| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jean-Paul Turcaud" |
| Date: |
20 Nov 2005 04:22:18 AM |
| Object: |
BIG BLOB & BIG SCREAM THEORIES |
This is a paper which I wrote a few years back and which I publish in
anticipation of another one, which I like to call the foundation paper of
the True Geology.
That other paper I will publish on those ng soon.
*************************************************
Refutation of the Horrid Geological Myths part
Further to the paper written to a leading Canadian scientist and which
appeared with the above heading and which refutes that most horrid theory of
glaciations.( None of them ever occurred and the proofs advanced for it are
particularly the proofs of its impossibility ). I am preparing another one
on the refutation of the Alpine Orogenesis to what follows gives you an
hint.
In fact, it occurred in less than seven days through an industrial process
completely unknown to geologist called 'Punching effect' and I have
thousands of witnesses I can call to the bar which are the cliffs in their
vertical continuity.
The stupid tectonic plates theory cannot account for what we can observe and
it would only lead through the composition of horizontal forces to
dissociated heap of rubble. In no case could we have the vertical resultant
in the continuity of an original beginning of cliff. Furthermore the four
main states of matter at hand in geological observations i.e. solid,
elastic, plastic and liquid show that most of the differential of structure
between the inside of the cliff and the face belong to the first and the
last one of the group. In clear the cliffs went up as-is in the solid state
maintaining in many place the exact dip of the original sedimentary
formation.
Further still the infinite planes of the cliffs and their superposition
would necessitate an infinity of so-called tectonic plates working with
wonderful precision so as to realise the continuity of the cliff
verticality. The Mechanic laws of composition of forces demonstrate the
complete physical impossibility of such a modelisation.
Also we can observe that mountains are larger are the base than on the top,
right? By the process of opposition of the so-called tectonic plates we
could have only two possible scenarios.
1) The one of two bully tectonics plates bashing at a hundred miles per hour
into an innocent little one in the middle. This is the "Big Scream theory"
which would lead to the "Big Squeeze" followed by mountains raising as a
result as ice-scream cones; we can observe that this is not the case. You
must note that I am considering only two forces in opposition. The presence
of vertical cliffs demonstrates that millions of horizontal forces would
have been needed to be in opposition to realise a single broken line of
mountains cliffs in their infinite vertical planes continuity.
2) The tectonic plates come into contact and lead to the necessary
transformation of matter from the solid to the plastic state. This is an
inevitable step otherwise as the most practical potters, the world over,
very well know, we would have heaps of rubbles and scoria. So in that theory
which I call the "Big Blob theory", a big blob of metamorphic material
should raise at the conjunction of those alleged immense tectonic plates
forces in confluence.
But then the tectonic plates would not be in contact anymore and the big
blob would have had high time to cool down, before the tectonic plates again
comes in contact (taking into account the accepted rate of displacement )
Therefore if another big blob comes up and, thanks to a geological hazard,
at the exact spot where the precedent occurred, we still could never have
the cliffs continuity we observe the world over. Further, the piling of
blobs do not make cliffs, as everyone knows, in fact it can makes anything
at all but cliffs.
Page 2***************
Also, what on earth can warranty that in the so-called tectonic plates in
conjunction we would have the surrection occurring at the exact point where
the precedent took place.(Again, considering only two forces in opposition )
Any breaking and surrection could very well occur anywhere along the line of
force as physicists, mechanical and process engineers and potters very well
know.
Such horrid dishonesty theories put over the people must account for the
geologists basic propensity at robbing prospectors; Indeed no one of these
theories can lead upon what we observe in the Alpine fold mountains, that is
the immense vertical faces and wondrous folds of rock in their observable
continuity. The rounded forms of the previous Hercynien and especially
Caledonian folds are due to other reasons which is not discussed here. (but
will be latter)
The time tags in relation to these numerous Alpine Orogenesis cliffs are
uncontestable the world over and these are the main waterfalls which in
fact indicate the surrection of their millions of square miles water basin.
These main falls the world over are never older than 12, 000 years. Niagara,
Zambese etc.
In clear the Alpine Orogenesis occurred less than 12 000 years ago in less
than seven days and probably in its early punching surrection at rates up to
600m /h, so fast indeed than the matrix was blasted open and new cliffs went
up. The erosion theory cannot account either for a so-called erosion or
weathering since the water has no linear flow.
Nota.
Re earthquake anticipation there is method invented and developed by Dr J.
Rousseau and Prof. L.C Vincent which allows one to anticipate earthquake
with an unmanning precision of at least 24 but in fact 48 hours warranted on
the site. It needs however continuous monitoring of the rH2 which is the
electronisation potential and the type of measuring instrument is sold (but
never for this type of determination) by the Yokogawa firm of Japan or by
the US firm of Consort.
On top of these instruments, the determination requires a simple glass of
sea water or rain water. If any on is interested I shall give him addresses
in France or Belgium or Germany where one can get scientific reference works
on this application of discoveries made by the two top scientists above
named and called Bio-Electronic-Vincent.
This invention would have saved thousands of human life in the past and
naturally would save a lot of life in the future. However, the great
drawback of the system - from the geologists' point of view - is that it
does need geologists nor sismologists to be implemented. It follows that
these people will never speak about the method, especially that it goes
again their official understanding of our earth working. It follows that
people will keep on being caught unaware from earthquakes as it has been the
case in Japan recently.
Dr Jeanne Rousseau has conducted over the years thousands of experiment
which proves the Bio-Electronic theory and the possibility it offers to
anticipate earth quakes. Should people the world over keep on dying in
terrible earth turmoil, sacrificed on the altar of geological orthodoxy ?
THIS IS THE QUESTION !!!
Page 3***************
WHAT FOLLOWS IS A SMALL NOTE SENT TO PROF WHITFORD, LEADING CANADIAN
SCIENTIST .
( with regards to the quakes vs nukes controversy)
Now if you look at a cannon, let's say 6 miles away. Then you see a flash of
light but you do not care about it since you do not feel concerned about
what you see as as a simple light signal. Suddenly 30 seconds after the
flash a shell lands and kills 50 people around you.
The argument of the flash-ologists would be to say, there an impossibility
for the very weak signal to have triggered the blast which killed 50
persons. It stands to reason that the sism-ologists oppose you the same
argument. They say Whitford's theory of correlation between quakes and nukes
is a nonsense, since the weak seismic signal cannot trigger a killer quake.
Now, with whom should I side, naturally I like to side with you. In fact, I
cannot take side since both of you are right. The flash of light from the
cannon did not trigger anything and did not kill directly or indirectly the
50 persons, so did the seismic signal. But you are right too since you are
saying that a simple flash of light indicates that 6 miles away somewhere,
50 persons might be killed and this the flas-ologists refuse to admit..
We really have somehow to get out of the dark ages !
Nota :
In clear with relation to geological theories,
Glaciations are a Myth,
Geological Datations are a Myth,
Tectonics plates are a Myth,
Continental Drift is a Myth,
Orogenesis Model of Alpine fold is a Myth,
further
Present Genesis of the Earth is a myth and
finally
The Law of Universal Attraction is a Myth.
From my own experience I have establish that most geological theories are
either wild, childish or plainly stupid and most of the time the three at
the same time.
END
With best regards
Jean-Paul Turcaud
Exploration Geologist
Founder of the True Geology
~~ Ignorance Is The Cosmic Sin, The One Never Forgiven ! ~~
.
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: BIG BLOB & BIG SCREAM THEORIES |
20 Nov 2005 08:10:30 AM |
|
|
Refutation of the Horrid Geological Myths part
Further to the paper written to a leading Canadian scientist and which
appeared with the above heading and which refutes that most horrid
t....(snipsky)
******************
That's as bad as that guy who keeps talking endlessly about the "Global
Brain" thingy, whatever it is, which is intuitively false and need not
be given any consideration at all.
"Self-reference is the key to unlimited advances in human knowledge and
turgidity."
- Douglas R. Hofstadter
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Giant Blob headed to Earth by 5500 AD ? Blame it on the Gum Nebula star explosion @15,000 years ago, it may have melted last ice age, caused ozon hole, volcanos and earth quakes, (Supernova Remnant in Puppis & Vela)Covering 40-60% of the Southern Sk
So I'm shopping in Target with "the team," and I walk by a civilian Mom with her little kid in the cart, and the little kid starts with the "soja teen scream cough," and you can tell the diference between a real cough and a soja aids infected cow pup
#22 Table of Comparison of these two theories Re: new book "ATOM TOTALITY THEORY Replaces Big Bang Theory in PHYSICS"
Beyond Singularity - Smart Theories
Re: When are scientific theories 'scientific explanations'?
Return to the end of probability theories
Orthodoxy's Opposition to Theories of Superluminality
Re: 911 Conspiracy Theories....
| Are Unified Field Theories Justified?
re:World full of theories makes an ignima unified field theory
Are Unified Field Theories Justified?
Least Action Principle is explained only in Atom Totality theory, notbig-bang and not in string theories
Dave Eggers Killed Literature, Poetry, and Physics With Postmodern Anti-Theories Like String Theory
Latest Theories about the Universe
Tired of Theories of everything, read this and get your own conclusion.
|
|
|
