C1 & C2 radiation constants.



 Science > Physics > C1 & C2 radiation constants.

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "brian a m stuckless"
Date: 12 Mar 2006 11:09:20 PM
Object: C1 & C2 radiation constants.
Aetherist wrote: >

On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 20:16:21 GMT, srp <srp2@globetrotter.net>
wrote: > >Aetherist a =E9crit : >> On Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:13:54 GMT,
srp <srp2@globetrotter.net> wrote: > > [Snip...] >

This viewpoint requires the quantum "vacuum" to determine
which particle is which.


Or simply identifying and understanding that "fundamental
quantum quantity" you refer to, that I have a hunch
(supported by my no fields model) that bare unsigned charge
may well be, whatever it ends up physically being.


You might want to consider... > >>
http://www.mountainman.com.au/charge_ps.htm


Hi Paul > >
Very interesting. Maybe you have already, but have you
explored Planck's black body equation regarding Boltzman
constant.

Your definition k=3Dh/qc definitely seems to be directly
related to the c_2 constant of Planck's equation

c_2 =3D hc/k [=3D qc^2 ..in your notation ..brackets mine.]

$$ C1 & C2 radiation constants.
$$ Planck C1 & C2 radiation constants, in GUESS iSS STANDARD Units:
$$ C2 =3D h*c/k =3D {e}*c^2 =3D (Amps*sec)*m^2/(sec)^2, ..in GUESS iSS;=
$$ =3D C1/4*pi*(MagFlux#) =3D (mol part)*degK*meters, ..in GUESS iSS;
$$ =3D C1/2*pi*k*c =3D Amps*(meters)^2/sec =3D (mol part)*degK*meters
$$ =3D C1/2*pi*rH*{e} =3D (Amperes*meters)^2/Amps*sec
$$ =3D eH*c^2/Vu =3D Ohms*(Amperes*meters)^2/Volts*sec.
$$ Where eH is Hartree energy.
$$ Where Vu is 10*("e")*Volts.
$$ Where rH is the Quantum of Hall resistance.
$$ Where ("e") is Natural (Naperian) logarithm base.
$$
See: < ANY flux formula >< My BiGGER bang.!!! >< ascii iSS GUESS >.
$$
$$ Sincerely, ```Brian A M Stuckless, Ph.T (Tivity).

Thought you might be interested in looking that lead up.


Ah yes, the quantum exponential part,

(h/k)(=83/T)
e - 1

Well, as you can tell, this simply becomes,

(qc)(=83/T)

And h/k -> simply qc...

Wein's displacement L (Lambda [Max]) is simply,

L =3D 2q/=A3=B5T =3D 2qc^2/T

Where =A3 =3D Permittivity [..Eo, in GUESS iSS.]
=B5 =3D Permeability [..Uo, in GUESS iSS.]

Nothing arbitrary anymore...

I also am intrigued by the 1.001 offset between measured
and calculated ground state electron's magnetic moment.
Can't reach any conclusion yet. > > > Regards > > Paul Stowe

Re: There NEVER was YET even ONE infinity and there NEVER will be.
Re: Is the Electron Charge really infinite.
Re: C1 & C2 radiation constants.
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Constants eps0, mu0, and c wrong?
Independent/Dependent Phases 23.2: "Varying universal constants"
Alternate Fundamental Constants
Avogrado constants and others
Mechanisms for Constants of Nature correlations
Constants: "gravitatioal mass" (w/g) = "inertial mass" (f/a)
Independent/Dependent Phases 7: Dyt vs Dtt Make Most "Universal Constants" Implausible
time constants in pitot static tubes
Quantum Gravity 209.0: How Phase Constants Generalize Dirac DeltaFunctions, Kronecker deltas, Levi-Civita (tensor) symbols, etc.
If Planck Constants Are Truly Fixed Forever Constant.....
Revisiting Variable Constants
Zero and 1 or Infinity Solutions in Universe-Partitioned Probability 3: Phase-Changing Constants
Quantum Gravity 184.2: John D. Barrow of Cambridge U. on Varying Constants
Time and the constant (was Re: Constants)
Re: Setting constants like hbar to unity
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER