Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 6: New Interpretation of Riccati Equation



 Science > Physics > Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 6: New Interpretation of Riccati Equation

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 19 Feb 2006 05:56:49 PM
Object: Causation/Causality, Memory, and Convolution 6: New Interpretation of Riccati Equation

From Osher Doctorow


The Riccati Differential equation is:
1) dy/dt = A(t) + B(t)y + C(t)y^2
with all variables/constants real scalars, although they can be
generalized to matrices with slight changes. In the latter case,
feedback/control such as Kalman filter-predictors and optimal control
using dynamical systems involve propagation of error-covariance or
variance-covariance matrices y = "P" using (1).
The most important Riccati Differential equation subtypes are the
Logistic Differential equation and the Exponential Growth/Decay
Differential equations, respectively:
2) dy/dt = ky(1 - y) (y "normalized" or "standardized" to be between 0
and 1 here)
3) dy/dt = ky
If we multiply out the right hand side of (2) and collect terms, and
likewise for (3), we get respectively:
4) dy/dt - ky + ky^2 = 0
5) dy/dt - ky = 0
SInce k > 0 usually in (4), the second and third terms have alternating
signs, and so up to a constant the three terms can be converted to
Probable Influence/Causation form:
6) 1 + y - x, x and y > = 0
In the case of (5) if k > 0 (exponential growth) and dy/dt > 0, the
terms are alternating in sign and can be easily converted to (6) for
the left-hand-side of (5) by adding 1 to both sides. The case k < 0
and dy/dt < 0 (exponential decay) can just be considered as a
"reflection" geometrically from (5) with k > 0.
Even if we don't standardize y in (2), we still get an equation similar
to (4) and (6) as follows:
7) dy/dt = ay(b - y) = aby - ay^2, a > 0, b > 0
This has alternating signs for the two terms on the right hand side
with the usual condition that y > = 0, so it can be converted to (6) up
to a constant.
So the Riccati Differential equation in its most common forms reflects
(Probable) Causation, and even the matrix feedback form can be regarded
as derived from those most common forms which gives a (Probable)
Causal/Influence interpretation to Feedback Control..
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Proper interpretation of data
Application of physics based on crank interpretation of the HUP and others
Possible Interpretation of the Wave Equation & Non-linearity
A variable rest mass interpretation of general relativity
Why Copenhagen Interpretation is Wrong
Are Particle Zoo interpretation infallible?
Single photon double slit expe interpretation
QM- the Penrose Interpretation (How true?)
Classical Interpretation of Bell Test Photon Correlation Experiments
Structure and Interpretation of Classical Mechanics -- reading group
Do all possibilities happen in the many worlds interpretation of QM?
Independent/Dependent Phases 10: Re-interpretation of f(x,y) = 1/2
Independent/Dependent Phases 24: Max Born Probability Interpretation Via 1/2
Massless vs Super-Massive Scenarios Via Knowledge Equation 2: Phase Interpretation
Interpretation of the complex wavefunction (Bohr, Einstein or Feynman) ?
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER