Science > Physics > Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"" |
| Date: |
06 Aug 2005 02:12:55 AM |
| Object: |
Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
Coming to think about my proposal of a Coulomb Unification of the
forces of physics where in an Atom Totality the strong-nuclear combines
with the weak-nuclear to end up with a nuclear-Coulomb-force. We can
envision the Nuclear-Coulomb as the nuclear-electron that resides
inside every neutron spills out and runs around avidly holding together
the protons of the nucleus. Whereas normal electrons orbit at a
distance from the protons of the nucleus to provide the normal-Coulomb.
Nuclear-Coulomb have the glue of the nuclear-electrons and these
electrons have little to no space whereas normal electrons are mostly
space. So the deficient space of nuclear-electrons is converted into
energy of gluing together the protons including the protons inside of
neutrons.
However the force of gravity is purely a fiction force because what we
observe as gravity is really the mass of the electrons of the Atom
Totality and they are held in place and orbit, not by gravity, but by
the Coulomb force of the protons in the nucleus of the Atom Totality.
Thus, in a Coulomb Unification of the forces of physics in an Atom
Totality implies that there is a proof, via experiments, for all proofs
eventually resolve down to experiments. So there is a experimental
proof that there exists only Coulomb force and Nuclear-Coulomb begot
from the combining of Strong-nuclear with Weak-nuclear. This means that
experiments exist to prove gravity is a fiction.
Perhaps someone has already found some evidence that the force of
gravity is in contradiction or inconsistency with the force of Coulomb
and Strongnuclear and Weaknuclear. If gravity is a fiction then
inconsistencies with other physics arises, inconsistency and
contradictions.
So I wonder if anyone has stumbled on to some area of physics where
gravity seems to serve up a contradiction.
I think one area of contradiction is superfluid helium in that the
behaviour of superfluid helium defies the existence of a force we
commonly call gravity.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
| User: "Jim Black" |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
07 Aug 2005 12:43:15 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Coming to think about my proposal of a Coulomb Unification of the
forces of physics where in an Atom Totality the strong-nuclear combines
with the weak-nuclear to end up with a nuclear-Coulomb-force. We can
envision the Nuclear-Coulomb as the nuclear-electron that resides
inside every neutron spills out and runs around avidly holding together
the protons of the nucleus. Whereas normal electrons orbit at a
distance from the protons of the nucleus to provide the normal-Coulomb.
Nuclear-Coulomb have the glue of the nuclear-electrons and these
electrons have little to no space whereas normal electrons are mostly
space. So the deficient space of nuclear-electrons is converted into
energy of gluing together the protons including the protons inside of
neutrons.
However the force of gravity is purely a fiction force because what we
observe as gravity is really the mass of the electrons of the Atom
Totality and they are held in place and orbit, not by gravity, but by
the Coulomb force of the protons in the nucleus of the Atom Totality.
Thus, in a Coulomb Unification of the forces of physics in an Atom
Totality implies that there is a proof, via experiments, for all proofs
eventually resolve down to experiments. So there is a experimental
proof that there exists only Coulomb force and Nuclear-Coulomb begot
from the combining of Strong-nuclear with Weak-nuclear. This means that
experiments exist to prove gravity is a fiction.
Perhaps someone has already found some evidence that the force of
gravity is in contradiction or inconsistency with the force of Coulomb
and Strongnuclear and Weaknuclear. If gravity is a fiction then
inconsistencies with other physics arises, inconsistency and
contradictions.
So I wonder if anyone has stumbled on to some area of physics where
gravity seems to serve up a contradiction.
I think one area of contradiction is superfluid helium in that the
behaviour of superfluid helium defies the existence of a force we
commonly call gravity.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
then wrote:
I think that no-one has done the calculations on the strange behaviour
of superfluid helium in that it is able to defy gravity and move
upwards and out of a container. It is container-uncontrollable. The
force of gravity however, is a force that is equivalent to the concept
of container-controllable. In other words there is a equivalent
statement in physics that gravity demands the existence of a container
for any given specific quantity of matter. So that if gravity is a true
force and not a fictional force then a container that confines
superfluid helium must exist.
