| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Dr. Jai Maharaj" |
| Date: |
17 Jan 2005 10:16:22 PM |
| Object: |
Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
Forwarded message from Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
[ Subject: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
[ From: Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
[ Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005
Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
By Greg Schneider
The Washington Post
Sunday 09 January 2005
http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011005W.shtml
The brakes are controlled by a computer, so the car can stop a full
length shorter than most. Each rear wheel has its own motor and can
turn by itself, which not only improves traction but also makes
parallel parking a snap. And the only thing this car emits is water
vapor.
But for all the exotic gizmos on the Sequel, an experimental
hydrogen-powered car to be shown today by General Motors Corp., the
biggest breakthrough is that it is designed to drive as far and
accelerate as quickly as the cars in most driveways.
The Sequel uses fuel-cell technology that until now has not matched
the overall performance of gasoline engines. GM is introducing the
car at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit as rival
companies make similar announcements.
Passengers at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport will soon
ride on buses with hydrogen-powered engines, Ford Motor Co. chief
executive William Clay Ford Jr. is to announce today. Ford also is to
announce plans to create three gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles for
retail sale, and to rush the hybrid Mercury Mariner sport-utility
vehicle to showrooms later this year - a year ahead of schedule to
capitalize on consumer interest in hybrids.
Honda is showing off a new-generation hydrogen-fuel-cell car called
the FCX for the first time this week. While the car is not intended
for retail sale, it will show up in municipal fleets in New York,
California and elsewhere in the coming year.
After a century of dependence on oil-based fuel, the auto industry
is finally giving consumers a serious look at a future with little or
no gasoline power. The products showing up this week in Detroit have
far more corporate support than recent electricity-powered vehicles,
and are advanced beyond the demonstration vehicles shown by car
companies over the last few years. The fleet of fuel-cell minivans
that GM maintains in Washington, for example, has limited range and
must be operated by company employees.
By contrast, Honda lets almost anyone drive its FCX. In a recent
feature on the automotive research online site Edmunds.com, a
reviewer described picking up the FCX from a valet-parking attendant.
Hydrogen is still years away from reducing the nation's dependence
on foreign oil. No one has yet figured out how to generate large
amounts of hydrogen without causing as much pollution as
internal-combustion engines now create, or how to pay for a
nationwide distribution network. And the vehicles are prohibitively
expensive; if GM's Sequel were for sale, it would cost as much as a
warehouse full of Corvettes.
Still, auto industry executives say their business is on the verge
of a fundamental change.
"It's a frenzy" to get out front with new technology, said Mary
Ann Wright, director of such efforts at Ford. "What you're seeing is
a groundswell, not really of industry pushing as much as everybody
demanding that we really get serious about these solutions. . . . The
market's telling us something - they're ready for this kind of stuff.
The public is aware that we can't continue to consume oil like we
do."
People have sent that message in the way car companies understand
best: by buying products such as the Toyota Prius, the Honda Civic
Hybrid and the Ford Escape Hybrid. Rising fuel prices, instability in
the Middle East and concerns about global warming have helped sustain
the hybrid phenomenon, and U.S. car buyers have even turned away from
the biggest SUVs in favor of smaller models.
Most automakers consider hybrids to be a step toward the ultimate
solution - hydrogen fuel cells. Fuel cells work by combining hydrogen
with oxygen to create heat and electricity, with water the only
byproduct. Though many people associate hydrogen with disasters - the
hydrogen bomb, or the Hindenburg zeppelin explosion in 1937 -
scientists say the gas is in many ways safer than gasoline. Hydrogen
is the lightest element, so leaks dissipate quickly and are difficult
to concentrate enough to ignite. Hydrogen is stable, so it will not
explode just from an impact.
But those same properties make it challenging to store hydrogen in
a large-enough quantity to power a vehicle. The Bush administration
has pledged $1.2 billion over five years to sustain a
government-industry research partnership on hydrogen power, with many
auto and energy companies cooperating to develop the technology.
One thing, though, seems to have changed the tenor of the otherwise
polite hydrogen effort: Toyota's success with the Prius.
That car's unexpected popularity helped influence public policy,
with the federal government offering tax breaks to hybrid buyers and
state governments offering express-lane exemptions. The Prius gave
Toyota a "halo" of technological virtue, said Lindsay Brooke of the
auto consulting firm CSM Worldwide Inc. Now other companies want a
piece of the action.
GM, which has been slow to roll out hybrid products, is using the
Sequel to try to win some of the attention for hydrogen, Brooke said.
"We're reaching out to show that this is truly doable," GM
technology chief Lawrence D. Burns said. "We're talking about a real
car. It's not affordable yet, but I can assure you it's doable."
In 2002, GM showed a fuel-cell concept car called the Hy-Wire that
consisted of an 11-inch thick "skateboard" chassis that contained all
the working parts - one-tenth as many as in a conventional car - with
a body simply bolted on top. But the Hy-Wire was rickety to drive and
could never have met federal highway standards, let alone satisfied
demanding buyers.
The Sequel's biggest single advance, Burns said, is a
compressed-hydrogen storage tank that can hold enough fuel to give
the car a range of 300 miles. That is twice as far as the range of
older versions of fuel-cell cars, and is considered the threshold
distance to be marketable. With liquid hydrogen, the range could
extend to 450 miles, Burns said.
The Sequel also has a more powerful stack of fuel cells than
previously possible, cutting 0-to-60 mph acceleration time to fewer
than 10 seconds, comparable to most conventional cars.
GM is also working on the technology to produce and assemble the
Sequel, hoping to be able to build 1 million a year by 2010, Burns
said.
Not many in the industry agree with such a close date. "The goal is
to make it a practical technology, and it's going to be after 2010,"
said Ben Knight, vice president for research and development at Honda
USA. His company's fuel-cell car has a range of about 190 miles, and
is the only such vehicle certified by U.S. regulators for public use.
But while they disagree on specifics, virtually all automakers are
pushing to get more attention for hydrogen so that society, the
government and other industries will get ready for the eventual
change, Brooke said. "They're starting to force the public to look at
it and now the fuel industry needs to step up and develop the
infrastructure and develop the means to produce the hydrogen," he said.
End of forwarded message from Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
.
|
|
| User: "Ed Earl Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
18 Jan 2005 06:14:37 AM |
|
|
Dr. you missed sci.energy.hydrogen, where the experts live.
Personally, I'd rather the government spend my money biodiesel
research rather than hydrogen fuel cells.
Dr. Jai Maharaj wrote:
Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
Forwarded message from Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
[ Subject: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
[ From: Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
[ Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005
Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
By Greg Schneider
The Washington Post
Sunday 09 January 2005
http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011005W.shtml
The brakes are controlled by a computer, so the car can stop a full
length shorter than most. Each rear wheel has its own motor and can
turn by itself, which not only improves traction but also makes
parallel parking a snap. And the only thing this car emits is water
vapor.
But for all the exotic gizmos on the Sequel, an experimental
hydrogen-powered car to be shown today by General Motors Corp., the
biggest breakthrough is that it is designed to drive as far and
accelerate as quickly as the cars in most driveways.
The Sequel uses fuel-cell technology that until now has not matched
the overall performance of gasoline engines. GM is introducing the
car at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit as rival
companies make similar announcements.
Passengers at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport will soon
ride on buses with hydrogen-powered engines, Ford Motor Co. chief
executive William Clay Ford Jr. is to announce today. Ford also is to
announce plans to create three gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles for
retail sale, and to rush the hybrid Mercury Mariner sport-utility
vehicle to showrooms later this year - a year ahead of schedule to
capitalize on consumer interest in hybrids.
Honda is showing off a new-generation hydrogen-fuel-cell car called
the FCX for the first time this week. While the car is not intended
for retail sale, it will show up in municipal fleets in New York,
California and elsewhere in the coming year.
After a century of dependence on oil-based fuel, the auto industry
is finally giving consumers a serious look at a future with little or
no gasoline power. The products showing up this week in Detroit have
far more corporate support than recent electricity-powered vehicles,
and are advanced beyond the demonstration vehicles shown by car
companies over the last few years. The fleet of fuel-cell minivans
that GM maintains in Washington, for example, has limited range and
must be operated by company employees.
By contrast, Honda lets almost anyone drive its FCX. In a recent
feature on the automotive research online site Edmunds.com, a
reviewer described picking up the FCX from a valet-parking attendant.
Hydrogen is still years away from reducing the nation's dependence
on foreign oil. No one has yet figured out how to generate large
amounts of hydrogen without causing as much pollution as
internal-combustion engines now create, or how to pay for a
nationwide distribution network. And the vehicles are prohibitively
expensive; if GM's Sequel were for sale, it would cost as much as a
warehouse full of Corvettes.
Still, auto industry executives say their business is on the verge
of a fundamental change.
"It's a frenzy" to get out front with new technology, said Mary
Ann Wright, director of such efforts at Ford. "What you're seeing is
a groundswell, not really of industry pushing as much as everybody
demanding that we really get serious about these solutions. . . . The
market's telling us something - they're ready for this kind of stuff.
The public is aware that we can't continue to consume oil like we
do."
People have sent that message in the way car companies understand
best: by buying products such as the Toyota Prius, the Honda Civic
Hybrid and the Ford Escape Hybrid. Rising fuel prices, instability in
the Middle East and concerns about global warming have helped sustain
the hybrid phenomenon, and U.S. car buyers have even turned away from
the biggest SUVs in favor of smaller models.
Most automakers consider hybrids to be a step toward the ultimate
solution - hydrogen fuel cells. Fuel cells work by combining hydrogen
with oxygen to create heat and electricity, with water the only
byproduct. Though many people associate hydrogen with disasters - the
hydrogen bomb, or the Hindenburg zeppelin explosion in 1937 -
scientists say the gas is in many ways safer than gasoline. Hydrogen
is the lightest element, so leaks dissipate quickly and are difficult
to concentrate enough to ignite. Hydrogen is stable, so it will not
explode just from an impact.
But those same properties make it challenging to store hydrogen in
a large-enough quantity to power a vehicle. The Bush administration
has pledged $1.2 billion over five years to sustain a
government-industry research partnership on hydrogen power, with many
auto and energy companies cooperating to develop the technology.
One thing, though, seems to have changed the tenor of the otherwise
polite hydrogen effort: Toyota's success with the Prius.
That car's unexpected popularity helped influence public policy,
with the federal government offering tax breaks to hybrid buyers and
state governments offering express-lane exemptions. The Prius gave
Toyota a "halo" of technological virtue, said Lindsay Brooke of the
auto consulting firm CSM Worldwide Inc. Now other companies want a
piece of the action.
GM, which has been slow to roll out hybrid products, is using the
Sequel to try to win some of the attention for hydrogen, Brooke said.
"We're reaching out to show that this is truly doable," GM
technology chief Lawrence D. Burns said. "We're talking about a real
car. It's not affordable yet, but I can assure you it's doable."
In 2002, GM showed a fuel-cell concept car called the Hy-Wire that
consisted of an 11-inch thick "skateboard" chassis that contained all
the working parts - one-tenth as many as in a conventional car - with
a body simply bolted on top. But the Hy-Wire was rickety to drive and
could never have met federal highway standards, let alone satisfied
demanding buyers.
The Sequel's biggest single advance, Burns said, is a
compressed-hydrogen storage tank that can hold enough fuel to give
the car a range of 300 miles. That is twice as far as the range of
older versions of fuel-cell cars, and is considered the threshold
distance to be marketable. With liquid hydrogen, the range could
extend to 450 miles, Burns said.
The Sequel also has a more powerful stack of fuel cells than
previously possible, cutting 0-to-60 mph acceleration time to fewer
than 10 seconds, comparable to most conventional cars.
GM is also working on the technology to produce and assemble the
Sequel, hoping to be able to build 1 million a year by 2010, Burns
said.
