Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational



 Science > Physics > Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 3 of 6

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "kT"
Date: 19 May 2007 10:58:38 AM
Object: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational
Christians are irrational. They're so irrational, and they know it, that
they refuse to allow people to refer to Christianity in print.
Christian Science - an oxymoron.
Christians - morons.
Why are these institutions allowed tax exempt status, and why are they
allowed to participate in government?
--
Get A Free Orbiter Space Flight Simulator :
http://orbit.medphys.ucl.ac.uk/orbit.html
.

User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 23 May 2007 09:38:20 PM
Rand Simberg wrote:

I find fascinating the question of why it's so important to Pat to not
believe it that he put himself through these mental gymnastics in an
absurd attempt to prove it's not true.

Because it's faked; the foreground is in focus, the midsection is out of
focus, the background is in focus again.
Camera optics don't work like that.

Check out this link:

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=25589_Iranian_Talk_Show_From_Hell&only

Now, why would it be so hard to believe that people who deny the
Holocaust and/or Hitler's role in it wouldn't also march around with
signs saying "God Bless Hitler"? (For western consumption, of
course.)

The question is not whether they would do that, but is that picture faked?
Saying "that's just the sort of thing they would do" without proof that
they actually did it is blatantly racist.
All you are is the flip side of their attitude, as is Little Green
Footballs.
A fair, unbiased journal:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Little_Green_Footballs
"For "promoting Israel, and Zionism" and "presenting Israel's side of
the conflict," LGF won the "Best Israel Advocacy Blog" award from the
Jerusalem Post in 2005 [5]; opines Gil Ronen, a reporter for internet
news outlet, Israel National News:[6]
If anyone ever compiles a list of Internet sites that contribute to
Israel’s public relations effort, Johnson's site will probably come in
first, far above the Israeli Foreign Ministry's site."
So, it's Islamofascists versus Zionists apparently.
Pat
.
User: "Rand Simberg"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 23 May 2007 09:54:23 PM
On Wed, 23 May 2007 21:38:20 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Rand Simberg wrote:

I find fascinating the question of why it's so important to Pat to not
believe it that he put himself through these mental gymnastics in an
absurd attempt to prove it's not true.


Because it's faked; the foreground is in focus, the midsection is out of
focus, the background is in focus again.
Camera optics don't work like that.

Says you.

Check out this link:

http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=25589_Iranian_Talk_Show_From_Hell&only

Now, why would it be so hard to believe that people who deny the
Holocaust and/or Hitler's role in it wouldn't also march around with
signs saying "God Bless Hitler"? (For western consumption, of
course.)

The question is not whether they would do that, but is that picture faked?

There's no reason to think that it's not, other than the ravings of a
loon.

Saying "that's just the sort of thing they would do" without proof that
they actually did it is blatantly racist.

*****. You obviously don't even know what "race" means.
That's why you have no credibility, and no one takes you seriously.
Or now, are you wishing they were? Despite the fact that you yourself
have said we shouldn't?
.
User: "Eric Chomko"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 24 May 2007 11:28:35 AM
On May 23, 10:54 pm,
(Rand Simberg)
wrote:

On Wed, 23 May 2007 21:38:20 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Rand Simberg wrote:

I find fascinating the question of why it's so important to Pat to not
believe it that he put himself through these mental gymnastics in an
absurd attempt to prove it's not true.


Because it's faked; the foreground is in focus, the midsection is out of
focus, the background is in focus again.
Camera optics don't work like that.


Says you.

Check out this link:


http://littlegreenfootballs.com/weblog/?entry=25589_Iranian_Talk_Show...


Now, why would it be so hard to believe that people who deny the
Holocaust and/or Hitler's role in it wouldn't also march around with
signs saying "God Bless Hitler"? (For western consumption, of
course.)


The question is not whether they would do that, but is that picture faked?


There's no reason to think that it's not, other than the ravings of a
loon.

Saying "that's just the sort of thing they would do" without proof that
they actually did it is blatantly racist.


*****. You obviously don't even know what "race" means.

That's why you have no credibility, and no one takes you seriously.

And you have credibility and are taken seriously? You fool, Pat has
already stated he's here for fun. You claim the same and them make a
stupid claim about credibility.
I don't know who pays you to be a consultant but you better hope that
they never wake up.


Or now, are you wishing they were? Despite the fact that you yourself
have said we shouldn't?

You you be more vague? I bet you can't!
Eric
.



User: "Rand Simberg"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 21 May 2007 01:37:30 PM
On Mon, 21 May 2007 12:41:51 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Rand Simberg wrote:

Yes. There's no reason to think it wasn't. In fact, several people
who know what they're doing inspected it thoroughly to see if that was
the case. It wasn't.

