| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
26 Dec 2006 05:10:04 PM |
| Object: |
Commendations To George Bush |
Regardless of any other matters, there are two commendations that
George Bush deserves as valuable historical contributions to humanity.
Being basically a democrat, I thought Bush would only serve the vested
interest of the rich when he was elected.When he began talking about
invading Iraq, I didn't think he had the guts to do it because of
poitical fallout if the situation became bad.
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
Also, he deserves the gratitude of humanity for defeating Gore and
keeping us out of the Kyoto treaty. The theory of global warming by CO2
is fraudulent. The imposition of the illegalization of CO2, requires
the imposition of the centralized governmental control of socialism or
communsim, and the death of our free market democracy. Bush has led a
good administration in attempting always to bolster the economy for the
benefit of the people of the US. The socialists that wish to impose the
bogus carbon dioxide restrictions on our society, only seek the
destruction of our society and the toleration of some degree of direct
or indirect genocide towards their goals.
Kent Deatherage
.
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
26 Dec 2006 05:32:43 PM |
|
|
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
Seriously, do you have difficulty dressing yourself in the morning?
.
|
|
|
| User: "Edward Green" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
26 Dec 2006 07:48:17 PM |
|
|
T Wake wrote:
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
It may have shortened the conflict, and it probably wouldn't have been
known as WWII.
Of course, this is speculative, but it is a well known speculation.
This speculation is the subject of his screed, obviously, and therefore
your smarky "start WWII earlier to prevent WWII?" scoff is simply a
play on words. The thesis -- whether or not you agree with it -- is
that starting the conflict earlier would have ameliorated the conflict.
The "good part" about WWII was that there were no significant
uninvolved parties. That's the problem with Iraq and was the problem
with Vietnam: the US can't throw "everything it has", short, or not, of
nuclear weapons into winning the conflict, for fear of involving
uninvolved -- or not explicitly involved -- parties. This concern was
not present in WWII; we didn't have to be much worried about third
parties being offended and turning on us -- there were no significant
third parties.
The real point of the war in Iraq, if you want a quasi-conspiracy
theory, is to blood the peacetime US military. Peacetime militaries,
where almost nobody has seen real fighting, are like untested nuclear
weapons: eventually their reliability and effectiveness is called into
question. We now have a lot of dead US soldiers, but also a good
reserve of battle tested troops.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 07:03:26 AM |
|
|
"Edward Green" <spamspamspam3@netzero.com> wrote in message
news:1167184097.199423.94070@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
T Wake wrote:
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
It may have shortened the conflict, and it probably wouldn't have been
known as WWII.
Of course, this is speculative, but it is a well known speculation.
However, being well known doesn't give it any level of accuracy.
This speculation is the subject of his screed, obviously, and therefore
your smarky "start WWII earlier to prevent WWII?" scoff is simply a
play on words.
I never said that. I scoffed at "Going to war with Germany a year earlier
would have prevented WWII." There is a difference and depending where in
Europe you live, WWII had started in 1938.
The thesis -- whether or not you agree with it -- is
that starting the conflict earlier would have ameliorated the conflict.
It may well be his thesis, but there is no logic to support that idea.
Starting the war earlier may have changed it's outcome, duration or process
but it unlikely to have done so in a manner which made the war better. Given
that in 1939 the British Army was certainly in no position to be able to
fight the German Army and win, it is unlikely that a year earlier (while the
UK was trying to ramp up its production) it would have fared better.. In the
very early days, Hitler's Germany had a modicum of international support. A
war of "aggression" by Imperialist Britain is equally likely to have driven
neutral nations to support Hitler rather than "beleaguered old Britain."
The "good part" about WWII was that there were no significant
uninvolved parties. That's the problem with Iraq and was the problem
with Vietnam: the US can't throw "everything it has", short, or not, of
nuclear weapons into winning the conflict, for fear of involving
uninvolved -- or not explicitly involved -- parties. This concern was
not present in WWII; we didn't have to be much worried about third
parties being offended and turning on us -- there were no significant
third parties.
The real point of the war in Iraq, if you want a quasi-conspiracy
theory, is to blood the peacetime US military. Peacetime militaries,
where almost nobody has seen real fighting, are like untested nuclear
weapons: eventually their reliability and effectiveness is called into
question. We now have a lot of dead US soldiers, but also a good
reserve of battle tested troops.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
26 Dec 2006 07:30:33 PM |
|
|
T Wake wrote:
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
xxxxxx
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
Seriously, do you have difficulty dressing yourself in the morning?
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production. By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty. Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
Deatherage
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 06:47:50 AM |
|
|
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167183033.610364.120860@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production.
Nope. You need to look into your European history a bit more. Hitler's
regime had long since gone to a war production footing by 1938.
By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty.
It is easy to sit at home nearly seventy years later and make assumptions
like this. There is no way of knowing what would have happend if Britain and
France had done this. For example, there is a good chance the Germans would
have got international support in their plight against invasion and America
would have gone to war on their side.
Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
But more importantly it gave Britain time to build its armament industries
to the extent that it could survive long enough for America to see the light
and join the war on the side of the allies.
If Britain had gone to war in 1938, the chances are the vastly superior (at
the time) German army and air force would have crushed the BEF and the UK
wouldn't have been able to withstand the blitz, allowing Germany to invade
by sea.
Now, more importantly, none of the groups you have spammed are called
"alt.wwII.revisionism-armchair-generals-with-20-20-hindsight" so I don't
really think any of this matters.
In a nutshell, your posts, like I suspect you are yourself, are insane.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 07:29:28 PM |
|
|
T Wake wrote:
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167183033.610364.120860@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production.
Nope. You need to look into your European history a bit more. Hitler's
regime had long since gone to a war production footing by 1938.
By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty.
It is easy to sit at home nearly seventy years later and make assumptions
like this. There is no way of knowing what would have happend if Britain and
France had done this. For example, there is a good chance the Germans would
have got international support in their plight against invasion and America
would have gone to war on their side.
Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
But more importantly it gave Britain time to build its armament industries
to the extent that it could survive long enough for America to see the light
and join the war on the side of the allies.
If Britain had gone to war in 1938, the chances are the vastly superior (at
the time) German army and air force would have crushed the BEF and the UK
wouldn't have been able to withstand the blitz, allowing Germany to invade
by sea.
Now, more importantly, none of the groups you have spammed are called
"alt.wwII.revisionism-armchair-generals-with-20-20-hindsight" so I don't
really think any of this matters.
In a nutshell, your posts, like I suspect you are yourself, are insane.
Go get your Phobiac handbook and look up the word 'sedition'.
Any way you look at it, the appeasement or isolationism did nothing to
stop the war. Somebody should have stopped Hitler. The problem there
was too many idiots sitting around in their fantasies, like Lindberge,
that had their little philosophical fantasies going on that supported
Hitler. Although those in Britain gave this up in the National war
against Germany, people didn't realize the threat he was or do anything
to stop him. Other analyses, see Britain and France with military
superiority and without the initiative to stop the violations of
international law.
Even when the Jews were being abused in Germany. Harvard invited Nazis
to their campus.
There is very little or no difference in the AGW movement and the
National Socialists of Germany. They are both elitist, genocidists and
percieve themselves taking power in a coup and installing socialism or
governmental control and fiat for any decree. Their pandering to
leftists is just their propaganda to get idiots to back them.
Dream on you freaky, little, no life twits. You'll just have to find
some other freaky fantasy to pull your freaky little puds to.
Deatherage
CO2Phobia is a dangerous and fatal disease like rabies.
.
|
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
28 Dec 2006 09:14:02 AM |
|
|
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167269368.723061.91250@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com...
T Wake wrote:
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167183033.610364.120860@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production.
Nope. You need to look into your European history a bit more. Hitler's
regime had long since gone to a war production footing by 1938.
By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty.
It is easy to sit at home nearly seventy years later and make assumptions
like this. There is no way of knowing what would have happend if Britain
and
France had done this. For example, there is a good chance the Germans
would
have got international support in their plight against invasion and
America
would have gone to war on their side.
Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
But more importantly it gave Britain time to build its armament
industries
to the extent that it could survive long enough for America to see the
light
and join the war on the side of the allies.
If Britain had gone to war in 1938, the chances are the vastly superior
(at
the time) German army and air force would have crushed the BEF and the UK
wouldn't have been able to withstand the blitz, allowing Germany to
invade
by sea.
Now, more importantly, none of the groups you have spammed are called
"alt.wwII.revisionism-armchair-generals-with-20-20-hindsight" so I don't
really think any of this matters.