Not many in the industry agree with such a close date. "The goal is
to make it a practical technology, and it's going to be after 2010,"
said Ben Knight, vice president for research and development at Honda
USA. His company's fuel-cell car has a range of about 190 miles, and
is the only such vehicle certified by U.S. regulators for public use.
But while they disagree on specifics, virtually all automakers are
pushing to get more attention for hydrogen so that society, the
government and other industries will get ready for the eventual
change, Brooke said. "They're starting to force the public to look at
it and now the fuel industry needs to step up and develop the
infrastructure and develop the means to produce the hydrogen," he said.
End of forwarded message from Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
19 Jan 2005 02:27:44 AM |
|
|
Ed Earl Ross wrote:
Dr. you missed sci.energy.hydrogen, where the experts live.
Personally, I'd rather the government spend my money biodiesel
research rather than hydrogen fuel cells.
You may be right, Ed, but don't get excited about the economics of bio.
Many oil producing crops are very "hungry"; they deplete the soil,
meaning that either uneconomic crop rotations must be used, or large
amounts of costly fertiliser applied (and mineral fertilisers running
out!)
If we go bio, we will probably have to go genetic modification as well
:-(
How about thermal/wind power ----> electricity ----> ye old battery
terminal ---> H2 ?
Jim G
PS: I forgot all the weedicides and insecticides...............
.
|
|
|
| User: "Ed Earl Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
19 Jan 2005 01:32:51 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Ed Earl Ross wrote:
Dr. you missed sci.energy.hydrogen, where the experts live.
Personally, I'd rather the government spend my money biodiesel
research rather than hydrogen fuel cells.
You may be right, Ed, but don't get excited about the economics of bio.
Many oil producing crops are very "hungry"; they deplete the soil,
meaning that either uneconomic crop rotations must be used, or large
amounts of costly fertiliser applied (and mineral fertilisers running
out!)
If we go bio, we will probably have to go genetic modification as well
:-(
How about thermal/wind power ----> electricity ----> ye old battery
terminal ---> H2 ?
Jim G
PS: I forgot all the weedicides and insecticides ...............
The best crop for biodiesel production is probably marine algae.
The growth rate is about 10 times better than land crops. These
crops would not displace existing land crops. In fact, the residue
from making biodiesel can be used for fertilizer for land crops.
Some estimates say it is already less expensive to produce than
oil, especially if you consider environmental effects as a cost of
using oil.
It is already being produced for commercial use in small
quantities. All that is really necessary is to ramp up production.
Algae can sequester 100% of CO2 and N2O being emitted from a coal
or gas fired power plant. It is grown in ponds or bioreactors near
a power plant, for profit. Whereas, other methods of CO2
sequestration are merely an expense.
Algae may be used to purify sewage, and produce an income.
Eliminating the need for mineral fertilizers.
In the US, where gasoline is still relatively inexpensive, it may
take a a few years for pump prices of biodiesel to be less than
petroleum diesel. Sooner or later it will happen. If congress
passed a fair environmental tax on oil, I'm confident biodiesel
would beat the cost of petroleum diesel, now.
Electricity from the grid is not yet, and may never be, practical
for transportation.
The H2 economy is years off at best, because research has not found
viable solutions. Moreover, it requires a very expensive
infrastructure replacement. IMO, it will never happen. Biodiesel is
clean (ecofriendly) and doesn't require rebuilding every gas
station and replacing every vehicle, in the world.
Battery power is great for neighborhood electric vehicles and
intra-city commuting. However, batteries cannot be used for long
distance travel. Folks don't buy many battery powered vehicles. It
appears they never will.
Algae are very sensitive creatures. You cannot use weedicides,
insecticides and other unfriendly chemicals.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Simonds" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
23 Jan 2005 10:28:30 AM |
|
|
We can already do battery cars that go 200 miles on a charge - that is
sufficient for all but the longer trips which are usually made on the
interstate highway system. So all we need do is put battery swapping
stations along the highways. You whip in, they put a fully charged
battery in.
Of course...where does the electricity come from...coal? Battery
electric vehicles presupose that we have some clean scheme for making
the elect. Either renewables or nuclear.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Swanson" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
23 Jan 2005 06:42:09 PM |
|
|
In article <ct0jbk$suq$1@pcls4.std.com>, says...
We can already do battery cars that go 200 miles on a charge - that is
sufficient for all but the longer trips which are usually made on the
interstate highway system. So all we need do is put battery swapping
stations along the highways. You whip in, they put a fully charged
battery in.
Of course...where does the electricity come from...coal? Battery
electric vehicles presupose that we have some clean scheme for making
the elect. Either renewables or nuclear.
I saw a TV story several years ago about a guy in S. Cal that worked for GM
designing the electronic controls for the Impact. He has a car running on
batteries, but for longer trips, he had a small trailer with an IC powered
generator. Sort of like a Hybrid, but with the engine only used for longer
trips, thus there was no need to haul the extra weight of the IC engine and
generator for most in town uses. The IC engine could run on ethanol or
biodiesel. It might be the best of both worlds.
--
Eric Swanson --- E-mail address: e_swanson(at)skybest.com :-)
--------------------------------------------------------------
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tom Simonds" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
27 Jan 2005 08:06:31 PM |
|
|
I saw a TV story several years ago about a guy in S. Cal that worked
for GM
designing the electronic controls for the Impact. He has a car
running on
batteries, but for longer trips, he had a small trailer with an IC
powered
generator. Sort of like a Hybrid, but with the engine only used for
longer
trips, thus there was no need to haul the extra weight of the IC
engine and
generator for most in town uses. The IC engine could run on ethanol
or
biodiesel. It might be the best of both worlds.
Isuggested the same thing one time. A trailer with a generator for long
trips. It deserves further consideration. You could even rent the
generator/trailer to people so they wouldn't buy it.
I could certainly make due with a electric car that gets 200 miles to
the charge. I don't think I would ever need to exceed the 200 mile range
over the life of the car.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tim Ward" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
27 Jan 2005 10:13:30 PM |
|
|
"Tom Simonds" <tsimonds@theworld.com> wrote in message
news:ctc6nf$5st$1@pcls4.std.com...
