"Phineas T Puddleduck" <phineaspuddleduck@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:phineaspuddleduck-7C741E.16530809042007@news.octanews.com...

In article
<UVqSh.270931$5j1.160362@bgtnsc04-news.ops.worldnet.att.net>,
"Painius" <starswirlernosp@maol.com> wrote:

There is no further reason for any uncivil talk
from you or from me. If you want to continue
discussing this, then i'm all for it. However,
we will discuss it in a civil manner or we will
not discuss it all.

After all, scientific reasoning and the scientific
method demand non-emotional communication,
don't they? Emotional phrases such as "please
keep up" have no place in science that i can
discern.

Why, you're the one being deliberately obtuse.

You have been warned, Phineas. Art Deco says that
i am in no position to issue ultimatums. As both of
you know, here on UseNet, thass jus' plain *****.

You--let me restate this emphatically--*YOU* have
ended this conversation with your lack of civility
you've shown above.

You may say or do whatever you wish to try to make
others believe that i ended this conversation. But it
makes no diff to me. I tried to be civil, even to be
somewhat friendly. It is evident that you are not
willing to be reciprocative. You would rather use
emotional terms to show how much like Art Deco you
are, rather than civil terms like a real scientist would
do.

Your credibility is shot in my book. Bye now.

And NO, Deco, i'm not leaving for good. I'm just
saying bye to you and your sockpuppet because i no
longer plan to read you... either of you. Your posts
will be clicked as read without reading. You are just
too negative to be around.

Here's hoping that you will find more positive things
to fill your life with. I may check in on you from
time to time just to see if there's any positive change.

And i'll check any responses to this particular post;
however, don't expect any further response from me
in any case.

happy days and...
starry starry nights!

--
Indelibly yours,
Paine
http://www.savethechildren.org/
http://www.painellsworth.net