| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"John Sefton" |
| Date: |
20 Nov 2003 07:12:27 PM |
| Object: |
commuting or anti-commuting |
Here is a three-point standing wave
using the galaxy pattern.
Are the two points on the
red line commuting or anti-commuting?
http://rapfast.petcom.com/~john/Li.GIF
They always are exact negatives of each other,
but after 16 frames they each follow the
exact same points the other did.
To illustrate; here are the first
five positions:
x y z x y z
0, 0, 80 0, 0, -80
5.9726, -14.4192,78.4128 -5.9726, 14.4192, -78.4128
21.6478,-21.6478,73.9104 -21.6478, 21.6478, -73.9104
41.0624,-17.0086,66.5176 -41.0624, 17.0086, -66.5176
56.5685, 0, 56.5685 -56.5685, 0, -56.5685
and here are the seventeenth to twenty-first positions:
0, 0, -80 0, 0, 80
-5.9726, 14.4192, -78.4128 5.9726, -14.4192,78.4128
-21.6478, 21.6478, -73.9104 21.6478,-21.6478,73.9104
-41.0624, 17.0086, -66.5176 41.0624,-17.0086,66.5176
-56.5685, 0, -56.5685 56.5685, 0, 56.5685
So, commuting or anti-commuting?
John
.
|
|
| User: "ghytrfvbnmju7654" |
|
| Title: Re: commuting or anti-commuting |
21 Nov 2003 02:25:36 PM |
|
|
John Sefton <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> wrote in message news:<3fbd6466$1@news3.accesscomm.ca>...
Here is a three-point standing wave
using the galaxy pattern.
Are the two points on the
red line commuting or anti-commuting?
Do you think you are our professor, teaching us about the new
"physics" as described by your wacky theories, and giving us a quiz
from time to time? You don't even know what "commuting" means.
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Sefton" |
|
| Title: Re: commuting or anti-commuting |
21 Nov 2003 03:29:20 PM |
|
|
ghytrfvbnmju7654 wrote:
John Sefton <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> wrote in message news:<3fbd6466$1@news3.accesscomm.ca>...
Here is a three-point standing wave
using the galaxy pattern.
Are the two points on the
red line commuting or anti-commuting?
Do you think you are our professor, teaching us about the new
"physics" as described by your wacky theories, and giving us a quiz
from time to time? You don't even know what "commuting" means.
No, I think I have a viable orbital
pattern that just might fit into
the Standard Model's concept of what
electrons do.
Unfortunately, QM itself is so wacky
that most people that CAN think went
into other fields, leaving only the
regurgitators- like Al and Spaceshit (aka Sam).
John
.
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Black" |
|
| Title: Re: commuting or anti-commuting |
25 Nov 2003 08:08:20 AM |
|
|
John Sefton <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> wrote in message news:<3fbe819d$1@news3.accesscomm.ca>...
ghytrfvbnmju7654 wrote:
John Sefton <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> wrote in message news:<3fbd6466$1@news3.accesscomm.ca>...
Here is a three-point standing wave
using the galaxy pattern.
Are the two points on the
red line commuting or anti-commuting?
Do you think you are our professor, teaching us about the new
"physics" as described by your wacky theories, and giving us a quiz
from time to time? You don't even know what "commuting" means.
No, I think I have a viable orbital
pattern that just might fit into
the Standard Model's concept of what
electrons do.
It appears that your pattern has little or nothing to do with the
Standard Model. It is definitely not consistent with it. And to
answer your original question, no. The terms "commuting" and
"anti-commuting" used in the Standard Model have no meaning in the
context in which you use them. It's like asking if the moon is
democratic.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: commuting or anti-commuting |
21 Nov 2003 04:29:20 PM |
|
|
John Sefton wrote:
ghytrfvbnmju7654 wrote:
John Sefton <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> wrote in message news:<3fbd6466$1@news3.accesscomm.ca>...
Here is a three-point standing wave
using the galaxy pattern.
Are the two points on the
red line commuting or anti-commuting?
Do you think you are our professor, teaching us about the new
"physics" as described by your wacky theories, and giving us a quiz
from time to time? You don't even know what "commuting" means.
No, I think I have a viable orbital
pattern that just might fit into
the Standard Model's concept of what
electrons do.
[snip]
You are a world class idiot. You know less about the Standard Model
than you do about your Canals of Schlemm - which is nothing at all.
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
| User: "John Sefton" |
|
| Title: Re: commuting or anti-commuting |
25 Nov 2003 01:49:53 AM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
John Sefton wrote:
ghytrfvbnmju7654 wrote:
John Sefton <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> wrote in message news:<3fbd6466$1@news3.accesscomm.ca>...
Here is a three-point standing wave
using the galaxy pattern.
Are the two points on the
red line commuting or anti-commuting?
Do you think you are our professor, teaching us about the new
"physics" as described by your wacky theories, and giving us a quiz
from time to time? You don't even know what "commuting" means.
No, I think I have a viable orbital
pattern that just might fit into
the Standard Model's concept of what
electrons do.
[snip]
You are a world class idiot. You know less about the Standard Model
than you do about your Canals of Schlemm - which is nothing at all.
Are you the one sending the worms, Al?
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Cardinale" |
|
| Title: Re: commuting or anti-commuting |
25 Nov 2003 09:28:49 AM |
|
|
John Sefton <vegan16@accesscomm.ca> wrote in message news:<3fbd6466$1@news3.accesscomm.ca>...
Here is a three-point standing wave
using the galaxy pattern.
Are the two points on the
red line commuting or anti-commuting?
http://rapfast.petcom.com/~john/Li.GIF
They always are exact negatives of each other,
but after 16 frames they each follow the
exact same points the other did.
To illustrate; here are the first
five positions:
x y z x y z
0, 0, 80 0, 0, -80
5.9726, -14.4192,78.4128 -5.9726, 14.4192, -78.4128
21.6478,-21.6478,73.9104 -21.6478, 21.6478, -73.9104
41.0624,-17.0086,66.5176 -41.0624, 17.0086, -66.5176
56.5685, 0, 56.5685 -56.5685, 0, -56.5685
and here are the seventeenth to twenty-first positions:
0, 0, -80 0, 0, 80
-5.9726, 14.4192, -78.4128 5.9726, -14.4192,78.4128
-21.6478, 21.6478, -73.9104 21.6478,-21.6478,73.9104
-41.0624, 17.0086, -66.5176 41.0624,-17.0086,66.5176
-56.5685, 0, -56.5685 56.5685, 0, 56.5685
So, commuting or anti-commuting?
neither! they ar anti-conortorating (i.e. they ar disconortorated)!
warning: that x-ray of yor hed shows yor down to yor last thre nurons;
and only to of them are conected! i think you shud stic yor bran
into a re-embiggenator (tak off yor alyuminium foil duns hat furst).
Paul Cardinale
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: commuting or anti-commuting |
20 Nov 2003 07:48:36 PM |
|
|
John Sefton wrote:
Here is a three-point standing wave
using the galaxy pattern.
[snip]
Idiot on board.
Uncle Al says, "What is purple and commutes? An Abelian grape."
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