I saw a TV story several years ago about a guy in S. Cal that worked
for GM
designing the electronic controls for the Impact. He has a car
running on
batteries, but for longer trips, he had a small trailer with an IC
powered
generator. Sort of like a Hybrid, but with the engine only used for
longer
trips, thus there was no need to haul the extra weight of the IC
engine and
generator for most in town uses. The IC engine could run on ethanol
or
biodiesel. It might be the best of both worlds.
Isuggested the same thing one time. A trailer with a generator for long
trips. It deserves further consideration. You could even rent the
generator/trailer to people so they wouldn't buy it.
I could certainly make due with a electric car that gets 200 miles to
the charge. I don't think I would ever need to exceed the 200 mile range
over the life of the car.
If a two-seater sports car suits your mission profile, plunk down the eighty
grand for the tzero.
I'm not sure if that's for the lead-acid battery version, or the Lithium-ion
version.
AC Propulsion mentions they've sold two. The spec sheet for the tzero says
lead-acid batteries, so I suspect the lithium-ion version they're driving
around now is the only one outfitted that way. I suspect the price might go
up a tad, equipped with Li-ion.
I, on the other hand, need to be able to cart my kids around, so a
two-seater isn't going to work. And if I had a spare seventy or eighty
thousand, there are other things I'd rather have.
Tim Ward
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Ed Earl Ross" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
23 Jan 2005 07:08:50 PM |
|
|
Eric Swanson wrote:
In article <ct0jbk$suq$1@pcls4.std.com>, says...
We can already do battery cars that go 200 miles on a charge - that is
sufficient for all but the longer trips which are usually made on the
interstate highway system. So all we need do is put battery swapping
stations along the highways. You whip in, they put a fully charged
battery in.
Of course...where does the electricity come from...coal? Battery
electric vehicles presupose that we have some clean scheme for making
the elect. Either renewables or nuclear.
I saw a TV story several years ago about a guy in S. Cal that worked for GM
designing the electronic controls for the Impact. He has a car running on
batteries, but for longer trips, he had a small trailer with an IC powered
generator. Sort of like a Hybrid, but with the engine only used for longer
trips, thus there was no need to haul the extra weight of the IC engine and
generator for most in town uses. The IC engine could run on ethanol or
biodiesel. It might be the best of both worlds.
Based on the number of electric cars that are sold, one must
question whether this more complex vehicle has a large enough
market to be viable. So far, no company has attempted it, as far as
I know. Of course, Detroit and most of the industry completely
misjudged the popularity of hybrids.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vendicar Decarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
01 Feb 2005 05:02:34 PM |
|
|
"Ed Earl Ross" <edearl@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:CUXId.45963$_56.6630@fe2.texas.rr.com...
Based on the number of electric cars that are sold, one must
question whether this more complex vehicle has a large enough
market to be viable.
Potentially they are less complex than an ordinary automobile, just as
electronic hard drives are less complex in a sense than mechanical ones.
The current crop of electric cars will fail because they are implemented
as high end luxury cars. And not many of those sell. As a result, the
benefits of mass production are lost. But lets face it, in the Automotive
world, mass production is pretty much a thing of the past anyhow.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisin" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
01 Feb 2005 06:23:53 PM |
|
|
"Vendicar Decarian" <VD@Pyro.net> wrote in message
news:YLTLd.2130$m22.996@read1.cgocable.net...
Potentially they are less complex than an ordinary automobile, just as
electronic hard drives are less complex in a sense than mechanical ones.
The current crop of electric cars will fail because they are implemented
as high end luxury cars. And not many of those sell. As a result, the
benefits of mass production are lost. But lets face it, in the Automotive
world, mass production is pretty much a thing of the past anyhow.
Whatever you say Vendy. I see they restored internet access to your ward.
Do you drive the handmade Volvo then? Powered by Free Energy?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vendicar Decarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
01 Feb 2005 07:07:05 PM |
|
|
"Eric Gisin" <ericgisin@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ctp6jd02e6v@enews2.newsguy.com...
Whatever you say Vendy. I see they restored internet access to your ward.
Gisin's ***** is still hurting from the last time he got it whacked by me.
Watching Americans die in Iraq is pure joy.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
01 Feb 2005 07:44:50 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics Vendicar Decarian <VD@pyro.net> wrote:
"Ed Earl Ross" <edearl@satx.rr.com> wrote in message
news:CUXId.45963$_56.6630@fe2.texas.rr.com...
Based on the number of electric cars that are sold, one must
question whether this more complex vehicle has a large enough
market to be viable.
Potentially they are less complex than an ordinary automobile, just as
electronic hard drives are less complex in a sense than mechanical ones.
The current crop of electric cars will fail because they are implemented
as high end luxury cars. And not many of those sell. As a result, the
benefits of mass production are lost. But lets face it, in the Automotive
world, mass production is pretty much a thing of the past anyhow.
"high end luxury cars"; snicker.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove -spam-sux to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
23 Jan 2005 05:01:08 PM |
|
|
In sci.physics Tom Simonds <tsimonds@theworld.com> wrote:
We can already do battery cars that go 200 miles on a charge - that is
sufficient for all but the longer trips which are usually made on the
interstate highway system. So all we need do is put battery swapping
stations along the highways. You whip in, they put a fully charged
battery in.
I take it you've never actually seen how many batteries it takes to
power a car or been told what it costs to swap them out.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove -spam-sux to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Don Lancaster" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
23 Jan 2005 10:46:55 AM |
|
|
Tom Simonds wrote:
We can already do battery cars that go 200 miles on a charge - that is
sufficient for all but the longer trips which are usually made on the
interstate highway system. So all we need do is put battery swapping
stations along the highways. You whip in, they put a fully charged
battery in.
Of course...where does the electricity come from...coal? Battery
electric vehicles presupose that we have some clean scheme for making
the elect. Either renewables or nuclear.
The problem with "battery swapping stations" is that millions of unused
batteries will have to be lying around, thus dramatically increasing the
amortized vehicle cost per mile.
http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
voice: (928)428-4073 email:
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Lancaster" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
23 Jan 2005 05:02:20 PM |
|
|
Don Lancaster wrote:
Tom Simonds wrote:
We can already do battery cars that go 200 miles on a charge - that is
sufficient for all but the longer trips which are usually made on the
interstate highway system. So all we need do is put battery swapping
stations along the highways. You whip in, they put a fully charged
battery in.
Of course...where does the electricity come from...coal? Battery
electric vehicles presupose that we have some clean scheme for making
the elect. Either renewables or nuclear.
The problem with "battery swapping stations" is that millions of unused
batteries will have to be lying around, thus dramatically increasing the
amortized vehicle cost per mile.
http://www.tinaja.com/glib/energfun.pdf
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
voice: (928)428-4073 email:
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
Assuming a "gas" station exchanges 240 batteries per day and it takes
ten hours to charge a battery, then they would have to keep at least 100
batteries in stock at all times for each customer.
Thus raising the cost per mile of electric vehicles by at least two
orders of magnitude.
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
voice: (928)428-4073 email:
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "Carl Ijames" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
23 Jan 2005 08:03:34 PM |
|
|
Assuming a "gas" station exchanges 240 batteries per day and it takes
ten hours to charge a battery, then they would have to keep at least
100
batteries in stock at all times for each customer.
And how many kW will be drawn while simultaneously charging 100
batteries? How many more power lines and substations to feed all those
charging stations?
Thus raising the cost per mile of electric vehicles by at least two
orders of magnitude.
Um, they need 340 batteries to keep 240 customers on the road, assuming
a uniform exchange rate of 10 per hour as you did (peak times make this
even worse, of course), so it raises the cost of the battery packs for
those 240 cars by 340/240 or 42%, not 100-fold.
--
Regards,
Carl Ijames carl.ijames at verizon.net
.
|
|
|
| User: "Don Lancaster" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
24 Jan 2005 10:31:37 AM |
|
|
Carl Ijames wrote:
Assuming a "gas" station exchanges 240 batteries per day and it takes
ten hours to charge a battery, then they would have to keep at least
100
batteries in stock at all times for each customer.
And how many kW will be drawn while simultaneously charging 100
batteries? How many more power lines and substations to feed all those
charging stations?
Thus raising the cost per mile of electric vehicles by at least two
orders of magnitude.
Um, they need 340 batteries to keep 240 customers on the road, assuming
a uniform exchange rate of 10 per hour as you did (peak times make this
even worse, of course), so it raises the cost of the battery packs for
those 240 cars by 340/240 or 42%, not 100-fold.
--
Regards,
Carl Ijames carl.ijames at verizon.net
Correct, my figures were wrong.
But you would at least have to triple this figure for peak versus
average times.
And the battery cost would be a tiny fraction of the full amortization
(site + electricity + labor + interest + taxes + profit + etc )
Could easily get up into the 10x range.
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
voice: (928)428-4073 email:
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
24 Jan 2005 11:45:01 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics Don Lancaster <> wrote:
Carl Ijames wrote:
Assuming a "gas" station exchanges 240 batteries per day and it takes
ten hours to charge a battery, then they would have to keep at least
100
batteries in stock at all times for each customer.
And how many kW will be drawn while simultaneously charging 100
batteries? How many more power lines and substations to feed all those
charging stations?
Thus raising the cost per mile of electric vehicles by at least two
orders of magnitude.
Um, they need 340 batteries to keep 240 customers on the road, assuming
a uniform exchange rate of 10 per hour as you did (peak times make this
even worse, of course), so it raises the cost of the battery packs for
those 240 cars by 340/240 or 42%, not 100-fold.
--
Regards,
Carl Ijames carl.ijames at verizon.net
Correct, my figures were wrong.
But you would at least have to triple this figure for peak versus
average times.
And the battery cost would be a tiny fraction of the full amortization
(site + electricity + labor + interest + taxes + profit + etc )
Could easily get up into the 10x range.
--
Many thanks,
Don Lancaster
Synergetics 3860 West First Street Box 809 Thatcher, AZ 85552
voice: (928)428-4073 email:
Please visit my GURU's LAIR web site at http://www.tinaja.com
Not to mention batteries would have to be standardized for this to
work.
The EV1 had two or three different batteries over it's short production
life alone.
--
Jim Pennino
Remove -spam-sux to reply.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Vendicar Decarian" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
30 Jan 2005 12:32:33 PM |
|
|
<jimp@specsol-spam-sux.com> wrote in message
news:ct3c6t$7jg$1@mail.specsol.com...
Not to mention batteries would have to be standardized for this to
work.
The automotive industry is opposed to all manner of standardization as it
reduces their profits.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "dd" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
31 Jan 2005 05:51:26 PM |
|
|
Many missile systems use compressed air in titanium? spheres as a long
life energy storage system how about a 10000psi fillup.
You heard it first here. :)
In message <41F522E9.18680F06@tinaja.com>, Don Lancaster
<don@tinaja.com> writes
Correct, my figures were wrong.
But you would at least have to triple this figure for peak versus
average times.
And the battery cost would be a tiny fraction of the full amortization
(site + electricity + labor + interest + taxes + profit + etc )
Could easily get up into the 10x range.
--
dd
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "dd" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
31 Jan 2005 05:48:46 PM |
|
|
In message <41F3D4FF.8066C8F3@tinaja.com>, Don Lancaster
<don@tinaja.com> writes
The problem with "battery swapping stations" is that millions of unused
batteries will have to be lying around, thus dramatically increasing
the amortized vehicle cost per mile.
Also energy lost through charge discharge 30?% so no energy saved even
with regen braking.
--
dd
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dr. Jai Maharaj" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
18 Jan 2005 01:04:27 PM |
|
|
Ed, I appreciate your adding s.e.h to the
distribution. I think that the field needs
to be open for all reasonable technologies,
experimental or not, but more important than
that a little behavior modification is also
necessary in the consumer. Right, right, now
some people may respond with comments like:
"What did you say? I couldn't hear you over
my idling F-350 in the driveway."
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
In article <41ECFD7A.9060807@satx.rr.com>,
Ed Earl Ross <edearl@satx.rr.com> posted:
Dr. you missed sci.energy.hydrogen, where the experts live.
Personally, I'd rather the government spend my money biodiesel
research rather than hydrogen fuel cells.
Dr. Jai Maharaj posted:
Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
Forwarded message from Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
[ Subject: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
[ From: Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
[ Date: Mon, 17 Jan 2005
Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track
By Greg Schneider
The Washington Post
Sunday 09 January 2005
http://www.truthout.org/docs_05/011005W.shtml
The brakes are controlled by a computer, so the car can stop a full
length shorter than most. Each rear wheel has its own motor and can
turn by itself, which not only improves traction but also makes
parallel parking a snap. And the only thing this car emits is water
vapor.
But for all the exotic gizmos on the Sequel, an experimental
hydrogen-powered car to be shown today by General Motors Corp., the
biggest breakthrough is that it is designed to drive as far and
accelerate as quickly as the cars in most driveways.
The Sequel uses fuel-cell technology that until now has not matched
the overall performance of gasoline engines. GM is introducing the
car at the North American International Auto Show in Detroit as rival
companies make similar announcements.
Passengers at Dallas-Fort Worth International Airport will soon
ride on buses with hydrogen-powered engines, Ford Motor Co. chief
executive William Clay Ford Jr. is to announce today. Ford also is to
announce plans to create three gasoline-electric hybrid vehicles for
retail sale, and to rush the hybrid Mercury Mariner sport-utility
vehicle to showrooms later this year - a year ahead of schedule to
capitalize on consumer interest in hybrids.
Honda is showing off a new-generation hydrogen-fuel-cell car called
the FCX for the first time this week. While the car is not intended
for retail sale, it will show up in municipal fleets in New York,
California and elsewhere in the coming year.
After a century of dependence on oil-based fuel, the auto industry
is finally giving consumers a serious look at a future with little or
no gasoline power. The products showing up this week in Detroit have
far more corporate support than recent electricity-powered vehicles,
and are advanced beyond the demonstration vehicles shown by car
companies over the last few years. The fleet of fuel-cell minivans
that GM maintains in Washington, for example, has limited range and
must be operated by company employees.
By contrast, Honda lets almost anyone drive its FCX. In a recent
feature on the automotive research online site Edmunds.com, a
reviewer described picking up the FCX from a valet-parking attendant.
Hydrogen is still years away from reducing the nation's dependence
on foreign oil. No one has yet figured out how to generate large
amounts of hydrogen without causing as much pollution as
internal-combustion engines now create, or how to pay for a
nationwide distribution network. And the vehicles are prohibitively
expensive; if GM's Sequel were for sale, it would cost as much as a
warehouse full of Corvettes.
Still, auto industry executives say their business is on the verge
of a fundamental change.
"It's a frenzy" to get out front with new technology, said Mary
Ann Wright, director of such efforts at Ford. "What you're seeing is
a groundswell, not really of industry pushing as much as everybody
demanding that we really get serious about these solutions. . . . The
market's telling us something - they're ready for this kind of stuff.
The public is aware that we can't continue to consume oil like we
do."
People have sent that message in the way car companies understand
best: by buying products such as the Toyota Prius, the Honda Civic
Hybrid and the Ford Escape Hybrid. Rising fuel prices, instability in
the Middle East and concerns about global warming have helped sustain
the hybrid phenomenon, and U.S. car buyers have even turned away from
the biggest SUVs in favor of smaller models.
Most automakers consider hybrids to be a step toward the ultimate
solution - hydrogen fuel cells. Fuel cells work by combining hydrogen
with oxygen to create heat and electricity, with water the only
byproduct. Though many people associate hydrogen with disasters - the
hydrogen bomb, or the Hindenburg zeppelin explosion in 1937 -
scientists say the gas is in many ways safer than gasoline. Hydrogen
is the lightest element, so leaks dissipate quickly and are difficult
to concentrate enough to ignite. Hydrogen is stable, so it will not
explode just from an impact.
But those same properties make it challenging to store hydrogen in
a large-enough quantity to power a vehicle. The Bush administration
has pledged $1.2 billion over five years to sustain a
government-industry research partnership on hydrogen power, with many
auto and energy companies cooperating to develop the technology.
One thing, though, seems to have changed the tenor of the otherwise
polite hydrogen effort: Toyota's success with the Prius.
That car's unexpected popularity helped influence public policy,
with the federal government offering tax breaks to hybrid buyers and
state governments offering express-lane exemptions. The Prius gave
Toyota a "halo" of technological virtue, said Lindsay Brooke of the
auto consulting firm CSM Worldwide Inc. Now other companies want a
piece of the action.
GM, which has been slow to roll out hybrid products, is using the
Sequel to try to win some of the attention for hydrogen, Brooke said.
"We're reaching out to show that this is truly doable," GM
technology chief Lawrence D. Burns said. "We're talking about a real
car. It's not affordable yet, but I can assure you it's doable."
In 2002, GM showed a fuel-cell concept car called the Hy-Wire that
consisted of an 11-inch thick "skateboard" chassis that contained all
the working parts - one-tenth as many as in a conventional car - with
a body simply bolted on top. But the Hy-Wire was rickety to drive and
could never have met federal highway standards, let alone satisfied
demanding buyers.
The Sequel's biggest single advance, Burns said, is a
compressed-hydrogen storage tank that can hold enough fuel to give
the car a range of 300 miles. That is twice as far as the range of
older versions of fuel-cell cars, and is considered the threshold
distance to be marketable. With liquid hydrogen, the range could
extend to 450 miles, Burns said.
