(1) at the atomic level we have the particles as the electron, proton,
etc, and the field is composed of photons we can use either QM or EMSFT
to investigate its structure and energy spectroscopy

(2) if we assume that the 'field' is fractal, in particular there is a
lower level of 'field' in the normal sense of fractal; we now have the
photon as a particle;

(3) we can use the same mathematics that was used to investigate the
hydrogen atom. i.e. either QM or SFT. note that this field is NOT an
EM field but it does have a similar composition in that there is now a
tiny tiny particle that makes up ITS field

(4) when we do this we must now have certain conditions on the photon's
internal structure; since its energy spectrum is continuous, one way to
arrange this via the mathematics is to have two subophotonic particles

of equal mass and opposite charge.

ANY frequency is a valid solution to the maxwell-lorentz equations.

(5) the mass and charge can be determined from the maths to see whether
this matches other phenomena including the energy density foe E-fields
etc.

(6) is there proof for any such photon spectroscopy? yes, in brief the
physics of hydration and its role in the functioning of DNA.

(7) what does all this mean? well it gives us a "photon chemistry"
which yields a picture not unlike the standard model of particle

physics, and extends our depth of view from what QFT gives us. it
gives us a "unified" picture of phenomena; this picture is really an
extension of the findings some 100 years ago when it was found that
electromagnetics could be extended over decades and decades of
frequency

were brought under the one theoretical umbrella.

standard model, that the equations can be modified to suit the force
involved; something very like gauge groups exists in SFT as it does in
the standard model

(8) note that there are differences between SFT and 'classical' EM and
SFT and QFT;

SFT means that HUP is not present in any form in SFT and hence we can
obtain the motions rather than just the probability that a particle is
at a point in space-time.

(9) SFT allows various 2D spinorial structures that are apriori
relativistic and can be seen to approximate to special relativity where
the curvature of one of the spinors is very large.

(10) the differences in SFT to QFT and the standard model will
influence many areas of physics and biophysics over the coming decades.

i have no personal or monetary ambitions in ANY of this; i want to
'spread my gospel' for the betterment of mankind, it is my earnest
belief that SFT contains the germ of knowledge we need going into the
new millenium to help us search for new energy sources and improved
medical techniques. so please feel free to ask me anything about SFT
and if you feel inclined to use it in your academic studies do with the

usual reference to my work of course please.