What you've got here is either:
A. Some people screwing around with Photoshop to see what they can pull off.
Or
B. A pretty well done piece of propaganda.

This took a lot of work, I suspect the latter.

Pat Flannery, Graphics Expert?
Sorry, I'll take the word of people who do it for a living.
.
User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 21 May 2007 07:34:50 PM
Rand Simberg wrote:

Pat Flannery, Graphics Expert?

Sorry, I'll take the word of people who do it for a living.

Oh, I didn't write that for you; I wrote it by anyone who might be duped
by it.
The focus part is particularly telling.
It would be fun to back-track the origin of this image.
Pat
.
User: "Rand Simberg"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 21 May 2007 07:43:14 PM
On Mon, 21 May 2007 19:34:50 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Rand Simberg wrote:

Pat Flannery, Graphics Expert?

Sorry, I'll take the word of people who do it for a living.


Oh, I didn't write that for you; I wrote it by anyone who might be duped
by it.

You mean people who want to live in an alternate reality, like you?
Do you think you'll find any competent graphics analyst who would
agree with you? A search certainly finds none on the web.
But go ahead, continue to live in your own dreamworld, in which
Christians are the greatest threat to humanity, and Islam is the
"religion of peace."
.
User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 22 May 2007 12:00:40 AM
Rand Simberg wrote:

You mean people who want to live in an alternate reality, like you?
Do you think you'll find any competent graphics analyst who would
agree with you? A search certainly finds none on the web.

I want to see your citations for people who agreed the image _wasn't_
retouched.
I pointed out oddities in that image anyone can check out and see for
themselves.
Enlarge the image to 400% in MS Paint and have a look at the pixels
around their heads.
You'll see the "halos".
Then check out the variable focus sharpness in different parts of the image.
Sharp foreground...out-of-focus middle...sharp background.
Odd, very odd.
Pat
.




User: "Fred J. McCall"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 11:32:49 PM
Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> wrote:
:
:(Note for self...if going out to protest war in Iraq, make sure protest
:sign is written in Iraqi, so that people will get my point.) :-D
:
Note for Pat...if going out to protest the war in Iraq and you are
trying to influence the West, make sure protest sign is written in
English, so that Press will get and rebroadcast your point.
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
.
User: "Eric Chomko"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 21 May 2007 12:20:00 PM
On May 21, 12:32 am, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@earthlink.net> wrote:

Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> wrote:

:
:(Note for self...if going out to protest war in Iraq, make sure protest
:sign is written in Iraqi, so that people will get my point.) :-D
:

Note for Pat...if going out to protest the war in Iraq and you are
trying to influence the West, make sure protest sign is written in
English, so that Press will get and rebroadcast your point.

The West is already influenced. W's war is a mess. The Dems won
Congress mostly as a protest to W's war. Do try and keep up...
Eric


--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn

.
User: "Fred J. McCall"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 23 May 2007 07:10:18 PM
Eric Chomko <pne.chomko@comcast.net> wrote:
:On May 21, 12:32 am, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@earthlink.net> wrote:
:> Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> wrote:
:>
:> :
:> :(Note for self...if going out to protest war in Iraq, make sure protest
:> :sign is written in Iraqi, so that people will get my point.) :-D
:> :
:>
:> Note for Pat...if going out to protest the war in Iraq and you are
:> trying to influence the West, make sure protest sign is written in
:> English, so that Press will get and rebroadcast your point.
:
:The West is already influenced.
:
So?
:
:W's war is a mess. The Dems won
:Congress mostly as a protest to W's war. Do try and keep up...
:
Sorry, but that's just stupid. Oh, I'm sure the Democrats believe it
to be true, but they're kidding themselves.
I really wish politicians would get over this idea that a fingernail
victory for their party constitutes "a MANDATE" for whatever their pet
idea is.
--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson
.
User: "Eric Chomko"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 24 May 2007 11:34:22 AM
On May 23, 8:10 pm, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@earthlink.net> wrote:

Eric Chomko <pne.cho...@comcast.net> wrote:

:On May 21, 12:32 am, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@earthlink.net> wrote:
:> Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> wrote:
:>
:> :
:> :(Note for self...if going out to protest war in Iraq, make sure protest
:> :sign is written in Iraqi, so that people will get my point.) :-D
:> :
:>
:> Note for Pat...if going out to protest the war in Iraq and you are
:> trying to influence the West, make sure protest sign is written in
:> English, so that Press will get and rebroadcast your point.
:
:The West is already influenced.
:

So?

Where you lack words you obviously fill in with jingoism.


:
:W's war is a mess. The Dems won
:Congress mostly as a protest to W's war. Do try and keep up...
:

Sorry, but that's just stupid.

Is it now? Virtually every Republican candidate that aligned
themselves with Bush during the last election lost. Showing them with
the president or having him at one of their rallies was a negative
factor for their campaign.

Oh, I'm sure the Democrats believe it
to be true, but they're kidding themselves.

I really wish politicians would get over this idea that a fingernail
victory for their party constitutes "a MANDATE" for whatever their pet
idea is.

Losing both hosues of Congress is not a fingernail victory. The Dems
were supposed to get one the GOP gave them both!

--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson

.
User: "Fred J. McCall"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 24 May 2007 09:13:37 PM
Eric Chomko <pne.chomko@comcast.net> wrote:
:On May 23, 8:10 pm, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@earthlink.net> wrote:
:> Eric Chomko <pne.cho...@comcast.net> wrote:
:>
:> :On May 21, 12:32 am, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@earthlink.net> wrote:
:> :> Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> wrote:
:> :>
:> :> :
:> :> :(Note for self...if going out to protest war in Iraq, make sure protest
:> :> :sign is written in Iraqi, so that people will get my point.) :-D
:> :> :
:> :>
:> :> Note for Pat...if going out to protest the war in Iraq and you are
:> :> trying to influence the West, make sure protest sign is written in
:> :> English, so that Press will get and rebroadcast your point.
:> :
:> :The West is already influenced.
:> :
:>
:> So?
:
:Where you lack words you obviously fill in with jingoism.
:
Your inability to answer even a simple question is noted.
:
:>
:> :
:> :W's war is a mess. The Dems won
:> :Congress mostly as a protest to W's war. Do try and keep up...
:> :
:>
:> Sorry, but that's just stupid.
:
:Is it now?
:
Yeah, it is. But then, it came from you so what could we expect?
:Virtually every Republican candidate that aligned
:themselves with Bush during the last election lost.
Cite? Sure seem to be a lot of them left for that to be true.
:
:Showing them with
:the president or having him at one of their rallies was a negative
:factor for their campaign.
:
Apparently not.
:
:> Oh, I'm sure the Democrats believe it
:> to be true, but they're kidding themselves.
:>
:> I really wish politicians would get over this idea that a fingernail
:> victory for their party constitutes "a MANDATE" for whatever their pet
:> idea is.
:
:Losing both hosues of Congress is not a fingernail victory. The Dems
:were supposed to get one the GOP gave them both!
:
Look at the margins, Eric. Try not thinking with your politics for a
change...
In fact, try thinking at all for a change....
--
"Some people get lost in thought because it's such unfamiliar
territory."
--G. Behn
.

User: "The_Man"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 24 May 2007 01:11:06 PM
On May 24, 12:34 pm, Eric Chomko <pne.cho...@comcast.net> wrote:

On May 23, 8:10 pm, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@earthlink.net> wrote:





Eric Chomko <pne.cho...@comcast.net> wrote:


:On May 21, 12:32 am, Fred J. McCall <fmcc...@earthlink.net> wrote:
:> Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> wrote:
:>
:> :
:> :(Note for self...if going out to protest war in Iraq, make sure protest
:> :sign is written in Iraqi, so that people will get my point.) :-D
:> :
:>
:> Note for Pat...if going out to protest the war in Iraq and you are
:> trying to influence the West, make sure protest sign is written in
:> English, so that Press will get and rebroadcast your point.
:
:The West is already influenced.
:


So?


Where you lack words you obviously fill in with jingoism.



:
:W's war is a mess. The Dems won
:Congress mostly as a protest to W's war. Do try and keep up...
:


Sorry, but that's just stupid.


Is it now? Virtually every Republican candidate that aligned
themselves with Bush during the last election lost.

"Virtually all"? Is this Democratic math? If "virtually all" of the
pro-Bush Republicans lost in the election (which involved all of the
House), how come Bush has a veto-proof majority?
How come the Dems wimped out on setting a deadline for "pulling out"?

Showing them with
the president or having him at one of their rallies was a negative
factor for their campaign.

What about the one pro-war Democratic candidate, who lost the
Democratic primary in very blue state Connecticut, and then beat the
Democratic anti-war candidate while running as an independent?


Oh, I'm sure the Democrats believe it
to be true, but they're kidding themselves.


I really wish politicians would get over this idea that a fingernail
victory for their party constitutes "a MANDATE" for whatever their pet
idea is.


Losing both hosues of Congress is not a fingernail victory. The Dems
were supposed to get one the GOP gave them both!



--
"Ignorance is preferable to error, and he is less remote from the
truth who believes nothing than he who believes what is wrong."
-- Thomas Jefferson- Hide quoted text -


- Show quoted text -- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.





User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 08:17:10 PM
Rand Simberg wrote:

You're missing the point, which is that they weren't selling Nazism on
the basis of Christianity, even when addressing Lutherans. They did
it on the basis of nationalism. Pat's original statement was that
Nazism was based on Christianity. It was not.

That's NOT my original statement.
You said Nazism was pagan; I said it had a lot of Christian elements in
it, particularly while trying to appeal to the rank-and-file of the
Germans it wanted to enlist on its side.
Pat
.
User: "Rand Simberg"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 08:48:01 PM
On Sun, 20 May 2007 20:17:10 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:

Rand Simberg wrote:

You're missing the point, which is that they weren't selling Nazism on
the basis of Christianity, even when addressing Lutherans. They did
it on the basis of nationalism. Pat's original statement was that
Nazism was based on Christianity. It was not.

That's NOT my original statement.
You said Nazism was pagan; I said it had a lot of Christian elements in
it, particularly while trying to appeal to the rank-and-file of the
Germans it wanted to enlist on its side.

I'm sorry, you're right about your original (non) statement. I
misremembered the beginning of the thread. My apologies for that.
Yes, it was someone else who said that. The point remains that it was
much more pagan than Christian, and in fact, it really wasn't
Christian at all, but you tried desperately, and pathetically, to make
a case that it was. You remain wrong.
I wonder why you can't get as worked up about Islamists who want to
finish the Holocaust *now*, as you do over people over half a century
ago who started it who weren't Christians, but you want to imply were.
.
User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 10:49:22 PM
Rand Simberg wrote:

You said Nazism was pagan; I said it had a lot of Christian elements in
it, particularly while trying to appeal to the rank-and-file of the
Germans it wanted to enlist on its side.


I'm sorry, you're right about your original (non) statement. I
misremembered the beginning of the thread. My apologies for that.

I may cut this into a slab of marble and put it up on the wall.
The circle has just been squared, the three-body problem solved, and
Jupiter has indeed just left its orbit.

Yes, it was someone else who said that. The point remains that it was
much more pagan than Christian, and in fact, it really wasn't
Christian at all, but you tried desperately, and pathetically, to make
a case that it was. You remain wrong.

Synthetic marble inside the toilet lid.

I wonder why you can't get as worked up about Islamists who want to
finish the Holocaust *now*, as you do over people over half a century
ago who started it who weren't Christians, but you want to imply were.

The Islamics want to kill off all the Poles, Slavs, and Gypsies, also?
I didn't know that.
If it weren't for Israel and the Palestinians, they might not have that
many problems with the Jews, either.
Have I ever told you about my idea of "Mickism"?
You see, a lot of the Irish are Roman Catholic, but because of the great
potato famine, we were scattered all over the world.
Now being Roman Catholic, we are of course Romans in the depth of our souls.
Yet where is our homeland in Italy?
In Ireland, we are constantly under the threat of the damned English,
who do not respect us, or understand our ways, and tried to exterminate
us or starve us to death on many occasions, so that we died in our millions.
NEVER AGAIN!
It is time to return home, it is time to take back our holy city of Rome
from the damned Italians who have occupied it.
By force, if necessary.
(Throws pint glass on floor, stomps on it, and declares: "NEXT ST.
PADDY'S DAY IN ROME!")
Lads and lassies, it's time for all of us to plant a tater plant in Rome!
Save those tater eyes, so that your children may see them blooming next
to the Vatican with their own eyes!
Now we don't want much...just the Vatican States...at least for starters.
I want you to remember your glorious Irish Roman Catholic past...I want
you to paint your door posts with Guinness come next Hangover!
Pat bar Jimmy
.
User: "Rand Simberg"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 21 May 2007 07:07:12 AM
On Sun, 20 May 2007 22:49:22 -0500, in a place far, far away, Pat
Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> made the phosphor on my monitor glow in
such a way as to indicate that:



Rand Simberg wrote:

You said Nazism was pagan; I said it had a lot of Christian elements in
it, particularly while trying to appeal to the rank-and-file of the
Germans it wanted to enlist on its side.


I'm sorry, you're right about your original (non) statement. I
misremembered the beginning of the thread. My apologies for that.


I may cut this into a slab of marble and put it up on the wall.
The circle has just been squared, the three-body problem solved, and
Jupiter has indeed just left its orbit.

Nonsense. I always apologize when I mistakenly misattribute words. I
don't like it when people do it to me (which is often), and I try to
avoid doing it to others.

Yes, it was someone else who said that. The point remains that it was
much more pagan than Christian, and in fact, it really wasn't
Christian at all, but you tried desperately, and pathetically, to make
a case that it was. You remain wrong.


Synthetic marble inside the toilet lid.

I wonder why you can't get as worked up about Islamists who want to
finish the Holocaust *now*, as you do over people over half a century
ago who started it who weren't Christians, but you want to imply were.


The Islamics want to kill off all the Poles, Slavs, and Gypsies, also?

No, it was mostly Jews, but that's what most people think of when they
hear the word "Holocaust," rightly or wrongly. I'm sure they'd be
happy to give them up, though, and wouldn't weep a tear, as long as it
took care of the Jews.

I didn't know that.
If it weren't for Israel and the Palestinians, they might not have that
many problems with the Jews, either.

I see. So when the Mufti of Jerusalem allied with Hitler, it was
because he anticipated the formation of Israel and the artificial
creationn of the "Palestinians" (who are after all, just Arabs)?
There was no hatred of Jews by Wahhabist Arabs prior to the founding
of Israel?
If Israel ceased to exist, all would be sweetness and light in the
Middle East, since the people there are historically so peaceful?
<rest of nonsensical and irrelevance about the Irish elided>
.




User: "Rand Simberg"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 19 May 2007 08:39:05 PM
On Sun, 20 May 2007 01:32:01 GMT, in a place far, far away,
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such
a way as to indicate that:

In article <134v8425jcat066@corp.supernews.com>, Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> writes:



Rand Simberg wrote:

The Nazis weren't Christians. They were pagans.


I once talked to a former Hitler Youth; he stated that they were taught
they were fighting for God to destroy the duel threats that Bolshevism
and Judaism posed to Christian Europe.

I suggest you leaf a tad through "Mein Kampf". You'll find that
Hitler had nothing of contempt for Christianity. Then you may consult
Shirer's "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich", there is a chepter
there on the status of the Church in Nazi Germany.

You're asking Pat to actually crack a serious book or two? Or learn
actual history?
Good luck with that.
.
User: ""

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 19 May 2007 08:50:43 PM
In article <46a8a691.1128232142@news.giganews.com>,
(Rand Simberg) writes:

On Sun, 20 May 2007 01:32:01 GMT, in a place far, far away,
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such
a way as to indicate that:

In article <134v8425jcat066@corp.supernews.com>, Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> writes:



Rand Simberg wrote:

The Nazis weren't Christians. They were pagans.


I once talked to a former Hitler Youth; he stated that they were taught
they were fighting for God to destroy the duel threats that Bolshevism
and Judaism posed to Christian Europe.

I suggest you leaf a tad through "Mein Kampf". You'll find that
Hitler had nothing of contempt for Christianity. Then you may consult
Shirer's "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich", there is a chepter
there on the status of the Church in Nazi Germany.


You're asking Pat to actually crack a serious book or two? Or learn
actual history?

Good luck with that.

Well, based on the level of his remark above, my expectations weren't
that high to begin with, so the disappointment won't be severe:-)
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
.
User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 19 May 2007 09:01:04 PM
wrote:

Well, based on the level of his remark above, my expectations weren't
that high to begin with, so the disappointment won't be severe:-)

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_Religion
Pat
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 19 May 2007 09:24:23 PM
In article <134vb1elf1ku9e7@corp.supernews.com>, Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> writes:



mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

Well, based on the level of his remark above, my expectations weren't
that high to begin with, so the disappointment won't be severe:-)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_Religion

Aha. Did you actully bother to read the contents, or just assumed by
the title that it must, in some way, support your claims.
I gave you some reading pointers. Granted, they involve a tad more
effort than just reading a page or two in wiki. So, how about just
reading this page or two. This'll be a beginning.
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
.
User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 04:25:25 AM
wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_Religion


Aha. Did you actully bother to read the contents, or just assumed by
the title that it must, in some way, support your claims.

Yes, I did; some excerpts:
"Nazism claimed to adhere to Positive Christianity, which many
Christians and Germans accepted.[1] Even in the later years of the Third
Reich, many Protestant and Catholic clergy within Germany persisted in
believing that Nazism was in its essence in accordance with Christian
precepts.[1]"
"Yet Lutherans voted for Hitler more than Catholics. Different German
states possessed regional social variations as to class densities and
religious denomination;[2] Richard Steigmann-Gall alleges a linkage
between several Protestant churches and Nazism,[3] the main aspect being
Hitler's citing anti-Semitic pamphlets by Martin Luther and accusations
that the Lutheran establishment supported Hitler."
"Tangential to the more extreme of collaborationist accusations is the
characterisation that Nazism actively based itself on a similar
pontifical structure and corps of functionaries. For example the special
clothing, ghettoization, and badges demanded of Jews were once common or
even began in the Papal States. Also that the Nazis saw themselves as an
effective replacement of Catholicism that would co-opt its unity and
respect for hierarchy. Hence attempts were made to unite other
religions, as in the earlier example of the Protestant Reich Church."
Here's Positive Christianity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Christianity
They weren't so much pagans, as a radical type of protestants who
wanted to mold and modify Christianity to their own ends.
In this respect they aren't that different from Mormons, who also have
some beliefs that are highly mystical and way off the norm of
traditional Christianity, or Reverend Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church.
Step one was to figure out some way to turn Jesus from a heretical
Jewish Rabbi into a Anti-Jewish Aryan freedom fighter hero.
Those blond-haired, blue-eyed Jesus paintings couldn't have hurt in that
regard: http://42.bloguje.sk/img/jesus_blond3.jpg
Even nowadays, American Neo-Nazi's have prominently used Christian
symbolism in their flags: http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us%7Dnaz.html
Pat
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 05:04:21 AM
In article <135052l227f6j03@corp.supernews.com>, Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> writes:



mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_Religion


Aha. Did you actully bother to read the contents, or just assumed by
the title that it must, in some way, support your claims.


Yes, I did; some excerpts:

"Nazism claimed to adhere to Positive Christianity, which many
Christians and Germans accepted.[1] Even in the later years of the Third
Reich, many Protestant and Catholic clergy within Germany persisted in
believing that Nazism was in its essence in accordance with Christian
precepts.[1]"

Aha. However, what "many Protestant and Catholic clergy believed" is
not the issue, what Nazism believed is. Hitler's contempt for
Christianity is clearly manifested in "Mein Kampf". The fact that
belonging to any Church was a career killer for anybody within the
Nazi hierarchy and and at least a career brake for anybody in the
military is sufficiently well documented as well.
And, you conveniently skipped over the many Christians who did not
favor Nazism and paid for it. But then, I do not expect intellectual
honesty from the likes of you.

"Yet Lutherans voted for Hitler more than Catholics.

Aha. And Catholics vote Democrat more than Protestants. Does this
make the Democrats a Catholic party? Wait, more (way more) Jews vote
Democrat than Republican. Does this make Democrats a Jewish Party?
Make up your mind:-)

Different German
states possessed regional social variations as to class densities and
religious denomination;[2]

Gee whiz. There are differences between regions in terms of class and
religions. Who would have thunk it.

Richard Steigmann-Gall alleges a linkage
between several Protestant churches and Nazism,[3] the main aspect being
Hitler's citing anti-Semitic pamphlets by Martin Luther and accusations
that the Lutheran establishment supported Hitler."

Yes. So?
I note how you carefully avoided all the references (in the material
you qouted) to the denominations which opposed Nazism and paid dearly
for it. Now, let me explain some distinction, this between lawyerly
and scientific argumentation. A lawyer goes over some material,
notices some small part of it that appears (when viewed in isolation
from the rest) to support his case and quotes it, ignoring the rest.
A scientist views somebody engaging in such practice as garbage. I'm
a scientist. I view you as garbage. Hope this is clear.


"Tangential to the more extreme of collaborationist accusations is the
characterisation that Nazism actively based itself on a similar
pontifical structure and corps of functionaries. For example the special
clothing, ghettoization, and badges demanded of Jews were once common or
even began in the Papal States. Also that the Nazis saw themselves as an
effective replacement of Catholicism that would co-opt its unity and
respect for hierarchy. Hence attempts were made to unite other
religions, as in the earlier example of the Protestant Reich Church."

Aha. So? All it says is that the Nazis sought to replace
Christianity as a mass belief. In what way, in the mind of any
reasonable (even marginally reasonable) person does this translate
into "Nazi ideology was Christian ideology"?

Here's Positive Christianity:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Christianity
They weren't so much pagans, as a radical type of protestants who
wanted to mold and modify Christianity to their own ends.
In this respect they aren't that different from Mormons, who also have
some beliefs that are highly mystical and way off the norm of
traditional Christianity, or Reverend Sun Myung Moon's Unification Church.
Step one was to figure out some way to turn Jesus from a heretical
Jewish Rabbi into a Anti-Jewish Aryan freedom fighter hero.
Those blond-haired, blue-eyed Jesus paintings couldn't have hurt in that
regard: http://42.bloguje.sk/img/jesus_blond3.jpg
Even nowadays, American Neo-Nazi's have prominently used Christian
symbolism in their flags: http://www.crwflags.com/fotw/flags/us%7Dnaz.html

Aha. And all this says what? Pretty much nothing. To make it clear,
your position is that the Nazi ideology was a Christian ideology. To
support this position you pick pieces of text which *when viewed in
isolation* appear to have something to do with what you you claim to
be the case, while ignoring any evidence to the contrary. Just what
PC garbage will do. I still view you as garbage.
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
.
User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 06:41:42 AM
wrote:

Aha. And all this says what? Pretty much nothing. To make it clear,
your position is that the Nazi ideology was a Christian ideology.

