Hi,

It is not time which is subjective: it is the "observed" speed of
light.

Time, inasmuch as it indicates a stage in the universe's development -
St. Augustine of Hippo through Sephen Hawkins'"Big Bang" theory -
cannot be a variable.

Hi,

It is not time which is subjective: it is the "observed" speed of
light.

Time, inasmuch as it indicates a stage in the universe's development -
St. Augustine of Hippo through Sephen Hawkins'"Big Bang" theory -
cannot be a variable.

It was only the observed "constant" speed of light which caused time
to be regarded as a variable; and the "time" talked about was not
properly defined: as this discussion indicates.

The chances of our "observation" of the speed of light being in error
are much more likely than the rolling backwards and forwards of the
whole universe's development to accommodate an observed glitch in the
movement of an electron.

wiffle.the.wuff

www.universalforcehypothesis.info


fuminggreen@yahoo.com wrote in message news:<1b3b53b2.0405291822.7a4dfbc6@posting.google.com>...

mhelland@techmocracy.net (Mike Helland) wrote in message news:<ad157aec.0405291341.2b8e8076@posting.google.com>...

fuminggreen@yahoo.com wrote in message news:<1b3b53b2.0405290822.48a3990d@posting.google.com>...

Defintion: Time is present in the context of multiple states.

That is an assinine attempt at proving time objective when it is in
fact assumed subjective in every aspect.

I have presented my defintion in several forms:

Time is present in the context of change.
Time exists in the analysis of multiple states.

Both forms are subjective requiring analysis and observation. Thank
you for your comments, but they are mistaken.

You argue in the same poor form as before, except you essentially
admit to its usage intentionally to insult only?

It is common to write to philosophers in a complete form of discourse.
Making every word part of the arguement. And an ending statement to
transform the arguement in a nice fashion is a common habit.

So, since you are not admitting to this form, then you are right.
Time is subjective.

Douglas Eagleson
Gaitherbsurg, MD USA

Hi,

It is not time which is subjective: it is the "observed" speed of
light.

Douglas Eagleson