Dirac Matrices Derived From "Generalized PI"



 Science > Physics > Dirac Matrices Derived From "Generalized PI"

LINK TO THIS PAGE  


rating :  0   |  0


  Page 1 of 1
Topic: Science > Physics
User: "OsherD"
Date: 18 Jul 2005 10:21:40 AM
Object: Dirac Matrices Derived From "Generalized PI"

From Osher Doctorow


COPYRIGHT NOTICE
Dirac Matrices Derived From "Generalized PI"
Copyright By Owner Osher Doctorow Ph.D.
First Published 2005
In several of my earlier postings here and in sci.stat.math and
geoemtry.research and math-history-list (of Math Forum) and elsewhere,
I pointed out that Probable Influence (PI) generalizes more or less as
follows.
A. To all alternating series, finite or infinite.
B. To all measures or indicators of proximity, partial or "complete",
"one-sided" or "two-sided".
Proximity when used without qualification refers to the opposite in
some consistent sense of some distance-function or metric or distance,
while one-sided proximity refers to the imposition of an inequality
constraint between the two objects whose distance is considered (e.g.,
y < = x), and partial proximity means that the resulting measure or
indicator that's the "opposite" of distance is not itself a metric or
distance-function but has some of the properties of a
distance-function.
The Dirac matrices listed in Wolfram's Mathworld "Dirac Matrices,"
http://mathworld.wolfram.com/DiracMatrices.html, can all be derived
from the following principle 1 (although other forms of these matrices
exist which "permute" the matrices listed).
Principle 1. A Dirac matrix is a 4 x 4 matrix which is either (a) a
main diagonal matrix of alternating sign 1's or (b) which minimizes the
proximity and maximizes the distance (see below) between subdiagonals
occupied by 1's or i's provided that if i occurs then -i occurs in the
same subdiagonal, or (c) is the identity matrix (1 on main diagonal,
0's elsewhere) or the matrix of (a) above with the alternating sign 1's
grouped (permuted) into the main diagonal 1 1 -1 -1.
Subdiagonals are parts of a matrix parallel to either the main or
second diagonal (upper left to lower right, or lower left to upper
right diagonals), and here the term is used in the "proper" sense (so
that a diagonal is not a subdiagonal), and maximum distance between
subdiagonals a, b means that the number of parallel subdiagonals
between a and b is maximum for 4 x 4 matrices.
Of course, the Dirac matrix is composed of Pauli 2 x 2 submatrices.
Osher Doctorow
.


  Page 1 of 1


Related Articles
Dirac Matrices Derived From "Generalized PI" 2
Quantum Gravity 171.3: Dirac and Pauli Matrices As Generalized Alternating Sign Matrices
Dirac Matrices Via Toeplitz, Hankel, Banded and Symmetric Matrix/Operator Theory
x- and p-matrices
Infinitesimal generators of the 6x6 symmetric matrices Lie algebra
Q: properties of covariance matrices
Is sum of 2 positive-definite square matrices positive definite?
Re: Mathematical difference between operators and finite matrices?
question about diagonalizable but non-symmetric matrices
Pauli Spin Matrices in Domain Walls
Thanks To Baez on Cartan Matrices
Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 8: Tensors & Matrices
Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 17: Stochastic/Markov Matrices, Jordan and Classical Canonical Forms
Quantum Gravity-Dark Energy as Zero-Infinity (Coded as 0-1) Duals 17.1: Stochastic/Markov Matrices, Jordan and Classical Canonical Forms
Quantum Gravity 25: From Unit Balls/Spheres to Tensors and Matrices and Spinors
 

NEWER

pg.1612     pg.1232     pg.940     pg.716     pg.544     pg.412     pg.311     pg.234     pg.175     pg.130     pg.96     pg.70     pg.50     pg.35     pg.24     pg.16     pg.10     pg.6     pg.3     pg.1

OLDER