In a nutshell, your posts, like I suspect you are yourself, are insane.
Go get your Phobiac handbook and look up the word 'sedition'.
It has your name as an an example.
Any way you look at it, the appeasement or isolationism did nothing to
stop the war.
Very true. Until you invent a time machine we have no way of knowing if
anything else would have stopped the war. This is the problem with looking
back at history.
Somebody should have stopped Hitler.
There have been worse. Some one _really_ should have stopped Pope Urban II.
Take your pick as to the horrific events which have happened over the
centuries and you can easily say "they should have been stopped."
If you really are only concerned with WWII, maybe some one should have
stopped Kaiser Wilhelm as the second world war is generally accepted as
being a carry on from the unfinished business of the first. Maybe the treaty
of Versailles should have been stopped as that may have prevented WWII.
The problem there
was too many idiots sitting around in their fantasies, like Lindberge,
that had their little philosophical fantasies going on that supported
Hitler. Although those in Britain gave this up in the National war
against Germany, people didn't realize the threat he was or do anything
to stop him. Other analyses, see Britain and France with military
superiority and without the initiative to stop the violations of
international law.
Even when the Jews were being abused in Germany. Harvard invited Nazis
to their campus.
Jews have been persecuted pretty much their whole history. Generally
speaking most people who aren't Jew's dont realise this. There were larger
scale pogroms against them in the fourteenth century - Hitler's only claim
to fame was an industrialisation of it. If you think protecting the Jews was
the sole aim of fighting Hitler (what about the russians, blacks, poles,
gypsies, homosexuals etc), and you have a time machine to go back and
protect them, then it would be better to stop Pope Innocent III.
There is very little or no difference in the AGW movement and the
National Socialists of Germany.
Hahahaha.
Oh well, Godwin time. End of the debate and you "lose." [*]
They are both elitist, genocidists and
percieve themselves taking power in a coup and installing socialism or
governmental control and fiat for any decree. Their pandering to
leftists is just their propaganda to get idiots to back them.
Dream on you freaky, little, no life twits. You'll just have to find
some other freaky fantasy to pull your freaky little puds to.
Blah, blah. You cant even make an original kookrant.
--
[*] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law#Corollaries_and_usage
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lloyd Parker" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
28 Dec 2006 07:52:40 AM |
|
|
In article <1167269368.723061.91250@79g2000cws.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
T Wake wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1167183033.610364.120860@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production.
Nope. You need to look into your European history a bit more. Hitler's
regime had long since gone to a war production footing by 1938.
By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty.
It is easy to sit at home nearly seventy years later and make assumptions
like this. There is no way of knowing what would have happend if Britain
and
France had done this. For example, there is a good chance the Germans would
have got international support in their plight against invasion and America
would have gone to war on their side.
Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
But more importantly it gave Britain time to build its armament industries
to the extent that it could survive long enough for America to see the
light
and join the war on the side of the allies.
If Britain had gone to war in 1938, the chances are the vastly superior (at
the time) German army and air force would have crushed the BEF and the UK
wouldn't have been able to withstand the blitz, allowing Germany to invade
by sea.
Now, more importantly, none of the groups you have spammed are called
"alt.wwII.revisionism-armchair-generals-with-20-20-hindsight" so I don't
really think any of this matters.
In a nutshell, your posts, like I suspect you are yourself, are insane.
Go get your Phobiac handbook and look up the word 'sedition'.
Go look up the Bill of Rights.
Any way you look at it, the appeasement or isolationism did nothing to
stop the war. Somebody should have stopped Hitler. The problem there
was too many idiots sitting around in their fantasies, like Lindberge,
that had their little philosophical fantasies going on that supported
Hitler. Although those in Britain gave this up in the National war
against Germany, people didn't realize the threat he was or do anything
to stop him. Other analyses, see Britain and France with military
superiority and without the initiative to stop the violations of
international law.
So are you claiming Saddam would have eventually invaded the US and Europe?
Even when the Jews were being abused in Germany. Harvard invited Nazis
to their campus.
There is very little or no difference in the AGW movement and the
National Socialists of Germany.
OK, you'll officially insane.
They are both elitist, genocidists and
percieve themselves taking power in a coup and installing socialism or
governmental control and fiat for any decree. Their pandering to
leftists is just their propaganda to get idiots to back them.
And what are you neoNazis?
Dream on you freaky, little, no life twits. You'll just have to find
some other freaky fantasy to pull your freaky little puds to.
Deatherage
CO2Phobia is a dangerous and fatal disease like rabies.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 07:30:33 PM |
|
|
On 2006-12-28 01:29:28 +0000, said:
There is very little or no difference in the AGW movement and the
National Socialists of Germany. They are both elitist, genocidists and
percieve themselves taking power in a coup and installing socialism or
governmental control and fiat for any decree. Their pandering to
leftists is just their propaganda to get idiots to back them.
Dream on you freaky, little, no life twits. You'll just have to find
some other freaky fantasy to pull your freaky little puds to.
Godwin invoked. Shows over folks, nothing to see here.
--
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to
persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Carl Sagan
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Corporate Shill Catcher" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush for his Grandpa Presscott Helping the Rise of Hitler |
26 Dec 2006 08:11:24 PM |
|
|
wrote:
T Wake wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
xxxxxx
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
Seriously, do you have difficulty dressing yourself in the morning?
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production. By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty. Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
Deatherage
You forget the Fifth Columnists who worked to undermine action,
including US ambassadors to France and Britain (Joe Kennedy), and
Charles Lindbergh and his America-Firsters.
Lindbergh falsely reported that the German airforce was already
superior to any airforce in the world at a time it was quite weak.
George Bush's grandpa Prescott was money llaunderer in NYC for Fritz
Thyssen, Hitler's Financier.
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Contents/Contents.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/Charles_Lindbergh_Alexis_Carrel_Henry_Ford.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/Ford_Lindbergh.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/IBM_&_Holocaust.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Fortunes_Off_Genocide.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Bush_Tradition.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Genocide_Tradition.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Homicidal_Corporations.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Bush_Genocides/Holocaust_for_Everybody.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Bush_Genocides/More_Holocaust_for_All.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Slavery_IG_Farben/Less_Then_Slaves.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Slave_Machines/Slave_Machines.html
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lloyd Parker" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 07:07:53 AM |
|
|
In article <1167183033.610364.120860@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
T Wake wrote:
< > wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
xxxxxx
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
Seriously, do you have difficulty dressing yourself in the morning?
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production. By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty. Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
Deatherage
And the Byzantines...
Good grief man, you're drawing parallels between a rock and a salamander!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "James" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
26 Dec 2006 08:23:12 PM |
|
|
Most of these people don't read history, don't like history and don't care
about history. They get what little history they do know from movies.
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167183033.610364.120860@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
T Wake wrote:
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
xxxxxx
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
Seriously, do you have difficulty dressing yourself in the morning?
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production. By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty. Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
Deatherage
.
|
|
|
| User: "Corporate Shill Catcher" |
|
| Title: Commendations To George Bush for his Grandpa Presscott Helping the Rise of Hitler |
26 Dec 2006 08:30:54 PM |
|
|
James wrote:
Most of these people don't read history, don't like history and don't care
about history. They get what little history they do know from movies.
kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
T Wake wrote:
<kdth...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
xxxxxx
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
Seriously, do you have difficulty dressing yourself in the morning?
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production. By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty. Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
Deatherage
You forget the Fifth Columnists who worked to undermine action,
including US ambassadors to France and Britain (Joe Kennedy), and
Charles Lindbergh and his America-Firsters.
Lindbergh falsely reported that the German airforce was already
superior to any airforce in the world at a time it was quite weak.
George Bush's grandpa Prescott was money llaunderer in NYC for Fritz
Thyssen, Hitler's Financier.
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Contents/Contents.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/Charles_Lindbergh...
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/Ford_Lindbergh.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/IBM_&_Holocaust.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Fortunes_Off_Genocide.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Bush_Tradition.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Genocide_Tradition.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Homicidal_Corporations.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Bush_Genocides/Holocaust_for_Everybody.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Bush_Genocides/More_Holocaust_for_All.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Slavery_IG_Farben/Less_Then_Slaves.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Slave_Machines/Slave_Machines.html
.
|
|
|
| User: "James" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush for his Grandpa Presscott Helping the Rise of Hitler |
27 Dec 2006 09:40:04 AM |
|
|
Still working for Koch Industries I see.
"Corporate Shill Catcher" <foooo@h2-pv.us> wrote in message
news:1167186653.817705.211980@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com...
