| Topic: |
Science > Physics |
| User: |
"James Harris" |
| Date: |
01 Sep 2003 11:16:24 AM |
| Object: |
Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
James Harris
.
|
|
| User: "Eric Prebys" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
02 Sep 2003 02:59:58 PM |
|
|
"James Harris" <jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c65f87.0309010816.13d5dc7b@posting.google.com...
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit,
I recommend you submit your "paper" to some British journals.
I believe they will give the most entertaining responses.
-Eric
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
02 Sep 2003 03:29:00 PM |
|
|
"Eric Prebys" <ericprebys@comcast.net> wrote in message news:bj2skd$30q$1@info4.fnal.gov...
"James Harris" <jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message
news:3c65f87.0309010816.13d5dc7b@posting.google.com...
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit,
I recommend you submit your "paper" to some British journals.
I believe they will give the most entertaining responses.
-Eric
<Quote>
Dear Mr. Harris,
May we express our sincere gratitude for sending us
the product of your splendidly courageous endeavour
to produce a genuine mathematical paper.
Alas, our journal is not specialised in the subject you
seem to have chosen.
Nevertheless your submission provided us with a
unique and fascinating reading experience indeed.
Sincerely yours,
Neville McRefusal
</Quote>
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 11:22:13 AM |
|
|
"James Harris" <jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message news:3c65f87.0309010816.13d5dc7b@posting.google.com...
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
Try submitting a paper that is full of horse *****, even
according to *you*.
Compare the replies that you will get with the replies
you are getting now, and you will finally understand
that you are merely getting polite rejections.
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Brett" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 04:04:53 PM |
|
|
(James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0309010816.13d5dc7b@posting.google.com>...
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
Oohh! Me! Pick me!!! Okay, how about the 'Journal of Irreproducible Results?"
.
|
|
|
| User: "Dirk Van de moortel" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 04:11:43 PM |
|
|
"Brett" <cauchy_1@yahoo.com> wrote in message news:931f9c2.0309011304.532e7052@posting.google.com...
jstevh@msn.com (James Harris) wrote in message news:<3c65f87.0309010816.13d5dc7b@posting.google.com>...
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
Oohh! Me! Pick me!!! Okay, how about the 'Journal of Irreproducible Results?"
I really think he should try with the "Journal of Theoretics":
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/second-index.htm
He might get Ken Seto as a peer reviewer!
Dirk Vdm
.
|
|
|
| User: "Gib Bogle" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
06 Sep 2003 07:56:15 PM |
|
|
Dirk Van de moortel wrote:
I really think he should try with the "Journal of Theoretics":
http://www.journaloftheoretics.com/second-index.htm
He might get Ken Seto as a peer reviewer!
I vote for "Social Text".
Gib
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sarah Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 01:42:29 PM |
|
|
In <3c65f87.0309010816.13d5dc7b@posting.google.com> James Harris wrote:
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
Maybe you could try asking someone on your home planet.
HTH
James Harris
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Wayne Brown" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
02 Sep 2003 04:58:13 PM |
|
|
In alt.writing James Harris <jstevh@msn.com> wrote:
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
Maybe he's not familiar with "Jack and Jill" or "Highlights for Children."
--
Wayne Brown | "When your tail's in a crack, you improvise
fwbrown@bellsouth.net | if you're good enough. Otherwise you give
| your pelt to the trapper."
"e^(i*pi) = -1" -- Euler | -- John Myers Myers, "Silverlock"
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Sam Wormley" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 11:59:32 AM |
|
|
James Harris wrote:
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
James Harris
He's probably politely saying, "GET LOST".
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Chuck Simmons" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 12:17:23 PM |
|
|
James Harris wrote:
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
James Harris
The "Journal of Irreproducible Results" jumps to mind. I think it still
exists in some form even though the last I heard, the editors were
revolting. Nobel laureates have published there. Consider also "Hot Air"
which has had a print version. The headquarters, or properly
hindquarters, seem to be at MIT.
Chuck
--
... The times have been,
That, when the brains were out,
the man would die. ... Macbeth
Chuck Simmons
.
|
|
|
| User: "Sarah Jane" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 01:55:08 PM |
|
|
In <3F537F20.71565E02@earthlink.net> Chuck Simmons wrote:
James Harris wrote:
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both
were embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic
people. However, there are some interesting replies from Americans
as well, so here are two American editors of the New York Journal of
Mathematics to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced
Polynomial Factorization. <Quote> Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
James Harris
The "Journal of Irreproducible Results" jumps to mind. I think it
still exists in some form even though the last I heard, the editors
were revolting. Nobel laureates have published there. Consider also
"Hot Air" which has had a print version. The headquarters, or properly
hindquarters, seem to be at MIT.
Chuck
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&
list_uids=12385726&dopt=Abstract
I suppose if this could get published, then someone somewhere will
publish the whacktard's opus.
.
|
|
|
| User: "Chuck Simmons" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 02:26:05 PM |
|
|
Sarah Jane wrote:
In <3F537F20.71565E02@earthlink.net> Chuck Simmons wrote:
James Harris wrote:
[Clutter removed]
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
James Harris
The "Journal of Irreproducible Results" jumps to mind. I think it
still exists in some form even though the last I heard, the editors
were revolting. Nobel laureates have published there. Consider also
"Hot Air" which has had a print version. The headquarters, or properly
hindquarters, seem to be at MIT.
Chuck
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&
list_uids=12385726&dopt=Abstract
I suppose if this could get published, then someone somewhere will
publish the whacktard's opus.
I had always wondered about dragons. Thanks. James, however, doesn't
have the style. He does not know a thing about elevator operators and I
doubt that he has any expertise in the structural engineering of
strapless evening gowns. A snappy title might help. Methinks the likes
of "Factorization of Polynomials by Coercion" would be better. Maybe
"Tilting at a Palindrome" is more suggestive. No, not so good. "Saltines
and Polynomials" has a certain nothing about it. Come to think, I'll
take my first suggestion. I think he should add a proof that Alexander
the Great did not exist and had an infinite number of limbs. This would
demonstrate his prowess with mathematical logic.
Chuck
--
... The times have been,
That, when the brains were out,
the man would die. ... Macbeth
Chuck Simmons
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Jens Hansen" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 02:28:33 PM |
|
|
Sarah Jane wrote:
In <3F537F20.71565E02@earthlink.net> Chuck Simmons wrote:
James Harris wrote:
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both
were embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic
people. However, there are some interesting replies from Americans
as well, so here are two American editors of the New York Journal of
Mathematics to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced
Polynomial Factorization. <Quote> Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
James Harris
The "Journal of Irreproducible Results" jumps to mind. I think it
still exists in some form even though the last I heard, the editors
were revolting. Nobel laureates have published there. Consider also
"Hot Air" which has had a print version. The headquarters, or properly
hindquarters, seem to be at MIT.
Chuck
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov:80/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&
list_uids=12385726&dopt=Abstract
I suppose if this could get published, then someone somewhere will
publish the whacktard's opus.
After cross-reading this article, I have come to the conclusion that this
is "some" kind of serious scientfic work.
Jens
--
"Kriegsverbrechen werden verfolgt werden, Kriegsverbrecher werden bestraft
werden, und es wird keine Verteidigung sein zu sagen 'Ich habe nur Befehle
ausgeführt'." - Präsident Bush,17. März 2003.
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Uncle Al" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 01:51:25 PM |
|
|
James Harris wrote:
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?\
Journals are extremely supportive of researchers if there is any value
in their submission. Had there been any value at all, the Editor
would have appended a short list of objections to be remedied plus
with a request to correct and resubmit, or sent a list of allied
journals more suited to content.
"I'm not sure what journals to suggest" is isomorphous to "go away."
Since you are too fucking stooopid to comprehend declarative
sentences, Uncle Al will feed you your own tripe.
CASEY AT THE POST-MODERNIST BAT
The outlook wasn't brilliant for the theory crowd that week:
Objectivism ruled, and nothing radical was chic.
So when Derrida's new book got panned and Beaudrillard retired
The whole postmodern movement felt depressed and uninspired.
They said, "If only Casey had a chance to write a piece,
Our paradigm's imperiled life would get a second lease!"
But Casey was department chair at Northern Ivy U
And taught a massive seminar, and summer courses, too;
And what with that new cooking class and chanting every night
Six years would surely pass before he'd get a chance to write
So in yogurt shops in Berkeley and in trains at Harvard Square,
A hegemonic melancholy lingered in the air.
But then there came a rumor that the profs could scarce believe:
The seminar was off the books, and Casey's taken leave!
He'd ordered all his students not to bug him 'til the fall
And bought ten pounds of mocha from the Starbucks at the mall.
Then cheers rang out in latté bars across the eastern seaboard:
For Casey, mighty Casey, was advancing to the keyboard!
There was style in Casey's manner as he eased into his prose
On hegemonic (dis)course tropes in global know/ledge flows.
He quoted heavy metal bands and talked of mise-en-scène.
With long reflexive musings on a rash he'd had at ten.
He interspersed parentheses and slashes and notations
That made straightforward gerunds look like chemical equations.
He rounded off the essay with a trenchant aperçu
And mailed it off to Washington to breeze through peer review.
He sent out copies far and wide, and found they made a hit;
But then the journal wrote him back: "Revise and resubmit!"
"Deconstruct the editor!" flew the e-mails 'cross the lands
And they might have just pursued it had not Casey stayed their hands.
"A trifle," chuckled Casey as he glanced at the reviews
Then whipped off a revision that would surely make the news.
He added untranslated quotes in Arabic and Hmong
And one concluding sentence that was seven pages long.
He closed it with a stirring plea for union rights at Yale,
Then pasted in a glossy nude and popped it in the mail.
And then he packed his bags to rest in Maui for a bit
Until the journal wrote again: "Revise and resubmit!"
"Fight the power!" shouted angry mobs in internet cafes
Until they got his valiant fax: "I'll have it fixed in days!"
The play was gone from Casey's prose, his style was clipped and terse;
He'd taken out the lit review in blank Homeric verse;
He'd added charts and plots and graphs and diagrams from Venn
'Til all agreed his piece could never get turned down again
And now the printer spits it out, and now the stamp is bought,
And now the world is shattered by the depth of Casey's thought!
Oh, somewhere in the learned world progressive thought prevails
And journals publish fresh assaults on dead Caucasian males;
And somewhere deconstruction reigns, and joy is uninflected
But not this week in anthro - mighty Casey got rejected.
Hey Harris,
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
http://w0rli.home.att.net/youare.swf
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/sunshine.jpg
--
Uncle Al
http://www.mazepath.com/uncleal/
(Toxic URL! Unsafe for children and most mammals)
"Quis custodiet ipsos custodes?" The Net!
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andy Spragg" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
02 Sep 2003 04:42:38 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al <UncleAl0@hate.spam.net> pushed briefly to the front of the
queue on Mon, 01 Sep 2003 11:51:25 -0700, and nailed this to the shed
door:
^ "I'm not sure what journals to suggest" is isomorphous to "go away."
Is "isomorphous" isomorphic to "isomorphic"?
Andy
--
"No, you claim the magpie is to blame for all the
worlds ills, based on your ignorance of magpies."
(4a7391c12e538ef306d33d71c9482221@TeraNews)
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Steven" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 03:44:32 PM |
|
|
Uncle Al wrote:
James Harris wrote:
Hey Harris,
http://www.apa.org/journals/psp/psp7761121.html
And it has references! Lots of them.
.
|
|
|
|
|
| User: "Bill Vajk" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 12:04:53 PM |
|
|
James Harris wrote:
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
He was probably being polite. If your ideas had sex appeal
they might make the National Enquirer but short of that,
too bad......
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "David C. Ullrich" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
01 Sep 2003 04:58:02 PM |
|
|
On 1 Sep 2003 09:16:24 -0700, (James Harris) wrote:
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
If you ever sober up you're going to be more embarassed by this
stuff than by a lot of your stuff.
Really, if most people had a paper rejected by a _large_ number
of journals they wouldn't be advertising it like this, like it somehow
shows there's something wrong with the journals or the editors.
That "I'm not sure what journal to suggest" doesn't show ignorance,
it's an attempt at a polite brushoff.
James Harris
************************
David C. Ullrich
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Herman Jurjus" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
02 Sep 2003 05:21:49 AM |
|
|
Perhaps your work is just too hard to follow for the establishment?
That has happened before. The philosophers couldn't understand what Euclid
was talking about. That's how math got started in the first place.
So: why don't you start your own science, with its own journals?
You could call it "Matharritics" for example.
Cheers,
Herman Jurjus
"James Harris" <jstevh@msn.com> wrote in message news:3c65f87.0309010816.13d5dc7b@posting.google.com...
I'm an admirer of Einstein and Gauss who were both Germans, which may
be why I was picking on the German editors a bit, as I think both were
embarrassments to the rich intellectual history of Germanic people.
However, there are some interesting replies from Americans as well, so
here are two American editors of the New York Journal of Mathematics
to an earlier version of the same paper Advanced Polynomial
Factorization.
<Quote>
Dear James,
I am sorry but this looks more like a submission for the chief
editor,
Mark Steinberger, than for me. I only accept submissions directly
in number theory.
Sincerely
Andrew Granville
</Quote>
<Quote>
Dear James,
We generally don't publish short notes. I'm not sure what journals to
suggest, but NYJM probably isn't the right place for this one.
Best,
Mark
</Quote>
Wow, if the *chief* editor of the New York Journal of Mathematics
wouldn't know what journal to suggest, then who would?
James Harris
.
|
|
|
| User: "Kevin Buhr" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
02 Sep 2003 06:02:03 PM |
|
|
"Herman Jurjus" <h.jurjus@hetnet.nl> writes:
So: why don't you start your own science, with its own journals?
You could call it "Matharritics" for example.
I think Harrismatics works better, but it's James' call.
--
Kevin <buhr@telus.net>
.
|
|
|
|
| User: "Gib Bogle" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
06 Sep 2003 07:57:30 PM |
|
|
Herman Jurjus wrote:
Perhaps your work is just too hard to follow for the establishment?
That has happened before. The philosophers couldn't understand what Euclid
was talking about. That's how math got started in the first place.
So: why don't you start your own science, with its own journals?
You could call it "Matharritics" for example.
Harristotelian Logic.
Gib
.
|
|
|
| User: "Andy Spragg" |
|
| Title: Re: Editors again, New York Journal of Mathematics |
07 Sep 2003 11:20:00 AM |
|
|
Gib Bogle <bogle@too.much.spam.ihug.co.nz> pushed briefly to the front
of the queue on Sun, 07 Sep 2003 12:57:30 +1200, and nailed this to
the shed door:
^ Herman Jurjus wrote:
^ > So: why don't you start your own science, with its own journals?
^ > You could call it "Matharritics" for example.
^
^ Harristotelian Logic.
<stamps feet, applauds wildly>
In five years of watching the JSHow, that is (I think) the first time
I have derived more entertainment from a responder than from The Man
Himself. Mr Bogle, I salute you.,
Andy
--
"No, you claim the magpie is to blame for all the
worlds ills, based on your ignorance of magpies."
(4a7391c12e538ef306d33d71c9482221@TeraNews)
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Related Articles |
|
|