But since no container controlls superfluid helium then gravity is not
a force of Nature but a fictional illusion. And that the matter we
observe is all part of the electron matter of the 5f6 of 231Pu Atom
Totality and held in space by the Coulomb force of the protons of the
Atom Totality. We have the illusion that gravity is an independent
force only because we fail to recognize that all matter which we
observe is electron matter of the Atom Totality.
I suspect no-one has done the calculations of the behaviour of
superfluid helium and how it defies our notion of gravity in that it
climbs out of every container placed inside. However, if that
phenomenon matches the idea that all the forces are Coulomb forces then
the superfluid helium would thus prove that gravity is a fictional
force.
I suspect the detailed accounting of the strange behaviour of
superfluid helium as per noncontainerable would be a direct
mathematical accounting as to the fictional force of gravity. The
inability to containerize superfluid helium is directly proportional to
the fictionality or falsehood of the force of gravity. And that what is
truly going on with superfluid helium is 100 percent that of Coulomb
forces and no gravity force.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Disproving gravity is something sane people often do as a joke. Keep
it up. You may be in line for another "Weird Science" award.
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
07 Aug 2005 04:29:41 AM |
|
|
You seem to have a wooden mind, unable to understand that a force can
be fictional because another true force is what is working and replaces
the fictional force. In history we have the example of centripetal and
centrifugal.
What stumbles your mind is that you see it is obvious things fall and
thus there must be a force that makes things fall. I understand that
also. But what makes things fall is not gravity, but the Coulomb force
because Earth and everything on Earth and everything in the cosmic
skies are pieces of the electrons of the Atom Totality held in place by
the Coulomb force of the protons in the nucleus of the Atom Totality.
So can a wooden mind like Jim Black ever understand that a force exists
that makes things fall and keeps the cosmic bodies in orbit, but that
force is a Coulomb force. I doubt it. Jim is too stupid to understand
that I do not deny the obvious. I simply replace the force of gravity
by a Cosmic Coulomb force.
Another way of explaining it is suppose we were talking about the
Coulomb force of protons holding together electrons in atoms. And then
some science illiterate such as Jim Black saying that the Coulomb force
does not exist and offers no replacement for a force that holds protons
to electrons. Perhaps that may penetrate the wooden mind of Jim Black.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
|
| User: "mariposas morgan mair fheal greykitten tomys des anges" |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
07 Aug 2005 04:41:18 AM |
|
|
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
what is the half life of plutonium
and when does the one in your brain decay
arf meow arf - dogs and cats living together
the erisian constancy - though chaos is transformed
but never lost to sea - grey ordered ranks are swarmed
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
07 Aug 2005 02:07:10 PM |
|
|
Now there is supporting evidence that a Cosmic Coulomb force replaces
gravity. The evidence is obvious. It is as obvious as that things fall
when dropped.
This evidence is the fact that the mathematical form of Coulomb is
identical to gravity where both are inverse square laws.
So the next obvious question is whether there is evidence as to the
magnitude of their difference in force strength. Their force strength
difference is about 10^40, (some put it about 10^38, but I am not going
to quibble).
So, now, if gravity is a fiction and a Cosmic Coulomb exists where all
the matter we observe is electron matter of the 231Pu Atom Totality and
held in place by the protons of the Atom Totality, then there should be
a matching number of 10^40.
The best estimate of how the *time* of our Cosmos is what was given by
Dirac in his book DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS on page 73 of e^2/G m_e m_p of
the large dimensional number 10^39.
Coincidence???? I think not. I think the strength of the Coulomb force
to that of gravity is equal to this number of *time* of the Cosmos. And
the reason they are equal is because gravity is a fiction and what
holds the cosmic skies in its orbit is the Coulomb force of the Atom
Totality.
But it does not stop with *time*. If the total number of Coulomb
Interactions of a Plutonium Atom Totality is the number 95!/2 which is
10^148 and where 10^78 of those are to hold together the physical
matter of the universe and the remaining 10^70 are to hold together the
biological matter of the universe in Superdeterminism, then another
number of approx 10^40, or 10^39 or 10^38 pops out at us. It is the
average number of cells in a intelligent lifeform, or the average
number of DNA molecules of a intelligent lifeform. The human body has
approx 10^38 molecules of DNA, does it not?????