James wrote:
Most of these people don't read history, don't like history and don't
care
about history. They get what little history they do know from movies.
kdth...@yahoo.com wrote:
T Wake wrote:
<kdth...@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
<snip crank screed>
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude. The Israeli Hezbollah conflict
came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration. Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war. Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production,
and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
<snip crank screed>
This is brilliant. You are a genuine fruitcake.
The War in Iraq prevented War.......
xxxxxx
Brilliance.
Going to war with Germany a year earlier would have prevented WWII.
Amazing.
Seriously, do you have difficulty dressing yourself in the morning?
In 1938, the British and French still had superior military forces.
Hitler converted all of the powerful industrial capacity of Germany
into war production. By the time Hitler invaded Poland in 1939 and the
subsequent conquest of France which took only several weeks, the war
machine of Germany was far superior to theirs. If they had marched in
1938, they could have deposed Hitler and hung him and his cohorts with
little difficulty. Instead they signed the Munich accord of
appeasement, which did not solve the problem of the war, but only gave
Hitler time to build his military and his war of aggresion that
resulted.
Deatherage
You forget the Fifth Columnists who worked to undermine action,
including US ambassadors to France and Britain (Joe Kennedy), and
Charles Lindbergh and his America-Firsters.
Lindbergh falsely reported that the German airforce was already
superior to any airforce in the world at a time it was quite weak.
George Bush's grandpa Prescott was money llaunderer in NYC for Fritz
Thyssen, Hitler's Financier.
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Contents/Contents.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/Charles_Lindbergh...
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/Ford_Lindbergh.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Blogspot/industrialists/IBM_&_Holocaust.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Fortunes_Off_Genocide.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Bush_Tradition.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Genocide_Tradition.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Genocide/Homicidal_Corporations.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Bush_Genocides/Holocaust_for_Everybody.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Bush_Genocides/More_Holocaust_for_All.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Slavery_IG_Farben/Less_Then_Slaves.html
http://h2-pv.us/Bush-Hitler/Slave_Machines/Slave_Machines.html
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "turk" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
26 Dec 2006 05:30:58 PM |
|
|
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
Regardless of any other matters, there are two commendations that
George Bush deserves as valuable historical contributions to humanity.
Being basically a democrat,
Typical republican. Starts his post off with a whopper of a lie.
I thought Bush would only serve the vested
interest of the rich when he was elected.
That's exactly what he did, and what he continues to do. This retarded
chimp and his rubber stamp Congress has been Big Business' wet dream.
When he began talking about
invading Iraq, I didn't think he had the guts to do it because of
poitical fallout if the situation became bad.
It had nothing to do with "guts" and everything to do with money. Look how
well it went, you dumb fucking *****.
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude.
The world owes him a prosecution and a sentence of death for war crimes.
Now go fucking enlist so you can get your stupid, lying, worthless piece of
***** head blown off and save some innocent suburban kid who deserves better
from being sent into that GW-created killzone.
turk
--
"You know, when I campaigned here in 2000, I said, I want to be a war
President. No President wants to be a war President, but I am one." --George
W. Bush, Des Moines, Iowa, Oct. 26, 2006
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sorcerer" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 02:03:01 AM |
|
|
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message =
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Regardless of any other matters, there are two commendations that
| George Bush deserves as valuable historical contributions to humanity.
|=20
| Being basically a democrat, I thought Bush would only serve the vested
| interest of the rich when he was elected.When he began talking about
| invading Iraq, I didn't think he had the guts to do it because of
| poitical fallout if the situation became bad.
|=20
| But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****.=20
That was GW Bush. George Bush, his old man, fell over on the job.=20
.
|
|
|
| User: "Morton Davis" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 06:01:16 AM |
|
|
"Sorcerer" <Headmaster@hogwarts.physics_h> wrote in message
news:VMpkh.156427$bz5.129519@fe3.news.blueyonder.co.uk...
<kdthrge@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com...
| Regardless of any other matters, there are two commendations that
| George Bush deserves as valuable historical contributions to humanity.
|
| Being basically a democrat, I thought Bush would only serve the vested
| interest of the rich when he was elected.When he began talking about
| invading Iraq, I didn't think he had the guts to do it because of
| poitical fallout if the situation became bad.
|
| But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****.
That was GW Bush. George Bush, his old man, fell over on the job.
NOPE. There never was a plan to depose Saddam then.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Lloyd Parker" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 07:04:43 AM |
|
|
In article <1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
Regardless of any other matters, there are two commendations that
George Bush deserves as valuable historical contributions to humanity.
Population control in the middle east?
Being basically a democrat, I thought Bush would only serve the vested
interest of the rich when he was elected.When he began talking about
invading Iraq, I didn't think he had the guts to do it because of
poitical fallout if the situation became bad.
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude.
Yessir, because Iraq is so much more stable now. We're respected the world
over, we haven't had 3000 Americans killed there, we haven't spent a trillion
dollars there...
The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration.
Because we didn't have no fly zones.
Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
So that's what Bolton was doing.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war.
Yes, he started the war ... no wait, we invaded.
Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
Also, he deserves the gratitude of humanity for defeating Gore and
keeping us out of the Kyoto treaty.
And believing in creationism?
The theory of global warming by CO2
is fraudulent.
OK, you're a big fat liar.
The imposition of the illegalization of CO2, requires
the imposition of the centralized governmental control of socialism or
communsim,
So did the Hitler Youth form your values?
and the death of our free market democracy. Bush has led a
good administration in attempting always to bolster the economy for the
benefit of the people of the US.
Well, the benefit of the rich anyway.
The socialists that wish to impose the
bogus carbon dioxide restrictions on our society, only seek the
destruction of our society and the toleration of some degree of direct
or indirect genocide towards their goals.
Kent Deatherage
You're a democrat like Bush is an environmentalist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 05:22:06 PM |
|
|
Lloyd Parker wrote:
In article <1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
kdthrge@yahoo.com wrote:
Regardless of any other matters, there are two commendations that
George Bush deserves as valuable historical contributions to humanity.
Population control in the middle east?
Being basically a democrat, I thought Bush would only serve the vested
interest of the rich when he was elected.When he began talking about
invading Iraq, I didn't think he had the guts to do it because of
poitical fallout if the situation became bad.
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude.
Yessir, because Iraq is so much more stable now. We're respected the world
over, we haven't had 3000 Americans killed there, we haven't spent a trillion
dollars there...
The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration.
Because we didn't have no fly zones.
Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
So that's what Bolton was doing.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war.
Yes, he started the war ... no wait, we invaded.
Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
Also, he deserves the gratitude of humanity for defeating Gore and
keeping us out of the Kyoto treaty.
And believing in creationism?
xx
The theory of global warming by CO2
is fraudulent.
OK, you're a big fat liar.
Look LP, You are in a position to refer any direct data, being at some
college in Britain.. Lets talk about the heat capacity of CO2 O2 and
N2. The energy of heat capacity is measured by measuring the quantity
of heat from one substance to another with according temperature
change. This is done in conditions of constant temperature In
calibrating this to water, defintive values of heat capacity have been
derived. Look Lloyd. The law of conservation of energy is valid. This
is a part of modern chemistry. The energy that is absorbed as heat
capacity, is removed from the energy of the environment, or radiation
field. and it is immediately lost as density of enegy in the radiation
field diminshes with diminishing temperature. The pressure of a gas is
directly proportional to temperature and derived by RT.
From what I can tell, LP, you have absolutely no valid education in
very basic chemistry. What did you do. Daydream in chemistry class
about the day you could become a global warming enthusiaist and
conspire to deliberately subvert the economy and the government of the
US by the fraudulent theory that CO2 has any property to retain heat
and cause any warming whatsoever of the atmosphere?
You only have your rinky dink theory which you cannot corroborate with
any laboratory data whatsover. Why don't you go rub on that IR
trasparent test tube until that magic genie comes out and teaches your
charlatan ***** some basic damn chemistry.
Deatherage
CO2Phobia is a dangerous and fatal disease like rabies.
The imposition of the illegalization of CO2, requires
the imposition of the centralized governmental control of socialism or
communsim,
So did the Hitler Youth form your values?
and the death of our free market democracy. Bush has led a
good administration in attempting always to bolster the economy for the
benefit of the people of the US.
Well, the benefit of the rich anyway.
The socialists that wish to impose the
bogus carbon dioxide restrictions on our society, only seek the
destruction of our society and the toleration of some degree of direct
or indirect genocide towards their goals.
Kent Deatherage
You're a democrat like Bush is an environmentalist.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Lloyd Parker" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
28 Dec 2006 07:46:13 AM |
|
|
In article <1167261726.152438.150970@73g2000cwn.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
Lloyd Parker wrote:
In article <1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>,
wrote:
Regardless of any other matters, there are two commendations that
George Bush deserves as valuable historical contributions to humanity.
Population control in the middle east?
Being basically a democrat, I thought Bush would only serve the vested
interest of the rich when he was elected.When he began talking about
invading Iraq, I didn't think he had the guts to do it because of
poitical fallout if the situation became bad.
But he surprised me and kicked Saddam in the *****. For this the world
owes him a great deal of gratitude.
Yessir, because Iraq is so much more stable now. We're respected the world
over, we haven't had 3000 Americans killed there, we haven't spent a
trillion
dollars there...
The Israeli Hezbollah conflict came
and went. With Saddam still in power, this could have become a deadly
confligration.
Because we didn't have no fly zones.
Saddam virtually had control of the UN by bribery.
So that's what Bolton was doing.
Anyone who has ever studied the causes and nature of war, knows that
this form of tyrannt is the cause of war.
Yes, he started the war ... no wait, we invaded.
Nobody likes war. If the
British and French had had the guts to invade Germany in 1938 when
Hitler clearly was violating international law on arms production, and
had annexed Austria and Czechoslovakia, millions of lives could have
been saved.
Also, he deserves the gratitude of humanity for defeating Gore and
keeping us out of the Kyoto treaty.
And believing in creationism?
xx
The theory of global warming by CO2
is fraudulent.
OK, you're a big fat liar.
Look LP, You are in a position to refer any direct data, being at some
college in Britain.. Lets talk about the heat capacity of CO2 O2 and
N2. The energy of heat capacity is measured by measuring the quantity
of heat from one substance to another with according temperature
change. This is done in conditions of constant temperature In
calibrating this to water, defintive values of heat capacity have been
derived. Look Lloyd. The law of conservation of energy is valid. This
is a part of modern chemistry. The energy that is absorbed as heat
capacity, is removed from the energy of the environment, or radiation
field. and it is immediately lost as density of enegy in the radiation
field diminshes with diminishing temperature. The pressure of a gas is
directly proportional to temperature and derived by RT.
From what I can tell, LP, you have absolutely no valid education in
very basic chemistry. What did you do. Daydream in chemistry class
This from a fool who denies quantum mechanics. LOL!
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Phineas T Puddleduck" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
27 Dec 2006 05:58:47 PM |
|
|
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
----------------8469308861804289383
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
On 2006-12-27 23:22:06 +0000, said:
Look LP, You are in a position to refer any direct data, being at some
college in Britain.. Lets talk about the heat capacity of CO2 O2 and
N2. The energy of heat capacity is measured by measuring the quantity
of heat from one substance to another with according temperature
change. This is done in conditions of constant temperature In
calibrating this to water, defintive values of heat capacity have been
derived. Look Lloyd. The law of conservation of energy is valid. This
is a part of modern chemistry. The energy that is absorbed as heat
capacity, is removed from the energy of the environment, or radiation
field. and it is immediately lost as density of enegy in the radiation
field diminshes with diminishing temperature. The pressure of a gas is
directly proportional to temperature and derived by RT.
From what I can tell, LP, you have absolutely no valid education in
very basic chemistry. What did you do. Daydream in chemistry class
about the day you could become a global warming enthusiaist and
conspire to deliberately subvert the economy and the government of the
US by the fraudulent theory that CO2 has any property to retain heat
and cause any warming whatsoever of the atmosphere?
http://www.wag.caltech.edu/home/jang/genchem/infrared.htm
"What do we mean by molecular vibrations? Picture a diatomic molecule
as two spheres connected by a spring. When the molecule vibrates, the
atoms move towards and away from each other at a certain frequency. The
energy of the system is related to how much the spring is stretched or
compressed. The vibrational frequency is proportional to the square
root of the ratio of the spring force constant to the masses on the
spring. The lighter the masses on the spring, or the tighter (stronger)
the spring, the higher the vibrational frequency will be. Similarly,
vibrational frequencies for stretching bonds in molecules are related
to the strength of the chemical bonds and the masses of the atoms.
