough gravity nor having a worthy magnetosphere as to
otherwise prevent the loss of such ice and sodium)

Too bad the faith-based souls of this Earth are so afraid of their own
shadows. Too bad we still haven't accomplished the Earth/moon science
platform as efficiently station-keeping itself within the moon's
interactive L1 sweet spot. Too bad we're headed directly for WWIII
over the remains of the affordably accessible worth of our global
energy domination (including yellowcake) policy. Too bad that so many
innocent folks have paid the ultimate price, with lots more about to
pay their's (especially nasty if being Muslim is the only option
within their established family traditions).
-
Brad Guth