| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
18 Aug 2006 05:39:11 PM |
| Object: |
Conservation? |
* * * [must use a fixed-width font to view diagrams properly] * * *
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
=-=-=-A) Gravitational-Density Dynamo-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
The following is what I call a "Gravitational-density dynamo":
_____
| \_____
semi- __\ |_____ \_____
permeable / | | \_____ \_______
material | | \_____ |
(dialysis | | \___ |
tubing) | | | |
| |
| | |
| | |
| | |
| | ------*------ <--\
| | | |
| | | turbine
| | |
tube B --> | |
(contains | | | |
perfluoro- | | | |
octane) | | | |
| | | | <-- tube A
| | | | (contains
| |_________________| | water)
| | |
|____________|____________|
/|\
\_ semi-permeable
material
(dialysis
tubing)
Tube A contains 250ml of water. Tube B contains 750ml of
perfluorooctane. Tube A and tube B are connected to each other by
dialysis tubing, which is a semi-permeable material. Water can
permeate through the dialysis tubing, but perfluorooctane can't. Due
to osmotic pressure, the water in tube A will pass through the dialysis
tubing entering tube B. Since water is insoluble in perfluorooctane,
and since water is less dense than perfluorooctane, the water will rise
to the top of tube B. The water that has risen will permeate through
the dialysis tubing at the top of tube B. Once enough water has
accumulated at the top of tube B, it will fall, turning the turbine,
and returning back into tube A.
Notice that this dynamo didn't require any input energy, and it
will continue to work, creating electricity by turning the turbine (and
generator, which is not shown), so long as the perfluorooctane does not
seep into tube A through the semi-permeable material. Eventually, the
perfluorooctane will seep through the dialysis tubing, and so this
invention is not a perpetual motion machine.
But how can this dynamo generate electricity without any input
energy? First, let's observe that the water at the top of tube B has a
gravitational potential energy. When it falls, the gravitational
potential energy is realized and is converted into electricity by the
turbine (and generator, which is not shown). But how did the water
initially get its gravitational potential energy? It got its
gravitational potential energy by being displaced upward in a fluid
(perfluorooctane) that is more dense than it. Thus, we must conclude
that insoluble objects immersed in fluids that are more dense gain
gravitational potential energy by being displaced upwards. However,
where is that energy coming from? By the Law of Conservation of Energy
something must lose energy so that another can gain energy. Since we
cannot find anything losing energy, we must conclude that the Law of
Conservation of Energy is wrong, and that gravity creates forces which
then create/destroy energy; in this case it created energy in the final
form of electricity.
As mentioned before, enough perfluorooctane will eventually seep
through the dialysis tubing causing the level of the liquid in tube B
to lower such that the water cannot escape through the top of the tube.
And so, the turbine will stop spinning. At such a point we can easily
"unmix" both liquids by pouring all the liquid into a tall cylinder.
If we leave the two liquids in the tall cylinder for awhile then the
water will accumalate at the top and the perflourooctane will gather at
the bottom. We know that originally there was 250ml of water. So, we
need only take the top 250ml of liquid (water) from the cylinder and
put it into tube A; the rest of the 750ml of liquid (perfluorooctane)
can be dispensed back into tube B.
Thus, this dynamo can continually produce electricity; when the
turbine stops turning because the two liquids mix, then we need only
unmix the two liquids and restart the dynamo.
Notice again that this dynamo creates electricity without using
any input energy! Some may argue that we used energy to unmix the two
liquids. That is true, *but* even though we used energy to unmix the
two liquids we did not *give* the two liquids energy. That is, two
liquids in separate beakers have the same amount of energy as the same
two liquids in the same beaker.
Notice that the upward force on the water is balanced; that is,
the perfluorooctane experiences an equal force downwards. This,
however, does not change the fact that this dynamo creates energy (in
the form of electricity) without input energy.
We can conclude by noting that energy is being created/destroyed
all around us. Gravity and magnetism are prime examples. Both create
forces. The immediate effect of the forces on the system is nothing
(the vectors of the forces cancel each other out). However, after the
immediate effect, and after a minute amount of real time, the forces
will do work on the system. If "positive work" is done, then the
system will gain energy. If "negative work" is done, then the system
will lose energy. Should these forces be sustained for a longer
duration of real time, then the forces might be found to have not done
any work on the system (that is, it added the same amount of energy
that was removed). Whether "positive work" or "negative work" is done
is relative.
I must make it clear that I do not consider using the
Gravitational-density dynamo to create electricity in any practical
situation because it is slow and ineffecient. I am discussing the
Gravitational-density dynamo here simply to demonstrate that the Law of
Conservation of Energy is wrong and gravity can create energy.
-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-\-
-|-|-| THE END! -|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-|-
-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-/-
by Raheman Velji
August 18, 2006
you can also view this paper (and updated versions) at...
...http://www.angelfire.com/un/rv
or a less updated copy can be found at...
...http://www.angelfire.com/rebellion2/rahemanvelji
! ! ! BEWARE OF THE ILLUMINATI ! ! !
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