Molecules differ from sets of spheres-and-springs in that the
vibrational frequencies are quantized. That is, only certain energies
for the system are allowed, and only photons with certain energies will
excite molecular vibrations. The symmetry of the molecule will also
determine whether a photon can be absorbed.
The number of vibrational modes (different types of vibrations) in a
molecule is 3N-5 for linear molecules and 3N-6 for nonlinear molecules,
where N is the number of atoms. So the diatomic molecule we just
discussed has 3 x 2 - 5 = 1 vibration: the stretching of the bond
between the atoms. Carbon dioxide, a linear molecule, has 3 x 3 - 5 = 4
vibrations. These vibrational modes, shown in Figure 4, are responsible
for the "greenhouse" effect in which heat radiated from the earth is
absorbed (trapped) by CO2 molecules in the atmosphere. The arrows
indicate the directions of motion. Vibrations labeled A and B represent
the stretching of the chemical bonds, one in a symmetric (A) fashion,
in which both C=O bonds lengthen and contract together (in-phase), and
the other in an asymmetric (B) fashion, in which one bond shortens
while the other lengthens. The asymmetric stretch (B) is infrared
active because there is a change in the molecular dipole moment during
this vibration. To be "active" means that absorption of a photon to
excite the vibration is allowed by the rules of quantum mechanics.
[Aside: the infrared "selection rule" states that for a particular
vibrational mode to be observed (active) in the infrared spectrum, the
mode must involve a change in the dipole moment of the molecule.]
Infrared radiation at 2349
(4.26 um) excites this particular vibration. The symmetric stretch is
not infrared active, and so this vibration is not observed in the
infrared spectrum of CO2. The two equal-energy bending vibrations in
CO2 (C and D in Figure 4) are identical except that one bending mode is
in the plane of the paper, and one is out of the plane. Infrared
radiation at 667
(15.00 um) excites these vibrations. Aside: another way of
illustrating the out-of-plane mode is to place circled + or - signs on
the atoms, signifying motion above of below the plane of the paper,
respectively. Thought question: Why do you think it takes more energy
(shorter wavelengths, higher frequencies) to excite the stretching
vibration than the bending vibration?"
--
For me, it is far better to grasp the Universe as it really is than to
persist in delusion, however satisfying and reassuring.
Carl Sagan
----------------8469308861804289383--
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "The Ghost In The Machine" |
|
| Title: Re: Commendations To George Bush |
28 Dec 2006 03:40:26 PM |
|
|
In sci.environment,
<>
wrote
on 26 Dec 2006 15:10:04 -0800
<1167174604.081751.61650@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com>:
Regardless of any other matters, there are two commendations that
George Bush deserves as valuable historical contributions to humanity.
Being basically a democrat, I thought Bush would only serve the vested
[rest of glowing Bush tribute snipped]
And you're not supporting the repeal of the 22nd Amendment precisely why?
--
#191,
Linux sucks efficiently, but Windows just blows around
a lot of hot air and vapor.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
Kill President George Walker Bush, Jr., Vice President Richard Cheney, Barabara Bush, Jr., Hillary Clinton, Barack Obama! Slit Their Throats! Dismember Them! Bomb All Democrats And Republicans, And Destroy Capital Hill! ***** Them In The ***** And In Th
'..when I saw the plane fly into the first building...I thought it was pilot error..' George W. Bush
Does Tony Blair suck off George Bush ?
Re: A CONFESSION TO ALL AMERICANS AND THE WORLD FROM IMPOTENT GEORGE BUSH JR AND FBI, CIA AND NSA
CONGRATULATIONS TO PRESIDENT GEORGE W BUSH
George W. Bush - American Terrorist and War Criminal
Group renames asteroid for George Takei
Walter Williams - Dishonorable Liar of George Mason University andthe State of Virginia
| Nomination - George E Hammond for Red King's Rook's Pawn {Kook Chess Set}
Hey, George
George Green, portrait?
Quantum Gravity 221.0: Phase Transition Theory of Quantized Phenomenaby Xiaolei Zhang of U.S. Naval Research Lab and George Mason U. Virginia USA
George F.R. Ellis, Physics, Philosophy
CHENEY REPORTs: Failed LEVEE keeps TOXiC in NOW George.!!
Re: George J. Bugh's Spin Wave Technology conception of the Vasant Corporation
|
|
|
