| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Diana" |
| Date: |
21 Mar 2006 01:26:05 AM |
| Object: |
Constant Light Speed |
Sorry I must be wrong but,
Is the Light speed constant or our measuring Instrument have limitations
-D
.
|
|
| User: "T Wake" |
|
| Title: Re: Best observations combined with best theory tells us... |
22 Mar 2006 01:45:42 PM |
|
|
"Jeff.Relf" <Me@Privacy.NET> wrote in message
news:Jeff_Relf_2006_Mar_21_kZiL@Cotse.NET...
So there never was a start to the big bang, I posit,
instead, entropy is merely a property of mass-energy,
Nonsense.
and everything has just always been, and will always be, dissipating.
At what rate?
I call that Space_Time_Entropy,
where entropy is the so-called cosmic time, a fifth _Spatial_ dimension.
So, please explain how this can be reconciled with gravity and the strong
force implying three spatial dimensions.
Although the spatial nature of entropy is easily observed at cosmic
scales,
smaller scales introduce many unknowns, making it seem directional to us.
Gibberish.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Eric Gisse" |
|
| Title: Re: Best observations combined with best theory tells us... |
21 Mar 2006 10:55:07 PM |
|
|
Jeff...Relf wrote:
More Relf droppings. You change the thread subject, and don't quote
properly.
[snip]
Where relativity obviously fails is the fact that
no place in nature could _Ever_ have infinite density,
because infinite gravitational acceleration implies infinite Unruh radiation,
so it'd have to emit more energy then exists in the cosmos.
Likewise, no place could ever have a perfect vauum,
because it takes energy to maintain a vacuum,
so it'd consume more energy than exists in the cosmos.
So there never was a start to the big bang, I posit,
instead, entropy is merely a property of mass-energy,
and everything has just always been, and will always be, dissipating.
I call that Space_Time_Entropy,
where entropy is the so-called cosmic time, a fifth _Spatial_ dimension.
Although the spatial nature of entropy is easily observed at cosmic scales,
smaller scales introduce many unknowns, making it seem directional to us.
Word for word, you repeat your idiotic word salad. I'm tired of
correcting you, so I will simply call you stupid.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Helmut Wabnig" |
|
| Title: Re: Constant Light Speed |
21 Mar 2006 02:11:26 AM |
|
|
On Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:26:05 GMT, "Diana" <Diana@hotmail.com> wrote:
Sorry I must be wrong but,
Is the Light speed constant or our measuring Instrument have limitations
-D
both
w.
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|