|
|
| User: "Divij Rao" |
|
| Title: Re: BOOK PLZ |
15 Jun 2007 11:05:07 AM |
|
|
On Jun 14, 8:32 pm, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Divij Rao wrote:
resnick and hallide's book "fundamentals of physics "is the best book
for physics for intermediate classes, can anyone plz suggest me a book
of same quality for chemistry, and for maths
When I was in school Halliday and Resnick was an excellent textbook
for freshman taking physics and calculus.
yes, that is true, i have just passed out of school, and have started
reading that book, i want a similar book in chemistry and maths. any
opinions and suggestions are welcome.
thank you,
regards,
Divij
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puppet_Sock" |
|
| Title: Re: BOOK PLZ |
15 Jun 2007 11:10:21 AM |
|
|
On Jun 15, 12:05 pm, Divij Rao <divij_urdb...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
[snip]
i want a similar book in chemistry and maths. any
opinions and suggestions are welcome.
My opinion is that chemists would be better able to tell you
about chemistry texts, and math types about math texts.
I stopped taking chemistry as soon as I had my requirement
for non-physics classes filled. Chem labs were a bother.
"You were doing acid-base titration with very weak
concentrations of each. How did you start a fire?"
"How did I start a fire? I don't know. That's the problem!"
Socks
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divij Rao" |
|
| Title: Re: BOOK PLZ |
15 Jun 2007 11:45:56 AM |
|
|
On Jun 15, 9:10 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 15, 12:05 pm, Divij Rao <divij_urdb...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
[snip]
i want a similar book in chemistry and maths. any
opinions and suggestions are welcome.
My opinion is that chemists would be better able to tell you
about chemistry texts, and math types about math texts.
I stopped taking chemistry as soon as I had my requirement
for non-physics classes filled. Chem labs were a bother.
"You were doing acid-base titration with very weak
concentrations of each. How did you start a fire?"
"How did I start a fire? I don't know. That's the problem!"
Socks
sorry, i could not understand what you posted....plz..can u
elaborate...i m not good in english, thus fail to read b/w lines.
thank you,
Divij
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puppet_Sock" |
|
| Title: Re: BOOK PLZ |
15 Jun 2007 01:57:58 PM |
|
|
On Jun 15, 12:45 pm, Divij Rao <divij_urdb...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
[snip]
sorry, i could not understand what you posted....plz..can u
elaborate...i m not good in english, thus fail to read b/w lines.
thank you,
Divij
sci.phys --- good for physics, bad for chemistry, medium to bad for
math
(Well, lately bad for everything.)
sci.chem --- good for chemistry, bad for physics, medium to bad for
math
sci.math --- good for math, bad for chemistry, medium to bad for math
You want chemistry books, ask in sci.chem.
You want math books, ask in sci.math.
Also, searching at groups.google.com in the newsgroup of your choice
could not hurt.
Socks
.
|
|
|
| User: "Divij Rao" |
|
| Title: Re: BOOK PLZ |
16 Jun 2007 12:57:12 AM |
|
|
On Jun 15, 11:57 pm, Puppet_Sock <puppet_s...@hotmail.com> wrote:
On Jun 15, 12:45 pm, Divij Rao <divij_urdb...@yahoo.co.in> wrote:
[snip]
sorry, i could not understand what you posted....plz..can u
elaborate...i m not good in english, thus fail to read b/w lines.
thank you,
Divij
sci.phys --- good for physics, bad for chemistry, medium to bad for
math
(Well, lately bad for everything.)
sci.chem --- good for chemistry, bad for physics, medium to bad for
math
sci.math --- good for math, bad for chemistry, medium to bad for math
AGREED
You want chemistry books, ask in sci.chem.
yes, i have.
You want math books, ask in sci.math.
i get the idea, science is strongly related to maths, so
mathematicians would have been good at chem also during college times,
when they had to choose b/w math-phy-chem.
Also, searching at groups.google.com in the newsgroup of your choice
could not hurt.
pardon...
Socks
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
