| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Sam Wormley" |
| Date: |
31 Mar 2005 08:42:49 AM |
| Object: |
Cosmic Ripples instead of Dark Energy? |
From Ned Wright's
News of the Universe
Cosmic Ripples instead of Dark Energy?
16 Mar 2005 - Rocky Kolb et al. have suggested that large scale ripples
in space-time could explain the observations of the accelerating
Universe that seem to require dark energy - the vacuum energy density
that is equivalent to the cosmological constant. Despite issuing press
releases and getting some coverage, even in the Los Angeles Times
although 10 days later, I find their arguments lacking. In Einstein's
General Relativity, the local metric determines the local stress-energy
tensor, so the large scale ripples do not change the need for a
negative pressure and hence a vacuum energy density or cosmological
constant based on the supernova observations of the local geometry.
[this article withembedded links: http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm#News]
.
|
|
| User: "John Sefton" |
|
| Title: Re: Cosmic Ripples instead of Dark Energy? |
31 Mar 2005 04:23:36 PM |
|
|
Sam Wormley wrote:
From Ned Wright's
News of the Universe
Cosmic Ripples instead of Dark Energy?
16 Mar 2005 - Rocky Kolb et al. have suggested that large scale ripples
in space-time could explain the observations of the accelerating
Universe that seem to require dark energy - the vacuum energy density
that is equivalent to the cosmological constant. Despite issuing press
releases and getting some coverage, even in the Los Angeles Times
although 10 days later, I find their arguments lacking. In Einstein's
General Relativity, the local metric determines the local stress-energy
tensor, so the large scale ripples do not change the need for a
negative pressure and hence a vacuum energy density or cosmological
constant based on the supernova observations of the local geometry.
[this article withembedded links:
http://www.astro.ucla.edu/~wright/cosmolog.htm#News]
Now we're getting close.
And galaxies are a result of
large-scale rotation.
John
.
|
|
|
|

|
Related Articles |
|
|