| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
26 Jan 2005 08:34:23 PM |
| Object: |
Carbon Nanotubes |
I have 5 grams of Fluorinated Carbon Nanotubes that I'm trying to get
rid of. Does anyone know a place I can sell them?
.
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
26 Jan 2005 08:40:26 PM |
|
|
wrote:
I have 5 grams of Fluorinated Carbon Nanotubes that I'm trying to get
rid of. Does anyone know a place I can sell them?
Ask Alridch.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
26 Jan 2005 08:43:31 PM |
|
|
eBAY?
Let me know it it works. I've got a couple hundred liters of spec grade
pure 2-methoxyethanol I'd like to get rid of.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
27 Jan 2005 10:19:06 AM |
|
|
"Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" wrote:
eBAY?
Let me know it it works. I've got a couple hundred liters of spec grade
pure 2-methoxyethanol I'd like to get rid of.
You can't lawfully ship it. Look up the regs.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Puppet_Sock" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
27 Jan 2005 11:47:57 AM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
"Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" wrote:
eBAY?
Let me know it it works. I've got a couple hundred liters of spec
grade
pure 2-methoxyethanol I'd like to get rid of.
You can't lawfully ship it. Look up the regs.
Just out of curiosity, do these regs allow one to ship newsprint?
I mean, it's loaded up with various chemicals.
Socks
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
27 Jan 2005 12:15:57 PM |
|
|
Puppet_Sock <puppet_sock@hotmail.com> wrote:
Uncle Al wrote:
"Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" wrote:
eBAY?
Let me know it it works. I've got a couple hundred liters of spec
grade
pure 2-methoxyethanol I'd like to get rid of.
You can't lawfully ship it. Look up the regs.
Just out of curiosity, do these regs allow one to ship newsprint?
I mean, it's loaded up with various chemicals.
Socks
Newsprint has been "organic" vegetable dye for years now.
Don't want to contaminate the county dump...
--
Jim Pennino
Remove -spam-sux to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
27 Jan 2005 01:43:40 PM |
|
|
Well, it certainly got shipped from SIGMA to me and is still in
original packaging. Are the shipping laws asymmetrical about WHO can
ship, as opposed to HOW??
.
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
27 Jan 2005 03:38:49 PM |
|
|
"Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" wrote:
Well, it certainly got shipped from SIGMA to me and is still in
original packaging. Are the shipping laws asymmetrical about WHO can
ship, as opposed to HOW??
Proper packaging helps. Look at the bill of lading. The truck must
have a safety placard for the flammables. You may or may not be able
to ship by air (flammable and toxic).
The first time you spend a morning going through a wooden crate,
vermiculite, a sealed metal can, more vermiculite, a chemical safety
pouch... down to the bottle of a Good's buffer (for mammalian cell
culture) your realize how corrupt and fucked the system is.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/qz.pdf
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
27 Jan 2005 05:37:56 PM |
|
|
Oh, indeed, I've done all that. And come at the end to a 50 g bottle of
chemically pure acetylsalicyic acid, marked with skull and crossbones
as a poison. Sigh. Which of course it is, but these thing are relative.
Good thing you didn't get any Good's Buffer on you. They even take
silly precautions for bottles of pure amino acids or vitamin powders.
God forbid any should break and you get any glycine or thiamine or
glucose on you. I think safety gloves, goggles, and proper chemical
aprons are recommended for handling.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Timo Nieminen" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
27 Jan 2005 06:32:58 PM |
|
|
On Fri, 27 Jan 2005, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com wrote:
Good thing you didn't get any Good's Buffer on you. They even take
silly precautions for bottles of pure amino acids or vitamin powders.
God forbid any should break and you get any glycine or thiamine or
glucose on you. I think safety gloves, goggles, and proper chemical
aprons are recommended for handling.
Maybe it's better to take precautions for everything, rather than try to
teach common sense. After all, there are people out there who, unless
strictly forbidden by rules, will use hazardous waste incinerators to
reheat their lunches (actually, I'm pretty sure there were rules, but they
failed in this case).
--
Timo Nieminen - Home page: http://www.physics.uq.edu.au/people/nieminen/
Shrine to Spirits: http://www.users.bigpond.com/timo_nieminen/spirits.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gregory L. Hansen" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
27 Jan 2005 08:20:56 PM |
|
|
In article <Pine.LNX.4.50.0501281030390.21730-100000@localhost>,
Timo Nieminen <timo@physics.uq.edu.au> wrote:
On Fri, 27 Jan 2005, Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com wrote:
Good thing you didn't get any Good's Buffer on you. They even take
silly precautions for bottles of pure amino acids or vitamin powders.
God forbid any should break and you get any glycine or thiamine or
glucose on you. I think safety gloves, goggles, and proper chemical
aprons are recommended for handling.
Maybe it's better to take precautions for everything, rather than try to
teach common sense. After all, there are people out there who, unless
strictly forbidden by rules, will use hazardous waste incinerators to
reheat their lunches (actually, I'm pretty sure there were rules, but they
failed in this case).
At work I see refrigerators labeled "NO CHEMICAL OR BIOLOGICAL SAMPLES".
There's also a sign on the road that says "DANGER: 10 MPH SPEED LIMIT".
--
"Suppose you were an idiot... And suppose you were a member of
Congress... But I repeat myself." - Mark Twain
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Andy Resnick" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
28 Jan 2005 07:27:51 AM |
|
|
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com wrote:
Oh, indeed, I've done all that. And come at the end to a 50 g bottle of
chemically pure acetylsalicyic acid, marked with skull and crossbones
as a poison. Sigh. Which of course it is, but these thing are relative.
Heh... we've got a bottle of caffeine, also marked "poison" and
amazingly enough, no-one has yet used it to amp up the coffee.
Good thing you didn't get any Good's Buffer on you. They even take
silly precautions for bottles of pure amino acids or vitamin powders.
God forbid any should break and you get any glycine or thiamine or
glucose on you. I think safety gloves, goggles, and proper chemical
aprons are recommended for handling.
At my previous job the standard way to dispose of the clean-up rags with
toluene, acetone, etc on them is to take them outside and let the
organics evaporate. Then the rags can be disposed of normally, and not
as hazardous waste.
--
Andrew Resnick, Ph.D.
Department of Physiology and Biophysics
CWRU School of Medicine
tanspose 'op' for mail
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
28 Jan 2005 04:43:35 PM |
|
|
At my previous job the standard way to dispose of the clean-=ADup rags
with
toluene, acetone, etc on them is to take them outside and le=ADt the
organics evaporate. Then the rags can be disposed of normal=ADly, and
not
as hazardous waste. <<
This works, but is frowned on (read-- illegal) in Southern California
and places with bigtime air polution and smog problems. Heck, we even
have ridiculous sucker thingies on the gas pumps nozzles to remove the
gasoline fumes (which turn out to be far, far more potent at causing
smog than NOx or most of what comes out of your tailpipe). All this
stuff is a pain but has actually worked. L.A. county air is clearer
than decades ago when there were many fewer cars.
There's no good environmental way to get rid of toluene and similar
aromatic solvents, or chlorinated solvents, yourself. Acetone and
simple alcohols are probably best simply poured down the drain with a
lot of water. Letting them evaporate just adds to the hydrocarbon air
burden. Which may be fine in the 'burbs, but not near the city. In
SoCal, it's all city.
SBH
.
|
|
|
| User: "Keith F. Lynch" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
31 Jan 2005 09:17:32 PM |
|
|
Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com <sbharris@ix.netcom.com> wrote:
There's no good environmental way to get rid of toluene and similar
aromatic solvents, or chlorinated solvents, yourself.
I don't know about chlorinated solvents, but why can't toluene and
other non-chlorinated solvents simply be burned, producing nothing
but a little heat, carbon dioxide, and water vapor?
I don't think your spamblock is very effective.
--
Keith F. Lynch - http://keithlynch.net/
Please see http://keithlynch.net/email.html before emailing me.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
01 Feb 2005 06:31:40 PM |
|
|
If you had the right equipment you could. You'd have to burn them at
quite high temperatures to make sure no hydrocarbon fragments escape,
like those incinerators they use for nerve agents (though not THAT
thorough). It's surprising how much stuff an ordinary fire vaporizes,
which escapes complete burning.
The very worst thing about Google is the way it completely screws up
any attempt at spamblocking. I have yet found no way to keep from
posting your complete and unaltered email address somewhere in the
header in Google posts. If you complain to Google about it, they blow
you off and suggest that if you want to post anonymously, to use some
other service.
SBH
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sbharris[atsign]ix.netcom.com" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
28 Jan 2005 04:44:38 PM |
|
|
At my previous job the standard way to dispose of the clean-=ADup rags
with
toluene, acetone, etc on them is to take them outside and le=ADt the
organics evaporate. Then the rags can be disposed of normal=ADly, and
not
as hazardous waste. <<
This works, but is frowned on (read-- illegal) in Southern California
and places with bigtime air polution and smog problems. Heck, we even
have ridiculous sucker thingies on the gas pumps nozzles to remove the
gasoline fumes (which turn out to be far, far more potent at causing
smog than NOx or most of what comes out of your tailpipe). All this
stuff is a pain but has actually worked. L.A. county air is clearer
than decades ago when there were many fewer cars.
There's no good environmental way to get rid of toluene and similar
aromatic solvents, or chlorinated solvents, yourself. Acetone and
simple alcohols are probably best simply poured down the drain with a
lot of water. Letting them evaporate just adds to the hydrocarbon air
burden. Which may be fine in the 'burbs, but not near the city. In
SoCal, it's all city.
SBH
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "tj Frazir" |
|
| Title: Re: Carbon Nanotubes |
28 Jan 2005 08:33:22 AM |
|
|
Answer the question Uncle comic .
Uncle al is a comic and dont know ***** about anything.
Tell us how mass attracts mass uncle dumbass .
You think you earned the rite to be an ***** to evryone .. Then deal with
me idiot.
Im ready with the math ,,you cant do because you suck at math and
physics.
Your just ere t ***** with people and times UP.
I want answers out of you or your *****.
Now smart fucking clown ,,put the answer down once and for all or
leave people alone.
Ill be on your stupid ***** like a tick.
1 you dont know a photon from a neutron.
2 . you dont know ***** about gravity.
3 ,, you block people and uck with evryone.
ILL kick your ***** outa hear.
Ill corect your stupid math and prove you are a ignorant arogant clown
..
Re: The Bending of Space Porat
Group: sci.physics Date: Thu, Jan 27, 2005, 12:01pm From:
GravityPhysics@webtv.net (tj=A0Frazir)
Poor rats.
=A0=A0Energy slope then idiot.
=A0=A0Up is a gain in mass .
=A0=A0so 1/2 evry atom is pushing its other 1/2 twards less mass. The
center of the atom is where all its parts are falling. But atoms change
mass at C.
=A0=A0one side of the atom has more mass than the other side , falling
twards its center and 1/2 the atom is pushing the other half.
=A0=A0=A0=A0You suck at physics uncle dumbass.
=A0Im ramming this page up your *****.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0" YOU DONT KNOW ***** ABOUT GRAVITY"
Still your turn.
=A0=A0I said this.
=A0=A0=A0=A0In an energy slope the atom pushes it's self. 1/2 of evry
atom pushes the other 1/2 down the energy slope. =A0 Gravity is a push
to less energy . UP is a gain in mass and atoms change mass at C.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0Gravity is push to less mass ... .......
As a mass is pushed up , it gains mass. Pushed up in an energy slope .
=A0=A0 =A0 1/2 of evry atom has more mass than the other half of evry
atom in the field of low.
=A0=A0=A0=A0More mass of evry atom is falling twards it"s own pit at the
center of the atom then the other.
=A0=A0Evry atom has the same energy diferance in the field. evry 1/2
atom pushes its other half as there is more mass on one side than the
other.
=A0=A0=A0=A0There is no pull. Its a push to LESS MASS =A0 How one atom
falls ..1/2 the atom has more mass and pushes it that way.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0 our turns SAM and AL.
=A0=A0tell all us dumbasses how gravity works.. Al and Sam are hiding
from me.
=A0=A0=A0=A0The subject of gravity is not one they like to deal with
because they have no clue.
=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0=A0As the universe expands a low forms around mass.
=A0 Gravity is a push to less .
=A0=A0Not a pull No attraction.
=A0The atom pushes its self.
=A0=A01/2 of evry atom is pushing its other 1/2. =A0 Its undeniable.
=A0=A0Bacause if you might notice the mass gain of evry atom and the
mass loss side of evry atom
is proportional and te driferance is F andd F--MA yet V is allways the
same.
=A0=A0F--MA is not suposed to work here.
=A0=A0I have combined GR and SR.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