Finally, in my recent thinking on this subject a surprize avenue of
thought arose in that the question of the quantity of water of a solar
system and the hydrology of that water of a solar system. Why is it
that a solar system concentrates all of its water content into just a
few planets or satellites?? And why is it that the amount of water per
solar system is probably a fixed amount. So that every alien solar
system has relatively the same amount of water and all are concentrated
in a few of its planets and satellites.
In this manner, life is a direct function of the water supply that
exists and the dynamics of that water supply in every alien solar
system including our own.
Planet Earth has approx 10^50 molecules of water. How much water exists
in the entirety of our Solar System? And is that amount related to any
of the large numbers I have talked about such as 10^78, 10^70 etc etc.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
|
| User: "Prai Jei" |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
10 Aug 2005 01:04:42 PM |
|
|
(or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in
message <1123441629.993489.241230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
This evidence is the fact that the mathematical form of Coulomb is
identical to gravity where both are inverse square laws.
All that proves is that space has three dimensions. I think we are all
familiar with that fact.
--
A couple of questions. How do I stop the wires short-circuiting, and what's
this nylon washer for?
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
.
|
|
|
| User: "Attila the Bum" |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
11 Aug 2005 12:03:53 PM |
|
|
I thought I responded to this, yesterday.
Must be losing it at 59 years.
Prai Jei wrote:
a_plutonium@hotmail.com (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in
message <1123441629.993489.241230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
This evidence is the fact that the mathematical form of Coulomb is
identical to gravity where both are inverse square laws.
All that proves is that space has three dimensions. I think we are all
familiar with that fact.
Cool! I was afraid my belief in
the linear one-dimensional action
of gravity or columbic effects
would pollute the minds of those
in the social side of society :-)
A couple of questions. How do I stop the wires short-circuiting,
Disconnect the battery or power supply.
and what's
this nylon washer for?
Cleaning your stinky pantyhose, sweetie.
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
tahw ot ylper?
Atty (Still here, still smiling, ***** for brains :-)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Attila the Bum" |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
10 Aug 2005 01:14:42 PM |
|
|
Prai Jei wrote:
a_plutonium@hotmail.com (or somebody else of the same name) wrote thusly in
message <1123441629.993489.241230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com>:
This evidence is the fact that the mathematical form of Coulomb is
identical to gravity where both are inverse square laws.
All that proves is that space has three dimensions. I think we are all
familiar with that fact.
Good to know, that gravity and
coulombic forces do not act more
or less in one dimension between
two bodies :-)
How much did your degree cost and
where did you buy it?
--
A couple of questions. How do I stop the wires short-circuiting,
Disconnect the battery or power supply.
and what's
this nylon washer for?
Your pantyhose.
Interchange the alphabetic letter groups to reply
Tahw ot ylper?
Atty (Is the US whining the war in Iraq again?
It opted for that more favorable battle
ground, and the rag-heads went along with
it -- should have made the stand in 'stan)
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
09 Aug 2005 02:59:44 PM |
|
|
wrote:
This evidence is the fact that the mathematical form of Coulomb is
identical to gravity where both are inverse square laws.
Learn what identical means, dumbass. The form is similar, but not
identical. The inverse square is what a pole does in 3-space.
The best estimate of how the *time* of our Cosmos is what was given by
Dirac in his book DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS on page 73 of e^2/G m_e m_p of
the large dimensional number 10^39.
what time?
number of DNA molecules of a intelligent lifeform. The human body has
approx 10^38 molecules of DNA, does it not?????
how?
Finally, in my recent thinking on this subject a surprize avenue of
thought arose in that the question of the quantity of water of a solar
system and the hydrology of that water of a solar system. Why is it
that a solar system concentrates all of its water content into just a
few planets or satellites?? And why is it that the amount of water per
It doesn't. Most of the water is vomitatious asteroids and clouds,
like your brain.
solar system is probably a fixed amount. So that every alien solar
system has relatively the same amount of water and all are concentrated
in a few of its planets and satellites.
It's probably not, depending on galactic radius.
Planet Earth has approx 10^50 molecules of water. How much water exists
in the entirety of our Solar System? And is that amount related to any
of the large numbers I have talked about such as 10^78, 10^70 etc etc.
hah
.
|
|
|
| User: "Odysseus" |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces impliesgravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
10 Aug 2005 02:17:40 AM |
|
|
"Autymn D. C." wrote:
a_plutonium@hotmail.com wrote:
<snip>
The human body has
approx 10^38 molecules of DNA, does it not?????
how?
Reality check: H_2_O has a molecular weight of about 18 daltons,
meaning that 6.02*10^23 (Avogadro's number) of water molecules have a
mass of 18 grams. Supposing a large 90-kg human body to be composed
entirely of water, it would contain about 5000 * 6*10^23 = 3*10^27
molecules, some thirty billion times fewer than 10^38. Now consider
that the DNA molecule is a giant polymer weighing millions of
daltons, and that genetic material makes up only a tiny fraction of a
human body's mass, and it should be obvious that this value is
exaggerated by at least twenty orders of magnitude. My own wild-assed
guess would be something like 10^15 -- trillions of cells having
perhaps a hundred DNA molecules each.
--
Odysseus
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
10 Aug 2005 11:11:02 AM |
|
|
Odysseus wrote:
a_plutonium@hotmail.com wrote:
The human body has
approx 10^38 molecules of DNA, does it not?????
Reality check: H_2_O has a molecular weight of about 18 daltons,
meaning that 6.02*10^23 (Avogadro's number) of water molecules have a
mass of 18 grams. Supposing a large 90-kg human body to be composed
entirely of water, it would contain about 5000 * 6*10^23 = 3*10^27
molecules, some thirty billion times fewer than 10^38. Now consider
that the DNA molecule is a giant polymer weighing millions of
daltons, and that genetic material makes up only a tiny fraction of a
human body's mass, and it should be obvious that this value is
exaggerated by at least twenty orders of magnitude. My own wild-assed
guess would be something like 10^15 -- trillions of cells having
perhaps a hundred DNA molecules each.
--
Odysseus
Yes, excuse the error on my part. I meant to say the total number of
DNA molecules on Earth is somewhere between 10^38 and 10^40. I need the
total number of DNA molecules on Earth and using your scheme of water
molecules as an upper and lower bound is a very good scheme. It seems
as though water plays a role in all and every measure of life whether
on Earth or alien solar systems.
So now, if the human body is composed of on average 10^27 molecules of
DNA then it is not unreasonable to say that on average there are 10^13
bodies of life whose integrated DNA molecules is equal to 10^27 and
thereby the total number of DNA molecules on planet Earth is 10^40.
And since the entire Cosmos has 10^78 photons multiply 10^70 neutrinos,
of which the 10^70 neutrinos superdetermines the total life in the
cosmos implies that since the number of galaxies which is 10^10 and the
number of solar systems in the galaxies is 10^11, implies that these
numbers are far too low. Because 10^70 does not equal 10^40 x 10^11 x
10^10. We are 10^9 off. So what I suggest is that the Cosmos is more
likely to have 10^15 galaxies and that a galaxy has on average 10^15
solar systems.
So is anyone in physics or astronomy working on the refinement of the
number of galaxies in the cosmos? Because I have a strong suspicion
that the current modern day number of 10^10 galaxies is highly
deficient and should be 10^15. And that the figure for the number of
stars in a galaxy of 10^11 is also highly deficient and should be more
likely 10^15.
Now I wonder if the amount of water per solar system is a fixed number,
rather scarce and that we have a sort of Cosmological limit as to how
much water each star system contains and the water in a star-system has
a physics tendency to be concentrated in only a few of its planets and
satellites. In other words what I am getting at-- is that the amount of
water in the Cosmos is a stable constant and can tell us how many
galaxies there are in the Universe at large and further can tell us how
many solar systems per galaxy on average. Because water is conserved on
a Cosmic basis. Not that there is a Cosmic conservation of water such
as the Conservation principles of Energy or momentum, but rather a
weaker form of conservation.
Quite honest and frankly, we have not really considered the dynamics of
water in our own solar system as to why it is concentrated on Earth and
Europa and nowhere else and why it seems to be a conserved total number
of water molecules.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "blart" |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
07 Aug 2005 09:36:57 PM |
|
|
ARK!
I thought you were dead!
You should collect all your works into a TOME, and publish.
You will be rich.
<a_plutonium@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:1123441629.993489.241230@g43g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
Now there is supporting evidence that a Cosmic Coulomb force replaces
gravity. The evidence is obvious. It is as obvious as that things fall
when dropped.
This evidence is the fact that the mathematical form of Coulomb is
identical to gravity where both are inverse square laws.
So the next obvious question is whether there is evidence as to the
magnitude of their difference in force strength. Their force strength
difference is about 10^40, (some put it about 10^38, but I am not going
to quibble).
So, now, if gravity is a fiction and a Cosmic Coulomb exists where all
the matter we observe is electron matter of the 231Pu Atom Totality and
held in place by the protons of the Atom Totality, then there should be
a matching number of 10^40.
The best estimate of how the *time* of our Cosmos is what was given by
Dirac in his book DIRECTIONS IN PHYSICS on page 73 of e^2/G m_e m_p of
the large dimensional number 10^39.
Coincidence???? I think not. I think the strength of the Coulomb force
to that of gravity is equal to this number of *time* of the Cosmos. And
the reason they are equal is because gravity is a fiction and what
holds the cosmic skies in its orbit is the Coulomb force of the Atom
Totality.
But it does not stop with *time*. If the total number of Coulomb
Interactions of a Plutonium Atom Totality is the number 95!/2 which is
10^148 and where 10^78 of those are to hold together the physical
matter of the universe and the remaining 10^70 are to hold together the
biological matter of the universe in Superdeterminism, then another
number of approx 10^40, or 10^39 or 10^38 pops out at us. It is the
average number of cells in a intelligent lifeform, or the average
number of DNA molecules of a intelligent lifeform. The human body has
approx 10^38 molecules of DNA, does it not?????
Finally, in my recent thinking on this subject a surprize avenue of
thought arose in that the question of the quantity of water of a solar
system and the hydrology of that water of a solar system. Why is it
that a solar system concentrates all of its water content into just a
few planets or satellites?? And why is it that the amount of water per
solar system is probably a fixed amount. So that every alien solar
system has relatively the same amount of water and all are concentrated
in a few of its planets and satellites.
In this manner, life is a direct function of the water supply that
exists and the dynamics of that water supply in every alien solar
system including our own.
Planet Earth has approx 10^50 molecules of water. How much water exists
in the entirety of our Solar System? And is that amount related to any
of the large numbers I have talked about such as 10^78, 10^70 etc etc.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
|
| User: "Barry in Maryland" |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
08 Aug 2005 12:34:06 PM |
|
|
Those who find ArcPu a wart on Usenet wanted to disconnect the
artificial life support. But there was a successful court challenge by
others who find him merely amusing.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: supporting evidence Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
10 Aug 2005 01:38:51 AM |
|
|
The number of Coulomb Interactions to hold together a plutonium atom is
95!/2 which is 10^148 and Dirac showed in his book Directions in
Physics that the world contains 10^78 protons.
So here I am left with a puzzle. Is the life in toto in the Cosmos
supported by 10^78 neutrinos or 10^70 neutrinos and is the physical
matter supported by 10^78 photons or 10^70 photons.
And more of this puzzle is the meaning of 10^78 photons multiply 10^70
neutrinos, or,
10^70 photons multiply 10^78 neutrinos. My guess is that it is 10^78
photons multiply 10^70 neutrinos.
One thing does seem to be a sure bet is that every alien solar system
harbors life because every alien solar system concentrates its water
into a few planets and satellites which are highly conducive to life.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
10 Aug 2005 02:19:02 AM |
|
|
There are no pseudoforces, only proxy forces.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jim Black" |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
06 Aug 2005 11:22:44 AM |
|
|
wrote:
Coming to think about my proposal of a Coulomb Unification of the
forces of physics where in an Atom Totality the strong-nuclear combines
with the weak-nuclear to end up with a nuclear-Coulomb-force. We can
envision the Nuclear-Coulomb as the nuclear-electron that resides
inside every neutron spills out and runs around avidly holding together
the protons of the nucleus. Whereas normal electrons orbit at a
distance from the protons of the nucleus to provide the normal-Coulomb.
