| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Sam Wormley" |
| Date: |
19 Apr 2007 08:54:24 AM |
| Object: |
Conceptual Problem for Ken Seto |
Ken, consider two entities, A and B, experiencing relative motion
such that each measures dv/dt = 0 and c > |dr/dt| >> 0 with respect
to each other.
Consider observer A. A will *measure* B's clock to run slow.
Similarly, B will *measure* A's clock to run slow. And, of course,
this is expected due to the symmetric relationship between A and B.
The degree of *measured* time dilation is exactly as is predicted
by SR.
Furthermore, let |dr/dt| equal 17000 km/s. Then A will measure B's
clock to run slow by a factor of 1.0016, and B will *measure* A's
clock to run slow by a factor of 1.0016.
Each measures the other's clock to run slower than her own. There
is nothing wrong with that.
.
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Conceptual Problem for Ken Seto |
19 Apr 2007 12:00:43 PM |
|
|
"Sam Wormley" <swormley1@mchsi.com> wrote in message news:kwKVh.2726$n_.1014@attbi_s21...
Ken, consider two entities, A and B, experiencing relative motion
such that each measures dv/dt = 0 and c > |dr/dt| >> 0 with respect
to each other.
Ken does not understand things like
dv/dt = 0
let alone things like
c > |dr/dt| >> 0
See, for instance
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SquareDiff.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NegSquareRoot.html
Ken only understands words.
Well, a few words, at least.
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Cardinale" |
|
| Title: Re: Conceptual Problem for Ken Seto |
19 Apr 2007 01:48:26 PM |
|
|
On Apr 19, 10:00 am, "Dirk Van de moortel" <dirkvandemoor...@ThankS-NO-
SperM.hotmail.com> wrote:
"Sam Wormley" <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote in messagenews:kwKVh.2726$n_.1014@attbi_s21...
Ken, consider two entities, A and B, experiencing relative motion
such that each measures dv/dt = 0 and c > |dr/dt| >> 0 with respect
to each other.
Ken does not understand things like
dv/dt = 0
let alone things like
c > |dr/dt| >> 0
See, for instance
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SquareDiff.html
http://users.telenet.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/NegSquareRoot....
Ken only understands words.
Well, a few words, at least.
And those are mostly one-syllable words, and never three-syllable
words. He also likes to frequently use words (especially long ones)
that he doesn't understand.
Paul Cardinale
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Paul Cardinale" |
|
| Title: Re: Conceptual Problem for Ken Seto |
19 Apr 2007 01:57:19 PM |
|
|
On Apr 19, 6:54 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ken, consider two entities, A and B, experiencing relative motion
such that each measures dv/dt = 0 and c > |dr/dt| >> 0 with respect
to each other.
Consider observer A. A will *measure* B's clock to run slow.
Similarly, B will *measure* A's clock to run slow. And, of course,
this is expected due to the symmetric relationship between A and B.
The degree of *measured* time dilation is exactly as is predicted
by SR.
Furthermore, let |dr/dt| equal 17000 km/s. Then A will measure B's
clock to run slow by a factor of 1.0016, and B will *measure* A's
clock to run slow by a factor of 1.0016.
Each measures the other's clock to run slower than her own. There
is nothing wrong with that.
Don't be silly. It's a waste electrons of trying to explain anything
to the kenseto.
After all, he has no input bandwidth and no processing power.
His brain operates as a NIGO: Nothing In, Garbage Out.
Paul Cardinale
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Conceptual Problem for Ken Seto |
19 Apr 2007 01:58:02 PM |
|
|
"Paul Cardinale" <pcardinale@volcanomail.com> wrote in message news:1177009039.564626.249790@e65g2000hsc.googlegroups.com...
On Apr 19, 6:54 am, Sam Wormley <sworml...@mchsi.com> wrote:
Ken, consider two entities, A and B, experiencing relative motion
such that each measures dv/dt = 0 and c > |dr/dt| >> 0 with respect
to each other.
Consider observer A. A will *measure* B's clock to run slow.
Similarly, B will *measure* A's clock to run slow. And, of course,
this is expected due to the symmetric relationship between A and B.
The degree of *measured* time dilation is exactly as is predicted
by SR.
Furthermore, let |dr/dt| equal 17000 km/s. Then A will measure B's
clock to run slow by a factor of 1.0016, and B will *measure* A's
clock to run slow by a factor of 1.0016.
Each measures the other's clock to run slower than her own. There
is nothing wrong with that.
Don't be silly. It's a waste electrons of trying to explain anything
to the kenseto.
After all, he has no input bandwidth and no processing power.
His brain operates as a NIGO: Nothing In, Garbage Out.
Good one :-)
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|