Can the energy loss of 2 orbiting stars, currently explained by emission of 'gravity waves', be explained by emission of 'dark force'?



 Science > Physics > Can the energy loss of 2 orbiting stars, currently explained by emission of 'gravity waves', be explained by emission of 'dark force'?

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1

1

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Jan Panteltje"
Date: 07 Mar 2005 09:25:01 AM
Object: Can the energy loss of 2 orbiting stars, currently explained by emission of 'gravity waves', be explained by emission of 'dark force'?
The subject line says it all.
Now that would be cute would it not?
I am probably wrong, but as more and more
the search for those elusive 'gravity waves'
shows no results, time to look for a 'non Jewish'
explanation?
This idea is copyright Jan Panteltje, and any nomination for
the Jan Panteltje price are a given fact.
I propose 'Panteltje force'
hey!
.

User: "tadchem"

Title: Re: Can the energy loss of 2 orbiting stars, currently explained by emission of 'gravity waves', be explained by emission of 'dark force'? 07 Mar 2005 10:13:41 AM
Jan Panteltje wrote:

The subject line says it all.
Now that would be cute would it not?
I am probably wrong, but as more and more
the search for those elusive 'gravity waves'
shows no results,

For a display of current gravity wave records at a station near you:
http://tidesonline.nos.noaa.gov/geographic.html

time to look for a 'non Jewish'
explanation?

The use of the term 'non Jewish' is not only inaccurate an not
humerous, it is gratuitous and makes you appear to be a bigot.

This idea is copyright Jan Panteltje, and any nomination for
the Jan Panteltje price are a given fact.
I propose 'Panteltje force'

Energy is NOT the same thing as force. For a force to transfer energy,
it must be demonstrated to act upon an object through a finite
distance.
If you are seriously going to propose a novel 'force' you had better
describe what attributes of material objects it acts upon to impart a
change in momentum and transfer energy.
Otherwise you have just volunteered to join the ever-growing list of
cranks.
You might want to edit that 'probably' to read 'almost certainly'.
Tom Davidson
Richmond, VA
.


  Page 1 of 1

1

 


Related Articles
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER