Science > Physics > dedanoe's solution to Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture
| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"dedanoe" |
| Date: |
08 Mar 2006 04:19:29 AM |
| Object: |
dedanoe's solution to Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture |
check this: 3^3+4^3+5^3=27+64+125=216=6^3
http://dedanoe.tripod.com/polynomials
i understand that the problem was to find the whole numbers x_k so that
the sum of the powers of the first x_{k-1} numbers will be same type of
power of the last number x_k. i have a general solution to any n and k
in \sum_{i=1}^{k-1} x_i^n = x_k^n. well can i have my money now?
the problem's location:
http://claymath.org/millennium/Birch_and_Swinnerton-Dyer_Conjecture/
and the usual: http:dedanoe.tripod.com
.
|
|
| User: "dedanoe" |
|
| Title: Re: dedanoe's solution to Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture |
08 Mar 2006 04:25:02 AM |
|
|
correction: the usual is http://dedanoe.tripod.com
the solution i just gave you here is worth a milion dollars.
so says http://claymath.org
.
|
|
|
| User: "" |
|
| Title: Re: dedanoe's solution to Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture |
08 Mar 2006 08:35:37 AM |
|
|
dedanoe writes:
correction: the usual is http://dedanoe.tripod.com
the solution i just gave you here is worth a milion dollars.
so says http://claymath.org
According to http://claymath.org/millennium/Rules_etc/ :
"Before consideration, a proposed solution must be published in a
refereed mathematics publication of worldwide repute (or such other
form as the SAB shall determine qualifies), and it must also have
general acceptance in the mathematics community two years after. "
A solution doesn't make a million dolalrs - a published, widely
accepted solution does. It's that damn anti-crank clause again.
Moreover, I think that you have misunderstood the
Birch--Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture. But don't take my word on it -- the
referee's report will put everything in the light of day.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pubkeybreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: dedanoe's solution to Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture |
08 Mar 2006 09:24:07 AM |
|
|
"Moreover, I think that you have misunderstood the
Birch--Swinnerton-Dyer conjecture. "
He did. He is nowhere close to the conjecture.
The conjecture says that the rank of an Elliptic Curve (over Q)
equals the order of vanishing of its associated L-series, evaluated
at 1.
.
|
|
|
| User: "dedanoe" |
|
| Title: Re: dedanoe's solution to Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture |
08 Mar 2006 11:24:10 AM |
|
|
i taught this:
you have an array of numbers x_k^n.
you sum them and you equalize them to y^n.
i was looking to solve all of x_k and y
in the set of whole numbers.
that is how i got: 3^3+4^3+5^3=6^3
i might have been solving something else entirely
but hey how do you like my solution any way?
http://dedanoe.tripod.com/polynomials
.
|
|
|
| User: "Pubkeybreaker" |
|
| Title: Re: dedanoe's solution to Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture |
08 Mar 2006 12:15:55 PM |
|
|
"i taught this:
you have an array of numbers x_k^n.
you sum them and you equalize them to y^n"
<snip>
What you try to discuss has been well known for a
LONG time.
See:
http://euler.free.fr/
.
|
|
|
| User: "dedanoe" |
|
| Title: Re: dedanoe's solution to Birch and Swinnerton-Dyer Conjecture |
08 Mar 2006 02:04:14 PM |
|
|
i never new that!
http://dedanoe.tripod.com/polynomials/micro-macro.jpg
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