The Sequel also has a more powerful stack of fuel cells than
previously possible, cutting 0-to-60 mph acceleration time to fewer
than 10 seconds, comparable to most conventional cars.
GM is also working on the technology to produce and assemble the
Sequel, hoping to be able to build 1 million a year by 2010, Burns
said.
Not many in the industry agree with such a close date. "The goal is
to make it a practical technology, and it's going to be after 2010,"
said Ben Knight, vice president for research and development at Honda
USA. His company's fuel-cell car has a range of about 190 miles, and
is the only such vehicle certified by U.S. regulators for public use.
But while they disagree on specifics, virtually all automakers are
pushing to get more attention for hydrogen so that society, the
government and other industries will get ready for the eventual
change, Brooke said. "They're starting to force the public to look at
it and now the fuel industry needs to step up and develop the
infrastructure and develop the means to produce the hydrogen," he said.
End of forwarded message from Fidyl <fidyl@yahoo.com>
Jai Maharaj
http://www.mantra.com/jai
Om Shanti
Hindu Holocaust Museum
http://www.mantra.com/holocaust
Hindu life, principles, spirituality and philosophy
http://www.hindu.org
http://www.hindunet.org
The truth about Islam and Muslims
http://www.flex.com/~jai/satyamevajayate
The terrorist mission of Jesus stated in the Christian bible:
"Think not that I am come to send peace on earth: I came not so send
peace, but a sword.
"For I am come to set a man at variance against his father, and the
daughter against her mother, and the daughter in law against her mother in
law.
"And a man's foes shall be they of his own household.
- Matthew 10:34-36.
o Not for commercial use. Solely to be fairly used for the educational
purposes of research and open discussion. The contents of this post may not
have been authored by, and do not necessarily represent the opinion of the
poster. The contents are protected by copyright law and the exemption for
fair use of copyrighted works.
o If you send private e-mail to me, it will likely not be read,
considered or answered if it does not contain your full legal name, current
e-mail and postal addresses, and live-voice telephone number.
o Posted for information and discussion. Views expressed by others are
not necessarily those of the poster.
FAIR USE NOTICE: This article may contain copyrighted material the use of
which may or may not have been specifically authorized by the copyright
owner. This material is being made available in efforts to advance the
understanding of environmental, political, human rights, economic,
democratic, scientific, social, and cultural, etc., issues. It is believed
that this constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as
provided for in section 107 of the US Copyright Law. In accordance with
Title
17 U.S.C. Section 107, the material on this site is distributed without
profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the
included
information for research, comment, discussion and educational purposes by
subscribing to USENET newsgroups or visiting web sites. For more information
go to: http://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/17/107.shtml
If you wish to use copyrighted material from this article for purposes of
your own that go beyond 'fair use', you must obtain permission from the
copyright owner.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "dd" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
31 Jan 2005 05:46:33 PM |
|
|
I believe that the prius is the way forward i,e, reduce emissions by
increasing efficiency.
Efficiency to be achieved by increased complexity , which requires
up-front energy.
There are no easy answers.
All our technology increases complexity with time as usually does
evolution.
Clearly a hydrogen economy either relies on atomic power or shifts
pollution somewhere else.
A decent global warming could convert parts of central USA to a big
lake.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
18 Jan 2005 09:52:43 AM |
|
|
Yo Ho Dr Dumbass ..
LPE 138 hp gets 516 mpg.
Biult by the giant in HK.
liquid twin pistons driving sliding vane rotors.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
19 Jan 2005 09:01:42 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, tj Frazir
<GravityPhysics@webtv.net>
wrote
on Tue, 18 Jan 2005 10:52:43 -0500
<19706-41ED30CB-401@storefull-3216.bay.webtv.net>:
Yo Ho Dr Dumbass ..
LPE 138 hp gets 516 mpg.
Biult by the giant in HK.
liquid twin pistons driving sliding vane rotors.
And your drag coefficient, speed, and fuel were precisely what, again?
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
20 Jan 2005 12:58:55 AM |
|
|
350 cubic inches 60 times 21000 cubic inch per minute intake air. 200
hp .
........ VRS a 350 cubic inch V8 5000 rpm 4 stroke 350 cubic inch x
1200 is 420,000 cubic inches intake air per minut.
The sliding vane rotor has 1000 foot pounds but the V8 has 130 foot
pounds.
I dont nead the trans .
21000 VRS 420,000
21 to 420
20 to 1
20 times your gas milage.
an engine you will never wear out.
1/40 the emishions .
more power less fuel..alot less fuel.
In thermal ballance its the same fuel work ratio as a girl on a bike.
TGOTB * MOE
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
20 Jan 2005 01:01:17 AM |
|
|
Best 350 V8 gets 25 mpg .200 hp
200 hp lpe gets 400 mpg.
.
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
20 Jan 2005 10:01:50 AM |
|
|
In sci.physics, tj Frazir
<GravityPhysics@webtv.net>
wrote
on Thu, 20 Jan 2005 02:01:17 -0500
<1119-41EF573D-137@storefull-3214.bay.webtv.net>:
Best 350 V8 gets 25 mpg .200 hp
200 hp lpe gets 400 mpg.
And generates 100% recycled ***** unless one
postulates an additional heat source to keep
the pistons liquid.
--
#191,
It's still legal to go .sigless.
.
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
20 Jan 2005 11:15:52 AM |
|
|
Same intake air , same fuel mix .
except the liquid piston at 60 rpm can handle liquid oxygen and gas (
rocket fuel ) and your car cant.
We just compaired the lpe against a 350 V8.
,,each cylinder of the lpe is 350 ci the same as the v8 .
The same 200 HP.
If you wernt so stupid you could understand it.
my ship runs at 51 to 1 .
If a tank of fuel last 30 days befor I put the lpe in then it will run
51 months on a tank .
The car 270 hp is 2 engines of 138 hp lpe in a stack of 2 . 4 liquid
pistons and 2 rotors is 2 engines in line.
.......................................
a 24 inch rotor vrs a 2 inch crank .
....... effective force of cranks suck.
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Look at the fuel,,, at 8 to 1 compresion air rammed up to 8/1 is 340 deg
at 145 psi
befor detnation injection.
The fuel is then injected in a V8 and the psi is
400 psi x 16 si is 6400 pounds at 0.01 feet R on a crank. 160 foot
pounds or what ever.
Thats fucking nothin.<<<<<<<<<<<<
Now a rotor with 400 psi ,,same stroke as v8.. has 400 psi siting
flat against the vane sticking out the 24 inch rotor .
One square inch of vane at 12 inch R is 400 foot pounds . O2 boost
the fuel and its 800 psi
at 12 inches ,,800 foot pounds.
slide 2 inch of vane out the rotor and its 1600 foot pounds ,,
I can still slide another inch 2400 foot pounds...
then I can inject amoniumnitrate and diesel and o2 and gas , and start
running .
You wount find 2400 foot pounds in a funny car. But I can stack the
lpe and run a lpe v8
that is 4 inline engines X 2400 foot ponds.
10,000 foot pounds in a car is enouph !
A viper has 200 foot pounds !
10,000 foot pounds is a car that is as strong as a train .
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
AND YET ,,,,,,,,, as good as that compairison is between lpe and V8 ,,,
there is the steam with air intake rammed up to 16/1 then injected with
O2 ,,and LESS GAS.
In ballance ,,the steam and o2 is driving the car and the fuel is
maintaining the steam .
There is no coolant . In fact the lower the boiling point the better.
The shape of the liquid cylinder is the same volume of 350 cubic inches
in a 3 inch pipe 3 feet long.
forced threw a 1 inch chanel with a vane on the rotor blocking the
channel.
..............................................
Why =A9=BF=A9* it blows the fucking snott out of a stupid V8
!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
If I put a 270 hp lpe on each wheel ,,no driveshafts ,,I could do MOCK
1 in a 4wd.
............. or you could just drive normal and get 516 mpg in a 88
cadilac.
I put that whale engine in that caddy in 88 and still have not turned
it off.
2 oil injected berrings ,,nothing else ever touches.
it has gone 5 million miles .
I garrentee an engine for 1 million miles.
And build then in HK for sale soon at $ 2500 each .
270 hp 200 mpg 1 million mile engine for $2500 .
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Automakers Put Hydrogen Power On the Fast Track |
20 Jan 2005 12:13:29 PM |
|
|
You compair 20 to 1 with the electric bill.
selling a 138 hp 3 gallon day will end the nuke plant coal plant and
all plants except hydroelectric plants and will change them.
thats 10 all electric homes with the heat and the air on 24;;7 . on
fucking 3 gallon a day.
And gas would cost 32 cents a gal again.
The worlds oil neads cut by 95 %.
Oil will be worthless.
USA gov fears this will bust all thier rich buddies. The bush
faimely could go broke quick. GM and ford dont want any line changes .
They dont give a ***** what gas is ..change the rules would change the
line .
The rich like the gas prices.
They get more of your money .
So forget a pattent ,,I just gave the GOV navy and engine .
Now its imposble to file te patent because I wount let them have a Run
program .
I gave evry leagle chance to the US Gov ,,then went to Hong Kong and
worked to get auto import door wide open into usa.
Then I started building the worlds biggest tallest factory in Hong
Kong.
An import deal , to usa auto market and a brad new auto plant with the
worlds biggest engine plant.
They wount understand what hit the market till they see it.
Then they are all 10 years behind .
I can build an engine out te door for 500 and make te 2000.
Ill sell 100 times more engines than bill gates ever sold pc and made
200.
500 million engines a year.
x 2000 bucks.
BEST UNDERSTAND NAFTA BEFOR THE GOV TURNS THIER UGLY HEAD ON MY
ENGINE ...I could have built the pant in detroit .
building in Hong kong was world smart.
ausome workforce.
easy shipping , evryone loves hong kong .
BUT the deal is ,,,no oil co owns china.
China wount turn a back on the engine like the usa gov oil bosses.
They cant fucking find me to knock me off.
Im tooooo rich to stop.
I beat them over thier heads with thier own rule book befor the games
began.
They might try claiming I exported it because Im a usa native and are
entiteled to shares.
I have a letter that proves and a photo that proves and a statement "
they dont want anything that works ""
I went to china .
USA turned it down .
Now Ill imort it into the usa =A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1=A1
Because thats te rules ,,now they have to let me import the fucker
,,,its the rules.
They hoped for it deing unfunded and forgoten. keep the oil running.
Ford and eddison were not giants and neaded funding.
I dont nead thier suport or stock suport.
I pulled 4 billion usd out of my pants and the market felt it. I biult
the plant at 10 cents on the usd in hong kong and 4 bil builds a 40
billion usd supper tower auto plant.
An auto line with a view.
You could put 5 GM plants inside it.
It has its own subway to the docks.
outsourcing parts ???? ***** its hong kong !!
the engine assembly plant and auto asembly in the tower and body
stamps at the docks.
parts sourced around town.
Ill sell 1 ... in usa ,,then the news will sell them all.
a composit of best methods.
the math on evry method and evry part.
The sliding vane rotor with the inner wheel for a vane cam was
invented to fit the methods requirement deitctated by the math.
An imposible task .
the rotor no engineer could draw.
I drew it. I allready had its math equirements.
Move the inner wheel up 1 inch and the vanes on spings stick out the
top of the rotor as the rotor turns ..and then move the inner wheel down
1 inch and the vanes stick out the bottom of the rotor 1 inch .
the director is the top and botom vane chnnel and is spllit at the
inner wheel berring.
move the inner wheel up you move the director chanel up and maintain
1/1000 clearance at all times.
The 2 cylinders ,, one on each side of the rotor send water as its
piston back and forth forcing the water down just the samemethod as any
2 cycle gas engine and pushes the water up the oposit cylinder ..2
liquid pistons 2 cycle gas engines with a vane rotor between .
It beats the fucking snott out of anything else ever biult.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|