"Spaceman" <Spaceman@realspaceman.com> wrote in message news:<o25cb.419392$cF.129424@rwcrnsc53>...

"Shaddy Daddy" <shaddy_s@hotmail.com> wrote in message

Hi I'm looking for a supplier to a lightweight and cheap mirror of
medium surface area? can anyone help me out to find something?

Thanks in advance!!

AOL CD's
:)

Always good to see you visit the forum,as far as I can tell
sci.physics fell to pieces after you left and it has become an
uninteresting place where I don't even bother to post regularly.As you
can see these relativistic jokers are still making fools of themselves
with clocks and you deserve much of the credit for pointing out
Albert's great smoke and mirrors relativity machine and many others
shoud thank you.

I had a good chuckle at how Albert did astronomy and have had nobody
to share the joke with.He fixes the path of the planet (try Mars
tonight) to the 'fixed stars' and then asked his readers to ignore the
influence of the motion of the fixed stars,I guess nobody told Albert
that the motion of the fixed stars is just the Earth rotating.

http://www.synapses.co.uk/astro/earthmot.html

James,it is that funny how he paints the boys here into a corner that
you might have to invent a new language to handle the stupidity of
it,look for yourself -

"We must draw attention here to one of these deviations. According to
Newton's theory, a planet moves round the sun in an ellipse, which
would permanently maintain its position with respect to the fixed
stars, if we could disregard the motion of the fixed stars, themselves
and the action of the other planets under consideration. Thus, if we
correct the observed motion of the planets for these two influences,
and if Newton's theory be strictly correct, we ought to obtain for the
orbit of the planet an ellipse, which is fixed with reference to the
fixed stars"



http://www.bartleby.com/173/29.html