No, I was saying it wasn't pagan, as Rand claimed. There are definite
Christian aspects that played a part in the overall belief system it
espoused, rather than a complete return to pre-Christian Germanic
paganism. In fact, what they came up with was probably pretty close to
what Germany was like when it was in the process from converting from
Teutonic Norse religion to Christianity, with aspects of both
co-existing. Pretty close to the world Wagner set his operas in that had
such a influence on Hitler's world view.

To
support this position you pick pieces of text which *when viewed in
isolation* appear to have something to do with what you you claim to
be the case, while ignoring any evidence to the contrary. Just what
PC garbage will do. I still view you as garbage.

You and Rand both had the same degree of tolerance and politeness bred
into you, didn't you? :-D
Just read this in its entirety:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Positive_Christianity
It explains the relationship between the Nazi's and Christianity, as far
as their government's view went.
As to what being "PC" has to do with the relationship between the Nazis
and the church is a bit beyond me, but I'll look into some of your
other newsgroup postings to try to figure out where exactly you are
coming from, other than Chicago.
If nothing else, it might be good for a laugh or two.
Pat
.

User: ""

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 12:03:32 PM
In article <1350d258sbu3ve8@corp.supernews.com>, Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> writes:



mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

Aha. And all this says what? Pretty much nothing. To make it clear,
your position is that the Nazi ideology was a Christian ideology.


No, I was saying it wasn't pagan, as Rand claimed. There are definite
Christian aspects that played a part in the overall belief system it
espoused, rather than a complete return to pre-Christian Germanic
paganism. In fact, what they came up with was probably pretty close to
what Germany was like when it was in the process from converting from
Teutonic Norse religion to Christianity, with aspects of both
co-existing. Pretty close to the world Wagner set his operas in that had
such a influence on Hitler's world view.

Aha. That definitely makes it far more pagan than anything seen in
Germany in the past thousand years. So, at most, what you claim is
that "it is not pagan unless it is purely pagan". Not much here.
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
.
User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 08:00:25 PM
wrote:


Aha. That definitely makes it far more pagan than anything seen in
Germany in the past thousand years. So, at most, what you claim is
that "it is not pagan unless it is purely pagan". Not much here.

Ever know where a Christmas tree comes from?
http://www.religioustolerance.org/xmas_tree.htm
Replace that angel on the top with Odin's eagle, those lights in the
branches with the stars of the sky, and you're looking at Yggdrasil, the
Norse world tree.
Ideally, your tree skirt should probably be in the shape of a large
serpent gnawing at its own tail, and sinking its fangs into the tree's
roots alternately.
Kissing under the mistletoe works fine as long as your name isn't Baldr,
and your blind brother isn't in the area.
Unless of course you're a Celtic druidic follower, in which case you
should cut the mistletoe down under a crescent moon and then screw your
brains out.
Christianity itself has absorbed so much paganism over the years, right
down to the celebration of Christmas in late December and All-Saints Day
on the day after Samhain, (otherwise known as Halloween), that it's
probably as much pagan as Christian at this point.
Pat
.

User: "Eric Chomko"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 22 May 2007 03:07:08 PM
On May 20, 1:03 pm,
wrote:

In article <1350d258sbu3...@corp.supernews.com>, Pat Flannery <flan...@daktel.com> writes:

wrote:

Aha. And all this says what? Pretty much nothing. To make it clear,
your position is that the Nazi ideology was a Christian ideology.


No, I was saying it wasn't pagan, as Rand claimed. There are definite
Christian aspects that played a part in the overall belief system it
espoused, rather than a complete return to pre-Christian Germanic
paganism. In fact, what they came up with was probably pretty close to
what Germany was like when it was in the process from converting from
Teutonic Norse religion to Christianity, with aspects of both
co-existing. Pretty close to the world Wagner set his operas in that had
such a influence on Hitler's world view.


Aha. That definitely makes it far more pagan than anything seen in
Germany in the past thousand years. So, at most, what you claim is
that "it is not pagan unless it is purely pagan". Not much here.

You almost make a case for Martlin Luther being a pagan. Surely Hitler
was trying to appeal to the masses. The fact that you are trying your
darndess to seperate the Nazis from your own beliefs is quite clear
here, though little else of your argument is.
Eric


Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
m...@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"- Hide quoted text -

- Show quoted text -

.



User: ""

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 19 May 2007 09:32:11 PM
In article <46aab2d4.1131371175@news.giganews.com>,
(Rand Simberg) writes:

On Sun, 20 May 2007 02:24:23 GMT, in a place far, far away,
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such
a way as to indicate that:

In article <134vb1elf1ku9e7@corp.supernews.com>, Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> writes:



mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

Well, based on the level of his remark above, my expectations weren't
that high to begin with, so the disappointment won't be severe:-)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_Religion

Aha. Did you actully bother to read the contents, or just assumed by
the title that it must, in some way, support your claims.

I gave you some reading pointers. Granted, they involve a tad more
effort than just reading a page or two in wiki. So, how about just
reading this page or two. This'll be a beginning.


Well, obviously, even reading a wiki page is beyond Pat, so it was
clearly unreasonable to expect him to read actual long books with big
words in them.

So it appears.
Mati Meron | "When you argue with a fool,
meron@cars.uchicago.edu | chances are he is doing just the same"
.

User: "Rand Simberg"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 19 May 2007 09:31:39 PM
On Sun, 20 May 2007 02:24:23 GMT, in a place far, far away,
mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu made the phosphor on my monitor glow in such
a way as to indicate that:

In article <134vb1elf1ku9e7@corp.supernews.com>, Pat Flannery <flanner@daktel.com> writes:



mmeron@cars3.uchicago.edu wrote:

Well, based on the level of his remark above, my expectations weren't
that high to begin with, so the disappointment won't be severe:-)


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nazism_and_Religion

Aha. Did you actully bother to read the contents, or just assumed by
the title that it must, in some way, support your claims.

I gave you some reading pointers. Granted, they involve a tad more
effort than just reading a page or two in wiki. So, how about just
reading this page or two. This'll be a beginning.

Well, obviously, even reading a wiki page is beyond Pat, so it was
clearly unreasonable to expect him to read actual long books with big
words in them.
.
User: "Pat Flannery"

Title: Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational 20 May 2007 05:53:42 AM
Rand Simberg wrote:

Well, obviously, even reading a wiki page is beyond Pat, so it was
clearly unreasonable to expect him to read actual long books with big
words in them.

I own over 400 books at the moment, BTW, and have probably read well
over 3,000.
At the moment I'm simultaneously reading "Theodore Rex" by Edmund
Morris, and "Inventing A Nation" by Gore Vidal.
I've read "The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich" "The Arms Of Krupp" "In
the Name of the Volk" "Hitler" "SS and Gestapo"
"Hitler Youth" "The Nazis and the Occult", and even "The Spear Of
Destiny"... as well as having a whole slew of books on German military
equipment in WW II, although I'll admit I haven't gotten around to
reading "Mein Kampf" yet.
But I've got a copy of "Triumph of The Will" on VHS and a whole book of
stuff from "Signal" magazine, and that should count for something.
Signal felt it necessary to write a very lengthly article to explain the
Nazi-Soviet Treaty Of Nonaggresion; it has these rather prophetic words
in it: "In a period of two hundred years the co-ordination of German and
Russian foreign policy has always resulted in brilliant successes for
both sides; antagonism led to disappointment, even into catastrophe, as
in the Great War. In history, whenever France went to war against
England, or Japan against Russia, one country was always victorious and
the other lost. When Germany and Russia clashed in mortal combat, both
countries lost. The year 1939 proved that this lesson was not in vain."
Now if Hitler had actually learned that lesson from his propaganda
magazine, things might have been way different six years later.
Pat
.






  Page 3 of 6

1

 

2

 

3

 

4

 

5

 

6

 


Related Articles
Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational
Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational
Re: Christianity Verses Science - Christians Are Irrational
Problems understanding irrational q values in Tokamaks
#521 why primeness remains with AP-adics but rational, irrational,transcendental break apart with hybrids
A theory of Einstein the irrational plagiarist
Is the universe grainy or does it have irrational values in it?
Was Einstein an 'Irrational Plagiarist'?
GOD=G_uv: UNIFYING ISLAM & CHRISTIANITY
GOD=G_uv <> PHYSICS TACKLES CHRISTIANITY
Re: "The Book of Daniel"--A Satire on Liberal Christianity?
Christianity & Astrology
Re: Did Constantine invent christianity?
Re: Religion & Science Are Perfectly Synonymous
Abstracts for the 2005 Lunar and Planetary Science Conference are up.
 

NEWER

pg.1170     pg.648     pg.358     pg.197     pg.108     pg.59     pg.32     pg.17     pg.9     pg.5     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER