| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
19 Feb 2005 02:20:03 PM |
| Object: |
BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
BEWARE OF THIS IMBECILE.
It says: two planes leave in opposite direction from an inertial
reference frame platform, travel the same distance, and then return to
the platform...
AND THE IDIOT asks: "the distance is in REFERENCE TO WHAT?????"
The dummy don't know what an "inertial reference frame" is.
So be carefull and keep away from this retard and his stupid comments.
The NITWIT's comments are fully documented below:
------------------------------------------------------------
Postulate #1:
Two planes simultaneously take off at c/3 in opposition directions
(West and East) from a Platform used as the inertial reference plane.
*** If both planes travel the same distance and return to the
platform
then both the planes clocks will match with each others ***.
2) Hey stooopid - how is "distance" measured? Time? By whom?
------------------------------------------
DUHH I don't don't know dummy ask around and they'll tell ya, what a
stupid *****...that's only one of a dozen EXACTLY similar replies.
On top of all that the idiot continues by pointing to web links which
the nitwit believes will CLARIFY his stupidity.
****INDEED THEY CLARIFY HIS STUPIDITY....KINDERGARTEN EDUCATION****
.
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 11:24:00 PM |
|
|
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108844403.415942.314960@f14g2000cwb.googlegroups.com...
BEWARE OF THIS IMBECILE.
We know.
It also says "winter is at apogee" and fuckwit CarbUncle Sch-wart-zit
cannot read:
"BTW, you *****-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
could it. Hey Androcyst, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high
school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling
alley." --Schwartz the fucking imbecile.
½[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+ x'/(c+v) )] =
tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
Reference:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
_________________________________
| IMPORTANT NOTICE! |
| DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS |
| IT RELIEVES THEM OF |
| CONSTIPATION |
| AND THE RESULT IS |
| OBNXIOUS |
|________________________________|
Androcles
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 03:43:49 PM |
|
|
wrote:
BEWARE OF THIS IMBECILE.
It says: two planes leave in opposite direction from an inertial
reference frame platform, travel the same distance, and then return to
the platform...
AND THE IDIOT asks: "the distance is in REFERENCE TO WHAT?????"
The dummy don't know what an "inertial reference frame" is.
So be carefull and keep away from this retard and his stupid comments.
The NITWIT's comments are fully documented below:
------------------------------------------------------------
Postulate #1:
Two planes simultaneously take off at c/3 in opposition directions
(West and East) from a Platform used as the inertial reference plane.
*** If both planes travel the same distance and return to the
platform
then both the planes clocks will match with each others ***.
2) Hey stooopid - how is "distance" measured? Time? By whom?
------------------------------------------
DUHH I don't don't know dummy ask around and they'll tell ya, what a
stupid *****...that's only one of a dozen EXACTLY similar replies.
On top of all that the idiot continues by pointing to web links which
the nitwit believes will CLARIFY his stupidity.
****INDEED THEY CLARIFY HIS STUPIDITY....KINDERGARTEN EDUCATION****
Res ipsa loquiter.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 04:14:52 PM |
|
|
Habeus Corpus Simulado
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 07:19:30 PM |
|
|
Flunked Latin too, I see.
Harry C.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 07:17:50 PM |
|
|
Mouthy moron!
Harry C.
p.s. What is the problem that retards have with Uncle Al in refusing to
learn the excellent information that he posts?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 08:35:42 PM |
|
|
wrote:
BEWARE OF THIS IMBECILE.
A troll insulting one of the most knowledgable posters in this forum doesn't
cut much slack.. instead of insulting people who know what they are talking
about, how about you get off your *****, or off your boyfriends *****, and get
an education.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles Androcles@ MyPlace.org" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 11:26:01 PM |
|
|
"Morituri-|-Max" <newage@sendarico.net> wrote in message
news:2ISRd.13286$cW2.2242@fe2.texas.rr.com...
guskz@hotmail.com wrote:
BEWARE OF THIS IMBECILE.
A troll insulting one of the most knowledgable posters in this forum
doesn't cut much slack.. instead of insulting people who know what
they are talking about, how about you get off your *****, or off your
boyfriends *****, and get an education.
It also says "winter is at apogee" and fuckwit CarbUncle Sch-wart-zit
cannot read:
"BTW, you *****-faced baboon, "(c+v) appears nowhere in the paper, nor
could it. Hey Androcyst, you are an ineducable idiot. Your high
school should be leveled and replaced by an abandoned bowling
alley." --Schwartz the fucking imbecile.
½[tau(0,0,0,t)+tau(0,0,0,t+x'/(c-v)+ x'/(c+v) )] =
tau(x',0,0,t+x'/(c-v))
Reference:
http://www.fourmilab.ch/etexts/einstein/specrel/www/
Go kiss its arse, fuckwit.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
22 Feb 2005 11:44:33 AM |
|
|
Terribly Sorry I had no idea you and AUNT AL had a fling going on!!!
Oh and a troll is one who stupidly replies without anything to back-up
his claims.
The other 30% of trolls is those that back-up their claims with
irrelevant words and links.
Here's an example of Aunt Al.
No look at link www.yahoo.com/balletforqueers
.
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
22 Feb 2005 02:26:54 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Terribly Sorry I had no idea you and AUNT AL had a fling going on!!!
Oh and a troll is one who stupidly replies without anything to
back-up
his claims.
The other 30% of trolls is those that back-up their claims with
irrelevant words and links.
Here's an example of Aunt Al.
No look at link www.yahoo.com/balletforqueers
I think you need to grow up. What are you, 14?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Schweinkolben" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 03:42:22 PM |
|
|
he gotcha huh?
Well, you are working in a class of simple problems, with a known answer.
You are trying to find some way around the answer.
If you cannot accept/learn time dilation, how are you going to progress
further in Physics?
This stuff is at least 80 years old. Try something newer, more complex.
You don't have to beat yourself up over the simple stuff.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 04:02:10 PM |
|
|
Another idiot
.
|
|
|
| User: "Schweinkolben" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 04:10:00 PM |
|
|
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108850530.500446.89440@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Another idiot
I offer private tutoring in Physics, highschool level to graduate school.
If you want the help, it is here. You can pass with A's, honest.
Contact me at
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 05:10:25 PM |
|
|
Educate yourself dummy.
Why do you need to hide in private, are you a queer?
Explain what was wrong or shut-up idiot.
There was nothing wrong the distance is calculated from the INERTIAL
REFERENCE FRAME DUMMY.
WHAT are you and AL GAY LOVERS!!!!!!!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Marcus Wellpoth" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 05:38:27 PM |
|
|
Schweinkolben wrote:
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108850530.500446.89440@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Another idiot
I offer private tutoring in Physics, highschool level to graduate school.
If you want the help, it is here. You can pass with A's, honest.
Contact me at
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
He can't. He is beyond any help. Sam Wormley put it right. Don't feed
the troll.
mw
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 05:06:31 PM |
|
|
Schweinkolben wrote:
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108850530.500446.89440@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Another idiot
I offer private tutoring in Physics, highschool level to graduate
school.
If you want the help, it is here. You can pass with A's, honest.
Contact me at
Clever Idiot
Tutor yourself
No need to hide and go "private", demonstrate to everyone your
stupidity and "try" to correct what was written incorrectly.
Honest you can't and your stupid.
----------------------------------------------------------------
BEWARE OF THIS IMBECILE.
It says: two planes leave in opposite direction from an inertial
reference frame platform, travel the same distance, and then return to
the platform...
AND THE IDIOT asks: "the distance is in REFERENCE TO WHAT?????"
The dummy don't know what an "inertial reference frame" is.
So be carefull and keep away from this retard and his stupid comments.
The NITWIT's comments are fully documented below:
------------------------------------------------------------
Postulate #1:
Two planes simultaneously take off at c/3 in opposition directions
(West and East) from a Platform used as the inertial reference plane.
*** If both planes travel the same distance and return to the
platform
then both the planes clocks will match with each others ***.
2) Hey stooopid - how is "distance" measured? Time? By whom?
------------------------------------------
DUHH I don't don't know dummy ask around and they'll tell ya, what a
stupid *****...that's only one of a dozen EXACTLY similar replies.
On top of all that the idiot continues by pointing to web links which
the nitwit believes will CLARIFY his stupidity.
****INDEED THEY CLARIFY HIS STUPIDITY....KINDERGARTEN EDUCATION****
.
|
|
|
| User: "Schweinkolben" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 10:39:41 PM |
|
|
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108851899.222688.171540@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Schweinkolben wrote:
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108850530.500446.89440@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Another idiot
I offer private tutoring in Physics, highschool level to graduate
school.
If you want the help, it is here. You can pass with A's, honest.
Contact me at
Clever
Yes, I am.
Idiot
If so, and I outsmarted you, what does that make you?
Tutor yourself
I do, I read a book every two-three days, books in Math, Physics, Coding
theory, everything technical.
No need to hide and go "private", demonstrate to everyone your
stupidity and "try" to correct what was written incorrectly.
Public is fine with me. Perhaps others will want to join in, too. If you
want your tutoring in this public newsgroup, that is OK by me, but you need
to specify what level you want to start at. Perhaps SR, with inertial
reference frames. How are you at Calculus? You need to pay me ahead of
time for 5 lessons, via Posting, and you will have homework to do too.
PayPal is fine, free shipping, at $50/hr my typing time.
LESSON 1
Your three clocks problem, two move at same velocities (c/3) and return to
beginning point.
1. the reference frame has the stationary clock on it.
2. the reference frame is stationary with general respect to the universe
3 the path the two moving clocks take, does not matter.
4. This problem can be demonstrated with 1 clock, or expanded to n clocks
5. The moving clocks do not have to leave at the same time.
6. The moving clocks must have identical speeds referenced to the frame.
7. After all clocks arrive back, all are compared, and the time dilation is
TD= 1/sqrt(1-((c/3)^2)/c^2) or about 6.07%
8. If the trip took 1 minute, the time dilation, or time on the moving clock
is 56.23 seconds.
9. If the trip took 1 hour, the time on the moving clock (any of them) is
56.23 minutes.
10 Your homework questions are:
A. Why is path of the clock irrelevant in this example?
B. Why are the number of clocks irrelevant in this example?
C. Why is distance an intermediate parameter, and can be ignored?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
21 Feb 2005 11:56:46 AM |
|
|
Schweinkolben wrote:
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108851899.222688.171540@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
Schweinkolben wrote:
<guskz@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1108850530.500446.89440@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Another idiot
I offer private tutoring in Physics, highschool level to graduate
school.
If you want the help, it is here. You can pass with A's, honest.
Contact me at
Clever
Yes, I am.
Idiot
If so, and I outsmarted you, what does that make you?
Tutor yourself
I do, I read a book every two-three days, books in Math, Physics,
Coding
theory, everything technical.
No need to hide and go "private", demonstrate to everyone your
stupidity and "try" to correct what was written incorrectly.
Public is fine with me. Perhaps others will want to join in, too. If
you
want your tutoring in this public newsgroup, that is OK by me, but
you need
to specify what level you want to start at. Perhaps SR, with
inertial
reference frames. How are you at Calculus? You need to pay me ahead
of
time for 5 lessons, via Posting, and you will have homework to do
too.
PayPal is fine, free shipping, at $50/hr my typing time.
LESSON 1
Your three clocks problem, two move at same velocities (c/3) and
return to
beginning point.
1. the reference frame has the stationary clock on it.
2. the reference frame is stationary with general respect to the
universe
3 the path the two moving clocks take, does not matter.
4. This problem can be demonstrated with 1 clock, or expanded to n
clocks
5. The moving clocks do not have to leave at the same time.
6. The moving clocks must have identical speeds referenced to the
frame.
7. After all clocks arrive back, all are compared, and the time
dilation is
TD= 1/sqrt(1-((c/3)^2)/c^2) or about 6.07%
8. If the trip took 1 minute, the time dilation, or time on the
moving clock
is 56.23 seconds.
9. If the trip took 1 hour, the time on the moving clock (any of
them) is
56.23 minutes.
Now, let me get this straight...
With your God given eyes you still see as what "I" wrote is incorrect
and infact is not exactly what you just wrote??
It all began when I wrote the post: "Subject: Postulate #1: Time
Dilation" and "UNCLE AL" started to HECKLE the post.
10 Your homework questions are:
A. Why is path of the clock irrelevant in this example?
B. Why are the number of clocks irrelevant in this example?
C. Why is distance an intermediate parameter, and can be ignored?
Oh no it's not! Why look at UNCLE AL's HECKLING(one of a million) REPLY
BELOW:
UNCLE AL:"2) Hey stooopid - how is "distance" measured? Time? By
whom?"
So "you" say distance "can be ignored" where as "AL" says the opposite:
"hey stooopidis we must know how is distance measured?"
-----------------------------------------------------------
In the "Postulate #1: Time Dilation" post, It is written the platform
(where the planes departe) is the Inertial Reference Frame.
So I setup an Inertial Frame for the model
but then UNCLE AL Heclkes:"1) Hey stooopid - only works for inertial
frames"
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Morituri-|-Max" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 08:36:05 PM |
|
|
wrote:
Another idiot
So far, the only clear idiot here is you.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BEWARE of THE IDIOT UNCLE AL |
19 Feb 2005 05:23:13 PM |
|
|
Schweinkolben Feb 19, 2:05 pm show options
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: "Schweinkolben" <nos...@nospam.com> - Find messages by this
author
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:05:47 -0600
Local: Sat, Feb 19 2005 2:05 pm
Subject: TROLL! TROLL!
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
TROLL JSH's paper is completely worthless, and was rejected long time
ago
as too simplistic to even start to consider. After all the paper was
only 1
sheet of paper.
KILLFILE to clean up.
Reply
Thomas Nordhaus Feb 19, 2:58 pm show options
Newsgroups: sci.math
From: Thomas Nordhaus <thnord2...@yahoo.de> - Find messages by this
author
Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 23:58:39 +0100
Local: Sat, Feb 19 2005 2:58 pm
Subject: Re: TROLL! TROLL!
Reply | Reply to Author | Forward | Print | Individual Message | Show
original | Report Abuse
"Schweinkolben" <nos...@nospam.com> schrieb etwas:
Hi - what is "Schweinkolben"? Do you mean "Schweinekoben"="Pigsty"?
Thomas
Reply
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
