Science > Physics > Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubed headset
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Resonanceone" |
| Date: |
07 Jun 2004 01:22:12 AM |
| Object: |
Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubed headset |
Which would reduce radiation more for cell phone usage: a wireless headset or
a tubed headset that tranmits the sound via an airtube rather than wire.
Considerations:
-The wireless headsets have a battery (the ones I saw used Lithium) and this
would be right next to the head.
-I don't think the wired headsets have batteries in them.
-The wired headset that I would get is "Radfree" which tramits sound via a
flexable tube instead of a wire. I think that some of it is wired until near
your head, where there is a chamber that converts electrical waves to sound
waves, and then the rest of the path (which goes toward your head) is a tube.
http://www.sygnet-tech.com/products_rf_cl.asp?item=rfcl
-The distance from the phone to my head would be the same irregardless of the
headset
I ask because I was about to buy a wireless headset, but then I realized that
it has a battery in it. So I viewed the decision as coming down to whether the
battery radiation from the wireless headset is worse than the radiation that
might be sent through the tubed/wired headset.
.
|
|
| User: "Michael Varney" |
|
| Title: Re: Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubed headset |
07 Jun 2004 12:12:46 PM |
|
|
"Resonanceone" <resonanceone@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040607022212.16160.00000720@mb-m15.aol.com...
Which would reduce radiation more for cell phone usage: a wireless
headset or
a tubed headset that tranmits the sound via an airtube rather than wire.
Considerations:
-The wireless headsets have a battery (the ones I saw used Lithium) and
this
would be right next to the head.
-I don't think the wired headsets have batteries in them.
-The wired headset that I would get is "Radfree" which tramits sound via a
flexable tube instead of a wire. I think that some of it is wired until
near
your head, where there is a chamber that converts electrical waves to
sound
waves, and then the rest of the path (which goes toward your head) is a
tube.
http://www.sygnet-tech.com/products_rf_cl.asp?item=rfcl
-The distance from the phone to my head would be the same irregardless of
the
headset
I ask because I was about to buy a wireless headset, but then I realized
that
it has a battery in it. So I viewed the decision as coming down to whether
the
battery radiation from the wireless headset is worse than the radiation
that
might be sent through the tubed/wired headset.
There is a sucker born every min.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Cardinale" |
|
| Title: Re: Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubed headset |
07 Jun 2004 02:13:28 PM |
|
|
(Resonanceone) wrote in message news:<20040607022212.16160.00000720@mb-m15.aol.com>...
Which would reduce radiation more for cell phone usage: a wireless headset or
a tubed headset that tranmits the sound via an airtube rather than wire.
Considerations:
-The wireless headsets have a battery (the ones I saw used Lithium) and this
would be right next to the head.
-I don't think the wired headsets have batteries in them.
-The wired headset that I would get is "Radfree" which tramits sound via a
flexable tube instead of a wire. I think that some of it is wired until near
your head, where there is a chamber that converts electrical waves to sound
waves, and then the rest of the path (which goes toward your head) is a tube.
http://www.sygnet-tech.com/products_rf_cl.asp?item=rfcl
-The distance from the phone to my head would be the same irregardless of the
headset
I ask because I was about to buy a wireless headset, but then I realized that
it has a battery in it. So I viewed the decision as coming down to whether the
battery radiation from the wireless headset is worse than the radiation that
might be sent through the tubed/wired headset.
Get some aluminum tape and tape three D-cells to your forehead
upside-down. This will generate a placebo effect that will exactly
counteract the effect of the batteries in any headset.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jan Panteltje" |
|
| Title: Re: Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubed headset |
07 Jun 2004 08:12:00 AM |
|
|
On a sunny day (07 Jun 2004 06:22:12 GMT) it happened
(Resonanceone) wrote in <20040607022212.16160.00000720@mb-m15.aol.com>:
Which would reduce radiation more for cell phone usage: a wireless headset or
a tubed headset that tranmits the sound via an airtube rather than wire.
Considerations:
-The wireless headsets have a battery (the ones I saw used Lithium) and this
would be right next to the head.
-I don't think the wired headsets have batteries in them.
-The wired headset that I would get is "Radfree" which tramits sound via a
flexable tube instead of a wire. I think that some of it is wired until near
your head, where there is a chamber that converts electrical waves to sound
waves, and then the rest of the path (which goes toward your head) is a tube.
http://www.sygnet-tech.com/products_rf_cl.asp?item=rfcl
-The distance from the phone to my head would be the same irregardless of the
headset
I ask because I was about to buy a wireless headset, but then I realized that
it has a battery in it. So I viewed the decision as coming down to whether the
battery radiation from the wireless headset is worse than the radiation that
might be sent through the tubed/wired headset.
Batteries do NOT radiate.
Oops, well, a RTG does, so do not use a RTG.
A wireless headset (RF based) would likely radiate less (then the cellphone).
Why not use a normal headset with wire that plugs in your handy?
You can buy these everywhere.
What counts is the distance from the handy (eh cellphone) antenna to your brain.
This assumes something, cavety where brain normally is should not be empty.
JP
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubed headset |
07 Jun 2004 08:23:21 AM |
|
|
Resonanceone <resonanceone@aol.com> wrote:
Which would reduce radiation more for cell phone usage: a wireless headset or
a tubed headset that tranmits the sound via an airtube rather than wire.
Considerations:
-The wireless headsets have a battery (the ones I saw used Lithium) and this
would be right next to the head.
-I don't think the wired headsets have batteries in them.
-The wired headset that I would get is "Radfree" which tramits sound via a
flexable tube instead of a wire. I think that some of it is wired until near
your head, where there is a chamber that converts electrical waves to sound
waves, and then the rest of the path (which goes toward your head) is a tube.
http://www.sygnet-tech.com/products_rf_cl.asp?item=rfcl
-The distance from the phone to my head would be the same irregardless of the
headset
I ask because I was about to buy a wireless headset, but then I realized that
it has a battery in it. So I viewed the decision as coming down to whether the
battery radiation from the wireless headset is worse than the radiation that
might be sent through the tubed/wired headset.
What in the world makes you think that a battery radiates anything?
--
Jim Pennino
Remove -spam-sux to reply.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubedheadset |
07 Jun 2004 11:17:01 AM |
|
|
Resonanceone wrote:
Which would reduce radiation more for cell phone usage: a wireless headset or
a tubed headset that tranmits the sound via an airtube rather than wire.
[snip]
Uncle Al has a 1/4" thick solid copper helmet that trails a 1/2"
beryllium-copper bonze link chain to a silicon steel grounding spike.
Give the spike a couple of firm taps with a 5-lb baby sledge and even
6-inch thick cement yields to a good ground. Cell phone radiation is
no problem! The entire setup is entirely portable in a small
backpack.
Japan has female teenage brains being cell-phone fried a solid 8
hrs/day. No etiology of pathology in a large population voer a long
period of time. Ditto violent magnetic field fluctuations washing
through more than a million people/day for 50 years in the New York
City subway system. Take a cheap compass for a ride and watch the
needle as the subway starts, stops, and merely rushes through the
tunnels.
They are LYING to you.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Tm" |
|
| Title: Re: Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubed headset |
07 Jun 2004 08:24:14 PM |
|
|
"Uncle Al" <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> wrote in message
news:40C494FD.A02F1DD3@hate.spam.net...
Resonanceone wrote:
Which would reduce radiation more for cell phone usage: a wireless
headset or
a tubed headset that tranmits the sound via an airtube rather than wire.
[snip]
Uncle Al has a 1/4" thick solid copper helmet that trails a 1/2"
beryllium-copper bonze link chain to a silicon steel grounding spike.
Give the spike a couple of firm taps with a 5-lb baby sledge and even
6-inch thick cement yields to a good ground. Cell phone radiation is
no problem! The entire setup is entirely portable in a small
backpack.
Japan has female teenage brains being cell-phone fried a solid 8
hrs/day. No etiology of pathology in a large population voer a long
period of time. Ditto violent magnetic field fluctuations washing
through more than a million people/day for 50 years in the New York
City subway system. Take a cheap compass for a ride and watch the
needle as the subway starts, stops, and merely rushes through the
tunnels.
They are LYING to you.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
The jury is still out. The hand wringers need more money for study.
Maybe in the next 100 years something will show up.
Meantime, go with Al's ground system. It works.
Tom
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Geoff Taylor" |
|
| Title: Re: Cell phone radiation protection: wireless headset vs. special tubed headset |
09 Jun 2004 08:45:16 AM |
|
|
Several protections from cell phone radiation spring to mind...
* Carefully wash the cell phone in salty water.
This will eliminate the nasty radio waves
* Encase the cell phone in several cm of cement.
Within a couple of days it will not radiate.
* Rather than using the charger, connect the phone directly to 240V Ac.
Be careful because it may radiate badly for a short while,
but in the long term, this will prevent the phone from radiating
harmfully.
* Keep the cell phone in a discarded tennis ball can.
* Bake out the radiation by placing the cell phone in an oven at 230C
for an hour
* Squash out the radiation by placing the cell phone under the wheel of a
car.
* A technique that will improve your fitness. Attach a string to the aerial.
Swing the phone forcefully in an arc, perpendicular to the Earth's
magnetic
field, until it hits a nearby wall. Done with sufficient force, the
harmful radiation
that it normally emits will be much attenuated.
"Resonanceone" <resonanceone@aol.com> wrote in message
news:20040607022212.16160.00000720@mb-m15.aol.com...
Which would reduce radiation more for cell phone usage: a wireless
headset or
a tubed headset that tranmits the sound via an airtube rather than wire.
Considerations:
-The wireless headsets have a battery (the ones I saw used Lithium) and
this
would be right next to the head.
-I don't think the wired headsets have batteries in them.
-The wired headset that I would get is "Radfree" which tramits sound via a
flexable tube instead of a wire. I think that some of it is wired until
near
your head, where there is a chamber that converts electrical waves to
sound
waves, and then the rest of the path (which goes toward your head) is a
tube.
http://www.sygnet-tech.com/products_rf_cl.asp?item=rfcl
-The distance from the phone to my head would be the same irregardless of
the
headset
I ask because I was about to buy a wireless headset, but then I realized
that
it has a battery in it. So I viewed the decision as coming down to whether
the
battery radiation from the wireless headset is worse than the radiation
that
might be sent through the tubed/wired headset.
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