Nuclear-Coulomb have the glue of the nuclear-electrons and these
electrons have little to no space whereas normal electrons are mostly
space. So the deficient space of nuclear-electrons is converted into
energy of gluing together the protons including the protons inside of
neutrons.
However the force of gravity is purely a fiction force because what we
observe as gravity is really the mass of the electrons of the Atom
Totality and they are held in place and orbit, not by gravity, but by
the Coulomb force of the protons in the nucleus of the Atom Totality.
Thus, in a Coulomb Unification of the forces of physics in an Atom
Totality implies that there is a proof, via experiments, for all proofs
eventually resolve down to experiments. So there is a experimental
proof that there exists only Coulomb force and Nuclear-Coulomb begot
from the combining of Strong-nuclear with Weak-nuclear. This means that
experiments exist to prove gravity is a fiction.
Perhaps someone has already found some evidence that the force of
gravity is in contradiction or inconsistency with the force of Coulomb
and Strongnuclear and Weaknuclear. If gravity is a fiction then
inconsistencies with other physics arises, inconsistency and
contradictions.
So I wonder if anyone has stumbled on to some area of physics where
gravity seems to serve up a contradiction.
I think one area of contradiction is superfluid helium in that the
behaviour of superfluid helium defies the existence of a force we
commonly call gravity.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
Atta boy! Make a stand against the gravitationalist cabal!
http://groups-beta.google.com/group/sci.physics/msg/31769f2885f13a8c?hl=en&
Fusa.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
06 Aug 2005 11:29:39 AM |
|
|
I think that no-one has done the calculations on the strange behaviour
of superfluid helium in that it is able to defy gravity and move
upwards and out of a container. It is container-uncontrollable. The
force of gravity however, is a force that is equivalent to the concept
of container-controllable. In other words there is a equivalent
statement in physics that gravity demands the existence of a container
for any given specific quantity of matter. So that if gravity is a true
force and not a fictional force then a container that confines
superfluid helium must exist.
But since no container controlls superfluid helium then gravity is not
a force of Nature but a fictional illusion. And that the matter we
observe is all part of the electron matter of the 5f6 of 231Pu Atom
Totality and held in space by the Coulomb force of the protons of the
Atom Totality. We have the illusion that gravity is an independent
force only because we fail to recognize that all matter which we
observe is electron matter of the Atom Totality.
I suspect no-one has done the calculations of the behaviour of
superfluid helium and how it defies our notion of gravity in that it
climbs out of every container placed inside. However, if that
phenomenon matches the idea that all the forces are Coulomb forces then
the superfluid helium would thus prove that gravity is a fictional
force.
I suspect the detailed accounting of the strange behaviour of
superfluid helium as per noncontainerable would be a direct
mathematical accounting as to the fictional force of gravity. The
inability to containerize superfluid helium is directly proportional to
the fictionality or falsehood of the force of gravity. And that what is
truly going on with superfluid helium is 100 percent that of Coulomb
forces and no gravity force.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
06 Aug 2005 08:34:53 PM |
|
|
Superfluid helium is blended with normal liquid helium, and is a great
thermotunneller. Hey dumbass, gases expand when heated. Would that
disprove the Coulomb force?
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
07 Aug 2005 04:17:15 AM |
|
|
I wonder if you ever been in an experimental physics lab. Ever
eyewitnessed superfluid helium.
Ever brought the temperature below that of superfluid helium.
Of course when you allow the temperature to rise above the superfluid
state you get all sorts of mix of helium, helium gas.
I suspect you are as sloppy of experiment as you are sloppy of mind.
Archimedes Plutonium
www.iw.net/~a_plutonium
whole entire Universe is just one big atom
where dots of the electron-dot-cloud are galaxies
.
|
|
|
| User: "Autymn D. C." |
|
| Title: Re: Coulomb Unification of forces implies gravity a fiction; so can I prove it |
08 Aug 2005 11:17:49 AM |
|
|
Give me published observations supporting your claim that the
populations aren't mixed at any temperature above 0 K. I suspect that
you're sloppy of everything.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
