| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"Jack Sarfatti" |
| Date: |
20 May 2005 01:53:29 PM |
| Object: |
Demystifying Cosmology & Astrophysical Anomalies |
PS I meant to add that the Higgs Ocean with Vacuum ODLRO has
/\ ~ (H(infinity)/c)^2 ~ 10^-56 cm^-2
= constant parameter for our particular universe at Max Tegmark's level 1
Energy density scales as (initial density) R(t)^-3(1 + w)
here R(t) is dimensionless scale factor in FRW metric
http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-4/p10.html
w = 0 for CDM
w = +1/3 for cosmic black body radiation
w = -1 for dark zero point energy
Dark zero point energy density with negative pressure accelerating the
universe is tuv(ZPF) = (c^4/hpiG)/\guv
/\ = Lp^-2(1 - Lp^2|Vacuum ODLRO)|^2) ~ (H/c)^2
Compared to Dirac Sea without Vacuum ODLRO where /\ ~ Lp^-2 ~ 10^+66 cm^-2
It's the Vacuum ODLRO that quenches /\ and that makes the entropy of
early universe small.
http://www.physicstoday.org/vol-56/iss-4/p10.html
Note Hal Puthoff's error on Ken Shoulders charge cluster EVOs. Hal uses
w = + 1/3 for EM ZPF his model is a shell of charge Ne with hollow
interior and a positive ZPE pressure outside the shell holding in the
Coulomb repulsion force ~ +(Ne)^2/r^2.
That requires a /\ filling all universe much too big!
i.e. /\ ~ (mc/h)^2 ~ 10^22 cm^-2 to be compared to actually observed /\
~ 10^-56 cm^-2.
My model is /\ ~ 0 outside the EVO but /\ ~ (1/137)(mc/h)^2 INSIDE the
EVO with NEGATIVE PRESSURE sucking the charge Ne in at stable
equilibrium. This also explains the stability of single electron shell
of charge e (lepto-quarks) from its negative pressure dark zero point
energy core where the Vacuum ODLRO is smaller than on the outside of the
shell.
Also NASA Pioneer 10 & 11 anomaly as Vacuum ODLRO hedgehog defect at Sun
with constant radial g-force ~ c^2(LC)^i00 per unit test mass
a_g = - cH = 1 nanometer per sec^2
between two concentric spherical surfaces, first starting out at 20 AU
from Sun.
That is /\ ~ (H/cr) between the 2 spherical surfaces
V = c^2/\r^2 > 0
a_g = - cH as observed
Similar model for Galactic Halo
/\ ~ (v/cr^2)
V = cv
a_r = -dV/dr = 0
v is constant tangential speed of stars around the dark halo.
On May 20, 2005, at 8:36 AM, Jack Sarfatti wrote:
bcc
The Cipher of Genesis Decoded
The Pre-inflationary "Fire" ("steam") unstable false vacuum Dirac Sea is
globally flat without any rest masses and without any gravity. The
cosmological constant is /\ ~ Lp^-2 = 10^66 cm^-2 in the RANDOM "SED" if
you like Dirac Sea.
Vacuum ODLRO = 0
The Post-inflationary "Ice" metastable curved vacuum is the calmer more
pacific Higgs Ocean whose FM phase ripples is Einstein's curvature
gravity i.e. B-field ~ LpP/ih operating on arg(Vacuum ODLRO) The dark
energy/matter stress-energy density Diff(4) tensors are AM amplitude
ripples in the Higgs intensity |Vacuum ODLRO|^2
The B-field is from local gauging T4 -> Diff(4) in the presence of
Vacuum ODLRO. It's the Vacuum ODLRO that causes the local gauging!
Vacuum ODLRO explains:
1. Why the large-scale world is "local" and "classical" - why no giant
Schrodinger Cats
2. Why the early curved universe has low thermodynamic entropy i.e.,
"arrow of time" parallel to expansion of space
David Deutsch's "multiverse" is wrong. You cannot use micro-quantum
rules on large scale precisely because of ODLRO. This is explained in
detail by P.W. Anderson in several papers in "A Career in Theoretical
Physics" (World)
On May 20, 2005, at 1:28 AM, wrote:
If you want to see the flat spacetime metric, you just remove all
gravitational sources sufficiently far away that gravitational effects
are negligible.
No, Paul you have confounded asymptotic flatness of a curved metric with
TWO co-existing metrics one flat the other curved.
This shows that a flat background metric has a concrete physical meaning.
Yes, as the unstable pre-inflation false vacuum without gravity and
without rest masses of lepto-quarks. Think of expanding spheres of ICE
floating in STEAM
Just as in Newtonian physics, the law of inertia only really applies in
a vacuum -- so that you have to remove all gas-phase matter before you
can "directly observe it".
Totally wrong. That's like saying that an ice cube has a co-existing
interpenetrating steam ghostly doppleganger occupying the same
space-time region with it.
So you are saying that any bimetric equivalent of GR is "confused"?
I see no bimetric in asymptotic flatness of the single curved metric.
Yes, what you write is confused. You are not using the metaphors
consistently.
I was simply responding to your assertion that since the background
metric is not
directly observable, it is physically meaningless.
The whole idea of Einstein's theory is that there is no rigid absolute
non-dynamical globally flat metric co-existing with the curved dynamical
"background independent" metric guv. What you are trying to impose here
is excess metaphysical baggage. It's like putting sugar in the gas tank
of a new Ferrari.
You obviously don't understand Rosen's concept. Have you read any of his
papers? Ever?
No. If Rosen proposed that. He is wrong.
I am not talking here about *Einstein's* idea; I'm talking about a
*bimetric equivalent* of GR, in which there is a non-deformable
background g_uv and a physical g_uv that depends on the distribution of
matter.
That's an ugly idea. It's not needed. That's simply BAD physics IMHO.
Most of the theory papers today are bad physics. Too many theorists with
too few ideas regurgitating mostly not-even-wrong ideas with very little
contact with observation and experiment.
.
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
