deuterium [could be] far more abundant than previously estimated



 Science > Physics > deuterium [could be] far more abundant than previously estimated

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "Sam Wormley"
Date: 31 Aug 2006 01:24:16 PM
Object: deuterium [could be] far more abundant than previously estimated
Hidden hydrogen could force galaxy rethink
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/10/8/20/1
30 August 2006
An international team of researchers is claiming that deuterium -- a
heavy form of hydrogen created moments after the Big Bang -- is far
more abundant than previously estimated. Using new data from NASA's
FUSE satellite, they say that some of the deuterium has gone
unnoticed in the past because it binds as a solid to interstellar
dust grains, making it difficult to see. The claim, if true, could
force astronomers to rethink current models of how stars and galaxies
form and evolve (Astrophysical J. 647, 1106).
Deuterium -- an isotope of hydrogen containing a proton plus a
neutron -- is cosmologically significant because it is continually
destroyed in star cores by the same nuclear reactions that create
helium and other heavier elements. The amount of deuterium is
therefore far lower now than it was in the early universe. Indeed,
the shortfall in the amount of deuterium allows scientists to track
our galaxy's chemical evolution over billions of years.
But what has mystified astronomers over the years is the fact that
while primordial concentrations are about 27 parts deuterium per
million hydrogen atoms (ppm), values in the Milky Way today range
from 5-22 ppm. Three years ago, Bruce Draine from Princeton
University developed a model that could explain this anomaly. He said
that deuterium, compared to hydrogen, might preferentially bind to
interstellar dust grains, changing from an easily detectable gas to
an unobservable solid form.
See: http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/10/8/20/1
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Re: Jets Spout Far Closer to Black Hole Than Thought, Scientists Say (Forwarded)
Democrats lost FAR more than the election . . .
Re: AFA-B NOMINATIONS: Re: Nominations so far and call for nominations--Spring AFA-B Awards
Far Out: Exploding dark-matter balls predicted
"Near and Far Fields" Wiki project
The electron shell model - is far from being 'The story'
How far does blood spray?
Hitler Youth Buttons - Latin Cross patches can't be far behind...
Far Object Visual Detection
(rev 2.7) Too Far ABOVE Journalists - People ARE not "Anti-American" {HRI 20070106-V2.7}
Sarfatti's prediction on null dark matter detection holds so far
A Better Idea (Was: July / August AUK nominations so far)
Are Quasars Really THAT Far Away?
Nikola Tesluman: His Lightning Staff & Far-Seeing Crystal Ball
Your current Axiom bug list is far far too short to be trusted
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER