| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"muser" |
| Date: |
11 Jan 2005 10:47:18 AM |
| Object: |
Draper, Androcles and Richard perry |
I must admit I find your post (to each other) stimulating. The post
about synchronising the rods or using the clock, is in itself a
wonderfully worked lecture in the subject. Androcles gained some
respect as he knew what he was talking about, although I can see
Draper and Perry are well schooled in psychics. If one looks on
Androcles as a well meaning devil's advocate and omitted post by
erroneous types like bilge and other we can all benefit from this
debate.
Please continue with the synchronising theme, or any other that takes
your fancy.
muser
.
|
|
| User: "LingChow" |
|
| Title: Re: Draper, Androcles and Richard perry |
11 Jan 2005 11:50:52 AM |
|
|
"muser" <charlie12345@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f9a2a258.0501110847.17398dfa@posting.google.com...
I must admit I find your post (to each other) stimulating. The post
about synchronising the rods or using the clock, is in itself a
wonderfully worked lecture in the subject. Androcles gained some
respect as he knew what he was talking about, although I can see
Draper and Perry are well schooled in psychics. If one looks on
Androcles as a well meaning devil's advocate and omitted post by
erroneous types like bilge and other we can all benefit from this
debate.
Please continue with the synchronising theme, or any other that takes
your fancy.
muser
You are talking about personalities, NOT physics, you are OFF TOPIC.
Go stroke them someplace else.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Androcles" |
|
| Title: Re: Draper, Androcles and Richard perry |
11 Jan 2005 12:34:25 PM |
|
|
"muser" <charlie12345@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:f9a2a258.0501110847.17398dfa@posting.google.com...
I must admit I find your post (to each other) stimulating. The post
about synchronising the rods or using the clock, is in itself a
wonderfully worked lecture in the subject. Androcles gained some
respect as he knew what he was talking about, although I can see
Draper and Perry are well schooled in psychics. If one looks on
Androcles as a well meaning devil's advocate and omitted post by
erroneous types like bilge and other we can all benefit from this
debate.
Please continue with the synchronising theme, or any other that takes
your fancy.
muser
Thank you. I rarely get a chance to say that, and it pleases me to be
able to.
Androcles.
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Draper, Androcles and Richard perry |
11 Jan 2005 10:57:58 AM |
|
|
"muser" <charlie12345@hotmail.com> wrote in message news:f9a2a258.0501110847.17398dfa@posting.google.com...
I must admit I find your post (to each other) stimulating. The post
about synchronising the rods or using the clock, is in itself a
wonderfully worked lecture in the subject. Androcles gained some
respect
with you?
as he knew what he was talking about, although I can see
Draper and Perry are well schooled in psychics.
Perry, well schooled in physics?
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/TempForce.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SimplyPut.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Counter.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AccelPerry.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/HowdyDoo.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/LorentzPerry.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/SRValid.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/AAB.html
hm, you're not very well schooled in physics, are you?
If one looks on
Androcles as a well meaning devil's advocate
A what meaning devil's advocate?
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Androrgasm.html
http://users.pandora.be/vdmoortel/dirk/Physics/Fumbles/Sputtering.html
etc...
and omitted post by
erroneous types like bilge and other we can all benefit from this
debate.
Debate?
Please continue with the synchronising theme, or any other that takes
your fancy.
Yes, let Androcles synchronize his rod with Perry's :-)
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "RP" |
|
| Title: Re: Draper, Androcles and Richard perry |
11 Jan 2005 10:03:06 PM |
|
|
muser wrote:
I must admit I find your post (to each other) stimulating. The post
about synchronising the rods or using the clock, is in itself a
wonderfully worked lecture in the subject. Androcles gained some
respect as he knew what he was talking about, although I can see
Draper and Perry are well schooled in psychics. If one looks on
Androcles as a well meaning devil's advocate and omitted post by
erroneous types like bilge and other we can all benefit from this
debate.
Please continue with the synchronising theme, or any other that takes
your fancy.
muser
Thanks for the unofficial accreditation, but I'll have to decline the
award. I'm not 'formally' schooled in physics, and can't hold a candle
to Bilge when it comes to mathematical physics. Though I've more than
likely gone through a stack of literature, including both popular and
mathematical treatments, that is an order of magnitude taller than
most undergrads have even seen in their lives, this is only due to the
greater number of years that I've had to do so. When other people pick
up a fiction novel, I pick of Feynman. It's been that way since as far
back as I can recall. I've had a few courses, and a lifetime of
serious and focused contemplation dotted with mounds of reading
material to provide further ideas, data, and logical arguments.
These are my only credentials.
BTW, Dirk is politically incorrect on most every occasion, but I'm not
going to feign that his post is entirely empirically incorrect. I've
done quite a bit of my contemplation out loud, and unfortunately he's
one of those who thinks he's got something tangible there. It seems to
make him immensely happy to save all of these misthoughts, as though
they are invariants through time, just as the bag lady is ecstatic
when she finds a broken and road damaged silver-handled mirror by the
curb; she thinks it must be the most valuable of treasures,
permanently what it ever was, and its hers now.
Richard Perry
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Draper, Androcles and Richard perry |
12 Jan 2005 02:30:00 AM |
|
|
"RP" <no_mail_no_spam@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:34jllrF4ce0l2U1@individual.net...
muser wrote:
I must admit I find your post (to each other) stimulating. The post
about synchronising the rods or using the clock, is in itself a
wonderfully worked lecture in the subject. Androcles gained some
respect as he knew what he was talking about, although I can see
Draper and Perry are well schooled in psychics. If one looks on
Androcles as a well meaning devil's advocate and omitted post by
erroneous types like bilge and other we can all benefit from this
debate.
Please continue with the synchronising theme, or any other that takes
your fancy.
muser
Thanks for the unofficial accreditation, but I'll have to decline the
award. I'm not 'formally' schooled in physics, and can't hold a candle
to Bilge when it comes to mathematical physics. Though I've more than
likely gone through a stack of literature, including both popular and
mathematical treatments, that is an order of magnitude taller than
most undergrads have even seen in their lives, this is only due to the
greater number of years that I've had to do so. When other people pick
up a fiction novel, I pick of Feynman. It's been that way since as far
back as I can recall. I've had a few courses, and a lifetime of
serious and focused contemplation dotted with mounds of reading
material to provide further ideas, data, and logical arguments.
These are my only credentials.
BTW, Dirk is politically incorrect on most every occasion, but I'm not
going to feign that his post is entirely empirically incorrect. I've
done quite a bit of my contemplation out loud, and unfortunately he's
one of those who thinks he's got something tangible there. It seems to
make him immensely happy to save all of these misthoughts, as though
they are invariants through time, just as the bag lady is ecstatic
when she finds a broken and road damaged silver-handled mirror by the
curb; she thinks it must be the most valuable of treasures,
permanently what it ever was, and its hers now.
As soon as I notice some form of improvement, I'll take them
away - just to tease you, if you like to be teased, that is.
How's that?
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "RP" |
|
| Title: Re: Draper, Androcles and Richard perry |
12 Jan 2005 05:49:58 AM |
|
|
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
"RP" <no_mail_no_spam@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:34jllrF4ce0l2U1@individual.net...
muser wrote:
I must admit I find your post (to each other) stimulating. The post
about synchronising the rods or using the clock, is in itself a
wonderfully worked lecture in the subject. Androcles gained some
respect as he knew what he was talking about, although I can see
Draper and Perry are well schooled in psychics. If one looks on
Androcles as a well meaning devil's advocate and omitted post by
erroneous types like bilge and other we can all benefit from this
debate.
Please continue with the synchronising theme, or any other that takes
your fancy.
muser
Thanks for the unofficial accreditation, but I'll have to decline the
award. I'm not 'formally' schooled in physics, and can't hold a candle
to Bilge when it comes to mathematical physics. Though I've more than
likely gone through a stack of literature, including both popular and
mathematical treatments, that is an order of magnitude taller than
most undergrads have even seen in their lives, this is only due to the
greater number of years that I've had to do so. When other people pick
up a fiction novel, I pick of Feynman. It's been that way since as far
back as I can recall. I've had a few courses, and a lifetime of
serious and focused contemplation dotted with mounds of reading
material to provide further ideas, data, and logical arguments.
These are my only credentials.
BTW, Dirk is politically incorrect on most every occasion, but I'm not
going to feign that his post is entirely empirically incorrect. I've
done quite a bit of my contemplation out loud, and unfortunately he's
one of those who thinks he's got something tangible there. It seems to
make him immensely happy to save all of these misthoughts, as though
they are invariants through time, just as the bag lady is ecstatic
when she finds a broken and road damaged silver-handled mirror by the
curb; she thinks it must be the most valuable of treasures,
permanently what it ever was, and its hers now.
As soon as I notice some form of improvement, I'll take them
away - just to tease you, if you like to be teased, that is.
How's that?
Dirk Vdm
Likewise.
Richard Perry
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
